The optical properties of materials vary under the influence of an electro-optic caused by an electrical field which is progressively changing with the optical light. The applied electric field changes the refractive index of the exposed material using an electro-optic effect as illustrated in Figure 1 (Bea and Teich, 1991).
Figure 1
Applied electric field along z-direction changes the refractive index of crystal.
The performance of many devices can be degraded under such exposure. For instance, the size of the Mach–Zehnder modulator (MZM) becomes larger (i.e., the length of branches MZM is increased), the bending losses of waveguides are greater, the Q-factor is diminished, and the size of the resonators is enlarged (Qi and Li, 2020). These performance degradations are attributed to the weak optical confinement factor (i.e., the overlap is small) resulting from the low relative refractive index variance (Yi-Yan, 1983; Korkishko et al., 1996; Cai et al., 2016). Some materials possess optical and structural properties that make them usable in many fields such as hydrogen production and wastewater treatment (Scharnberg et al., 2020). There is research concerned with studying the optical, structural, and electronic properties of some materials (Akhtar, 2022). Lithium niobate (LN) indicates the possibility to improve the overall performance of electro-optic modulators at the expense of its environmental properties. Examples of these improvements are powerful linear effect (i.e., Pockels effect), enormous transparency window, massive electro-optic coefficient (30 pm/V), and the stability of the temperature are at its best (Wooten et al., 2000). Thus, the low refractive index with large switching voltage–length product (Vπ·L, usually >10 V cm (Janner et al., 2009)) can create a problem for diffused or proton-exchange waveguide of commercial bulk LN modulators because it reflects a weak optical confinement factor. A standard length of a lithium niobate insulator (LNOI) photonic waveguide is much less than 1 μm2, which helps reach a small mode dimension and a strong optical confinement factor (Janner et al., 2009; Poberaj et al., 2012; Chang et al., 2016; Fathpour, 2017; Boes et al., 2018). This can coincide with the overlap between optical and electrical fields as a great performance of overlap and reduction switching voltage–length product (Xu et al., 2019). Furthermore, this strategy opens new levels of overall performance improvements for LN modulators due to a strong optical confinement factor and a large relative refractive index difference (Guarino et al., 2007; Janner et al., 2009; Poberaj et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2014; Jin et al., 2015; Rao et al., 2016; Chang et al., 2017; Rao and Fathpour, 2017; Boes et al., 2018; Mercante et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2018; Weigel et al., 2018; He et al., 2019; Xu et al., 2020). In hybrid LN-Si (silicone) electro-optic modulator (EOM), the performance of the LN overlap is 81%, and Si is 5% (Weigel et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2019), while the oxide SiO2 includes the remaining of the light. The performance of the overlap (i.e., strong optical confinement factor) can be increased by etching the thin-film LN (He et al., 2019) as demonstrated in Figure 2. Assuming the process is flawless. Some developers use a variety of methods to detect defects resulting from manufacturing errors, such as automatic visual inspection (Priscilla et al., 2020).
Figure 2
(a) A Mach–Zehnder interferometer modulator MZIM. (b) The cross-sectional diagram of the MZIM and the channel of the waveguides.
In the integrated metal-diffused, the optical waveguides own a weak optical confinement factor that restricts an electro-optic exchange as a result of the lower efficiency of an electro-optic modulation and large footprints of devices (Priscilla et al., 2020). Lately, a larger optical confinement factor (big overlap) has been achieved using a uniform thin-film LN modulator integration that leads to enhancements in terms of compactness, information measure, and energy potency. This interesting technique has attracted multiple studies presented in (Tavlykaev and Ramaswamy, 1999; Zenin et al., 2012; Zenin et al., 2017Alexander et al., 2018; DeVault et al., 2018; Deshpande et al., 2018; Thomaschewski et al., 2020). However, for commercial demand, the length of the branches is still relatively long within the limit of mm-scale, because the extraction is limited within an overlap of an electro-optic field (Priscilla et al., 2020). Moreover, a photonic crystal PC (crystal is a type of a barium titanate BaTiO3) can be used as a confined device for optical light and utilized with LN-Si devices. Nonetheless, this technique has reflected a weak optical confinement factor (i.e., small overlap) because of the small amount of confined optical light (Roussey et al., 2006, 2007; Lu et al., 2012a). Indeed, this problem is solved using a film of smart-cut LN (Sulser et al., 2009; Lu et al., 2012b), where it utilized a BaTiO3 PC structure in which the confined optical light has been magnified. This approach is named as high-speed PC modulator (Girouard et al., 2017). To design a small size system in micrometer is always challenging because of the required large enough confinement factor to consequently achieve high-quality modulation. In this design, the variation value of the ordinary negative refractive index (−Δn), in which the power is −7, is good because it is close to previous results. In addition, the development of the system using as small as 3 to 8 μm length of the modulator arm, low-energy consumption of about 4 V/µm, a large negative ordinary relative refractive index difference of about—0.2 × 10−7. Therefore, from the results of combining the optical light with the electric field, the system indicates a better overlap with a sufficiently large change in the negative ordinary refractive index.
