Zitieren

Introduction

Dirofilariosis is a zoonotic, mosquito-borne disease, caused by nematodes of the superfamily Filarioidea. One of the most pathogenic filarioid nematodes is the canine heartworm Dirofilaria immitis (Leidy, 1856) (Nematoda: Onchocercidae), the causative agent of infection that may lead to serious and potentially fatal cardiopulmonary disease, primarily induced by adult heartworms and their antigenic products (Simón et al., 2012). Canine dirofilariosis due to D. immitis was formerly considered as being a rare disease in humans, but a recent increase in number of infections, particularly after 2000, has resulted in its classification as an emerging zoonosis (Traversa et al., 2010). The species infects several mammalian species, especially domestic dogs, but in areas where these filariae are endemic, patent infections have also been recorded in wild carnivores as red foxes, jackals, wolves, leopards, coyotes, tigers, lions, ocelots, and less commonly in cats (Otranto & Deplazes, 2019). D. immitis can be transmitted by about 60 – 70 mosquito species of the family Culicidae that serve as potential intermediate hosts and vectors (McCall et al., 2008). The canine heartworm is widespread in tropical, subtropical and temperate areas, and its endemic occurrence has been reported in many countries of Europe, Asia, Africa, and the Americas (Dantas-Torres & Otranto, 2013; Genchi & Kramer, 2017).

In Europe, the historically endemic region for D. immitis infection is geographically restricted to southern countries including Spain, France, Portugal, Greece, Italy and Turkey (Genchi & Kramer, 2009). Nevertheless, the infections caused by this parasite are nowadays emerging in Europe, coinciding with geographic expansion from multiple focal populations in continental south towards the eastern, central and northern European territories (Farkas et al., 2020). In the region of Eastern Europe, Bulgaria, Croatia, Romania and Serbia are currently recognized as endemic countries, and sporadic autochthonous cases were also reported from the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary (Genchi et al., 2020). Among the main factors that have facilitated the spread of heart-worm disease in Europe during the last decades may be the global warming, which caused an increase in abundance of mosquito populations, and lengthening the transmission season (Sassnau et al., 2014); the high number of wild hosts, particularly golden jackals, and untreated stray dogs (e.g., Ionică et al., 2016; Stoyanova et al., 2019); and the launch of the Pet Travel Scheme in 2000, which has allowed easier movement of pet animals throughout the European Union (Trotz-Williams & Trees, 2003).

In Bulgaria, there is a clear trend of raising D. immitis prevalences in dogs and wild carnivores over the last decade (e.g., Panayotova-Pencheva et al., 2016; Iliev et al., 2017; Stoyanova et al., 2019). Nonetheless, no data are available so far about the genetic structure and polymorphism of Dirofilaria heartworms circulating in the country. Molecular methods were before successfully employed for identifying different filarioid parasites, especially by amplifying sequences of ribosomal DNA spacers by polymerase chain reactions using species-specific and universal primers for members of the superfamily Filarioidea (e.g., Gasser et al., 1996; Mar et al., 2002; Nuchprayoon et al., 2005; Rishniw et al., 2006). Hence, the purpose of this study was to verify the taxonomic characterization of selected canine heartworms from Bulgaria based on morphology, and to compare their genetic structure with filariae obtained from the different world regions using molecular assays. Additionally, previous epidemiological and ecological studies on D. immitis distribution and prevalences in different hosts and regions undertaken so far in Bulgaria are summarized.

Material and Methods

The study was carried out on adult heartworms collected from pulmonary arteries from three animals: a domestic dog (Canis familiaris L.) and a golden jackal (Canis aureus L.) originating from the Pazardzhik region, and from a red fox (Vulpes vulpes L.) from the Plovdiv region. Both regions are located in southern Bulgaria. The dog was provided dead for helminthological necropsy by the owners. The wild animals were hunted during the season 2014. Morphometric data and morphological characterization of adult helminths recovered from three hosts were provided in a previous study of Panayotova-Pencheva et al. (2016), and resulted in D. immitis taxonomic classification.

For molecular assays, genomic DNA was extracted using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit 250 (QIAGEN, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The second internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) of the ribosomal DNA was first amplified by conventional PCR using species-specific primers D.imm-F1 (CAT-CAGGTGATGATGTGATGAT) and D.imm-R1 (TTGATT GGAT-TTTAACGTATCATTT), designed by Rishniw et al. (2006), that amplify the expected products only for D. immitis (size of 302 bp). For DNA sequencing, ITS2 and adjacent nuclear regions (5.8S, 28S) were then amplified with pan-filarioid primers DIDR-F1 (AGTG-CGAATTGCAGACGCATTGAG) and DIDR-R1 (AGCGGGTAAT-CACGACTGAGTTGA), described also by Rishniw et al. (2006), and spanning a region of 542 bp for D. immitis.

