[Abeysinghe, S. 2009. Effect of combined use of Bacillus subtilis CA32 and Trichoderma harzianum RUOI on biological control of Rhizoctonia solani on Solanum melongena and Capsicum annuum. Plant Pathology Journal, 8: 9-16.10.3923/ppj.2009.9.16]Search in Google Scholar
[Abhilash, P.C., Dubey, R. K., Tripathi, V., Gupta, V. K. and Singh, H.B. 2016. Plant growth-promoting microorganisms for environmental sustainability. Trends in Biotechnology, 34(11): 847-850.10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.05.00527265889]Search in Google Scholar
[Adesemoye, A.O. and Kloepper, J.W. 2009. Plant–microbes interactions in enhanced fertilizer-use efficiency. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 85(1): 1-12.10.1007/s00253-009-2196-019707753]Search in Google Scholar
[Agusti, L., Bonaterra, A., Moragrega, C., Camps, J. and Montesinos, E. 2011. Biocontrol of root rot of strawberry caused by Phytophthora cactorum with a combination of two Pseudomonas fluorescens strains. Journal of Plant Pathology, 93(2): 363-372.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ahkami, A.H., White III, R.A., Handakumbura, P.P. and Jansson, C. 2017. Rhizosphere engineering: Enhancing sustainable plant ecosystem productivity. Rhizosphere, 3: 233-243.10.1016/j.rhisph.2017.04.012]Search in Google Scholar
[Alamri, S.A., Hashem, M., Mostafa, Y. S., Nafady, N. A. and Abo-Elyousr, K. A. 2019. Biological control of root rot in lettuce caused by Exserohilum rostratum and Fusarium oxysporum via induction of the defense mechanism. Biological Control, 128: 76-84.10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.09.014]Search in Google Scholar
[Ali, A.Α., ABD El-Kader, A.E.S. and Ghoneem K.H.M. 2018. Two Trichoderma species and Bacillus subtilis as biocontrol agents against rhizoctonia disease and their influence on potato productivity. Egyptian Journal Agricultural Research, 95: 527-540.10.21608/ejar.2017.147354]Search in Google Scholar
[Alizadeh, H., Behboudi, K., Ahmadzadeh, M., Javan-Nikkhah, M., Zamioudis, C., Pieterse, C.M. and Bakker, P.A. 2013. Induced systemic resistance in cucumber and Arabidopsis thaliana by the combination of Trichoderma harzianum Tr6 and Pseudomonas sp. Ps14. Biological Control, 65(1): 14-23.10.1016/j.biocontrol.2013.01.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Aloo, B.N., Makumba, B.A. and Mbega, E.R. 2019. The potential of bacilli rhizobacteria for sustainable crop production and environmental sustainability. Microbiological Research, 219: 26-39.10.1016/j.micres.2018.10.011]Search in Google Scholar
[Anith, K.N., Faseela, K.M., Archana, P.A. and Prathapan, K.D. 2011. Compatibility of Piriformospora indica and Trichoderma harzianum as dual inoculants in black pepper (Piper nigrum L.). Symbiosis, 55(1): 11-17.10.1007/s13199-011-0143-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Anith, K.N., Sreekumar, A. and Sreekumar, J. 2015. The growth of tomato seedlings inoculated with co-cultivated Piriformospora indica and Bacillus pumilus. Symbiosis, 65(1): 9-16.10.1007/s13199-015-0313-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Ansari, F.A. and Ahmad, I. 2019. Fluorescent Pseudomonas-FAP2 and Bacillus licheniformis interact positively in biofilm mode enhancing plant growth and photosynthetic attributes. Scientific Reports, 9(1): 4547.10.1038/s41598-019-40864-4641812330872708]Search in Google Scholar
[Arnold, A.E., Mejía, L.C., Kyllo, D., Rojas, E.I., Maynard, Z., Robbins, N. and Herre, E.A. 2003. Fungal endophytes limit pathogen damage in a tropical tree. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(26), 15649-15654.10.1073/pnas.2533483100]Search in Google Scholar
[Bashan, Y., de-Bashan, L. E., Prabhu, S. R. and Hernandez, J.P. 2014. Advances in plant growth-promoting bacterial inoculant technology: formulations and practical perspectives (1998–2013). Plant and Soil, 378(1-2): 1-33.10.1007/s11104-013-1956-x]Search in Google Scholar
[Becker, J., Eisenhauer, N., Scheu, S. and Jousset, A. 2012. Increasing antagonistic interactions cause bacterial communities to collapse at high diversity. Ecology Letters, 15(5): 468-474.10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01759.x22394557]Search in Google Scholar
[Berg, G. 2009. Plant–microbe interactions promoting plant growth and health: perspectives for controlled use of microorganisms in agriculture. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 84(1): 11-18.10.1007/s00253-009-2092-719568745]Search in Google Scholar
[Berlec, A. 2012. Novel techniques and findings in the study of plant microbiota: search for plant probiotics. Plant Science, 193: 96-102.10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.05.01022794922]Search in Google Scholar
[Berta, G., Copetta, A., Gamalero, E., Bona, E., Cesaro, P., Scarafoni, A. and D’Agostino, G. 2014. Maize development and grain quality are differentially affected by mycorrhizal fungi and a growth-promoting pseudomonad in the field. Mycorrhiza, 24(3): 161-170.10.1007/s00572-013-0523-x23995918]Search in Google Scholar
[Brewer, M.T. and Larkin, R.P. 2005. Efficacy of several potential biocontrol organisms against Rhizoctonia solani on potato. Crop Protection, 24(11): 939-950.10.1016/j.cropro.2005.01.012]Search in Google Scholar