Analytical model
This paper employs an electro-optic effect technique based on LN Mach–Zehnder modulator (MZM), as shown in Figure 3 and Table 1. This technique has reduced the electric field and minimized the length of arms to micrometer with suitable level of refractive index and strong optical confinement factor (i.e., a large overlap).
Figure 3
Integrated LN Mach-Zehnder modulator MZM: (a) top view and (b) cross-section area.
Electro-optic coefficients (r33), refractive index (no) and wavelengths (λ), for LN.4.
For the Mach–Zehnder interferometer (MZI), where the initial intensity of light Io in lum is modulated with the applied electric field E in V/m as follows (Figura, 2000):
E = {E_o}{e^{i\left( {Kx - wt} \right)}}
where Eo is the static electric field in V/m, i is the imaginary part, K is the wavenumber which equals 2π/λ, λ is the optical wavelength in nm, w is the angular frequency in Hz, and t is the time domain in sec.
The optical wave is divided into two branches of the modulator with equal lengths and refractive indices. Since the optical path length through each branch is the same, it will have a constructive interference at the end of the arms where the waves are recombined (Figura, 2000). Figure 4 visualizes MZI electro-optic modulator based on LiNbO3.
I = {I_o}{\cos ^2}\left( {{{\Delta \phi } \over 2}} \right) E = {E_o}\cos \left( {{{\Delta \phi } \over 2}} \right){e^{i\left( {Kx - wt} \right)}}
Figure 4
MZI electro-optic modulator based on LiNbO3.
where, I is the output intensity in lum and Δϕ is the phase difference. Therefore, the ordinary refractive index changes Δn0 that results from the applied electrical field in the direction of the extraordinary axis of the medium as follows (Figura, 2000):
\Delta {n_o} = - {1 \over 2}n_o^3{r_{33}}E
where n0 is the ordinary refractive index, r33 is the electro-optic coefficient pm/V · rij represented by second rank tensor and rij is the matrix in which i = 1, …,6 and j = 1, 2, 3, thus for r33, i = 3 and j = 3. When applying an external voltage on the arms, a phase difference ΔØ induces and the half-wave voltage (i.e., switching voltage) Vπ for MZM can then be calculated using (Figura, 2000):
\Delta \emptyset = {{\pi L{r_{33}}n_o^3E} \over \lambda }
where λ is the optical wavelength in nm, and L is the length of arms in µm.
V\pi = {{d\lambda } \over {L{r_{33}}n_o^3}}
where d is the separation distance in between arms in μm. Moreover, the equation of MZM shows that the incident laser light splits into two components, Io1 and Io2, that separate optical path and combined again at the last part of the device as optical power (i.e. I2 = Io1 + Io2) a, and I1 = electro-optical input power (Luff et al., 1998; Hagn, 2001). Thus,
{{2{I_1}} \over {{I_2}}} = - {{4\Delta {n_o}} \over {{r_{33}}\Gamma n_o^3}}\left[ {\left( { - {{2\Delta {n_o}} \over {{r_{33}}\Gamma n_o^3}} - 1} \right) + \left( {1 + {{2\Delta {n_o}} \over {{r_{33}}\Gamma n_o^3}}} \right)\cos \Delta \emptyset } \right] + 1
where I1 is the input optical power in Watt, I2 is the electro-optical output power in Watt, and Γ is the optical confinement factor (unitless).
