This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Bennett, S., Banyard, V.L. and Edwards, K.M. (2017). ‘The impact of the bystander’s relationship with the victim and the perpetrator on intent to help in situations involving sexual violence.’ Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32: 5, 682–702.BennettS.BanyardV.L.EdwardsK.M.2017‘The impact of the bystander’s relationship with the victim and the perpetrator on intent to help in situations involving sexual violence.’32568270210.1177/0886260515586373Search in Google Scholar
Berdahl, J.L., Cooper, M., Glick, P., Livingston, R W. and Williams, J.C. (2018). ‘Work as a masculinity contest.’ Journal of Social Issues, 74: 3, 422–448.BerdahlJ.L.CooperM.GlickP.LivingstonR W.WilliamsJ.C.2018‘Work as a masculinity contest.’74342244810.1111/josi.12289Search in Google Scholar
Bernstein, M., Kostelac, C. and Gaarder, E. (2003). ‘Understanding “heterosexism”: Applying theories of racial prejudice to homophobia using data from a southwestern police department.’ Race, Gender, & Class, 10: 4, 54–74.BernsteinM.KostelacC.GaarderE.2003‘Understanding “heterosexism”: Applying theories of racial prejudice to homophobia using data from a southwestern police department.’1045474Search in Google Scholar
Beyer, F., Sidarus, N., Bonicalzi, S. and Haggard, P. (2017). ‘Beyond self-serving bias: diffusion of responsibility reduces sense of agency and outcome monitoring.’ Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience, 12: 1, 138–145.BeyerF.SidarusN.BonicalziS.HaggardP.2017‘Beyond self-serving bias: diffusion of responsibility reduces sense of agency and outcome monitoring.’12113814510.1093/scan/nsw160Search in Google Scholar
Blashill, A. and Powlishta, K. (2009). ‘Gay stereotypes: The use of sexual orientation as a cue for gender-related attributes.’ Sex Roles, 61: 11–12, 783–793.BlashillA.PowlishtaK.2009‘Gay stereotypes: The use of sexual orientation as a cue for gender-related attributes.’6111–1278379310.1007/s11199-009-9684-7Search in Google Scholar
Brody, N. and Vangelisti, A.L. (2016). ‘Bystander intervention in cyberbullying.’ Communication Monographs, 83: 1, 94–119.BrodyN.VangelistiA.L.2016‘Bystander intervention in cyberbullying.’8319411910.1080/03637751.2015.1044256Search in Google Scholar
Catalyst. (2017, May 30). ‘Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender workplace issues.’ Online: http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/lesbian-gay-bisexualtransgender-workplace-issues.Catalyst2017May30Online: http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/lesbian-gay-bisexualtransgender-workplace-issues.Search in Google Scholar
Chabot, H.F., Gray, M.L., Makande, T.B. and Hoyt, R.L. (2018). ‘Beyond sex: Likelihood and predictors of effective and ineffective intervention in intimate partner violence in bystanders perceiving an emergency.’ Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33: 12, 1909–1930.ChabotH.F.GrayM.L.MakandeT.B.HoytR.L.2018‘Beyond sex: Likelihood and predictors of effective and ineffective intervention in intimate partner violence in bystanders perceiving an emergency.’33121909193010.1177/0886260515621064Search in Google Scholar
Corrington, A., Nittrouer, C.L., Trump-Steele, R.C.E. and Hebl, M. (2018). ‘Letting him B: A study on the intersection of gender and sexual orientation in the workplace.’ Journal of Vocational Behavior, online October 10. Online: doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.10.005.CorringtonA.NittrouerC.L.Trump-SteeleR.C.E.HeblM.2018‘Letting him B: A study on the intersection of gender and sexual orientation in the workplace.’online October 10. Online:doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.10.005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Cox, A. and Adam, A. (2018). ‘The bystander effect in non-emergency situations: Influence of gender and group size.’ Modern Psychological Studies, 23: 2, 1–14.CoxA.AdamA.2018‘The bystander effect in non-emergency situations: Influence of gender and group size.’232114Search in Google Scholar