[Castanheira, N.L., Dourado, A.C., Pais, I., Semedo, J., Scotti-Campos, P., Borges, N., Carvalho G, Barreto Crespo M.T. and Fareleira, P. 2017. Colonization and beneficial effects on annual ryegrass by mixed inoculation with plant growth promoting bacteria. Microbiological Research, 198: 47-55.10.1016/j.micres.2017.01.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Chemeltorit, P.P., Mutaqin, K.H. and Widodo, W. 2017. Combining Trichoderma hamatum THSW13 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa BJ10–86: a synergistic chili pepper seed treatment for Phytophthora capsici infested soil. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 147(1): 157-166.10.1007/s10658-016-0988-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Chirino-Valle, I., Kandula, D., Littlejohn, C., Hill, R., Walker, M., Shields, M., Cummings, N., Hettiarachchi, D.. and Wratten, S. 2016. Potential of the beneficial fungus Trichoderma to enhance ecosystem-service provision in the biofuel grass Miscanthus x giganteus in agriculture. Scientific Reports, 6: 25109.10.1038/srep25109484687327117716]Search in Google Scholar
[Cota, L.V., Maffia, L.A., Mizubuti, E.S., Macedo, P.E. and Antunes, R. F. 2008. Biological control of strawberry gray mold by Clonostachys rosea under field conditions. Biological Control, 46(3): 515-522.10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.04.023]Search in Google Scholar
[Couillerot, O., Combes-Meynet, E., Pothier, J. F., Bellvert, F., Challita, E., Poirier, M. A., Rohr, R., Comte, G., Moënne-Loccoz, Y. and Prigent-Combaret, C. 2011. The role of the antimicrobial compound 2, 4-diacetylphloroglucinol in the impact of biocontrol Pseudomonas fluorescens F113 on Azospirillum brasilense phytostimulators. Micro-biology, 157(6): 1694-1705.10.1099/mic.0.043943-021273247]Search in Google Scholar
[da Silva, J.A.T., de Medeiros, E.V., da Silva, J.M., Tenório, D.D.A., Moreira, K.A., Nascimento, T.C. E.D.S. and Souza-Motta, C. 2016. Trichoderma aureoviride URM 5158 and Trichoderma hamatum URM 6656 are biocontrol agents that act against cassava root rot through diff erent mechanisms. Journal of Phytopathology, 164(11-12): 1003-1011.10.1111/jph.12521]Search in Google Scholar
[De Boer, M., van der Sluis, I., van Loon, L.C. and Bakker, P.A. 1999. Combining fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. strains to enhance suppression of fusarium wilt of radish. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 105(2): 201-210.10.1023/A:1008761729073]Search in Google Scholar
[De Vrieze, M., Germanier, F., Vuille, N. and Weisskopf, L. 2018. Combining different potato-associated Pseudomonas strains for improved biocontrol of Phytophthora infestans. Frontiers in Microbiology, 9: 2573.10.3389/fmicb.2018.02573]Search in Google Scholar
[Deveau, A., Gross, H., Palin, B., Mehnaz, S., Schnepf, M., Leblond, P., Dorrestein, P.C. and Aigle, B. 2016. Role of secondary metabolites in the interaction between Pseudomonas fluorescens and soil microorganisms under iron-limited conditions. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 92(8): fiw107.10.1093/femsec/fiw107]Search in Google Scholar
[Domenech, J., Reddy, M.S., Kloepper, J.W., Ramos, B., and Gutierrez-Manero, J. 2006. Combined application of the biological product LS213 with Bacillus, Pseudomonas or Chryseobacterium for growth promotion and biological control of soil-borne diseases in pepper and tomato. Bio-Control, 51(2): 245.10.1007/s10526-005-2940-z]Search in Google Scholar
[Emami, S., Alikhani, H. A., Pourbabaei, A. A., Etesami, H., Motashare Zadeh, B. and Sarmadian, F. 2018. Improved growth and nutrient acquisition of wheat genotypes in phosphorus deficient soils by plant growth-promoting rhizospheric and endophytic bacteria. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 64(6): 719-727.10.1080/00380768.2018.1510284]Search in Google Scholar
[Emami, S., Alikhani, H.A., Pourbabaei, A.A., Etesami, H., Sarmadian, F. and Motessharezadeh, B. 2019. Effect of rhizospheric and endophytic bacteria with multiple plant growth promoting traits on wheat growth. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-10.10.1007/s11356-019-05284-x]Search in Google Scholar
[Foster, K.R. and Bell, T. 2012. Competition, not cooperation, dominates interactions among culturable microbial species. Current Biology, 22(19): 1845-1850.10.1016/j.cub.2012.08.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Friedman, J., Higgins, L.M. and Gore, J. 2017. Community structure follows simple assembly rules in microbial microcosms. Nature Ecology and Evolution, 1(5): 0109.10.1038/s41559-017-0109]Search in Google Scholar
[Fuga, C.A.G., Lopes, E.A., Vieira, B.S. and da Cunha, W.V. 2016. Efficiency and compatibility of Trichoderma spp. and Bacillus spp. isolates on the inhibition of Sclerotium cepivorum. Científica, 44(4): 526-531.10.15361/1984-5529.2016v44n4p526-531]Search in Google Scholar
[García, R.A.M., Ten Hoopen, G.M., Kass, D.C., Garita, V.A.S. and Krauss, U. 2003. Evaluation of myco-parasites as biocontrol agents of Rosellinia root rot in cocoa. Biological Control, 27(2): 210-227.10.1016/S1049-9644(03)00014-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Georgakopoulos, D.G., Fiddaman, P., Leifert, C. and Malathrakis, N.E. 2002. Biological control of cucumber and sugar beet damping-off caused by Pythium ultimum with bacterial and fungal antagonists. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 92(6): 1078-1086.10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01658.x12010548]Search in Google Scholar