\matrix{ {{{2{I_1}} \over {{I_2}}} = - {{4\Delta {n_o}} \over {{r_{33}}\Gamma n_o^3}}\left[ { - {{2\Delta {n_o} - {r_{33}}\Gamma n_o^3} \over {{r_{33}}\Gamma n_o^3}} + {{\left( {{r_{33}}\Gamma n_o^3 + 2\Delta {n_o}} \right)} \over {{r_{33}}\Gamma n_o^3}}\cos \Delta \emptyset } \right] + 1} \hfill \cr {\cos \Delta \emptyset = {{2{I_1}r_{33}^2{\Gamma ^2}n_o^6 - {I_2}r_{33}^2{\Gamma ^2}n_o^6 - 8\Delta n_o^2{I_2} - 4\Delta {n_o}{I_2}{r_{33}}\Gamma n_o^3} \over {{I_2}\left( {4\Delta {n_o}{r_{33}}\Gamma n_o^3 + 8\Delta n_o^2} \right)}}} \hfill \cr } \cos \Delta \emptyset = {{\left( {2{I_1} - {I_2}} \right)r_{33}^2{\Gamma ^2}n_o^6} \over {{I_2}\left( {4\Delta {n_o}{r_{33}}\Gamma n_o^3 + 8\Delta n_o^2} \right)}} - 1\cos \Delta \emptyset + 1 = {{\left( {2{I_1} - {I_2}} \right)r_{33}^2{\Gamma ^2}n_o^6} \over {{I_2}\left( {4\Delta {n_o}{r_{33}}\Gamma n_o^3 + 8\Delta n_o^2} \right)}}\because \Delta \phi = {{\pi Ln_o^3{r_{33}}V} \over {\lambda d}}
where V is the applied voltage in volt. Plugging Eq. (10) into Eq. (11) yields:
\matrix{ {\Delta {n_o} = A \pm B} \cr {A = {{ - \left( {4{I_2}{r_{33}}\Gamma n_o^3\cos \Delta \emptyset + 4{I_2}{r_{33}}\Gamma n_o^3} \right)} \over {16\left( {1 + \cos \Delta \emptyset } \right)}}} \cr {B = {{\root 2 \of {\matrix{ {{{\left( {4{I_2}{r_{33}}\Gamma n_o^3\cos \Delta \emptyset + 4{I_2}{r_{33}}\Gamma n_o^3} \right)}^2}} \cr { - 4\left( {{I_2} - 2{I_1}} \right)r_{33}^2{\Gamma ^2}n_o^6\left( {8 + 8\cos \,\Delta \emptyset } \right)} \cr } } } \over {16\left( {1 + \cos \Delta \emptyset } \right)}}} \cr }
Eq. (12) expresses the fundamental model of Mach–Zehnder modulator (MZM) in the optical communication systems. The study was designed by selecting a longitudinal optical modulator in which the electric field is V/L, and the phase change is π (i.e., the polarities are not opposite). The study utilizes the relation between the changing of negative ordinary refractive index and the optical confinement factor as expressed in Eqs. (17) and (7). Hence, the designed system mathematical model is presented as in Eq. (12). The study was carried out when the large change in the ordinary negative refractive index due to large confinement factor (i.e, large overlap). The data were analyzed through a proposed mathematical model to explain the relationship between the changing of the ordinary negative refractive index −Δno and the confinement factor Γ, as Eq. (12).
Results and discussion
In this paper, an analytical model is proposed to enhance the optical confinement factor of the MZM based on the material of LN. The performance of the proposed modulator can be estimated by employing Eq. (12) where the techniques of electro-optic effect and electro-refractive are considered. The large energy of the optical light (i.e., high energy of light intensity) is merged with the electrical field to shape large ball lightning into the inner waveguide. The high modulation of light intensity of the modulator depends on how strong the ball lightning is and that indicates the high performance of modulating that light intensity in the modulator. Thus, the phenomena of a ball lightning are named as the overlap due to the overlapping between the electric field and the optical light where the large ball light is called big overlap (i.e., large optical confinement factor). Therefore, the large relative refractive index variation indicates a large overlap (i.e., large optical confinement factor). In this paper, it is shown that the ordinary negative change in the refractive index (Δ no) is affected by applying an electric field (E) at a value of 4V/µm. This can be even better when the larger ordinary negative change in the refractive index is associated with as small length as 3–8 µm of the waveguide branch which consequently leads to a large optical confinement factor (large overlap). This emphasizes how vital it is to select a suitable length of arms with respect to the applied electric field with a large negative ordinary change in the refractive index Δ no, as shown in Figures 5 and 6. Furthermore, the refractive index and electro-optic coefficient change with an ordinary negative change in refractive index Δ no for LN where the length of the branch is an effective factor to shape the required large ball lightning, as shown in Figures 7 and 8. In addition, a better change in the ordinary negative of refractive index Δ no can be obtained when using a window (near-infrared–visible) optical wavelength which has improved the modulation performance of MZM as presented in Figure 9.
Figure 5
The ordinary negative changing of refractive index by applying electric field versus different lengths of arms.
Figure 6
The ordinary negative changing of refractive index as a function of the confinement factor under different intensity of the applied electrical field.
Figure 7
The ordinary negative changing of refractive index as a function of refractive index versus different lengths of arms for LiTaO3.
Figure 8
The ordinary negative changing of refractive index as a function of electro-optic coefficient versus different lengths of arms for LiTaO3.
Figure 9
The ordinary negative changing of refractive index with wavelength under different applied electric fields for LiTaO3.
In 2020, Qi and Li (2020) and in 2019 He et al. (2019), designed the integrated electro-optical devices such as the modulator using a high refractive index to increase the optical confinement factor where the lengths of the modulator’s arms are 3 mm, and 13 mm while the waveguide lengths are 0.62 cm, 1.86 cm, and 4.43 cm. Because the length of the arm is large (in mm), the changing of the refractive index is small. adding the electric field induced using a phase change is π/2 (i.e, opposite polarities). Moreover, transverse type modulator is used where the applied electric field is (Maldonado, 1995):
E = {V \over d}
where d is the waveguide electrode spacing which is directly proportional to the confinement factor. The confinement factor can be slightly degraded by decreasing the waveguide electrode spacing d as expressed in the following equations (Hagn, 2001; Maldonado, 1995):
\Delta {n_o} = - {{{n^3}{r_{13}}\Gamma V} \over {2d}}
where r13 is the electro-optic coefficient.