Coyne, I., Gopaul, A.-M., Campbell, M., Pankász, A., Garland, R., and Cousans, F. (2019). ‘Bystander Responses to Bullying at Work: The Role of Mode, Type and Relationship to Target’. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(3), 813–827. https://doi-org.leo.lib.unomaha.edu/10.1007/s10551-017-3692-2.CoyneI.GopaulA.-M.CampbellM.PankászA.GarlandR.CousansF.2019‘Bystander Responses to Bullying at Work: The Role of Mode, Type and Relationship to Target’1573813827https://doi-org.leo.lib.unomaha.edu/10.1007/s10551-017-3692-2.10.1007/s10551-017-3692-2Search in Google Scholar
Darley, J. M., Teger, A. I., and Lewis, L. D. (1973). ‘Do groups always inhibit individuals’ responses to potential emergencies?’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26:3, 395–399.DarleyJ. M.TegerA. I.LewisL. D.1973‘Do groups always inhibit individuals’ responses to potential emergencies?’26339539910.1037/h0034450Search in Google Scholar
D’Cruz, P. and Noronha, E. (2010). ‘The limits to workplace friendship.’ Employee Relations, 33:3, 269–288.D’CruzP.NoronhaE.2010‘The limits to workplace friendship.’33326928810.1108/01425451111121777Search in Google Scholar
DeSilver, D. (2018). ‘Women scarce at the top of U.S. business - and in the jobs that lead there.’ FactTank: News in the Numbers, Pew Research Center. Online: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/04/30/women-scarce-at-top-of-u-s-business-and-in-the-jobs-that-lead-there/.DeSilverD.2018‘Women scarce at the top of U.S. business - and in the jobs that lead there.’Online: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/04/30/women-scarce-at-top-of-u-s-business-and-in-the-jobs-that-lead-there/.Search in Google Scholar
EEOC. (2016). Select Task Force on the Study of Harassment in the Workplace: Report of Co-Chairs Chai R. Feldblum & Victoria A. Lipnic. Online: https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/task_force/harassment/report.cfm.EEOC2016Online: https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/task_force/harassment/report.cfm.Search in Google Scholar
Eliason, M.J. (1997). ‘The prevalence and nature of biphobia in heterosexual undergraduate students.’ Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26, 317–326.EliasonM.J.1997‘The prevalence and nature of biphobia in heterosexual undergraduate students.’2631732610.1023/A:1024527032040Search in Google Scholar
Eliason, M.J., Dibble, S. and Robertson, P. (2011). ‘Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) physicians’ experiences in the workplace.’ Journal of Homosexuality, 58: 10, 1355–1371.EliasonM.J.DibbleS.RobertsonP.2011‘Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) physicians’ experiences in the workplace.’58101355137110.1080/00918369.2011.614902Search in Google Scholar
Emdad, R., Alipour, A., Hagberg, J. and Jensen, I.B. (2013). ‘The impact of bystanding to workplace bullying on symptoms of depression among women and men in industry in Swededn: An empirical and theoretical longitudinal study.’ International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 86:6, 709–716.EmdadR.AlipourA.HagbergJ.JensenI.B.2013‘The impact of bystanding to workplace bullying on symptoms of depression among women and men in industry in Swededn: An empirical and theoretical longitudinal study.’86670971610.1007/s00420-012-0813-1Search in Google Scholar
Einarsdottir, A., Hoel, H., Lewis, D. (2015). ‘It’s nothing personal’: Anti-homosexuality in the British workplace.’ Sociology, 49:6, 1183–1199.EinarsdottirA.HoelH.LewisD.2015‘It’s nothing personal’: Anti-homosexuality in the British workplace.’4961183119910.1177/0038038515582160Search in Google Scholar
Escartín, J., Rodríguez-Carballeira, A., Zapf, D., Porrúa, C. and Martín-Peñaa, J. (2009). ‘Perceived severity of various bullying behaviours at work and the relevance of exposure to bullying.’ Work & Stress, 23: 3, 191–205.EscartínJ.Rodríguez-CarballeiraA.ZapfD.PorrúaC.Martín-PeñaaJ.2009‘Perceived severity of various bullying behaviours at work and the relevance of exposure to bullying.’23319120510.1080/02678370903289639Search in Google Scholar
