[Anderson, J. R.; Bothell, D.; Byrne, M. D.; Douglass, S.; Lebi`ere, C.; and Qin, Y. L. 2004. An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review 111(4):1036-1060.10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1036]Search in Google Scholar
[Burnham, K. P., and Anderson, D. R. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference. Springer.]Search in Google Scholar
[Coello, C. A. C. 2000. An updated survey of GA-based multiobjective optimization techniques. ACM Computing Surveys 32:109-143.10.1145/358923.358929]Search in Google Scholar
[Coello, C. A. C. 2003. Recent trends in evolutionary multiobjective optimization. In Abraham, A.; Jain, L.; and Goldberg, R., eds., Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization. London, UK: Springer-Verlag. 7-32.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cooper, R. P., and Shallice, T. 1995. Soar and the case for unified theories of cognition. Cognition 55:115-49.10.1016/0010-0277(94)00644-Z]Search in Google Scholar
[Cooper, R. P.; Fox, J.; Farringdon, J.; and Shallice, T. 1996. A systematic methodology for cognitive modelling. Artificial Intelligence 85:3-44.10.1016/0004-3702(95)00112-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Cooper, R. P. 2002. Modelling high-level cognitive processes. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Feigenbaum, E. A., and Simon, H. A. 1984. EPAM-like models of recognition and learning. Cognitive Science 8:305-336.10.1207/s15516709cog0804_1]Search in Google Scholar
[Fisher, D. H.; Pazzani, M. J.; and Langley, P. 1991. Concept formation: Knowledge and experience in unsupervised learning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[Frias-Martinez, E., and Gobet, F. 2007. Automatic generation of cognitive theories using genetic programming. Minds and Machines 17:287-309.10.1007/s11023-007-9070-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Gluck, K. A.; Staszewski, J. J.; Richman, H.; Simon, H. A.; and Delahanty, P. 2001. The right tool for the job: Information-processing analysis in categorization. In Moore, J. D., and Stenning, K., eds., Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 330-335. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gluck, K. A.; Stanley, C. T.; Moore, L. R.; Reitter, D.; and Halbrugge, M. 2010. Exploration for understanding in cognitive modeling. Journal of Artificial General Intelligence 2:88-107.10.2478/v10229-011-0011-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Gobet, F., and Lane, P. C. R. 2005. A distributed framework for semi-automatically developing architectures of brain and mind. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on e-Social Science.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gobet, F., and Ritter, F. E. 2000. Individual data analysis and Unified Theories of Cognition: A methodological proposal. In Taatgen, N., and Aasman, J., eds., Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Cognitive Modelling, 150-57. Veenendaal, The Netherlands: Universal Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gobet, F., and Schiller, M. 2011. A manifesto for cognitive models of problem gambling. In Kokinov, B.; Karmiloff-Smith, A.; and Nersessian, N. J., eds., European Perspectives on Cognitive Sciences - Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Science. New Bulgarian University Press, Sofia.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gobet, F., andWaters, A. J. 2003. The role of constraints in expert memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 29:1082-1094.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gobet, F.; Richman, H.; Staszewski, J.; and Simon, H. A. 1997. Goals, representations, and strategies in a concept attainment task: The EPAM model. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation 37:265-290.10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60504-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Gobet, F.; Lane, P. C. R.; Croker, S. J.; Cheng, P. C.-H.; Jones, G.; Oliver, I.; and Pine, J. M. 2001. Chunking mechanisms in human learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5:236-243.10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01662-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Goldberg, D. E. 1989. Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grant, D. A. 1962. Testing the null hypothesis and the strategy and tactics of investigating theoretical models. Psychological Review 69:54-61.10.1037/h003881313901149]Search in Google Scholar
[Gunzelmann, G. 2008. Strategy generalization across orientation tasks: Testing a computational cognitive model. Cognitive Science 32:835-861.10.1080/03640210802221957]Search in Google Scholar
[Holland, J. H. 1975. Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hsu, C.-W.; Chang, C.-C.; and Lin, C.-J. 2003. A Practical Guide to Support Vector Classification. Available from http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/˜cjlin/libsvm/ (accessed February 2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[Kase, S. E.; Ritter, F. E.; and Schoelles, M. 2008. From modeler-free individual data fitting in 3-d parametric prediction landscapes: A research expedition. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 1398-1403. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lane, P. C. R., and Gobet, F. 2003. Developing reproducible and comprehensible computational models. Artificial Intelligence 144:251-63.10.1016/S0004-3702(02)00384-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Lane, P. C. R., and Gobet, F. 2005. Multi-task learning and transfer: The effect of algorithm representation. In Giraud-Carrier, C.; Vilalta, R.; and Brazdil, P., eds., Proceedings of the ICML-2005 Workshop on Meta-Learning.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lane, P. C. R., and Gobet, F. 2012. A theory-driven testing methodology for developing scientific software. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 24:421-56.10.1080/0952813X.2012.695443]Search in Google Scholar