Pm/V,\Gamma = {{2\pi \Delta nL} \over \lambda }
In this paper, used a small waveguide electrode spacing d and focused in this paper on the waveguide electrode spacing d, thus, a large ordinary changing of refractive index Δn, then a large confinement factor.
Thus, in this paper, the electro-optic modulator is designed using a high refractive index that induces a large confinement factor. The proposed design has deployed a longitudinal modulator type in which the applied electric field can be evaluated by (Maldonado, 1995):
E = {V \over L}
where L is the length of the modulator arm in μm where the used values of L in the proposed design are 3 μm, 5 μm, 7 μm, and 8 μm. Since the proposed structure adopts small lengths of arm (in μm), the change in the refractive index Δn is large and hence the confinement factor is large as well based on the following formula (Hagn, 2001):
\Delta {n_o} = - {{{n^3}{r_{13}}\Gamma V} \over {2L}}
Furthermore, the electric field induces using a phase change is π (i.e, polarities not opposite), where it selects a suitable electric field, that induces a large changing of refractive index. Eventually, the main benefit of this work is the enhancement of the confinement factor as well as the improvement in the modulation efficiency of the modulator, see Table 2.
In the presented results, the longitudinal configuration of the separation distance between arms (d) does not have any effect on the electric field because L and d are equal (Maldonado, 1995), thus the electric field E is restricted. Finally, the future work is to experimentally assemble this design.
The challenges and difficulties of this design are in the selection of the values of variables such as the length of the modulator arm (L) and the separation distance between arms (d) in micrometers because of a small applied electric field E through the small area of these arms (i.e., E < 10 V/μm). Meantime, a large applied electric field (E) is not feasible here because the design is limited by small size whereas for commercial modulators, E can be hundreds of voltages per millimeter with a big size of the available systems in mm or even in cm. Therefore, in the longitudinal configuration, the electric field E is restricted because (L = d), and the electric field (E = V/L). As a result, the aspect ratio (L/d) is unity and d is not controlled by the electric field E. On the other hand, in the transverse configuration, the electric field is not restricted as (d ≪ L), and d operates as a capacitor in the device. Therefore, a reduction in d due to the electric field E has increased the aspect ratio (L/d) and hence d is controlled by E, where L is also large.
Conclusions
The proposed structure has accomplished good performance with large optical confinement factor resulting from as small as 8 µm length of arms which consequently led to a compact MZM. The large ordinary negative changing of the refractive index when applying lower driving power of the electric field of 1–4 V/µm to the MZM has reflected better performance. With LN, the best length of arms was about 8 µm with a large negative change in the refractive index when using near-infrared and visible wavelengths with the electric field of 4V/µm.
Akhtar, M. B. 2022. The use of a convolutional neural network in detecting soldering faults from a printed circuit board assembly. HighTech and Innovation Journal 3(1): 1–14.AkhtarM. B.2022The use of a convolutional neural network in detecting soldering faults from a printed circuit board assemblyHighTech and Innovation Journal3111410.28991/HIJ-2022-03-01-01Search in Google Scholar
Alexander, K., George, J. P., Verbist, J., Neyts, K., Kuyken, B., Van Thourhout, D. and Beeckman, J. 2018. Nanophotonic Pockels modulators on a silicon nitride platform. Nature communications 9(1): 3444.AlexanderK.GeorgeJ. P.VerbistJ.NeytsK.KuykenB.Van ThourhoutD.BeeckmanJ.2018Nanophotonic Pockels modulators on a silicon nitride platformNature communications91344410.1038/s41467-018-05846-6611076830150757Search in Google Scholar
Bea, S. and Teich, M. 1991. Fundamentals of photonics, Wiley, New York, p. 313.BeaS.TeichM.1991Fundamentals of photonicsWileyNew York313Search in Google Scholar