[Großkopf, T. and Soyer, O.S. 2014. Synthetic microbial communities. Current Opinion in Microbiology, 18: 72-77.10.1016/j.mib.2014.02.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Guetsky, R., Elad, Y., Shtienberg, D. and Dinoor, A. 2002. Improved biocontrol of Botrytis cinerea on detached strawberry leaves by adding nutritional supplements to a mixture of Pichia guilermondii and Bacillus mycoides. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 12(5): 625-630.10.1080/0958315021000016289]Search in Google Scholar
[Guijarro, B., Larena, I., Casals, C., Teixidó, N., Melgarejo, P. and De Cal, A. 2019. Compatibility interactions between the biocontrol agent Penicillium frequentans Pf909 and other existing strategies to brown rot control. Biological Control, 129: 45-54.10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.11.011]Search in Google Scholar
[Haas, D. and Défago, G. 2005. Biological control of soil-borne pathogens by fluorescent pseudomonads. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 3(4): 307.10.1038/nrmicro112915759041]Search in Google Scholar
[Hassani, M.A., Durán, P. and Hacquard, S. 2018. Microbial interactions within the plant holobiont. Microbiome, 6(1): 58.10.1186/s40168-018-0445-0587068129587885]Search in Google Scholar
[Hidalgo, E., Bateman, R., Krauss, U., Ten Hoopen, M., and Martínez, A. 2003. A field investigation into delivery systems for agents to control Moniliophthora roreri. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 109(9): 953-961.10.1023/B:EJPP.0000003746.16934.e2]Search in Google Scholar
[Hol, W. H., Bezemer, T. M. and Biere, A. 2013. Getting the ecology into interactions between plants and the plant growth-promoting bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens. Frontiers in Plant Science, 4, 81.10.3389/fpls.2013.00081]Search in Google Scholar
[Hu, J., Wei, Z., Friman, V.P., Gu, S.H., Wang, X.F., Eisenhauer, N., Yang, T.J., Ma, J., Shen, Q.R., Xu Y.C. and Jousset, A. 2016. Probiotic diversity enhances rhizosphere microbiome function and plant disease suppression. MBio, 7(6): e01790-16.10.1128/mBio.01790-16]Search in Google Scholar
[Hussein, A., Abbasi, S., Sharifi, R. and Jamali, S. 2018. The effect of biocontrol agents consortia against Rhizoctonia root rot of common bean Phaseolus vulgaris. Journal of Crop Protection, 7(1): 73-85.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jain, A., Singh, A., Chaudhary, A., Singh, S. and Singh, H.B. 2014. Modulation of nutritional and anti-oxidant potential of seeds and pericarp of pea pods treated with microbial consortium. Food Research International, 64: 275-282.10.1016/j.foodres.2014.06.033]Search in Google Scholar
[Jain, A., Singh, A., Singh, S. and Singh, H.B. 2013. Microbial consortium-induced changes in oxidative stress markers in pea plants challenged with Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 32(2): 388-398.10.1007/s00344-012-9307-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Jain, A., Singh, A., Singh, S. and Singh, H.B. 2015. Biological management of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in pea using plant growth promoting microbial consortium. Journal of Basic Microbiology, 55(8): 961-972.10.1002/jobm.201400628]Search in Google Scholar
[Jain, A., Singh, S., Kumar Sarma, B. and Bahadur Singh, H. 2012. Microbial consortium–mediated reprogramming of defence network in pea to enhance tolerance against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 112(3): 537-550.10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05220.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Jambhulkar, P.P., Sharma, P., Manokaran, R., Lakshman, D.K., Rokadia, P. and Jambhulkar, N. 2018. Assessing synergism of combined applications of Trichoderma harzianum and Pseudomonas fluorescens to control blast and bacterial leaf blight of rice. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 152(3): 747-757.10.1007/s10658-018-1519-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Jetiyanon, K., Fowler, W.D. and Kloepper, J.W. 2003. Broad-spectrum protection against several pathogens by PGPR mixtures under field conditions in Thailand. Plant Disease, 87(11): 1390-1394.10.1094/PDIS.2003.87.11.1390]Search in Google Scholar
[Jiang, Z.Q., Guo, Y.H., Li, S.M., Qi, H.Y. and Guo, J.H. 2006. Evaluation of biocontrol efficiency of different Bacillus preparations and field application methods against Phytophthora blight of bell pepper. Biological Control, 36(2): 216-223.10.1016/j.biocontrol.2005.10.012]Search in Google Scholar
[Jisha, M.S. and Alagawadi, A.R. 1996. Nutrient up-take and yield of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) inoculated with phosphate solubilizing bacteria and cellulolytic fungus in a cotton stalk amended vertisol. Microbiological Research, 151(2): 213-217.10.1016/S0944-5013(96)80046-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Jousset, A., Becker, J., Chatterjee, S., Karlovsky, P., Scheu, S. and Eisenhauer, N. 2014. Biodiversity and species identity shape the antifungal activity of bacterial communities. Ecology, 95(5): 1184-1190.10.1890/13-1215.125000750]Search in Google Scholar
