1. bookVolumen 12 (2021): Heft 2 (August 2021)
Zeitschriftendaten
License
Format
Zeitschrift
eISSN
2067-9785
Erstveröffentlichung
06 Mar 2017
Erscheinungsweise
3 Hefte pro Jahr
Sprachen
Englisch
Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Bureaucracy and Leadership Must Align with Circumstances

Online veröffentlicht: 19 Aug 2021
Volumen & Heft: Volumen 12 (2021) - Heft 2 (August 2021)
Seitenbereich: 31 - 48
Eingereicht: 01 Dec 2020
Akzeptiert: 01 Apr 2021
Zeitschriftendaten
License
Format
Zeitschrift
eISSN
2067-9785
Erstveröffentlichung
06 Mar 2017
Erscheinungsweise
3 Hefte pro Jahr
Sprachen
Englisch
Abstract

The concepts of bureaucracy and leadership must align with the circumstances in the public or private sectors to be optimal in any given situation. This paper will grant readers with a deep dive into this concept. More specifically, this paper will compare bureaucracy, leadership, and groupthink by using author’s experiences in two private banking organizations and one public bureau. The purpose of this paper is to persuade readers that these frameworks can be auspicious, but only under the appropriate conditions.

Bozeman, B., & Anderson, D.M. (2016). Public policy and the origins of bureaucratic red tape: Implications of the Stanford yacht scandal. Administration & Society, 48, no. 6: 736-759. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0095399714541265. Search in Google Scholar

Business Insider (2020). PNC Report Third Quarter 2020 Net Income of $1.5 Billion, $3.39 Diluted EPS. Business Insider Website. Accessed October 14, 2020. https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/pnc-reports-third-quarter-2020-net-income-of-1-5-billion-3-39-diluted-eps-1029678302. Search in Google Scholar

Chang, E. (2019). SunTrust and BB&T Merger: What You Need to Know. U.S. News. Accessed October 1, 2019. https://money.usnews.com/banking/articles/suntrust-and-bbt-merger-what-you-need-to-know. Search in Google Scholar

Cleary, M., Lees, D., & Sayers, J. (2019). Leadership, thought diversity, and the influence of groupthink. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 40, no. 8: 731-733. https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2019.1604050.10.1080/01612840.2019.1604050 Search in Google Scholar

Department of Consumer Affairs (2020). Department of Consumer Affairs Website. Accessed October 10, 2020. https://www1.nyc.gov/site/dca/index.page. Search in Google Scholar

Farazmand, A. (2002). Modern Organizations: Theory and Practice, 2nd edition and expanded. Westport, CT: Henry, N. (Original Work Published 2000). Search in Google Scholar

Farazmand, A. (2003). Chaos and Transformation Theories: Implications for Public Management. Public Management Review, 3, no. 4: 339-372. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PORJ.0000004814.35884.a3.10.1023/B:PORJ.0000004814.35884.a3 Search in Google Scholar

Farazmand, A. (2009). Bureaucracy and Administrations. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.10.1201/NOE0824723699 Search in Google Scholar

Farazmand, A. (2010). Bureaucracy and democracy: A theoretical analysis. Public Organization Review, 10, no. 3: 245-258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-010-0137-0.10.1007/s11115-010-0137-0 Search in Google Scholar

Gobble, M.M. (2019). In defence of bureaucracy. Research Technology Management, 62, no. 1: 50-55. http://doi55.10.1080/08956308.2019.1541731. Search in Google Scholar

Heclo, Hugh (2009). On Thinking Institutionally. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers. Search in Google Scholar

Hummel, R. (1982). The Bureaucratic Experience. New York, New York: St. Martin’s Press. Search in Google Scholar

Kettl, D.F. (2018). Politics of the administrative process. Thousand Oaks, California: CQ Press. Search in Google Scholar

Kingdon, J.W. (2014). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited. Search in Google Scholar

Morgan, G. (2007). Images of Organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Saga. Search in Google Scholar

Palmer, D., Crowe, K.S., Greenwood, R. (2006). Organizational Wrongdoing. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Rainey, H. (2014). Understanding and Managing Public Organizations. 5th edition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Search in Google Scholar

Riggs, F. (1979). Introduction: Shifting meanings of the term ‘bureaucracy’. International Social Science Journal, 31, no. 4: 563-584. Search in Google Scholar

Sanders, R.L. (1997). The future of bureaucracy. Records Management Quarterly, 31, no. 1: 44-51. Search in Google Scholar

Waldo, D. (1961). Organization Theory: An Elephantine Problem. Public Administration Review, 21, no. 4: 210-225. https://doi.org/10.2307/973632.10.2307/973632 Search in Google Scholar

Ward, M. L., & Schwartz, J. (2003). The Nation: NASA’s Curse?; ‘Groupthink’ Is 30 Years Old, And Still Going Strong. The New York Times Online. Accessed March 3, 2003. https://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/09/weekinreview/the-nation-nasa-s-curse-groupthink-is-30-years-old-and-still-going-strong.html. Search in Google Scholar

Ward, S. (2020). What is leadership? The Balance. Accessed September 17, 2020. https://www.thebalancesmb.com/leadership-definition-2948275. Search in Google Scholar

Wilse, C.M. (1941). The representative function of bureaucracy. The American Political Science Review, 35, no. 3: 510-516. https://doi.org/10.2307/1948766.10.2307/1948766 Search in Google Scholar

Empfohlene Artikel von Trend MD

Planen Sie Ihre Fernkonferenz mit Scienceendo