Boes, A., Corcoran, B., Chang, L., Bowers, J. and Mitchell, A. 2018. Status and potential of lithium niobate on insulator (LNOI) for photonic integrated circuits. Laser & Photonics Reviews 12(4): 1700256.BoesA.CorcoranB.ChangL.BowersJ.MitchellA.2018Status and potential of lithium niobate on insulator (LNOI) for photonic integrated circuitsLaser & Photonics Reviews124170025610.1002/lpor.201700256Search in Google Scholar
Cai, L., Kang, Y. and Hu, H. 2016. Electric-optical property of the proton exchanged phase modulator in single-crystal lithium niobate thin film. Optics Express 24(5): 4640–4647.CaiL.KangY.HuH.2016Electric-optical property of the proton exchanged phase modulator in single-crystal lithium niobate thin filmOptics Express2454640464710.1364/OE.24.00464029092292Search in Google Scholar
Casson, J. L., Gahagan, K. T., Scrymgeour, D. and Jain, R. K. 2004. Electro-optic coefficients of lithium tantalate at near-infrared wavelengths. JOSA B 21(11): 1948–1952.CassonJ. L.GahaganK. T.ScrymgeourD.JainR. K.2004Electro-optic coefficients of lithium tantalate at near-infrared wavelengthsJOSA B21111948195210.1364/JOSAB.21.001948Search in Google Scholar
Chang, L., Pfeiffer, M. H. P., Volet, N., Zervas, M., Peters, J. D., Manganelli, C. L., Stanton, E. J., Li, Y., Kippenberg, T. J. and Bowers, J. E. 2017. Heterogeneous integration of lithium niobate and silicon nitride waveguides for wafer-scale photonic integrated circuits on silicon. Optics Letters 42(4): 803–806.ChangL.PfeifferM. H. P.VoletN.ZervasM.PetersJ. D.ManganelliC. L.StantonE. J.LiY.KippenbergT. J.BowersJ. E.2017Heterogeneous integration of lithium niobate and silicon nitride waveguides for wafer-scale photonic integrated circuits on siliconOptics Letters42480380610.1364/OL.42.00080328198869Search in Google Scholar
Chang, L., Li, Y., Volet, N., Wang, L., Peters, J. and Bowers, J. E. 2016. Thin film wavelength converters for photonic integrated circuits. Optica 3(5): 531–535.ChangL.LiY.VoletN.WangL.PetersJ.BowersJ. E.2016Thin film wavelength converters for photonic integrated circuitsOptica3553153510.1364/OPTICA.3.000531Search in Google Scholar
Chen, L., Xu, Q., Wood, M. G. and Reano, R. M. 2014. Hybrid silicon and lithium niobate electro-optical ring modulator. Optica 1(2): 112–118.ChenL.XuQ.WoodM. G.ReanoR. M.2014Hybrid silicon and lithium niobate electro-optical ring modulatorOptica1211211810.1364/OPTICA.1.000112Search in Google Scholar
Deshpande, R., Zenin, V. A., Ding, F., Mortensen, N. A. and Bozhevolnyi, S. I. 2018. Direct characterization of near-field coupling in gap plasmon-based metasurfaces. Nano Letters 18(10): 6265–6270.DeshpandeR.ZeninV. A.DingF.MortensenN. A.BozhevolnyiS. I.2018Direct characterization of near-field coupling in gap plasmon-based metasurfacesNano Letters18106265627010.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0239330216727Search in Google Scholar
DeVault, C. T., Zenin, V. A., Pors, A., Chaudhuri, K., Kim, J., Boltasseva, A., Shalaev, V. M. and Bozhevolnyi, S. I. 2018. Suppression of near-field coupling in plasmonic antennas on epsilon-near-zero substrates. Optica 5(12): 1557–1563.DeVaultC. T.ZeninV. A.PorsA.ChaudhuriK.KimJ.BoltassevaA.ShalaevV. M.BozhevolnyiS. I.2018Suppression of near-field coupling in plasmonic antennas on epsilon-near-zero substratesOptica5121557156310.1364/OPTICA.5.001557Search in Google Scholar
Figura, C. C. 2000. Second order nonlinear optics in ionically self-assembled thin films. PhD Dissertation, Virginia Tech.FiguraC. C.2000Second order nonlinear optics in ionically self-assembled thin filmsPhD Dissertation,Virginia Tech.Search in Google Scholar
Girouard, P., Chen, P., Jeong, Y. K., Liu, Z., Ho, S. and Wessels, B. W. 2017. X-2 modulator with 40-GHz modulation utilizing BaTiO3 photonic crystal waveguides. IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics 53(4): 1–10.GirouardP.ChenP.JeongY. K.LiuZ.HoS.WesselsB. W.2017X-2 modulator with 40-GHz modulation utilizing BaTiO3 photonic crystal waveguidesIEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics53411010.1109/JQE.2017.2718222Search in Google Scholar