[Kamou, N.N., Dubey, M., Tzelepis, G., Menexes, G., Papadakis, E.N., Karlsson, M., Lagopodi, A.L. and Jensen, D.F. 2016. Investigating the compatibility of the biocontrol agent Clonostachys rosea IK726 with prodigiosin-producing Serratia rubidaea S55 and phenazine-producing Pseudomonas chlororaphis ToZa7. Archives of Microbiology, 198(4): 369-377.10.1007/s00203-016-1198-426860841]Search in Google Scholar
[Kapongo, J.P., Shipp, L., Kevan, P. and Sutton, J.C. 2008. Co-vectoring of Beauveria bassiana and Clonostachys rosea by bumble bees (Bombus impatiens) for control of insect pests and suppression of grey mould in greenhouse tomato and sweet pepper. Biological Control, 46(3): 508-514.10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.05.008]Search in Google Scholar
[Kashyap, P.L., Rai, P., Srivastava, A.K. and Kumar, S. 2017. Trichoderma for climate resilient agriculture. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 33(8): 155.10.1007/s11274-017-2319-128695465]Search in Google Scholar
[Karlsson, M., Durling, M. B., Choi, J., Kosawang, C., Lackner, G., Tzelepis, G.D., Nygren K., Dubey, M.K., Kamou, N., Levasseur, A., Zapparata, A., Wang, J., Amby, D.B., Jensen, B., Sarrocco, S., Panteris, E., Lagopodi, A.L., Pöggeler, S., Vannacci, G., Collinge, D.B., Hoffmeister, D., Henrissat, B., Lee, Y.H. and Jensen, D.F. 2015. Insights on the evolution of mycoparasitism from the genome of Clonostachys rosea. Genome Biology and Evolution, 7(2): 465-480.10.1093/gbe/evu292435017125575496]Search in Google Scholar
[Karthiba, L., Saveetha, K., Suresh, S., Raguchander, T., Saravanakumar, D. and Samiyappan, R. 2010. PGPR and entomopathogenic fungus bioformulation for the synchronous management of leaffolder pest and sheath blight disease of rice. Pest Management Science: formerly Pesticide Science, 66(5): 555-564.10.1002/ps.190720069626]Search in Google Scholar
[Kelsic, E. D., Zhao, J., Vetsigian, K. and Kishony, R. 2015. Counteraction of antibiotic production and degradation stabilizes microbial communities. Nature, 521(7553): 516.10.1038/nature14485455141025992546]Search in Google Scholar
[Keyser, C.A., Jensen, B. and Meyling, N.V. 2016. Dual effects of Metarhizium spp. and Clonostachys rosea against an insect and a seed-borne pathogen in wheat. Pest Management Science, 72(3): 517-526.10.1002/ps.401525827357]Search in Google Scholar
[Kim, W.G., Weon, H.Y., Seok, S.J. and Lee, K.H. 2008. In vitro antagonistic characteristics of bacilli isolates against Trichoderma spp. and three species of mushrooms. Mycobiology, 36(4): 266-269.10.4489/MYCO.2008.36.4.266375520723997638]Search in Google Scholar
[Kloepper, J.W., Leong, J., Teintze, M. and Schroth, M.N. 1980. Enhanced plant growth by siderophores produced by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Nature, 286(5776): 885.10.1038/286885a0]Search in Google Scholar
[Kloepper, J.W., Ryu, C.M. and Zhang, S. 2004. Induced systemic resistance and promotion of plant growth by Bacillus spp. Phytopathology, 94(11): 1259-1266.10.1094/PHYTO.2004.94.11.125918944464]Search in Google Scholar
[Kokalis-Burelle, N., Kloepper, J.W. and Reddy, M.S. 2006. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria as transplant amendments and their effects on indigenous rhizosphere microorganisms. Applied Soil Ecology, 31(1-2): 91-100.10.1016/j.apsoil.2005.03.007]Search in Google Scholar
[Korada, S.K., Yarla, N.S., Mishra, V., Daim, M. A., Sharma, B., Ashraf, G.M., Reggi, R., Palmery, M., Peluso, I. and Kamal, M.A. 2018. Single Probiotic versus Multiple Probiotics-A Debate On Current Scenario for Alleviating Health Benefits. Current Pharmaceutical Design, 24(35): 4150-4153.10.2174/138161282466618101212413630317991]Search in Google Scholar
[Krauss, U. and Soberanis, W. 2001. Biocontrol of cocoa pod diseases with mycoparasite mixtures. Biological control, 22(2): 149-158.10.1006/bcon.2001.0956]Search in Google Scholar
[Krauss, U., Hidalgo, E., Arroyo, C. and Piper, S.R. 2004. Interaction between the entomopathogens Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae and Paecilomyces fumosoroseus and the mycopara-sites Clonostachys spp., Trichoderma harzianum and Lecanicillium lecanii. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 14(4): 331-346.10.1080/09583150410001665196]Search in Google Scholar
[Krauss, U., Ten Hoopen, M., Rees, R., Stirrup, T., Argyle, T., George, A., Arroyo, C., Corrales, E. and Casanoves, F. 2013. Mycoparasitism by Clonostachys byssicola and Clonostachys rosea on Trichoderma spp. from cocoa (Theobroma cacao) and implication for the design of mixed biocontrol agents. Biological Control, 67(3): 317-327.10.1016/j.biocontrol.2013.09.011]Search in Google Scholar
[Kumar, M., Mishra, S., Dixit, V., Kumar, M., Agarwal, L., Chauhan, P. S., and Nautiyal, C.S. 2016. Synergistic effect of Pseudomonas putida and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens ameliorates drought stress in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Plant Signaling and Behavior, 11(1): e1071004.10.1080/15592324.2015.1071004]Search in Google Scholar
[Liu, H.X., Li, S.M., Luo, Y.M., Luo, L.X., Li, J.Q. and Guo, J. H. 2014. Biological control of Ralstonia wilt, Phytophthora blight, Meloidogyne root-knot on bell pepper by the combination of Bacillus subtilis AR12, Bacillus subtilis SM21 and Chryseobacterium sp. R89. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 139(1): 107-116.10.1007/s10658-013-0369-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Liu, K., Garrett, C., Fadamiro, H. and Kloepper, J.W. 2016a. Induction of systemic resistance in Chinese cabbage against black rot by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Biological Control, 99: 8-13.10.1016/j.biocontrol.2016.04.007]Search in Google Scholar
