This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Adams, R.J., Smart, P., & Huff, A.S. (2017). Shades of grey: guidelines for working with the grey literature in systematic reviews for management and organizational studies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19, 432–454.AdamsR.J.SmartP.HuffA.S.2017Shades of grey: guidelines for working with the grey literature in systematic reviews for management and organizational studiesInternational Journal of Management Reviews1943245410.1111/ijmr.12102Search in Google Scholar
Atkinson, L., & Cipriani, A. (2018). How to carry out a literature search for a systematic review: a practical guide. BJPsych Advances, 24(2), 74–82.AtkinsonL.CiprianiA.2018How to carry out a literature search for a systematic review: a practical guideBJPsych Advances242748210.1192/bja.2017.3Search in Google Scholar
Bassi, H., Lee, C.J., Misener, L., & Johnson, A.M. (2020). Exploring the characteristics of crowdsourcing: an online observational study. Journal of Information Science, 46(3), 291–312.BassiH.LeeC.J.MisenerL.JohnsonA.M.2020Exploring the characteristics of crowdsourcing: an online observational studyJournal of Information Science46329131210.1177/0165551519828626Search in Google Scholar
Boell, S.K., & Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2014). A hermeneutic approach for conducting literature reviews and literature searches. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 34(1), 257–286.BoellS.K.Cecez-KecmanovicD.2014A hermeneutic approach for conducting literature reviews and literature searchesCommunications of the Association for Information Systems34125728610.17705/1CAIS.03412Search in Google Scholar
Bramer, W.M., de Jonge,, G.B.., Rethlefsen L., Mast, F., & Kleijnen, J. (2018). A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106(4), 531–541.BramerW.M.de JongeG.B.RethlefsenL.MastF.KleijnenJ.2018A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searchesJournal of the Medical Library Association106453154110.5195/jmla.2018.283Search in Google Scholar
Bramer, W.M., Rethlefsen, M.L., Kleijnen, J., & Franco, O.H. (2017). Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study. Systematic Reviews, 6(245), 1–12.BramerW.M.RethlefsenM.L.KleijnenJ.FrancoO.H.2017Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory studySystematic Reviews624511210.1186/s13643-017-0644-ySearch in Google Scholar
Breretona, P., Kitchenhama, B.A., Budgenb, D., Turnera, M., & Khalilc, M. (2007). Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. Journal of Systems and Software, 80(4), 571–583.BreretonaP.KitchenhamaB.A.BudgenbD.TurneraM.KhalilcM.2007Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domainJournal of Systems and Software80457158310.1016/j.jss.2006.07.009Search in Google Scholar
Cronin, P., Ryan, F., & Coughlan, M. (2008). Undertaking a literature review: a step-by-step approach. British Journal of Nursing, 17(1), 38–43.CroninP.RyanF.CoughlanM.2008Undertaking a literature review: a step-by-step approachBritish Journal of Nursing171384310.12968/bjon.2008.17.1.28059Search in Google Scholar
Czakon, W. (2011). Metodyka systematycznego przeglądu literatury. Przegląd Organizacji, 3, 57–61.CzakonW.2011Metodyka systematycznego przeglądu literaturyPrzegląd Organizacji3576110.33141/po.2011.03.13Search in Google Scholar
Czakon, W., Klimas, P., & Kawa, A. (2019). Krótkowzroczność strategiczna – metodyczne aspekty systematycznego przeglądu literatury. Studia Oeconomica Posnaniensia, 7(2), 27–37.CzakonW.KlimasP.KawaA.2019Krótkowzroczność strategiczna – metodyczne aspekty systematycznego przeglądu literaturyStudia Oeconomica Posnaniensia72273710.18559/SOEP.2019.2.2Search in Google Scholar
Davis, J., Mengersen, K., Bennett, S., & Mazerolle, L. (2014). Viewing systematic reviews and meta-analysis in social research through different lenses. SpringerPlus, 3, 1–9.DavisJ.MengersenK.BennettS.MazerolleL.2014Viewing systematic reviews and meta-analysis in social research through different lensesSpringerPlus31910.1186/2193-1801-3-511Search in Google Scholar
Denyer, D., & Tranfield, D. (2009). Producing a systematic review. In D.A. Buchanan & A. Bryman (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational research methods (pp. 671–689). SAGE Publications Ltd.DenyerD.TranfieldD.2009Producing a systematic reviewInBuchananD.A.BrymanA.(Eds.),The SAGE handbook of organizational research methods671689SAGE Publications Ltd.Search in Google Scholar
