<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>This article seeks to contribute to the body of research on the formulaicity of academic written English by adopting a text-internal perspective on the use of lexical bundles across four main rhetorical sections (i.e. Introduction, Method, Results, Discussion) of research articles in public health. The corpus linguistic approach was adopted to explore a section-coded corpus of 200 research papers published in high impact journals with the aim of identifying salient shared and section-specific 4-word bundles, calculating their respective frequencies as well as classifying them structurally and functionally. The results show that the Method is the most formulaic section, containing the greatest number of bundles, including those most frequent and section-specific ones. The sections also differ in the extent to which they exploit the distinct structural and functional categories of shared bundles to fulfill their individual communicative needs.</p>
</abstract>

This article seeks to contribute to the body of research on the formulaicity of academic written English by adopting a text-internal perspective on the use of lexical bundles across four main rhetorical sections (i.e. Introduction, Method, Results, Discussion) of research articles in public health. The corpus linguistic approach was adopted to explore a section-coded corpus of 200 research papers published in high impact journals with the aim of identifying salient shared and section-specific 4-word bundles, calculating their respective frequencies as well as classifying them structurally and functionally. The results show that the Method is the most formulaic section, containing the greatest number of bundles, including those most frequent and section-specific ones. The sections also differ in the extent to which they exploit the distinct structural and functional categories of shared bundles to fulfill their individual communicative needs.

In-Text Variation in the Use of Lexical Bundles in a Corpus of Research Articles in Public Health

Journal of Linguistics/Jazykovedný casopis

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This article seeks to contribute to the body of research on the formulaicity of academic written English by adopting a text-internal perspective on the use of...

In-Text Variation in the Use of Lexical Bundles in a Corpus of Research Articles in Public Health

Online veröffentlicht: 27. März 2023

Seitenbereich: 117 - 140

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jazcas-2023-0001

Schlüsselwörter
academic English, research article, lexical bundles, shared bundles, section-specific bundles

© 2022 Tatiana Szczygłowska, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

In-Text Variation in the Use of Lexical Bundles in a Corpus of Research Articles in Public Health

Online veröffentlicht: 27. März 2023

Seitenbereich: 117 - 140

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jazcas-2023-0001

Schlüsselwörteracademic English, research article, lexical bundles, shared bundles, section-specific bundles

© 2022 Tatiana Szczygłowska, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Schlüsselwörter
academic English, research article, lexical bundles, shared bundles, section-specific bundles