[Liu, K., Garrett, C., Fadamiro, H. and Kloepper, J.W. 2016b. Antagonism of black rot in cabbage by mixtures of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). BioControl, 61(5): 605-613.10.1007/s10526-016-9742-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Liu, K., McInroy, J. A., Hu, C.H., and Kloepper, J.W. 2018. Mixtures of plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria enhance biological control of multiple plant diseases and plant-growth promotion in the presence of pathogens. Plant Disease, 102(1): 67-72.10.1094/PDIS-04-17-0478-RE30673446]Search in Google Scholar
[Liu, K., Newman, M., McInroy, J.A., Hu, C. H. and Kloepper, J.W. 2017. Selection and assessment of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria for biological control of multiple plant diseases. Phytopathology, 107(8): 928-936.10.1094/PHYTO-02-17-0051-R28440700]Search in Google Scholar
[Lugtenberg, B.J., Caradus, J.R. and Johnson, L.J. 2016. Fungal endophytes for sustainable crop production. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 92(12).10.1093/femsec/fiw19427624083]Search in Google Scholar
[Lyons, N.A. and Kolter, R. 2017. Bacillus subtilis protects public goods by extending kin discrimination to closely related species. MBio, 8(4): e00723-17.10.1128/mBio.00723-17]Search in Google Scholar
[Maketon, M., Apisitsantikul, J. and Siriraweekul, C. 2008. Greenhouse evaluation of Bacillus subtilis AP-01 and Trichoderma harzianum AP-001 in controlling tobacco diseases. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 39(2): 296-300.10.1590/S1517-83822008000200018]Search in Google Scholar
[Markowiak, P. and Śliżewska, K. 2018. The role of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics in animal nutrition. Gut pathogens, 10(1): 21.10.1186/s13099-018-0250-0598947329930711]Search in Google Scholar
[Maroniche, G.A., Diaz, P.R., Borrajo, M.P., Valverde, C.F. and Creus, C. 2018. Friends or foes in the rhizosphere: traits of fluorescent Pseudomonas that hinder Azospirillum brasilense growth and root colonization. FEMS microbiology ecology, 94(12): fiy202.10.1093/femsec/fiy202]Search in Google Scholar
[Mehrabi, Z., McMillan, V.E., Clark, I.M., Canning, G., Hammond-Kosack, K.E., Preston, G., P.R. Hirsch, and Mauchline, T.H. 2016. Pseudomonas spp. diversity is negatively associated with suppression of the wheat take-all pathogen. Scientific Reports, 6: 29905.10.1038/srep29905]Search in Google Scholar
[Mendoza, A.R. and Sikora, R.A. 2009. Biological control of Radopholus similis in banana by combined application of the mutualistic endophyte Fusarium oxysporum strain 162, the egg pathogen Paecilomyces lilacinus strain 251 and the antagonistic bacteria Bacillus firmus. Biocontrol, 54(2): 263-272.10.1007/s10526-008-9181-x]Search in Google Scholar
[Mishra, D.S., Kumar, A., Prajapati, C.R., Singh, A.K., and Sharma, S. D. 2013. Identification of compatible bacterial and fungal isolate and their effectiveness against plant disease. Journal of Environmental Biology, 34(2): 183.]Search in Google Scholar
[Molina-Romero, D., Baez, A., Quintero-Hernández, V., Castañeda-Lucio, M., Fuentes-Ramírez, L.E., del Rocío Bustillos-Cristales, M., Rodríguez-Andrade, O., Morales-García, Y.E., Munive, A. and Muñoz-Rojas, J. 2017. Compatible bacterial mixture, tolerant to desiccation, improves maize plant growth. PloS ONE, 12(11): e0187913.10.1371/journal.pone.0187913]Search in Google Scholar
[Müller, D.B., Vogel, C., Bai, Y. and Vorholt, J.A. 2016. The plant microbiota: systems-level insights and perspectives. Annual Review of Genetics, 50: 211-234.10.1146/annurev-genet-120215-034952]Search in Google Scholar
[Murphy, B.R., Doohan, F.M. and Hodkinson, T.R. 2015. Persistent fungal root endophytes isolated from a wild barley species suppress seed-borne infections in a barley cultivar. Biocontrol, 60(2): 281-292.10.1007/s10526-014-9642-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Murphy, B.R., Hodkinson, T.R. and Doohan, F.M. 2017. A fungal endophyte consortium counterbalances the negative effects of reduced nitrogen input on the yield of field-grown spring barley. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 155(8): 1324-1331.10.1017/S0021859617000417]Search in Google Scholar
[Myresiotis, C.K., Karaoglanidis, G.S., Vryzas, Z. and Papadopoulou-Mourkidou, E. 2012. Evaluation of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, acibenzolar-S-methyl and hymexazol for integrated control of Fusarium crown and root rot on tomato. Pest Management Science, 68(3): 404-411.10.1002/ps.227722307860]Search in Google Scholar
[Ndiaye, M., Termorshuizen, A. J. and Van Bruggen, A.H.C. 2010. Effects of compost amendment and the biocontrol agent Clonostachys rosea on the development of charcoal rot (Macrophomina phaseolina) on cowpea. Journal of Plant Pathology, 173-180.]Search in Google Scholar
[O’Callaghan, M. 2016. Microbial inoculation of seed for improved crop performance: issues and opportunities. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 100(13): 5729-5746.10.1007/s00253-016-7590-9490979527188775]Search in Google Scholar