Guarino, A., Poberaj, G., Rezzonico, D., Degl’Innocenti, R. and Günter, P. 2007. Electro–optically tunable microring resonators in lithium niobate. Nature Photonics 1(7): 407–410.GuarinoA.PoberajG.RezzonicoD.Degl’InnocentiR.GünterP.2007Electro–optically tunable microring resonators in lithium niobateNature Photonics1740741010.1038/nphoton.2007.93Search in Google Scholar
Hagn, G. 2001. Electro-optic effects and their application in indium phosphide waveguide devices for fibre optic access networks. PhD dissertation, ETH Zurich.HagnG.2001Electro-optic effects and their application in indium phosphide waveguide devices for fibre optic access networksPhD dissertation,ETH ZurichSearch in Google Scholar
He, M., Xu, M., Ren, Y., Jian, J., Ruan, Z., Xu, Y., Gao, S., Sun, S., Wen, X., Zhou, L., Liu, L., Guo, C., Chen, H., Yu, S., Liu, L. and Cai, X. 2019. High-performance hybrid silicon and lithium niobate Mach–Zehnder modulators for 100 Gbit s−1 and beyond. Nature Photonics 13(5): 359–364.HeM.XuM.RenY.JianJ.RuanZ.XuY.GaoS.SunS.WenX.ZhouL.LiuL.GuoC.ChenH.YuS.LiuL.CaiX.2019High-performance hybrid silicon and lithium niobate Mach–Zehnder modulators for 100 Gbit s−1 and beyondNature Photonics13535936410.1038/s41566-019-0378-6Search in Google Scholar
Janner, D., Tulli, D., García-Granda, M., Belmonte, M. and Pruneri, V. 2009. Micro-structured integrated electro-optic LiNbO3 modulators. Laser & Photonics Reviews 3(3): 301–313.JannerD.TulliD.García-GrandaM.BelmonteM.PruneriV.2009Micro-structured integrated electro-optic LiNbO3 modulatorsLaser & Photonics Reviews3330131310.1002/lpor.200810073Search in Google Scholar
Jin, S., Xu, L., Zhang, H. and Li, Y. 2015. LiNbO3 thin-film modulators using silicon nitride surface ridge waveguides. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters 28(7): 736–739.JinS.XuL.ZhangH.LiY.2015LiNbO3 thin-film modulators using silicon nitride surface ridge waveguidesIEEE Photonics Technology Letters28773673910.1109/LPT.2015.2507136Search in Google Scholar
Korkishko, Y. N., Fedorov, V., De Micheli, M., Baldi, P., El Hadi, K. and Leycuras, A. 1996. Relationships between structural and optical properties of proton-exchanged waveguides on Z-cut lithium niobate. Applied Optics, 35(36): 7056–7060.KorkishkoY. N.FedorovV.De MicheliM.BaldiP.El HadiK.LeycurasA.1996Relationships between structural and optical properties of proton-exchanged waveguides on Z-cut lithium niobateApplied Optics35367056706010.1364/AO.35.00705621151307Search in Google Scholar
Lu, H., Sadani, B., Ulliac, G., Courjal, N., Guyot, C., Merolla, J.-M., Collet, M., Baida, F. I. and Bernal, M.-P. 2012a. 6-micron interaction length electro-optic modulation based on lithium niobate photonic crystal cavity. Optics Express 20(19): 20884–20893.LuH.SadaniB.UlliacG.CourjalN.GuyotC.MerollaJ.-M.ColletM.BaidaF. I.BernalM.-P.2012a6-micron interaction length electro-optic modulation based on lithium niobate photonic crystal cavityOptics Express2019208842089310.1364/OE.20.02088423037212Search in Google Scholar
Lu, H., Sadani, B., Courjal, N., Ulliac, G., Smith, N., Stenger, V., Collet, M., Baida, F. I. and Bernal, M.-P. 2012b. Enhanced electro-optical lithium niobate photonic crystal wire waveguide on a smart-cut thin film. Optics Express 20(3): 2974–2981.LuH.SadaniB.CourjalN.UlliacG.SmithN.StengerV.ColletM.BaidaF. I.BernalM.-P.2012bEnhanced electro-optical lithium niobate photonic crystal wire waveguide on a smart-cut thin filmOptics Express2032974298110.1364/OE.20.00297422330535Search in Google Scholar
Luff, B. J., Wilkinson, J. S., Piehler, J., Hollenbach, U., Ingenhoff, J. and Fabricius, N. 1998. Integrated optical Mach–Zehnder biosensor, in. Journal of Lightwave Technology 16(4): 583–592.LuffB. J.WilkinsonJ. S.PiehlerJ.HollenbachU.IngenhoffJ.FabriciusN.1998Integrated optical Mach–Zehnder biosensorinJournal of Lightwave Technology16458359210.1109/50.664067Search in Google Scholar
Maldonado, T. A. 1995. Electro-optic modulators. Handbook of optics 2: 13–11.MaldonadoT. A.1995Electro-optic modulatorsHandbook of optics21311Search in Google Scholar
Mercante, A. J., Shi, S., Yao, P., Xie, L., Weikle, R. M. and Prather, D. W. 2018. Thin film lithium niobate electro-optic modulator with terahertz operating bandwidth. Optics Express 26(11): 14810–14816.MercanteA. J.ShiS.YaoP.XieL.WeikleR. M.PratherD. W.2018Thin film lithium niobate electro-optic modulator with terahertz operating bandwidthOptics Express2611148101481610.1364/OE.26.01481029877417Search in Google Scholar