Evans, D. (2017). ‘Categorizing the magnitude and frequency of exposure to uncivil behaviors: A new approach for more meaningful interventions.’ Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 49: 2, 214–222.EvansD.2017‘Categorizing the magnitude and frequency of exposure to uncivil behaviors: A new approach for more meaningful interventions.’49221422210.1111/jnu.12275Search in Google Scholar
Festinger, L. (1962). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.FestingerL.1962Stanford, CAStanford University Press10.1038/scientificamerican1062-93Search in Google Scholar
Fischer, P., Greitemeyer, T., Pollozek, F. and Frey, D. (2006). ‘The unresponsive bystander: Are bystanders more responsive in dangerous emergencies?’ European Journal of Social Psychology, 36: 2, 267–278.FischerP.GreitemeyerT.PollozekF.FreyD.2006‘The unresponsive bystander: Are bystanders more responsive in dangerous emergencies?’36226727810.1002/ejsp.297Search in Google Scholar
Fischer, P., Krueger, J.I., Greitemeyer, T., Kastenmüller, A., Heene, M., Wicher, M. and Kainbacher, M. (2011). ‘The bystander-effect: A meta-analytic review on bystander intervention in dangerous and non-dangerous emergencies.’ Psychological Bulletin, 137: 4, 517–537.FischerP.KruegerJ.I.GreitemeyerT.KastenmüllerA.HeeneM.WicherM.KainbacherM.2011‘The bystander-effect: A meta-analytic review on bystander intervention in dangerous and non-dangerous emergencies.’137451753710.1037/a0023304Search in Google Scholar
Fritzsche, B.A., Finkelstein, M.A. and Penner, L.A. (2000). ‘To help or not to help: Capturing individuals’ decision policies.’ Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 28: 6, 561–578.FritzscheB.A.FinkelsteinM.A.PennerL.A.2000‘To help or not to help: Capturing individuals’ decision policies.’28656157810.2224/sbp.2000.28.6.561Search in Google Scholar
Fyfe, B. (1983). ‘“Homophobia” or homosexual bias reconsidered.’ Archives of Sexual Behavior, 12: 6, 549–554.FyfeB.1983‘“Homophobia” or homosexual bias reconsidered.’12654955410.1007/BF01542216Search in Google Scholar
Gallup. (2017, January 11). ‘In U.S., more adults identifying as LGBT.’ Online: http://news.gallup.com/poll/201731/lgbt-identification-rises.aspx.Gallup2017January11Online: http://news.gallup.com/poll/201731/lgbt-identification-rises.aspx.Search in Google Scholar
Gates, T.G. and Viggiani, P.A. (2013). ‘Understanding lesbian, gay, and bisexual worker stigmatization: A review of the literature.’ International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 34: 5/6, 359–374.GatesT.G.ViggianiP.A.2013‘Understanding lesbian, gay, and bisexual worker stigmatization: A review of the literature.’345/635937410.1108/IJSSP-07-2013-0077Search in Google Scholar
Graf, N., Brown, A. and Patten, E. (2018). ‘The narrowing, but persistent, gender gap in pay.’ FactTank: News in the Numbers: Pew Research Center. Online: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/04/09/gender-pay-gap-facts/.GrafN.BrownA.PattenE.2018‘The narrowing, but persistent, gender gap in pay.’Online: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/04/09/gender-pay-gap-facts/.Search in Google Scholar
Hellemans, C., Dal Cason, D. and Casini, A. (2017). ‘Bystander helping behavior in response to workplace bullying.’ Swiss Journal of Psychology, 76: 4, 135–144.HellemansC.Dal CasonD.CasiniA.2017‘Bystander helping behavior in response to workplace bullying.’76413514410.1024/1421-0185/a000200Search in Google Scholar
Herek, G.M. (1994). ‘Assessing attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: A review of empirical research with the ATLG scale’, in B. Greene and G.M. Herek (eds), Lesbian and Gay Psychology, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.HerekG.M.1994‘Assessing attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: A review of empirical research with the ATLG scale’inGreeneB.HerekG.M.(eds),Thousand Oaks, CASage10.4135/9781483326757.n11Search in Google Scholar
