[
AHMED, Farhaan Uddin. Right to be forgotten: a critique of the post-Costeja Gonzalez paradigm. Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, 2015, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 175–185. 2015. Available at: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/253527
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ANDRAŠKO, Jozef and MESARČÍK, Matúš. Those Who Shall Be Identified: The Data Protection Aspects of the Legal Framework for Electronic Identification in the European Union. TalTech Journal of European Studies, 2021, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 3–24. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2021-0012.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CARTER, Edward L. The Right To Be Forgotten. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication, 22 November 2016. Available at: https://oxfordre.com/communication/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-189.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CULIK, Nikolai; DÖPKE, Christian. About Forgetting and Being Forgotten. In HOEREN, Thomas, KOLANY-RAISER, Barbara (eds). Big Data in Context – Legal, Social and Technological Insights. Cham: Springer, 2018, pp. 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62461-7_3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
EICHENSEHR, Kristen. Data Extraterritoriality. Texas Law Review, 2017, vol. 96, pp. 145–160. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3009774.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FABBRINI, Federico and Edoardo CELESTE. The Right to Be Forgotten in the Digital Age: The Challenges of Data Protection Beyond Borders. German Law Journal, 2020, vol. 21, no. S1, pp. 55–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2020.14.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HAMUĽÁK, Ondrej, VARDANYAN, Lusine, KOCHARYAN, Hovsep. The Global Reach of the Right to be Forgotten through the Lenses of the Court of Justice of the European Union. Czech Yearbook of Public and Private International Law, 2021, vol. 2021, no. 12, pp. 196–211.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
JONES, Meg Leta. Ctrl + Z: The Right to Be Forgotten. New York: NYU Press, 2016, 256 p. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1803zhx.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KAGANOFF, Jay. Send the Word Over There: An Offshore Solution to the Right to Be Forgotten. Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 2021, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 245–271. Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njilb/vol41/iss2/4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KOCHARYAN, Hovsep; VARDANYAN, Lusine; HAMUĽÁK, Ondrej; KERIKMÄE, Tanel. Critical Views on the Right to Be Forgotten After the Entry Into Force of the GDPR: Is it Able to Effectively Ensure Our Privacy? International and Comparative Law Review, 2021, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 96–115. https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2021-0015
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LAMBERT, Paul. The Right to Be Forgotten. London: Bloomsbury Professional, 2019, 544 p. Available at: https://www.bloomsburyprofessional.com/uk/right-to-be-forgotten-9781526521958/.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LIEVENS, Eva & VANDER Maelen, Carl. A Child’s Right to be Forgotten: Letting Go of the Past and Embracing the Future? Latin American Law Review, 2019, no. 2, pp. 61–79. Available at: https://revistas.uniandes.edu.co/doi/pdf/10.29263/lar02.2019.03.10.29263/lar02.2019.03
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MACH, Martin. Streisand Effect in the Context of the Right to be Forgotten. European Studies – the Review of European Law, Economics and Politics, 2022, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 110–121, DOI: 10.2478/eustu-2022-0005.10.2478/eustu-2022-0005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MARKS, Demi. The Internet Doesn’t Forget: Redefining Privacy Through an American Right to Be Forgotten. UCLA Entertainment Law Review, 2016, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 41–64. Available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4n00j4j310.5070/LR8231034309
]Search in Google Scholar
[
REES, Mark. Droit à l’oubli : l’effet Streisand peut être évité dans les décisions de la CJUE”. Nextimpact.com, 14 March 2017. Available at: https://www.nextinpact.com/article/25880/103671-droit-a-oubli-effet-streisand-peut-etre-evite-dans-decisions-cjue?fbclid=IwAR3KQQEmXTXq8ifKNeNl8y26xOAta-IfQHUrMkvzYfd5oJPrGD4ncBFzLLg
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SAMONTE, Mary. Google v CNIL Case C-507/17: The Territorial Scope of the Right to be Forgotten Under EU Law. European Law Blog, 29 October 2019. Available at: https://europeanlawblog.eu/2019/10/29/google-v-cnil-case-c-507-17-the-territorial-scope-of-the-right-to-be-forgotten-under-eu-law/.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
VAN HOBOKEN, Joris V.J. The Proposed Right to be Forgotten Seen from the Perspective of Our Right to Remember Freedom of Expression Safeguards in a Converging Information Environment. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2013, 30 p. Available at: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC86747.
]Search in Google Scholar