Poberaj, G., Hu, H., Sohler, W. and Guenter, P. 2012. Lithium niobate on insulator (LNOI) for micro-photonic devices. Laser & photonics reviews 6(4): 488–503.PoberajG.HuH.SohlerW.GuenterP.2012Lithium niobate on insulator (LNOI) for micro-photonic devicesLaser & photonics reviews6448850310.1002/lpor.201100035Search in Google Scholar
Priscilla, S. J., Judi, V. A., Daniel, R. and Sivaji, K. 2020. Effects of chromium doping on the electrical properties of ZnO nanoparticles. Emerging Science Journal 4(2): 82–88.PriscillaS. J.JudiV. A.DanielR.SivajiK.2020Effects of chromium doping on the electrical properties of ZnO nanoparticlesEmerging Science Journal42828810.28991/esj-2020-01212Search in Google Scholar
Qi, Y. and Li, Y. 2020. Integrated lithium niobate photonics, Nanophotonics, 9(6): 1287–1320.QiY.LiY.2020Integrated lithium niobate photonicsNanophotonics961287132010.1515/nanoph-2020-0013Search in Google Scholar
Rao, A., Patil, A., Rabiei, P., Honardoost, A., DeSalvo, R., Paolella, A. and Fathpour, S. 2016. High-performance and linear thin-film lithium niobate Mach–Zehnder modulators on silicon up to 50 GHz. Optics Letters 41(24): 5700–5703.RaoA.PatilA.RabieiP.HonardoostA.DeSalvoR.PaolellaA.FathpourS.2016High-performance and linear thin-film lithium niobate Mach–Zehnder modulators on silicon up to 50 GHzOptics Letters41245700570310.1364/OL.41.00570027973493Search in Google Scholar
Rao, A. and Fathpour, S. 2017. Compact lithium niobate electrooptic modulators. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 24(4): 1–14.RaoA.FathpourS.2017Compact lithium niobate electrooptic modulatorsIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics24411410.1109/JSTQE.2017.2779869Search in Google Scholar
Roussey, M., Baida, F. I. and Bernal, M.-P. 2007. Experimental and theoretical observations of the slow-light effect on a tunable photonic crystal. JOSA B 24(6): 1416–1422.RousseyM.BaidaF. I.BernalM.-P.2007Experimental and theoretical observations of the slow-light effect on a tunable photonic crystalJOSA B2461416142210.1364/JOSAB.24.001416Search in Google Scholar
Roussey, M., Bernal, M.-P., Courjal, N., Van Labeke, D., Baida, F. and Salut, R. 2006. Electro-optic effect exaltation on lithium niobate photonic crystals due to slow photons. Applied physics letters 89(24): 241110.RousseyM.BernalM.-P.CourjalN.Van LabekeD.BaidaF.SalutR.2006Electro-optic effect exaltation on lithium niobate photonic crystals due to slow photonsApplied physics letters892424111010.1063/1.2402946Search in Google Scholar
Scharnberg, A. A., de Loreto, A. C. and Alves, A. K. 2020. Optical and structural characterization of Bi2FexNbO7 nanoparticles for environmental applications. Emerging Science Journal 4(1): 11–17.ScharnbergA. A.de LoretoA. C.AlvesA. K.2020Optical and structural characterization of Bi2FexNbO7 nanoparticles for environmental applicationsEmerging Science Journal41111710.28991/esj-2020-01205Search in Google Scholar
Sulser, F., Poberaj, G., Koechlin, M. and Günter, P. 2009. Photonic crystal structures in ion-sliced lithium niobate thin films. Optics Express 17(22): 20291–20300.SulserF.PoberajG.KoechlinM.GünterP.2009Photonic crystal structures in ion-sliced lithium niobate thin filmsOptics Express1722202912030010.1364/OE.17.02029119997255Search in Google Scholar
Tavlykaev, R. F. and Ramaswamy, R. V. 1999. Highly linear Y-fed directional coupler modulator with low intermodulation distortion. Journal of Lightwave Technology 17(2): 282.TavlykaevR. F.RamaswamyR. V.1999Highly linear Y-fed directional coupler modulator with low intermodulation distortionJournal of Lightwave Technology17228210.1109/50.744238Search in Google Scholar
Thomaschewski, M., Zenin, V. A., Wolff, C. and Bozhevolnyi, S. I. 2020. Plasmonic monolithic lithium niobate directional coupler switches. Nature Communications 11(1): 1–6.ThomaschewskiM.ZeninV. A.WolffC.BozhevolnyiS. I.2020Plasmonic monolithic lithium niobate directional coupler switchesNature Communications1111610.1038/s41467-020-14539-y700515632029717Search in Google Scholar