Herek, G.M. (1995). ‘Psychological heterosexism in the United States’, in A.R. D’Augelli and C.J. Patterson (eds), Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identities Over the Lifespan: Psychological Perspectives, New York: Oxford University Press.HerekG.M.1995‘Psychological heterosexism in the United States’inD’AugelliA.R.PattersonC.J.(eds),New YorkOxford University Press10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195082319.003.0013Search in Google Scholar
Herek, G.M. (2002). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward bisexual men and women in the United States. The Journal of Sex Research, 39: 4, 264–275.HerekG.M.2002Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward bisexual men and women in the United States39426427510.1080/00224490209552150Search in Google Scholar
Hettinger, V. and Vandello, J. (2014). ‘Balance without equality: Just world beliefs, the gay affluence myth, and support for gay rights.’ Social Justice Research, 27: 4, 444–463.HettingerV.VandelloJ.2014‘Balance without equality: Just world beliefs, the gay affluence myth, and support for gay rights.’27444446310.1007/s11211-014-0226-2Search in Google Scholar
Hoefnagels, C. and Zwikker, M. (2001). ‘The bystander dilemma and child abuse: Extending the Latané and Darley model to domestic violence.’ Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31:6, 1158–1183.HoefnagelsC.ZwikkerM.2001‘The bystander dilemma and child abuse: Extending the Latané and Darley model to domestic violence.’3161158118310.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb02668.xSearch in Google Scholar
Hoel, H., Lewis, D. and Einarsdottir, A. (2017). ‘Debate: Bullying and harassment of lesbians, gay men and bisexual employees: Findings from a representative British national study.’ Public Money & Management, 37: 5, 312–314.HoelH.LewisD.EinarsdottirA.2017‘Debate: Bullying and harassment of lesbians, gay men and bisexual employees: Findings from a representative British national study.’37531231410.1080/09540962.2017.1328169Search in Google Scholar
Jenkins, L.N. and Nickerson, A.B. (2019). ‘Bystander intervention in bullying: Role of social skills and gender.’ Journal of Early Adolescence, 39: 2, 141–166.JenkinsL.N.NickersonA.B.2019‘Bystander intervention in bullying: Role of social skills and gender.’39214116610.1177/0272431617735652Search in Google Scholar
Katz, J., Federici, D. and Ramos-Dries, T. (2019). ‘Amnestic heterosexism and bystander responses to anti-gay bullying.’ Journal of Homosexuality, 66: 1, 1–16.KatzJ.FedericiD.Ramos-DriesT.2019‘Amnestic heterosexism and bystander responses to anti-gay bullying.’66111610.1080/00918369.2017.1395261Search in Google Scholar
Katz, J. and Klainberg, S. (2019). ‘Effects of group status and implicit theories of personality on bystander responses to antigay bullying.’ Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 24, 97–105.KatzJ.KlainbergS.2019‘Effects of group status and implicit theories of personality on bystander responses to antigay bullying.’249710510.24839/2325-7342.JN24.2.97Search in Google Scholar
Katz-Wise, S.L. and Hyde, J.S. (2012). ‘Victimization experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals: A meta-analysis.’ Journal of Sex Research, 49: 2–3, 142–167.Katz-WiseS.L.HydeJ.S.2012‘Victimization experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals: A meta-analysis.’492–314216710.1080/00224499.2011.637247Search in Google Scholar
Koehler, C. and Weber, M. (2018). ‘“Do I really need to help?!” Perceived severity of cyberbullying, victim blaming, and bystanders’ willingness to help the victim.’ Cyberpsychology, 12: 4, 1–15.KoehlerC.WeberM.2018‘“Do I really need to help?!” Perceived severity of cyberbullying, victim blaming, and bystanders’ willingness to help the victim.’12411510.5817/CP2018-4-4Search in Google Scholar
Latané, B. and Darley, J.M. (1968). ‘Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies.’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10: 3, 215–221.LatanéB.DarleyJ.M.1968‘Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies.’10321522110.1037/h0026570Search in Google Scholar