[Ouwehand, A.C., Invernici, M.M., Furlaneto, F.A. and Messora, M.R. 2018. Effectiveness of multistrain versus single-strain probiotics: current status and recommendations for the future. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 52: S35-S40.10.1097/MCG.0000000000001052]Search in Google Scholar
[Pangesti, N., Vandenbrande, S., Pineda, A., Dicke, M., Raaijmakers, J.M. and Van Loon, J.J. 2017. Antagonism between two root-associated beneficial Pseudomonas strains does not affect plant growth promotion and induced resistance against a leaf-chewing herbivore. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 93(4): fix038.10.1093/femsec/fix03828334335]Search in Google Scholar
[Parnell, J.J., Berka, R., Young, H. A., Sturino, J. M., Kang, Y., Barnhart, D.M. and DiLeo, M.V. 2016. From the lab to the farm: an industrial perspective of plant beneficial microorganisms. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7: 1110.10.3389/fpls.2016.01110]Search in Google Scholar
[Patel, J.S., Kharwar, R.N., Singh, H.B., Upadhyay, R. S. and Sarma, B.K. 2017. Trichoderma asperellum (T42) and Pseudomonas fluorescens (OKC)-enhances resistance of pea against Erysiphe pisi through enhanced ROS generation and lignifications. Frontiers in Microbiology, 8: 306.10.3389/fmicb.2017.00306533239628303123]Search in Google Scholar
[Pierson, E.A. and Weller, D.M. 1994. Use of mixtures of fluorescent pseudomonads to Suppress Take-all and Improve the Growth of Wheat. Phytopathology, 84: 940-947.10.1094/Phyto-84-940]Search in Google Scholar
[Prabhukarthikeyan, R., Saravanakumar, D. and Raguchander, T. 2014. Combination of endophytic Bacillus and Beauveria for the management of Fusarium wilt and fruit borer in tomato. Pest Management Science, 70(11): 1742-1750.10.1002/ps.371924376014]Search in Google Scholar
[Prasad, A.A. and Babu, S. 2017. Compatibility of Azospirillum brasilense and Pseudomonas fluorescens in growth promotion of groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.). Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 89(2): 1027-1040.10.1590/0001-376520172016061728489199]Search in Google Scholar
[Rathi, N., Singh, S., Osbone, J. and Babu, S. 2015. Co-aggregation of Pseudomonas fluorescens and Bacillus subtilis in culture and co-colonization in black gram (Vigna mungo L.) roots. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, 4(3): 304-308.10.1016/j.bcab.2015.05.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Raupach, G.S. and Kloepper, J.W. 1998. Mixtures of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria enhance biological control of multiple cucumber pathogens. Phytopathology, 88(11): 1158-1164.10.1094/PHYTO.1998.88.11.115818944848]Search in Google Scholar
[Ren, Q., Chen, Z., Luo, J., Liu, G., Guan, G., Liu, Z., Liu, A., Li, Y., Niu, Q., Liu, J., Yang, J., Han, X., Yin, H. and Yang, J. 2016. Laboratory evaluation of Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae in the control of Haemaphysalis qinghaiensis in China. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 69(2): 233-238.10.1007/s10493-016-0033-627071674]Search in Google Scholar
[Reaves, J.L. 1994. In vitro colony interactions among species of Trichoderma with inference toward biological control. Res. Pap. PNW-RP-474. Portland, OR: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 8 p., 474.10.2737/PNW-RP-474]Search in Google Scholar
[Ruano-Rosa, D. and Herrera, C.L. 2009. Evaluation of Trichoderma spp. as biocontrol agents against avocado white root rot. Biological Control, 51(1): 66-71.10.1016/j.biocontrol.2009.05.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Ruano-Rosa, D., Cazorla, F. M., Bonilla, N., Martín-Pérez, R., De Vicente, A. and López-Herrera, C.J. 2014. Biological control of avocado white root rot with combined applications of Trichoderma spp. and rhizobacteria. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 138(4): 751-762.10.1007/s10658-013-0347-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Ryu, C., Murphy, J.F., Reddy, M.S. and Kloepper, J.W. 2007. A two-strain mixture of rhizobacteria elicits induction of systemic resistance against Pseudomonas syringae and Cucumber mosaic virus coupled to promotion of plant growth on Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 17(2): 280.]Search in Google Scholar
[Samaddar, S., Chatterjee, P., Choudhur y, A. R., Ahmed, S. and Sa, T. 2019. Interactions between Pseudomonas spp. and their role in improving the red pepper plant growth under salinity stress. Microbiological Research, 219: 66-73.10.1016/j.micres.2018.11.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Sangeetha, G., Usharani, S. and Muthukumar, A. 2009. Biocontrol with Trichoderma species for the management of postharvest crown rot of banana. Phytopathologia Mediterranea, 48(2): 214-225.]Search in Google Scholar
[Santiago, C.D., Yagi, S., Ijima, M., Nashimoto, T., Sawada, M., Ikeda, S., Asano, K, Orikasa, Y. and Ohwada, T. 2017. Bacterial compatibility in combined inoculations enhances the growth of potato seedlings. Microbes and Environments, 32(1): 14-23.10.1264/jsme2.ME16127537107028163278]Search in Google Scholar
