Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Refugees welcome, but not in my backyard? The impact of immigration on right-wing voting: evidence from Germany


Zitieren

Figure 1

The number of refugee accommodations per 1,000 residents (left), and the AfD vote shares in 2016 in Baden-Wuerttemberg, that is, BW (right).
The number of refugee accommodations per 1,000 residents (left), and the AfD vote shares in 2016 in Baden-Wuerttemberg, that is, BW (right).

Placebo regression for the CDU vote shares in the year 2013 in percentage points

Dependent variable: CDU ’13 vote shareOLSSDMSDE
(1) Refugee variables
    Backyard effect (α1) (refhome)−0.162 (−0.45)−0.066 (−0.25)−0.629*** (−2.54)
    Neighborhood effect (α2) (Wrefhome)−0.062 (−0.79)0.019 (0.24)
    R20.83

Vote share estimates for the CDU in the year 2016 (in percentage points)

Dependent variable: CDU vote share in 2016OLSSDMSDE
(1) Refugee variables
      Backyard effect (α1)−0.604* (−1.91)−0.334 (−1.14)−0.113 (−0.43)
      Neighborhood effect (α2)−0.187** (−2.22)−0.184** (−2.08)
(2) Socioeconomic variables
    CDU 130.934*** (36.90)0.925*** (52.75)0.910*** (49.63)
    Turnout rate0.094*** (3.40)0.096*** (4.33)0.111*** (5.25)
    GDP−0.069*** (−5.29)−0.063*** (−3.95)−0.037** (−2.01)
    Unemployment−0.016 (−0.09)0.000 (0.00)0.122 (0.54)
    Mean age−0.046 (−0.49)−0.045 (−0.67)0.034 (0.52)
    Males−0.014 (−1.08)−0.014 (−1.49)0.003 (0.30)
    Married−0.025*** (−4.73)−0.026*** (−5.71)−0.024*** (5.24)
    Population density−0.053* (−1.64)−0.042 (−1.15)0.015 (0.37)
    Migrant background0.001 (0.29)0.001 (0.36)0.004 (1.47)
    Low education−0.002 (−0.50)−0.000 (−0.02)0.007* (1.91)
(3) Spatial parameters
    λ−0.000 (−0.03)
    θ
    r0.088*** (16.37)
    y^$\hat{y}$3.471* (1.69)3.802** (2.31)0.425 (0.27)
    R20.81

Determinants of refugee allocation

Dependent variable: Refugee accommodations per 1,000 residents
Initial entry centers−0.027*** (−4.33)
GDP0.001 (1.25)
Vacancy rate3.977*** (4.43)
Mayor dummy (CDU)−0.020 (−0.84)
R20.034
N = 1,101

Vote share estimates for the AFD in the year 2016 (in percentage points)

Dependent variable: AFD vote share in 2016OLSSDMKPM
(1) Refugee variables
      Backyard effect (α1)0.667** (2.47)0.594** (2.27)0.678*** (2.99)
      Neighborhood effect (α)0.046 (0.06)
(2) Socioeconomic variables
    AFD 131.087*** (12.05)1.033*** (15.41)0.878*** (13.26)
    Turnout rate−0.179*** (−7.14)−0.170*** (−8.53)−0.151*** (−8.34)
    GDP0.035*** (2.85)0.024 (1.66)0.024 (1.55)
    Unemployment1.234*** (7.47)1.094*** (6.12)0.938*** (4.80)
    Mean age−0.472*** (−6.32)−0.456*** (−7.64)−0.415*** (−7.41)
    Males0.005 (0.41)0.008 (0.92)−0.001 (−0.13)
    Married0.037*** (7.23)0.039*** (9.60)0.038*** (9.81)
    Population density0.078*** (2.81)0.066** (2.04)0.102*** (3.02)
    Migrant background0.002 (0.96)0.002 (0.96)0.003 (1.39)
    Low education0.012*** (4.43)0.012*** (4.04)0.012*** (3.84)
(3) Spatial parameters
    λ0.010*** (3.70)0.007*** (3.10)
    θ
    r0.094*** (20.77)
    y^$\hat{y}$5.521*** (2.93)5.170*** (3.52)4.377*** (3.21)
    R20.42

Placebo regression for the AFD vote shares in the year 2013 in percentage points

Dependent variable: AFD ’13 vote shareOLSSDMKPM
(1) Refugee variables
    Backyard effect (α) (refhome)0.120 (1.11)0.138 (1.29)0.184* (1.85)
    Neighborhood effect (α2) (Wrefhome)-0.018 (-0.58)
    R20.30

Variable overview and descriptive statistics

VariableDescriptionMeanSD
    RefhomeRefugee accommodations per 1,000 residents0.260.35
Policy variables
    AFD 16Vote share of the AFD party in state election 2016 in percentage points15.353.69
    CDU 16Vote share of the CDU party in state election 2016 in percentage points31.107.15
    AFD 13Vote share of the AFD party in parliamentary election 2013 in percentage points5.211.35
    CDU 13Vote share of the CDU party in parliamentary election 2013 in percentage points50.186.87
    Turnout rateTurnout rate in the parliamentary election in 2013 in percentage points71.934.93
Socioeconomic controls
    GDPGross domestic product per 1,000 residents (in €)35.577.16
    UnemploymentUnemployment rate in percentage points3.740.53
    Mean ageMean age of the population43.531.64
    MalesMale population per 1,000 residents495.1012.01
    MarriedMarried population per 1,000 residents486.0923.30
    Population densityThe number of residents per hectare3.243.45
    Migrant backgroundGerman citizens with migrant background per 1,000 residents160.4542.07
    Low educationHighest degree = Basic education (second step) per 1,000 residents337.8735.71
eISSN:
2520-1786
Sprache:
Englisch