Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Performance of Bee Colonies Headed by Queens Instrumentally Inseminated with Semen of Drones Who Come from a Single Colony or Many Colonies


Zitieren

Baer B., Schmid-Hempel P. (1999) Experimental variation in polyandry affects parasite loads and fitness in a bumblebee. Nature 397: 151-154. DOI:10.1038/1645110.1038/16451Search in Google Scholar

Crozier R. H., Page R. E. (1985) On being the right size: male contributions and multiple mating in social Hymenoptera. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 18: 105-115.10.1007/BF00299039Search in Google Scholar

Estoup A., Solignac M., Cornuet J. M. (1994) Precise assessment of the number of patrilines and of genetic relatedness in honeybee colonies. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 258: 1-7. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1994.013310.1098/rspb.1994.0133Search in Google Scholar

Fewell J. H., Page R. E. (1993) Genotypic variation in foraging responses to environmental stimuli by honey bees, Apis mellifera. Experientia 19: 1106-1112.10.1007/BF01929923Search in Google Scholar

Fuchs S., Schade V. (1994) Lower performance in honeybee colonies of uniform paternity. Apidologie 25: 151-171.10.1051/apido:19940204Search in Google Scholar

Fuchs S., Büchler R., Hoffmann S., Bienefeld K. (1996) Non-additive colony performances by inseminating queens with mixed sperm of several carniolan breeder lines. Apidologie 27: 304-306.Search in Google Scholar

Jennions, M. D., Petrie M. (2000) Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 75: 21-64.10.1017/S0006323199005423Search in Google Scholar

Mattila H. R., Seeley T. D. (2007) Genetic Diversity in Honey Bee Colonies Enhances Productivity and Fitness . Science 317: 362-364. DOI: 10.1126/science.114304610.1126/science.114304617641199Search in Google Scholar

Mattila H. R., Burke K. M., Seeley T. D. (2008) Genetic diversity within honeybee colonies increases signal production by waggle-dancing foragers. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Biological Sciences 275: 809-816. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2007.162010.1098/rspb.2007.1620259690818198143Search in Google Scholar

Moritz R. F. A., Kryger P., Koeniger N., Estoup A., Tingek S. (1995) High degree of polyandry in Apis dorsata queens detected by DNA microsatellite variability. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 37: 357-363.10.1007/BF00174141Search in Google Scholar

MultiScanBase v. 18.03. Computer Scanning Systems II. Licence no. 12/10/03/22/34.Search in Google Scholar

Neumann P., Moritz R. F. A. (2000) Testing genetic variance hypotheses for the evolution of polyandry in the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.). Insetces Sociaux 47: 271-279.10.1007/PL00001714Search in Google Scholar

Niño E. L., Tarpy D. R., Grozinger C. M. (2013) Differential effects of insemination volume and substance on reproductive changes in honey bee queens (Apis mellifera L.). Insect Molecular Biology 22(3): 233-44. DOI: 10.1111/imb.1201610.1111/imb.1201623414204Search in Google Scholar

Oldroyd B. P., Rinderer T. E., Harbo J. R., Buco S. M. (1992) Effect of intracolonial genetic on honeybee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) colony performance. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 85(3): 335-343.10.1093/aesa/85.3.335Search in Google Scholar

Oldroyd B. P., Clifton M. J., Parker K., Wongsiri S., Rinderer T. E., Crozier R. H. (1998) Evolution of mating behavior in the genus Apis and an estimate of mating frequency in A. cerana (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 91: 700-709.10.1093/aesa/91.5.700Search in Google Scholar

Oldroyd B. P., Clifton M. J., Wongsiri S., Rinderer T. E., Sylvester H. A., Crozier R. H. (1997) Polyandry in the genus Apis, particularly Apis andreniformis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 40: 17-26.10.1007/s002650050311Search in Google Scholar

Oldroyd B. P., Smolenski A. J., Cornuet J. M., Wongsiri S., Estoup A., Rinderer T., Crozier R. H. (1995) Levels of polyandry and intracolonial genetic relationships in Apis florea. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 37: 329-335.10.1007/BF00174137Search in Google Scholar

Oldroyd B. P., Smolenski A. J., Cornuet J.-M., Wongsiri S., Estoup A., Rinderer T. E., Crozier R. H. (1996) Levels of polyandry and intracolonial genetic relationships in Apis dorsata (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 89: 276-283.10.1093/aesa/89.2.276Search in Google Scholar

