<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p> This Paper addresses the right to informed consent regarding euthanasia using international conventions and, to a lesser extent, national laws and policies. Spe­cifically, The United States, Belgium and the Netherlands will be examined. The Paper specifically discusses legal capacity, the right to consent and the right to information. Three stories are used to argue the importance of implementing effective safeguards for these rights and notes that these safeguards are necessary regardless of whether or not euthanasia is legalized in a state. This Paper also argues that patients should not be offered euthanasia for mental illnesses. The ethical debate surrounding whether euthanasia should be permitted generally is not discussed.</p></abstract>

This Paper addresses the right to informed consent regarding euthanasia using international conventions and, to a lesser extent, national laws and policies. Spe­cifically, The United States, Belgium and the Netherlands will be examined. The Paper specifically discusses legal capacity, the right to consent and the right to information. Three stories are used to argue the importance of implementing effective safeguards for these rights and notes that these safeguards are necessary regardless of whether or not euthanasia is legalized in a state. This Paper also argues that patients should not be offered euthanasia for mental illnesses. The ethical debate surrounding whether euthanasia should be permitted generally is not discussed.

Informed Consent and Euthanasia: An International Human Rights Perspective

International and Comparative Law Review

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

{"article-title":"Informed Consent and Euthanasia: An International Human Rights Perspective"}

This Paper addresses the right to informed consent regarding euthanasia using international conventions and, to a lesser extent, national laws and policies....

Informed Consent and Euthanasia: An International Human Rights Perspective

Online veröffentlicht: 05. Feb. 2019

Seitenbereich: 118 - 133

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2018-0041

Schlüsselwörter
Informed Consent, Euthanasia, Terminally Ill, Mentally Ill, United States, Belgium, Netherlands, Human Rights

© 2019 Jessica McKenney, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Informed Consent and Euthanasia: An International Human Rights Perspective

Online veröffentlicht: 05. Feb. 2019

Seitenbereich: 118 - 133

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2018-0041

SchlüsselwörterInformed Consent, Euthanasia, Terminally Ill, Mentally Ill, United States, Belgium, Netherlands, Human Rights

© 2019 Jessica McKenney, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Schlüsselwörter
Informed Consent, Euthanasia, Terminally Ill, Mentally Ill, United States, Belgium, Netherlands, Human Rights