Latané, B. and Darley, J.M. (1970). The Unresponsive Bystander: Why Doesn’t He Help? Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.LatanéB.DarleyJ.M.1970Englewood Cliffs, NJPrentice HallSearch in Google Scholar
Levine, M., Cassidy, C., Brazier, G. and Reicher, S. (2002). ‘Self-categorization and bystander non-intervention: Two experimental studies.’ Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32: 7, 1452–1463.LevineM.CassidyC.BrazierG.ReicherS.2002‘Self-categorization and bystander non-intervention: Two experimental studies.’3271452146310.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb01446.xSearch in Google Scholar
Lukacena, K.M., Reynolds-Tylus, T. and Quick, B.L. (2019). ‘An application of the reasoned action approach to bystander intervention for sexual assault.’ Health Communication, 34: 1, 46–53.LukacenaK.M.Reynolds-TylusT.QuickB.L.2019‘An application of the reasoned action approach to bystander intervention for sexual assault.’341465310.1080/10410236.2017.1384356Search in Google Scholar
Lutgen-Sandvik, P., Hood, J. N. and Jacobson, R. P. (2016). ‘The impact of positive organizational phenomena and workplace bullying on individual outcomes’. Journal of Managerial Issues, 28:1–2, 30–49.Lutgen-SandvikP.HoodJ. N.JacobsonR. P.2016‘The impact of positive organizational phenomena and workplace bullying on individual outcomes’281–23049Search in Google Scholar
MacCurtain, S., Murphy, C., O’Sullivan, M., MacMahon, J. and Tuerner, T. (2018). ‘To stand back or step in? Exploring the responses of employees who observe workplace bullying.’ Nursing Inquiry, 25(1).MacCurtainS.MurphyC.O’SullivanM.MacMahonJ.TuernerT.2018‘To stand back or step in? Exploring the responses of employees who observe workplace bullying.’25110.1111/nin.12207Search in Google Scholar
MacInnis, C.C. and Hodson, G. (2015). ‘Why are heterosexual men (vs. women) particularly prejudiced toward gay men? A social dominance theory explanation.’ Psychology & Sexuality, 6: 3, 275–294.MacInnisC.C.HodsonG.2015‘Why are heterosexual men (vs. women) particularly prejudiced toward gay men? A social dominance theory explanation.’6327529410.1080/19419899.2014.987684Search in Google Scholar
McCord, M.A., Dhanani, L.Y., Joseph, D.L. and Beus, J.M. (2018). ‘A meta-analysis of sex and race differences in perceived workplace mistreatment.’ Journal of Applied Psychology, 103: 2, 137–163.McCordM.A.DhananiL.Y.JosephD.L.BeusJ.M.2018‘A meta-analysis of sex and race differences in perceived workplace mistreatment.’103213716310.1037/apl0000250Search in Google Scholar
Mulder, R., Bos, A.E.R., Pouwelse, M. and van Dam, K. (2017). ‘Workplace mobbing: How the victim’s coping behavior influences bystander responses.’ Journal of Social Psychology, 157: 1, 16–29.MulderR.BosA.E.R.PouwelseM.van DamK.2017‘Workplace mobbing: How the victim’s coping behavior influences bystander responses.’1571162910.1080/00224545.2016.1152213Search in Google Scholar
Mulder, R., Pouwelse, M., Lodewijkx, H., Bos, A.E.R. and van Dam, K. (2016). ‘Predictors of antisocial and prosocial behaviour of bystanders in workplace mobbing.’ Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 26: 3, 207–220.MulderR.PouwelseM.LodewijkxH.BosA.E.R.van DamK.2016‘Predictors of antisocial and prosocial behaviour of bystanders in workplace mobbing.’26320722010.1002/casp.2244Search in Google Scholar
Mulder, R., Pouwelse, M., Lodewijkx, H. and Bolman, C. (2014). ‘Workplace mobbing and bystanders’ helping behaviour towards victims: The role of gender, perceived responsibility and anticipated stigma by association.’ International Journal of Psychology, 49:4, 304–312.MulderR.PouwelseM.LodewijkxH.BolmanC.2014‘Workplace mobbing and bystanders’ helping behaviour towards victims: The role of gender, perceived responsibility and anticipated stigma by association.’49430431210.1002/ijop.12018Search in Google Scholar
Namie, G. and Lutgen-Sandvik, P.E. (2010). ‘Active and passive accomplices: The communal character of workplace bullying.’ International Journal of Communication, 4, 343–373.NamieG.Lutgen-SandvikP.E.2010‘Active and passive accomplices: The communal character of workplace bullying.’4343373Search in Google Scholar