Wang, C., Zhang, M., Chen, X., Bertrand, M., Shams-Ansari, A., Chandrasekhar, S., Winzer, P. and Lončar, M. 2018. Integrated lithium niobate electro-optic modulators operating at CMOS-compatible voltages. Nature 562(7725): 101–104.WangC.ZhangM.ChenX.BertrandM.Shams-AnsariA.ChandrasekharS.WinzerP.LončarM.2018Integrated lithium niobate electro-optic modulators operating at CMOS-compatible voltagesNature562772510110410.1038/s41586-018-0551-y30250251Search in Google Scholar
Wang, X., Weigel, P. O., Zhao, J., Ruesing, M. and Mookherjea, S. 2019. Achieving beyond-100-GHz large-signal modulation bandwidth in hybrid silicon photonics Mach Zehnder modulators using thin film lithium niobate. APL Photonics 4(9): 096101.WangX.WeigelP. O.ZhaoJ.RuesingM.MookherjeaS.2019Achieving beyond-100-GHz large-signal modulation bandwidth in hybrid silicon photonics Mach Zehnder modulators using thin film lithium niobateAPL Photonics4909610110.1063/1.5115243Search in Google Scholar
Weigel, P. O., Zhao, J., Fang, K., Al-Rubaye, H., Trotter, D., Hood, D., Mudrick, J., Dallo, C., Pomerene, A. T., Starbuck, A. L., DeRose, C. T., Lentine, A. L., Rebeiz, G. and Mookherjea, S. 2018. Bonded thin film lithium niobate modulator on a silicon photonics platform exceeding 100 GHz 3-dB electrical modulation bandwidth. Optics Express 26(18): 23728–23739.WeigelP. O.ZhaoJ.FangK.Al-RubayeH.TrotterD.HoodD.MudrickJ.DalloC.PomereneA. T.StarbuckA. L.DeRoseC. T.LentineA. L.RebeizG.MookherjeaS.2018Bonded thin film lithium niobate modulator on a silicon photonics platform exceeding 100 GHz 3-dB electrical modulation bandwidthOptics Express2618237282373910.1364/OE.26.02372830184869Search in Google Scholar
Wooten, E. L., Kissa, K. M., Yi-Yan, A., Murphy, E. J., Lafaw, D. A., Hallemeier, P. F., Maack, D., Attanasio, D. V., Fritz, D. J., McBrien, G. J. and Bossi, D. E. 2000. A review of lithium niobate modulators for fiber-optic communications systems. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 6(1): 69–82.WootenE. L.KissaK. M.Yi-YanA.MurphyE. J.LafawD. A.HallemeierP. F.MaackD.AttanasioD. V.FritzD. J.McBrienG. J.BossiD. E.2000A review of lithium niobate modulators for fiber-optic communications systemsIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics61698210.1109/2944.826874Search in Google Scholar
Xu, M., Chen, W., He, M., Wen, X., Ruan, Z., Xu, J., Chen, L., Liu, L., Yu, S. and Cai, X. 2019. Michelson interferometer modulator based on hybrid silicon and lithium niobate platform. APL Photonics 4(10): 100802.XuM.ChenW.HeM.WenX.RuanZ.XuJ.ChenL.LiuL.YuS.CaiX.2019Michelson interferometer modulator based on hybrid silicon and lithium niobate platformAPL Photonics41010080210.1063/1.5115136Search in Google Scholar
Xu, M., He, M., Zhang, H., Jian, J., Pan, Y., Liu, X., Chen, L., Meng, X., Chen, X., Li, Z., Xiao, X., Yu, S. and Cai, X. 2020. High-performance coherent optical modulators based on thin-film lithium niobate platform. Nature Communications 11(1): 1–7.XuM.HeM.ZhangH.JianJ.PanY.LiuX.ChenL.MengX.ChenX.LiZ.XiaoX.YuS.CaiX.2020High-performance coherent optical modulators based on thin-film lithium niobate platformNature Communications1111710.1038/s41467-020-17806-0741101532764622Search in Google Scholar
Yi-Yan, A. 1983. Index instabilities in proton-exchanged LiNbO3 waveguides. Applied Physics Letters, 42,(8): 633–635.Yi-YanA.1983Index instabilities in proton-exchanged LiNbO3 waveguidesApplied Physics Letters42863363510.1063/1.94055Search in Google Scholar
Zenin, V. A., Choudhury, S., Saha, S., Shalaev, V. M., Boltasseva, A. and Bozhevolnyi, S. I. 2017. Hybrid plasmonic waveguides formed by metal coating of dielectric ridges. Optics Express 25(11): 12295–12302.ZeninV. A.ChoudhuryS.SahaS.ShalaevV. M.BoltassevaA.BozhevolnyiS. I.2017Hybrid plasmonic waveguides formed by metal coating of dielectric ridgesOptics Express2511122951230210.1364/OE.25.01229528786587Search in Google Scholar
Zenin, V. A., Volkov, V. S., Han, Z., Bozhevolnyi, S. I., Devaux, E. and Ebbesen, T. W. 2012. Directional coupling in channel plasmon-polariton waveguides. Optics Express 20(6): 6124–6134.ZeninV. A.VolkovV. S.HanZ.BozhevolnyiS. I.DevauxE.EbbesenT. W.2012Directional coupling in channel plasmon-polariton waveguidesOptics Express2066124613410.1364/OE.20.00612422418492Search in Google Scholar