[
AKKERMANS, Bram. The Principle of Numerous Clausus in European Property Law. Intersentia, 2008.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Article 29 Data Protection Working Party. Opinion 4/2007 on the concept of personal data. [online]. Available at: <https://ec.europa.eu/justice/article-29/documentation/opinion-recommendation/files/2007/wp136_en.pdf> Accessed 15.10.2021.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BALOUP, Julie. et al. White Paper on the Data Governance Act. [online]. Available at: <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3872703> Accessed 15.10.2021, p. 12–13.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BIRCH, Kean – COCHRANE, DT – WARD. Callum. Data as asset? The measurement, governance, and valuation of digital personal data by Big Tech. Big Data & Society, January–June: 1–15.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PIERRE, Barbara. Classification of Property and Conceptions of Ownershipin Civil and Common Law. Revue générale de droit, 28(2), 1997, pp. 235–274.10.7202/1035639ar
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BYGRAVE, Lee. Data Protection Law: Approaching Its Rationale, Logic and Limits. Kluwer Law International; 1st edition, 2002.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CARPENTER, Christian. Privacy and Proportionality: Examining Mass Electronic Surveillance under Article 8 and the Fourth Amendment. International and Comparative Law Review, vol.20, no.1, 2020, pp. 27–57. <https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2020-0002>.10.2478/iclr-2020-0002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Court of Justice of the European Union. C-131/12. Google Spain SL and Google Inc. v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja González. 13 May 2014.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Court of Justice of the European Union. C-434/16 Peter Nowak v Data Protection Commissioner. 20 December 2017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Court of Justice of the European Union. C-582/14 Patrick Breyer v Bundesrepublik Deutschland. 19 October 2016.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Data Protection Report. EU’s possible Data Act: What can we anticipate from the Inception Impact Assessment and the Consultation? [online]. Available at: <https://www.data-protectionreport.com/2021/07/eus-possible-data-act-what-can-we-anticipate-from-the-inception-impact-assessment-and-the-consultation/> Accessed 15.10.2021.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DE HINGH, Anne. Some Reflections on Dignity as an Alternative Legal Concept in Data Protection Regulation’ German Law Journal, (2018) 19, pp. 1269–1290.10.1017/S2071832200023038
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Commission. COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT on the free flow of data and emerging issues of the European data economy, point. 4. [online].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Union. European Data Strategy. [online]. Available at: <https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/europe-fit-digital-age/european-data-strategy>. Accessed 15.10.2021.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Union. Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on European data governance (Data Governance Act). COM/2020/767 final.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FUNTA, Rastislav. Obchodovanie s osobnými údajmi z pohľadu hospodárskej súťaže (essential facility). Justičná Revue, 1/2020, 2020.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GÁBRIŠ, Tomáš – HAMUĽÁK, Ondrej. Pandemics in Cyberspace – Empire in Search of a Sovereign? Baltic Journal of Law & Politics, vol.14, no.1, 2021, pp.103–123.10.2478/bjlp-2021-0005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Google. EU Transparency Report. [online]. Available at: <https://transparencyreport.google.com/eu-privacy/overview?hl=en> Accessed 15.10.2021.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GORDLEY, James. Foundations of Private Law: Property, Tort, Contract, Unjust Enrichment. Oxford University Press, 2016.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GRAEF, Inge – HUSOVEC, Martin – PURTOVA, Nadezhda. Data Portability and Data Control: Lessons for an Emerging Concept in EU Law. German Law Journal 2018, vol. 19 no. 6, p. 1359–1398.10.1017/S2071832200023075
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HAMUĽÁK, Ondrej – KISS, Lilla Nóra – GÁBRIŠ, Tomáš – KOCHARYAN, Hovsep. This Content is not Available in your Country. A General Summary on Geo-Blocking in and Outside the European Union. International and Comparative Law Review. 2021;21(1): 153–183. <https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2021-0006>.10.2478/iclr-2021-0006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
JANEČEK, Václav. Ownership of Personal Data in the Internet of Things. Computer Law & Security Review, 2018, 34(5).10.1016/j.clsr.2018.04.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
JEŽOVÁ, Daniela. Sharing Economy in Digital Single Market EU – a Phenomena with Future Potential. European Studies, vol. 7, 2020, pp. 218–236.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KASPER, Agnes – KRASZNAY, Csaba. Towards Pollution-Control in Cyberspa-ce: Problem Structure and Institutional Design. International Cybersecurity. International and Comparative Law Review, 2019, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 76–96.10.2478/iclr-2019-0015
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SCHLOETTER, A. Lucas. EU Copyright law, A Commentary. Is there a concept of European copyright law? History, evolution, policies and politics and the acquis Communautaire. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2014, p.14.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
OECD. The Economics of Personal Data and Privacy: 30 Years after the OECD Privacy Guidelines. [online]. Available at: <https://www.oecd.org/sti/ieconomy/theeconomicsofpersonaldataandprivacy30yearsaftertheoecdprivacyguidelines.htm> Accessed 15.10.2021.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PEARCE, Henry. Could the doctrine of moral rights be used as a basis for understanding the notion of control within data protection law? Information & Communications Technology Law, Volume 27, 2018, Issue 2.10.1080/13600834.2018.1458449
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PURTOVA, Nadezhda. Do property rights in personal data make sense after the Big Data turn? Individual control and transparency. Journal of Law and Economic Regulation November 2017, 10(2).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PURTOVA, Nadezhda. Health Data for Common Good: Defining the Boundaries and Social Dilemmas of Data Commons. LEENES, Ronald et al (eds). Under Observation – The Interplay Between eHealth and Surveillance, 2017 Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-48342-9_10
]Search in Google Scholar
[
RATTI, Mathilde. Personal-Data and Consumer Protection: What do They Have in Common? Studies on Intellectual Property and Competition Law, (2018) 28 pp. 377–393.10.1007/978-3-662-57646-5_14
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ROSTOW, Theodore. What Happens When an Acquaintance Buys Your Data? A New Privacy Harm in the Age of Data Brokers. Yale Jornal on Regulation, 2017, 34.10.2139/ssrn.2870044
]Search in Google Scholar
[
The Guardian. Facebook launches app that will pay users for their data. [online].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
VIERIA, Helena. The economic value of personal data for online platforms, firms and consumers. [online]. Available at: <https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/businessreview/2016/01/19/the-economic-value-of-personal-data-for-online-platforms-firms-and-consumers/>. Accessed 15.10.2021.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
YU, Xiaolan. – ZHAO, Yun. Dualism in data protection: Balancing the right to personal data and the data property right, Computer Law & Security Review, Volume 35, Issue 5, 2019.10.1016/j.clsr.2019.04.001
]Search in Google Scholar