[Saravanakumar, D., Lavanya, N., Muthumeena, K., Raguchander, T. and Samiyappan, R. 2009. Fluorescent pseudomonad mixtures mediate disease resistance in rice plants against sheath rot (Sarocladium oryzae) disease. Biocontrol, 54(2): 273.10.1007/s10526-008-9166-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Sarma, B.K., Yadav, S.K., Singh, S. and Singh, H. B. 2015. Microbial consortium-mediated plant defense against phytopathogens: readdressing for enhancing efficacy. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 87: 25-33.10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.04.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Seenivasan, N., David, P.M.M., Vivekanandan, P. and Samiyappan, R. 2012. Biological control of rice root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne graminicola through mixture of Pseudomonas fluorescens strains. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 22(6): 611-632.10.1080/09583157.2012.675052]Search in Google Scholar
[Senthilraja, G., Anand, T., Kennedy, J.S., Raguchander, T. and Samiyappan, R. 2013. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and entomopathogenic fungus bioformulation enhance the expression of defense enzymes and pathogenesis-related proteins in groundnut plants against leafminer insect and collar rot pathogen. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 82: 10-19.10.1016/j.pmpp.2012.12.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Sharma, C.K., Vishnoi, V.K., Dubey, R.C. and Maheshwari, D.K. 2018. A twin rhizospheric bacterial consortium induces systemic resistance to a phytopathogen Macrophomina phaseolina in mung bean. Rhizosphere, 5: 71-75.10.1016/j.rhisph.2018.01.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Siddiqui, I.A. and Shaukat, S.S. 2003. Combination of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Pochonia chlamydosporia for Control of Root-Infecting Fungi in Tomato. Journal of Phytopathology, 151(4): 215-222.10.1046/j.1439-0434.2003.00708.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Sikora, R.A., Zum Felde, A., Mendoza, A., Menjivar, R. and Pocasangre, L. 2010. In Planta Suppressiveness to Nematodes and Long Term Root Health Stability through Biological Enhancement-Do We Need a Cocktail? Acta Horticulturae, 879: 553-56010.17660/ActaHortic.2010.879.60]Search in Google Scholar
[Simões, M., Simões, L. C., Pereira, M. O. and Vieira, M.J. 2008. Antagonism between Bacillus cereus and Pseudomonas fluorescens in planktonic systems and in biofilms. Biofouling, 24(5): 339-349.10.1080/0892701080223915418576180]Search in Google Scholar
[Singh, A., Jain, A., Sarma, B. K., Upadhyay, R.S. and Singh, H.B. 2014. Beneficial compatible microbes enhance antioxidants in chickpea edible parts through synergistic interactions. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 56(2): 390-397.10.1016/j.lwt.2013.11.030]Search in Google Scholar
[Singh, A., Sarma, B.K., Upadhyay, R.S. and Singh, H.B. 2013a. Compatible rhizosphere microbes mediated alleviation of biotic stress in chick-pea through enhanced antioxidant and phenylpropanoid activities. Microbiological Research, 168(1): 33-40.10.1016/j.micres.2012.07.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Singh, A., Jain, A., Sarma, B.K., Upadhyay, R.S. and Singh, H.B. 2013b. Rhizosphere microbes facilitate redox homeostasis in Cicer arietinum against biotic stress. Annals of Applied Biology, 163(1): 33-46.10.1111/aab.12030]Search in Google Scholar
[Sivasithamparam, K. and Parker, C.A. 1978. Effects of certain isolates of bacteria and actinomycetes on Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici and take-all of wheat. Australian Journal of Botany, 26(6): 773-782.10.1071/BT9780773]Search in Google Scholar
[Sniffen, J.C., McFarland, L.V., Evans, C.T. and Goldstein, E.J. 2018. Choosing an appropriate probiotic product for your patient: An evidence-based practical guide. PloS ONE, 13(12): e0209205.10.1371/journal.pone.0209205630624830586435]Search in Google Scholar
[Stefanic, P., Kraigher, B., Lyons, N. A., Kolter, R. and Mandic-Mulec, I. 2015. Kin discrimination between sympatric Bacillus subtilis isolates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(45): 14042-14047.10.1073/pnas.1512671112465315726438858]Search in Google Scholar
[Stockwell, V. O., Johnson, K.B., Sugar, D. and Loper, J.E. 2011. Mechanistically compatible mixtures of bacterial antagonists improve biological control of fire blight of pear. Phytopathology, 101(1): 113-123.10.1094/PHYTO-03-10-009820839962]Search in Google Scholar
[Subramanian, P., Kim, K., Krishnamoorthy, R., Sundaram, S. and Sa, T. 2015. Endophytic bacteria improve nodule function and plant nitrogen in soybean on co-inoculation with Bradyrhizobium japonicum MN110. Plant Growth Regulation, 76(3): 327-332.10.1007/s10725-014-9993-x]Search in Google Scholar
[Sundaramoorthy, S. and Balabaskar, P. 2012. Consortial effect of endophytic and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria for the management of early blight of tomato incited by Alternaria solani. Journal of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, 3: 7.10.4172/2157-7471.1000145]Search in Google Scholar
[Sundaramoorthy, S. and Balabaskar, P. 2013. Evaluation of Combined Efficacy of Pseudomonas fluorescens and Bacillus subtilis in Managing Tomato Wilt Caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (Fol). Plant Pathology Journal, 12(4): 154-161.10.3923/ppj.2013.154.161]Search in Google Scholar