Egger, M., Juni, P., Bartlett, C., Holenstein, F., & Sterne, J. (2003). How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study. Health Technology Assessment, 7(1), 1–76.EggerM.JuniP.BartlettC.HolensteinF.SterneJ.2003How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical studyHealth Technology Assessment7117610.3310/hta7010Search in Google Scholar
Falagas, M.E., Pitsouni, E.I., Malietzis, G.A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal, 22, 338–342.FalagasM.E.PitsouniE.I.MalietzisG.A.PappasG.2008Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknessesThe FASEB Journal2233834210.1096/fj.07-9492LSFSearch in Google Scholar
Ferguson, C.J., & Brannick, M.T. (2012). Publication bias in psychological science: Prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses. Psychological Methods, 17(1), 120–128.FergusonC.J.BrannickM.T.2012Publication bias in psychological science: Prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analysesPsychological Methods17112012810.1037/a0024445Search in Google Scholar
Fusar-Poli, P., Radua, J. (2018). Ten simple rules for conducting umbrella reviews. Evidence-Based Mental Health, 21, 95–100.Fusar-PoliP.RaduaJ.2018Ten simple rules for conducting umbrella reviewsEvidence-Based Mental Health219510010.1136/ebmental-2018-300014Search in Google Scholar
Gough, D., Thomas, J., & Oliver, S. (2012). Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. Systematic Reviews, 1(8), 1–9.GoughD.ThomasJ.OliverS.2012Clarifying differences between review designs and methodsSystematic Reviews181910.1186/2046-4053-1-28Search in Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, T. & Peacock, R. (2005). Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources. British Medical Journal, 331, 1064–1065.GreenhalghT.PeacockR.2005Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sourcesBritish Medical Journal3311064106510.1136/bmj.38636.593461.68Search in Google Scholar
Hiebl, M.R.W. (2021). Sample selection in systematic literature reviews of management research. Organizational Research Methods, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1094428120986851.HieblM.R.W.2021Sample selection in systematic literature reviews of management researchOrganizational Research Methodshttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1094428120986851.10.1177/1094428120986851Search in Google Scholar
Howe, J. (2006). The rise of crowdsourcing, Wired, 14.HoweJ.2006The rise of crowdsourcingWired14Search in Google Scholar
Ioannidis, J.P.A. (2016). The mass production of redundant, misleading, and conflicted systematic, reviews and meta-analyses. The Milbank Quarterly, 94(3), 485–514.IoannidisJ.P.A.2016The mass production of redundant, misleading, and conflicted systematic, reviews and meta-analysesThe Milbank Quarterly94348551410.1111/1468-0009.12210Search in Google Scholar
Kastner, M., Straus, S.E., McKibbon, K.A., & Goldsmith, C.H. (2009). The capture-mark-recapture technique can be used as a stopping rule when searching in systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(2), 149–157.KastnerM.StrausS.E.McKibbonK.A.GoldsmithC.H.2009The capture-mark-recapture technique can be used as a stopping rule when searching in systematic reviewsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology62214915710.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.06.001Search in Google Scholar
Khangura, S., Konnyu, K., Cushman, R., Grimshaw, J., Moher, D. (2012). Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach. Systematic Reviews, 1(1), 1–10.KhanguraS.KonnyuK.CushmanR.GrimshawJ.MoherD.2012Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approachSystematic Reviews1111010.1186/2046-4053-1-10Search in Google Scholar
Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Technical Report EBSE 2007-001, Keele University and Durham University Joint Report.KitchenhamB.ChartersS.2007Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineeringTechnical Report EBSE 2007-001, Keele University and Durham University Joint Report.Search in Google Scholar
Klimas, P., Czakon, W., & Fredrich, V. (2021). Strategy frames in coopetition: An examination of coopetition entry factors in high-tech firms. European Management Journal, https://www-1sciencedirect-1com-13wmmwumo09f7.hps.bj.uj.edu.pl/science/article/pii/S0263237321000554#bib28KlimasP.CzakonW.FredrichV.2021Strategy frames in coopetition: An examination of coopetition entry factors in high-tech firmsEuropean Management Journalhttps://www-1sciencedirect-1com-13wmmwumo09f7.hps.bj.uj.edu.pl/science/article/pii/S0263237321000554#bib2810.1016/j.emj.2021.04.005Search in Google Scholar