Nickerson, A.B., Aloe, A.M., Livingston, J.A. and Feeley, T.H. (2014). ‘Measurement of the bystander intervention model for bullying and sexual harassment.’ Journal of Adolescence, 37: 4, 391–400.NickersonA.B.AloeA.M.LivingstonJ.A.FeeleyT.H.2014‘Measurement of the bystander intervention model for bullying and sexual harassment.’37439140010.1016/j.adolescence.2014.03.003Search in Google Scholar
Nielsen, M. and Einarsen, S. (2012). ‘Outcomes of exposure to workplace bullying: A meta-analytic review.’ Work and Stress, 26:4, 309–332.NielsenM.EinarsenS.2012‘Outcomes of exposure to workplace bullying: A meta-analytic review.’26430933210.1080/02678373.2012.734709Search in Google Scholar
Palmer, J.E., Nicksa, S.C. and McMahon, S. (2018). ‘Does who you know affect how you act? The impact of relationships on bystander intervention in interpersonal violence situations.’ Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33: 17, 2623–2642.PalmerJ.E.NicksaS.C.McMahonS.2018‘Does who you know affect how you act? The impact of relationships on bystander intervention in interpersonal violence situations.’33172623264210.1177/0886260516628292Search in Google Scholar
Paull, M., Omari, M. and Standen, P. (2012). ‘When is a bystander not a bystander? A typology of the roles of bystanders in workplace bullying.’ Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 50: 3, 351–366.PaullM.OmariM.StandenP.2012‘When is a bystander not a bystander? A typology of the roles of bystanders in workplace bullying.’50335136610.1111/j.1744-7941.2012.00027.xSearch in Google Scholar
Piliavin, I.M., Piliavin, J.A. and Rodin, J. (1975). ‘Costs, diffusion, and the stigmatized victim.’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 429–438.PiliavinI.M.PiliavinJ.A.RodinJ.1975‘Costs, diffusion, and the stigmatized victim.’3242943810.1037/h0077092Search in Google Scholar
Poteat, V.P. and Vecho, O. (2016). ‘Who intervenes against homophobic behavior? Attributes that distinguish active bystanders.’ Journal of School Psychology, 54, 17–28.PoteatV.P.VechoO.2016‘Who intervenes against homophobic behavior? Attributes that distinguish active bystanders.’54172810.1016/j.jsp.2015.10.002Search in Google Scholar
Pugh, B., Ningard, H., Ven, T.V. and Butler, L. (2016). ‘Victim ambiguity: bystander intervention and sexual assault in the college drinking scene.’ Deviant Behavior, 37: 4, 401–418.PughB.NingardH.VenT.V.ButlerL.2016‘Victim ambiguity: bystander intervention and sexual assault in the college drinking scene.’37440141810.1080/01639625.2015.1026777Search in Google Scholar
Raja, S. and Stokes, J.P. (1998). ‘Assessing attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: The modern homophobia scale.’ Journal of Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Identity, 3: 2, 113–134.RajaS.StokesJ.P.1998‘Assessing attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: The modern homophobia scale.’32113134Search in Google Scholar
Ryan, A.M. and Wessel, J.L. (2012). ‘Sexual orientation harassment in the workplace: When do observers intervene?’ Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33: 4, 488–509.RyanA.M.WesselJ.L.2012‘Sexual orientation harassment in the workplace: When do observers intervene?’33448850910.1002/job.765Search in Google Scholar
Salin, D. and Hoel, H. (2013). ‘Workplace bullying as a gendered phenomenon.’ Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28: 3, 235–251.SalinD.HoelH.2013‘Workplace bullying as a gendered phenomenon.’28323525110.1108/02683941311321187Search in Google Scholar
Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Bjorkqvist, K., Osterman, K. and Kaukiainen, A. (1996). ‘Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group.’ Aggressive Behavior, i: 1, 1–15.SalmivalliC.LagerspetzK.BjorkqvistK.OstermanK.KaukiainenA.1996‘Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group.’i111510.4324/9781351153683-13Search in Google Scholar