[Leahy, K. 1994. The overfitting problem in perspective. AI Expert 9:35-36.]Search in Google Scholar
[Maneeratana, K.; Boonlong, K.; and Chaiyaratana, N. 2004. Multi-objective optimisation by cooperative co-evolution. In Yao, X.; Burke, E.; Lozano, J. A.; Smith, J.; Merelo-Guervs, J. J.; Bullinaria, J. A.; Rowe, J.; Tino, P.; Kabn, A.; and Schwefel, J.-P., eds., The Eighth International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, volume 3242 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 772-81. Springer Verlag.10.1007/978-3-540-30217-9_78]Search in Google Scholar
[Medin, D. L., and Schaffer, M. M. 1978. Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review 85:207-238.10.1037/0033-295X.85.3.207]Search in Google Scholar
[Medin, D. L., and Smith, E. E. 1981. Strategies and classification learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 7:241-253.]Search in Google Scholar
[Medin, D. L. 1989. Concept and conceptual structure. American Psychologist 44:1469-1481.10.1037/0003-066X.44.12.1469]Search in Google Scholar
[Moore Jr, L. R. 2011. Cognitive model exploration and optimization: A new challenge for computational science. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 17:296-313.10.1007/s10588-011-9092-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Murphy, G. L. 2002. The big book of concepts. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/1602.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Myung, I. J., and Pitt, M. A. 2010. Cognitive modeling repository. In Proceedings of the Thirty- Second Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 556. Portland, Oregon: Lawrence Erlbaum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Newell, A., and Simon, H. A. 1972. Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.]Search in Google Scholar
[Newell, A. 1990. Unified Theories of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nosofsky, R. M. 2000. Exemplar representation with generalization? Comment on Smith and Minda’s (2000) “Thirty Categorization Results in Search of a Model”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 26:1735-1743.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pew, R. W., and Mavor, A. S., eds. 1998. Modeling human and organizational behavior: Applications to military simulations. Washington, D. C.: National Academy Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pitt, M. A.; Kim, W.; Navarro, D. J.; and Myung, J. I. 2006. Global model analysis by parameter space partitioning. Psychological Review 113:57-83.10.1037/0033-295X.113.1.5716478301]Search in Google Scholar
[Pitt, M. A.; Myung, J. I.; and Zhang, S. 2002. Toward a method of selecting among computational models of cognition. Psychological Review 109:472-491.10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.47212088241]Search in Google Scholar
[Richman, H. B., and Simon, H. A. 1989. Context effects in letter perception: Comparison of two theories. Psychological Review 3:417-432.10.1037/0033-295X.96.3.4172667013]Search in Google Scholar
[Richman, H. B.; Simon, H. A.; and Feigenbaum, E. A. 2002. Simulations of Paired Associate Learning using EPAM VI. Complex Information Processing, Working Paper #553.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ritter, F. E.; Shadbolt, N. R.; Elliman, D.; Young, R. M.; Gobet, F.; and Baxter, G. D. 2003. Techniques for Modeling Human Performance in Synthetic Environments: A Supplementary Review. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio: Human Systems Information Analysis Center.10.21236/ADA487721]Search in Google Scholar
[Ritter, F. E.; Schoelles, M. J.; Quigley, K. S.; and Klein, L. C. 2011. Determining the number of model runs: Treating cognitive models as theories by not sampling their behaviour. In Rothrock, L., and Narayanan, S., eds., Human-in-the-loop simulations: Methods and practice. London: Springer-Verlag. 97-116.10.1007/978-0-85729-883-6_5]Search in Google Scholar
[Ritter, F. E. 1991. Towards Fair Comparisons of Connectionist Algorithms through Automatically Optimized Parameter Sets. In Hammond, K. J., and Gentner, D., eds., Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 877-881. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Roberts, S., and Pashler, H. 2000. How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing. Psychological Review 107:358-367.10.1037/0033-295X.107.2.35810789200]Search in Google Scholar
[Rumelhart, D. E., and McClelland, J. L., eds. 1986. Parallel Distributed Processing, volume 1 and 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5236.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Schaffer, J. D. 1984. Some experiments in machine learning using vector evaluated genetic algorithms. Ph.D. Dissertation, Vanderbilt University, Nashville.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schaffer, C. 1993. Overfitting avoidance as bias. Machine Learning 10:153-178.10.1007/BF00993504]Search in Google Scholar
[Simon, H. A., and Gobet, F. 2000. Expertise effects in memory recall: Comments on Vicente and Wang. Psychological Review 107(3):593-600.10.1037/0033-295X.107.3.59310941282]Search in Google Scholar
[Smith, J. D., and Minda, J. P. 2000. Thirty Categorization Results in Search of a Model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 26:3-27.]Search in Google Scholar
[Srinivas, N., and Deb, K. 1994. Multiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms. Evolutionary Computation 2:221-248.10.1162/evco.1994.2.3.221]Search in Google Scholar
[Stewart, T., andWest, R. 2010. Testing for equivalence: A methodology for computational cognitive modelling. Journal of Artificial General Intelligence 2:69-87.10.2478/v10229-011-0010-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Tor, K., and Ritter, F. E. 2004. Using a Genetic Algorithm to Optimize the Fit of Cognitive Models. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Cognitive Modeling, 308-313. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.]Search in Google Scholar