[Sundaramoorthy, S., Raguchander, T., Ragupathi, N. and Samiyappan, R. 2012. Combinatorial effect of endophytic and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria against wilt disease of Capsicum annum L. caused by Fusarium solani. Biological Control, 60(1): 59-67.10.1016/j.biocontrol.2011.10.002]Search in Google Scholar
[ten Hoopen, G.M., George, A., Martinez, A., Stirrup, T., Flood, J. and Krauss, U. (2010). Compatibility between Clonostachys isolates with a view to mixed inocula for biocontrol. Mycologia, 102(5): 1204-1215.10.3852/08-095]Search in Google Scholar
[Thakkar, A. and Saraf, M. 2015. Development of microbial consortia as a biocontrol agent for effective management of fungal diseases in Glycine max L. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection, 48(6): 459-474.10.1080/03235408.2014.893638]Search in Google Scholar
[Thilagavathi, R., Saravanakumar, D., Ragupathi, N. and Samiyappan, R. 2007. A combination of biocontrol agents improves the management of dry root rot (Macrophomina phaseolina) in greengram. Phytopathologia Mediterranea, 46(2): 157-167.]Search in Google Scholar
[Turner, T. R., James, E. K. and Poole, P.S. 2013. The plant microbiome. Genome biology, 14(6): 209.10.1186/gb-2013-14-6-209370680823805896]Search in Google Scholar
[Varkey, S., Anith, K.N., Narayana, R. and Aswini, S. 2018. A consortium of rhizobacteria and fungal endophyte suppress the root-knot nematode parasite in tomato. Rhizosphere, 5: 38-42.10.1016/j.rhisph.2017.11.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Vorholt, J. A., Vogel, C., Carlström, C. I. and Mueller, D.B. 2017. Establishing causality: opportunities of synthetic communities for plant microbiome research. Cell Host and Microbe, 22(2): 142-15510.1016/j.chom.2017.07.00428799900]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, C., Wang, C., Gao, Y.L., Wang, Y.P. Guo, J.H. 2016. A consortium of three plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium strains acclimates Lycopersicon esculentum and confers a better tolerance to chilling stress. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 35(1): 54-64.10.1007/s00344-015-9506-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, C.J., Yang, W., Wang, C., Gu, C., Niu, D. D., Liu, H. X., Wang Y-P and Guo, J.H. 2012. Induction of drought tolerance in cucumber plants by a consortium of three plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium strains. PLoS ONE, 7(12): e52565.10.1371/journal.pone.0052565]Search in Google Scholar
[Weller, D.M. and Cook, R.J. 1983. Suppression of take-all of wheat by seed treatments with fluorescent pseudomonads. Phytopathology, 73(3): 463-469.10.1094/Phyto-73-463]Search in Google Scholar
[Woo, S.L., & Pepe, O. 2018. Microbial consortia: promising probiotics as plant biostimulants for sustainable agriculture. Frontiers in Plant Science, 9: 1801.10.3389/fpls.2018.01801]Search in Google Scholar
[Woo, S. L., Ruocco, M., Vinale, F., Nigro, M., Marra, R., Lombardi, N., Pascale, A., Lanzuise, S., Manganiello, G. and Lorito, M. 2014. Trichoderma-based products and their widespread use in agriculture. The Open Mycology Journal, 8: 71-126.10.2174/1874437001408010071]Search in Google Scholar
[Xu, X., Robinson, J., Jeger, M. and Jeffries, P. 2010. Using combinations of biocontrol agents to control Botrytis cinerea on strawberry leaves under fluctuating temperatures. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 20(4): 359-373.10.1080/09583150903528114]Search in Google Scholar
[Yadav, S. K., Singh, S., Singh, H. B. and Sarma, B.K. 2017. Compatible rhizosphere-competent microbial consortium adds value to the nutritional quality in edible parts of chickpea. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 65(30): 6122-6130.10.1021/acs.jafc.7b0132628700827]Search in Google Scholar
[Yang, P., Sun, Z.X., Liu, S.Y., Lu, H.X., Zhou, Y. and Sun, M. 2013. Combining antagonistic endophytic bacteria in different growth stages of cotton for control of Verticillium wilt. Crop Protection, 47: 17-23.10.1016/j.cropro.2012.12.020]Search in Google Scholar
[Yobo, K.S., Laing, M.D. and Hunter, C.H. 2011. Effects of single and combined inoculations of selected Trichoderma and Bacillus isolates on growth of dry bean and biological control of Rhizoctonia solani damping-off. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10(44): 8746-8756.10.5897/AJB10.2213]Search in Google Scholar
[Zaim, S., Bekkar, A.A. and Belabid, L. 2018. Efficacy of Bacillus subtilis and Trichoderma harzianum combination on chickpea Fusarium wilt caused by F. oxysporum f. sp. ciceris. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection, 51(3-4): 217-226.10.1080/03235408.2018.1447896]Search in Google Scholar
[Zalila-Kolsi, I., Mahmoud, A.B., Ali, H., Sellami, S., Nasfi, Z., Tounsi, S. and Jamoussi, K. 2016. Antagonist effects of Bacillus spp. strains against Fusarium graminearum for protection of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. subsp. durum). Microbiological Research, 192: 148-158.10.1016/j.micres.2016.06.012]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhang, S., White, T.L., Martinez, M.C., McInroy, J.A., Kloepper, J.W. and Klassen, W. 2010. Evaluation of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria for control of Phytophthora blight on squash under greenhouse conditions. Biological Control, 53(1): 129-135.10.1016/j.biocontrol.2009.10.015]Search in Google Scholar