Page R. E., Robinson G. E., Fondrk M. K., Nasr M. E. (1995) Effects of worker genotype diversity on honey bee colony development and behavior (Apis mellifera L.). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 36: 387- 396.10.1007/BF00177334Search in Google Scholar

Pohorecka K., Bober A., Skubida M., Zdańska D. (2011) Epizootic status of apiaries with massive losses of bee colonies (2008-2009). Journal of Apicultural Science 55(1): 137-150.Search in Google Scholar

Richards F. J., Tarpy D. R., Grozinger C. M. (2007) Effects of Insemination Quantity on Honey Bee Queen Physiology. PLoS ONE 2(10): e980. DOI:10.1371/journal. pone.0000980Search in Google Scholar

Ridley M. (1993) Clutch size and mating frequency in parasitic Hymenoptera. The American Naturalist 142: 893-910. DOI: 10.1086/28557910.1086/285579Search in Google Scholar

Rinderer T. E., Stelzer J. A., Oldroyd B. P., Tingek S. (1998) Levels of polyandry and intracolonial genetic relationships in Apis koschevnikovi. Journal of Apicultural Research 37: 281-287.10.1080/00218839.1998.11100984Search in Google Scholar

Schmid-Hempel P. (1998) Parasites in Social Insects. Princeton University Press. Princeton NJ. 392 pp.10.1515/9780691206851Search in Google Scholar

Sherman P. W., Seeley T. D., Reeve H. K. (1988) Parasites, pathogens and polyandry in social Hymenoptera. The American Naturalist 131: 602-610. DOI: 10.1086/284809 10.1086/284809Search in Google Scholar

Shykoff J. A., Schmid-Hempel P. (1991) Parasites and the advantage of genetic variability within social insect colonies. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 243: 55-58.Search in Google Scholar

Simmons L. W., Siva-Jothy M. T. (1998) Sperm competition in insects: mechanisms and the potential for selection. In: Birkhead T. R., Møller A. P. (Eds.) Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection. Academic Press. San Diego: 341- 434.10.1016/B978-012100543-6/50035-0Search in Google Scholar

Skowronek W., Kruk C., Loc K. (1995) The insemination of queen honeybees with diluted semen. Apidologie 26 : 487-493. DOI: 10.1051/apido:1995060510.1051/apido:19950605Search in Google Scholar

StatSoft, Inc. STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 9.1.Search in Google Scholar

Stockley P., Searle J. B., Macdonald D. W., Jones C. S. (1993) Female multiple mating behavior in the common shrew as a strategy to reduce inbreeding. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 254: 173-179.Search in Google Scholar

Strassmann J. E. (2001) The rarity of multiple mating by females in the social Hymenoptera. Insectes Sociaux 48: 1-13. DOI: 10.1007/PL0000173710.1007/PL00001737Search in Google Scholar

Tarpy D. R,. Nielsen D. I. (2002) Sampling error, effective paternity, and estimating the genetic structure of honey bee colonies (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 95: 513-528.10.1603/0013-8746(2002)095[0513:SEEPAE]2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

Tarpy D. R. (2003) Genetic diversity within honeybee colonies prevents severe infections and promotes colony growth. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 270: 99-103. DOI 10.1098/ rspb.2002.219910.1098/rspb.2002.2199Search in Google Scholar

Tarpy D. R., Seeley T. D. (2006) Lower disease infections in honeybee (Apis mellifera) colonies headed by polyandrous vs monandrous queens. Naturwissenschaften 93: 195-199. DOI: 10.1007/s00114-006-0091-410.1007/s00114-006-0091-4Search in Google Scholar

Topolska G., Gajda A., Hartwig A. (2008) Polish honey bee colony-loss during the winter of 2007/2008. Journal of Apicultural Science 52(2): 95-104.Search in Google Scholar

Williams G. C. (1975) Sex and Evolution. Princeton University Press. Princeton NJ. 200 pp.Search in Google Scholar

Woyke J. (1960) Naturalne i sztuczne unasienianie matek pszczelich. Pszczelnicze Zeszyty Naukowe 4(3-4): 183-27. Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2299-4831
Sprache:
Englisch
Zeitrahmen der Veröffentlichung:
2 Hefte pro Jahr
Fachgebiete der Zeitschrift:
Biologie, Zoologie, andere