Klimas, P., Stańczyk, S., & Sachpazidu-Wójcicka, K. (2020). Metodyka systematycznego przeglądu literatury – wyzwania selekcji a posteriori podczas tworzenia bazy literatury. In Sopińska, A., & Modliński, A. (Eds). Współczesne zarządzanie – koncepcje i wyzwania, Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH, Warszawa.KlimasP.StańczykS.Sachpazidu-WójcickaK.2020Metodyka systematycznego przeglądu literatury – wyzwania selekcji a posteriori podczas tworzenia bazy literaturyInSopińskaA.ModlińskiA.(Eds).Współczesne zarządzanie – koncepcje i wyzwaniaOficyna Wydawnicza SGHWarszawaSearch in Google Scholar
Kraus, S., Breier, M., & Dasí-Rodríguez, S. (2020). The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal”, 16(3), 1023–1042.KrausS.BreierM.Dasí-RodríguezS.2020The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship researchInternational Entrepreneurship and Management Journal”1631023104210.1007/s11365-020-00635-4Search in Google Scholar
Lakhani, K., Jeppesen, L., Lohse, P., & Panetta, J. (2007). The value of openness in scientific problem solving, Working Paper, 07-050. Harvard Business School.LakhaniK.JeppesenL.LohseP.PanettaJ.2007The value of openness in scientific problem solving, Working Paper, 07-050Harvard Business SchoolSearch in Google Scholar
Lenart-Gansiniec, R., (2021). Systematyczny przegląd literatury w naukach społecznych. Przewodnik dla studentów, doktorantów i nie tylko. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa.Lenart-GansiniecR.2021Systematyczny przegląd literatury w naukach społecznych. Przewodnik dla studentów, doktorantów i nie tylkoWydawnictwo Naukowe ScholarWarszawaSearch in Google Scholar
Linnenluecke, M.K., Marrone, M., & Singh, A.K. (2020). Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses. Australian Journal of Management, 45(2), 175–194.LinnenlueckeM.K.MarroneM.SinghA.K.2020Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analysesAustralian Journal of Management45217519410.1177/0312896219877678Search in Google Scholar
Moher, D., Liberati, A., & Tetzlaff, J.A.D. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. Open Medicine”, 3(2), 123–130.MoherD.LiberatiA.TetzlaffJ.A.D.2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA StatementOpen Medicine32123130Search in Google Scholar
Okoli, C. (2015). A guide to conducting a standalone systematic literature review. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37(43), 879–910.OkoliC.2015A guide to conducting a standalone systematic literature reviewCommunications of the Association for Information Systems374387991010.17705/1CAIS.03743Search in Google Scholar
Palmatier, R.W., Houston, M.B., & Hulland, J. (2018). Review articles: Purpose, process, and structure. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science”, 46(1), 1–5.PalmatierR.W.HoustonM.B.HullandJ.2018Review articles: Purpose, process, and structureJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science”4611510.1007/s11747-017-0563-4Search in Google Scholar
Papaioannou, D., Sutton, A., Carroll, C., Booth, A., & Wong, R. (2010). Literature searching for social science systematic reviews: consideration of a range of search techniques. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 27, 114–122.PapaioannouD.SuttonA.CarrollC.BoothA.WongR.2010Literature searching for social science systematic reviews: consideration of a range of search techniquesHealth Information & Libraries Journal2711412210.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00863.xSearch in Google Scholar
Paré, G., & Templier, M. (2015). A framework for guiding and evaluating literature reviews. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37(6), 112–137.ParéG.TemplierM.2015A framework for guiding and evaluating literature reviewsCommunications of the Association for Information Systems37611213710.17705/1CAIS.03706Search in Google Scholar
Petrosino, A., Boruch, R.F., Soydan, H., Duggan, L., Sanchez-Meca, J. (2001), Meeting the challenges of evidence-based policy: The Campbell Collaboration. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 578, 14–34.PetrosinoA.BoruchR.F.SoydanH.DugganL.Sanchez-MecaJ.2001Meeting the challenges of evidence-based policy: The Campbell CollaborationAnnals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science578143410.1177/000271620157800102Search in Google Scholar
