[
[1] Prusák, J. (2001). Teória práva. Bratislava: Vydavateľské oddelenie Právnickej fakulty UK 2001, 331 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[2] Engberg, J. (2013). Legal linguistics as a mutual arena for cooperation. Recent developments in the field of applied linguistics and law. AILA Review 26, pages 24–41.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[3] Holländer, P. (2014). Interpretácia práva. Justičná akadémia. Available at: https://www.ja-sr.sk/files/Interpretacia_prava.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[4] Imrichová, M. (2014). Jazyk právnych textov so zreteľom na špecifiká právnej lexiky. In J. Kesselová, M. Imrichová and M. Ološtiak (eds.), Registre jazyka a jazykovedy (I). Prešov. Filozofická fakulta Prešovskej univerzity v Prešove, pages 207–212.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[5] Gahér, F., Števček, M., and Braxatoris, M. (2019). Nástroje a pravidlá produkcie a interpretácie koncízneho textu (s osobitným zreteľom na normativitu). Jazykovedný časopis, 70(1), pages 73–94.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[6] Berūkštienė, D. (2017). A corpus-driven analysis of structural types of lexical bundles in court judgments in English and their translation into Lithuanian. Kalbotyra 70, pages 7–31.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[7] Kačala, J. (2010). Zložené útvary v jazyku. Martin: Vydavateľstvo Matice slovenskej. 134 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[8] I. MacKenzie and M. A. Kayman (eds.). (2018). Formulaicity and Creativity in Language and Literature. Routledge. 126 p.10.4324/9781315194295
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[9] Kováříková, D. (2017). Kvantitativní charakteristiky termínů. Praha: Nakladatelství Lidové noviny. 136 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[10] Chlumská, L. (2017). Překladová čeština a její charakteristiky. Praha: Nakladatelství Lidové noviny. 150 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[11] Grabowski, Ł., and Forsyth, R. S. (2015). Is there a formula for formulaic language? Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 51(4), pages 511–549.10.1515/psicl-2015-0019
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[12] Wray, A., and Perkins, M. (2000). The functions of formulaic language: An integrated model. Language & Communication 20(1), pages 1–28.10.1016/S0271-5309(99)00015-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[13] Biber, D., Johansson S., Leech G., Conrad S., and Finegan E. (1999). The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow (Essex): Longman, 1204 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[14] Biber, D., and Barbieri, F. (2007). Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. English for Specific Purposes 26, pages 263–286.10.1016/j.esp.2006.08.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[15] Grabowski, Ł. (2014). On lexical bundles in Polish patient information leaflets: a corpus-driven analysis. Studies in Polish Linguistics 9(1), pages 21–43.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[16] Breeze, R. (2013). Lexical bundles across four legal genres. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(2), pages 229–253.10.1075/ijcl.18.2.03bre
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[17] Biel, Ł. (2017). Lexical bundles in EU law: the impact of translation process on the patterning of legal language. In Phraseology in legal and institutional settings. A corpus-based interdisciplinary perspective (e-book). S. Goźdź-Roszkowski and G. Pontrandolfo (eds.). London, New York: Routledge, pages 10–26.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[18] Goźdź-Roszkowski, S. (2018). Between corpus-based and corpus-driven approaches to textual recurrence: Exploring semantic sequences in judicial discourse. In J. Kopaczyk and J. Tyrkkö (eds.), Applications of Pattern-driven Methods in Corpus Linguistics, pages 131–158.10.1075/scl.82.06goz
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[19] Hyland, K. (2008). As can be seen: lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes 27, pages 4–21.10.1016/j.esp.2007.06.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[20] Biber, D., Conrad, S., and Cortes, V. (2004). If you look at...: lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics 25 (3), pages 371–405.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[21] Wiechmann, D., and Kerz, E. (2016). Formulaicity as a determinant of processing efficiency: investigating clause ordering in complex sentences. English Language and Linguistics 20(3), pages 421–437.10.1017/S1360674316000320
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[22] Tománková, V. (2016). Lexical bundles in legal texts corpora – selection, classification and pedagogical implications. Discourse and interaction 9(2), pages 75–94.10.5817/DI2016-2-75
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[23] Grabowski, Ł. (2018). Fine-tuning lexical bundles: A methodological reflection in the context of describing drug-drug interactions. In J. Kopaczyk and J. Tyrkkö (eds.), Applications of Pattern-driven Methods in Corpus Linguistics, pages 15–56.10.1075/scl.82.03gra
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[24] Cvrček, V., Laubeová, Z., Lukeš, D., Poukarová, P., řehořková, A., and Zasina, A. J. (2020). Registry v češtině. Praha: Nakladatelství Lidové noviny. 234 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[25] Čech, R., Garabík, R., and Altmann, G. (2015). Testing the Thematic Concentration of Text, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 22(3), pages 215–232.10.1080/09296174.2015.1037157
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[26] Štícha, F. (1985). O jazyce soudních rozhodnutí. Naše řeč, 68(2), pages 68–77.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[27] Slančová, D. (1999). Reč autority a lásky: reč učiteľky materskej školy orientovaná na dieťa. Opis registra. Prešov: Filozofická fakulta Prešovskej univerzity. 224 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[28] Procházka, R., and Káčer, M. (2019). Teória práva. 2. vydanie. Bratislava: C. H. Beck. 304 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[29] Gábriš, T. (2018). Sudcovské rozhodovanie z pohľadu súčasného právneho realizmu. In T. Gábriš (ed.), Sudcovské rozhodovanie. Záruky a prekážky spravodlivého procesu. Bratislava: Wolters Kluwer, pages 216–233.
]Search in Google Scholar