Sears, B. and Mallory, C. (2011). Documented Evidence of Employment Discrimination & Its Effects on LGBT People’. University of California, UCLA School of Law - Williams Institute. Online: https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/research/discrimination/documented-evidence-of-employment-discrimination-its-effects-on-lgbt-people/.SearsB.MalloryC.2011University of California, UCLA School of Law - Williams InstituteOnline: https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/research/discrimination/documented-evidence-of-employment-discrimination-its-effects-on-lgbt-people/.Search in Google Scholar
Sidanius, J. and Pratto, F. (1999). Social Dominance. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.SidaniusJ.PrattoF.1999Cambridge, EnglandCambridge University Press10.1017/CBO9781139175043Search in Google Scholar
Thorpe, J.R. (2017). People don’t step in when they see anti-gay bullying for this sad reason, according to a new study. Bustle. Online https://www.bustle.com/p/people-dont-step-in-when-they-see-anti-gay-bullying-for-this-sad-reason-according-to-anew-study-2991694.ThorpeJ.R.2017People don’t step in when they see anti-gay bullying for this sad reason, according to a new studyOnline https://www.bustle.com/p/people-dont-step-in-when-they-see-anti-gay-bullying-for-this-sad-reason-according-to-anew-study-2991694.Search in Google Scholar
Vanette, D. (2017). ‘Using attention checks in your surveys may harm data quality.’ QulatricsXM Blog. Online: https://www.qualtrics.com/blog/using-attention-checks-in-your-surveys-may-harm-data-quality.VanetteD.2017‘Using attention checks in your surveys may harm data quality.’Online: https://www.qualtrics.com/blog/using-attention-checks-in-your-surveys-may-harm-data-quality.Search in Google Scholar
Vartia, MA-L. (2001). ‘Consequences of workplace bullying with respect to the well-being of its targets and the observers of bullying.’ Scandinavian Journal of Work and Environmental Health, 27:1, 63–69.VartiaMA-L.2001‘Consequences of workplace bullying with respect to the well-being of its targets and the observers of bullying.’271636910.5271/sjweh.588Search in Google Scholar
Walls, N. (2008). ‘Toward a Multidimensional understanding of heterosexism: The changing nature of prejudice,’ Journal of Homosexuality, 55:1, 20–70.WallsN.2008‘Toward a Multidimensional understanding of heterosexism: The changing nature of prejudice,’551207010.1080/00918360802129287Search in Google Scholar
Walter, S., Seibert, S., Goering, D.D. and O’Boyle, E.H. (2016). ‘An Examination of the convergence of online panel data and conventionally sourced data.’ Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Conference, Anaheim, CA.WalterS.SeibertS.GoeringD.D.O’BoyleE.H.2016Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual ConferenceAnaheim, CA10.5465/ambpp.2016.284Search in Google Scholar
Worthen, M. (2013). ‘An argument for separate analyses of attitudes toward lesbian, gay, bisexual men, bisexual women, MtF and FtM transgender individuals.’ Sex Roles, 68: 11–12, 703–723.WorthenM.2013‘An argument for separate analyses of attitudes toward lesbian, gay, bisexual men, bisexual women, MtF and FtM transgender individuals.’6811–1270372310.1007/s11199-012-0155-1Search in Google Scholar
Zapf, D., Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., and Vartia, M. (2002). ‘Empirical findings on bullying in the workplace,’ in S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, and C. Cooper (eds), Bullying and Emotional Abuse in the Workplace: International Perspectives in Research and Practice, London: Taylor & Francix.ZapfD.EinarsenS.HoelH.VartiaM.2002‘Empirical findings on bullying in the workplace,’inEinarsenS.HoelH.CooperC.(eds),LondonTaylor & Francix10.4324/9780203278734Search in Google Scholar
Zurbrügg, L. and Miner, K.N. (2016). ‘Gender, sexual orientation, and workplace incivility: Who is most targeted and who is most harmed?’ Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 565.ZurbrüggL.MinerK.N.2016‘Gender, sexual orientation, and workplace incivility: Who is most targeted and who is most harmed?’756510.3389/fpsyg.2016.00565Search in Google Scholar