Petticrew, M., Roberts, H. (2012). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide (12th ed.). Blackwell Publishing.PetticrewM.RobertsH.2012Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide12th ed.Blackwell PublishingSearch in Google Scholar
Randolph, J. (2009). A guide to writing the dissertation literature review. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 14(13), 1–13.RandolphJ.2009A guide to writing the dissertation literature reviewPractical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation1413113Search in Google Scholar
Rojon, C., McDowall, A., & Saunders, M.N.K. (2011). On the experience of conducting a systematic review in industrial, work, and organizational psychology: yes, it is worthwhile. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 10(3), 133–138.RojonC.McDowallA.SaundersM.N.K.2011On the experience of conducting a systematic review in industrial, work, and organizational psychology: yes, it is worthwhileJournal of Personnel Psychology10313313810.1027/1866-5888/a000041Search in Google Scholar
Shaffril, H.A.M., Samah, A.A., & Samsuddin S.F. (2021). Guidelines for developing a systematic literature review for studies related to climate change adaptation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(18), 22265–2227.ShaffrilH.A.M.SamahA.A.SamsuddinS.F.2021Guidelines for developing a systematic literature review for studies related to climate change adaptationEnvironmental Science and Pollution Research281822265222710.1007/s11356-021-13178-0Search in Google Scholar
Shelby, L.B., & Vaske, J.J. (2008). Understanding meta-analysis: A review of the methodological literature. Leisure Sciences, 30(2), 96–110.ShelbyL.B.VaskeJ.J.2008Understanding meta-analysis: A review of the methodological literatureLeisure Sciences3029611010.1080/01490400701881366Search in Google Scholar
Short, J.C., Sharma, P., Lumpkin, G.T., & Pearson, A.W. (2016). Oh, the places we’ll go! reviewing past, present, and future possibilities in family business research. Family Business Review, 29(1), 11–16.ShortJ.C.SharmaP.LumpkinG.T.PearsonA.W.2016Oh, the places we’ll go! reviewing past, present, and future possibilities in family business researchFamily Business Review291111610.1177/0894486515622294Search in Google Scholar
Short, J. (2009). The art of writing a review article. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1312–1317.ShortJ.2009The art of writing a review articleJournal of Management3561312131710.1177/0149206309337489Search in Google Scholar
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: an overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.SnyderH.2019Literature review as a research methodology: an overview and guidelinesJournal of Business Research10433333910.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039Search in Google Scholar
Torraco, R.J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367.TorracoR.J.2005Writing integrative literature reviews guidelines and examplesHuman Resource Development Review4335636710.1177/1534484305278283Search in Google Scholar
Uhlmann, E.L., Ebersole, C.R., Chartier, C.R., Errington, T.M., Kidwell, M.C., Lai, C.K., McCarthy, R.J., Riegelman, A., Silberzahn, R., & Nosek, B.A. (2019). Scientific utopia III: crowdsourcing science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(5), 711–733.UhlmannE.L.EbersoleC.R.ChartierC.R.ErringtonT.M.KidwellM.C.LaiC.K.McCarthyR.J.RiegelmanA.SilberzahnR.NosekB.A.2019Scientific utopia III: crowdsourcing sciencePerspectives on Psychological Science14571173310.1177/1745691619850561Search in Google Scholar
Webster, J., & Watson, R.T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii–xxiii.WebsterJ.WatsonR.T.2002Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature reviewMIS Quarterly262xiiixxiiiSearch in Google Scholar
Williams, R.I., Clark, L.A., Clark, W.R., & Raffo, D.M. (2021). Re-examining systematic literature review in management research: additional benefits and execution protocols. European Management Journal, 39(4), 521–533.WilliamsR.I.ClarkL.A.ClarkW.R.RaffoD.M.2021Re-examining systematic literature review in management research: additional benefits and execution protocolsEuropean Management Journal39452153310.1016/j.emj.2020.09.007Search in Google Scholar
Xiao, Y, Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112.XiaoYWatsonM.2019Guidance on conducting a systematic literature reviewJournal of Planning Education and Research3919311210.1177/0739456X17723971Search in Google Scholar