The PCR products of the three isolates determined for sequencing were visualized on a 1.5 % agarose gel and then purified by NucleoSpin gel and PCR Clean-up (Macherey-Nagel, Germany). Amplicons were sequenced in both directions using a dye terminator cycle sequencing kit by Sanger sequencing in the commercial company at the Scientific Park of the Comenius University in Bratislava (Slovakia).

The obtained nucleotide sequences were manually edited and aligned using Clustal Omega multiple sequence alignment program (Sievers et al., 2011), and compared to the GenBank sequences by nucleotide BLAST program. The evolutionary branching patterns were generated by MEGA 7 software (Kumar et al., 2016) using the neighbor-joining method. The evolutionary distances were computed using the Tamura-3-parameter method (Tamura, 1992). All nucleotide positions with less than 95 % site coverage were eliminated from phylogenetic evaluation. Nucleotide sequences derived from the 5.8S-ITS2 region for three studied carnivore isolates were deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers MN596211, MN596213, and MN596214.

Ethical Approval and/or Informed Consent

No animals were killed for the purpose of this study.

Results and Discussion

The first DNA amplification of three examined Bulgarian adult isolates from domestic dog, golden jackal and red fox (herein assigned as DD-B, GJ-B, RF-B) using D. immitis-specific primers for the ITS-2 region generated single fragments in size around 300 bp, characteristic for these filariae (302 bp according to Rishniw et al., 2006) (Fig. 1a). The second DNA amplification of the 5.5S-ITS-2-28S region using pan-filarioid primers produced a band at position around 550 bp conformed to Rishniw et al. (2006) report where a single fragment of 542 bp was determined for D. immitis (Fig. 1b). The PCR products were then subjected to direct sequencing in both directions and the consensus sequences screened against the GenBank database using the BLAST algorithm has verified the D. immitis categorization for the three isolates under study.

Fig. 1

Gel electrophoresis of PCR products in a 1.5% agarose gel using Dirofilaria immitis-specific primers for ITS2 region (1a) and pan-filarioid primers for ITS2 region (1b). Lane M: MW marker; lane 1, sample 1: D. immitis DNA (dog); lane 2, sample 2: D. immitis DNA (jackal); lane 3, sample 3: D. immitis DNA (fox), lane 4, sample 4: positive control (D. immitis DNA); lane 5, sample 5: negative control.

Given that double peaks were detected throughout a second half of the obtained sequence patterns (spanning partially ITS2 and 28S region), only segments in length of 182 bp for ITS2 and 53 bp for 5.8S were taken for phylogenetic evaluation. Identical nucleotides were detected across the resolved nuclear region for the three Bulgarian isolates. When the sequences were compared to the worldwide GenBank-retrieved sequences available for the 5.8S-ITS2 region in D. immitis, three main clades were identified in the neighbor-joining phylogram (though not supported by high bootstrap values due to subtle intraspecific differences – 64 %, 54 %, and 65 %, respectively). As seen in Fig. 2, the Bulgarian samples clustered with the major D. immitis group consisting of isolates from geographically distinct areas in European, Asian and South American continents, specifically from Portugal, Turkey, Brazil, Iran and China. The only retrieved D. immitis sequences from Europe (GB accession numbers LN626266, LN626267) from continental Portugal (Ferreira et al., 2015) and from the geographically closer Mediterranean region (Kayseri province, Turkey; Yildrim et al., 2007) thus exactly matched the nucleotide composition of the Bulgarian isolates. Within this cluster, only two isolates (GB accession numbers FJ263456, KX932114) from north of Brazil (Marajo Island) (Furtado et al., 2009) exhibited one nucleotide substitution in different sites. A single nucleotide polymorphism (G/A at position 207) was responsible for separating this cluster from the second clade that contained isolates from Asia and South America, specifically from India, Taiwan, Iran, Turkey, Brazil, and Chile (revealing 99.6 % similarity with the ´Bulgarian´ cluster). The third, most differentiated clade, was formed by the two dog isolates from the Marajo Island and the state of Rio de Janeiro, southeast of Brazil (GB accession numbers FJ263468, FJ263455; Furtado et al., 2009) that showed 97.7 % and 98.6 % sequence similarity, respectively, to the ‘Bulgarian’ cluster.

Fig. 2

Neighbor-joining (NJ) phylogram generated from ITS2 and 5.8S (231 bp) sequences showing the relationships among the Dirofilaria immitis from Bulgaria and GenBank reference conspecific sequences. Onchocerca gibsonii (Og) was used as the outgroup. Numbers next to the branches indicate the bootstrap value calculated from 1,000 replicates. The evolutionary distances were computed using the Tamura 3-parameter method and are in the units of the number of base substitutions per site. Bulgarian isolates involved in the phylogram: D. immitis from domestic dog (DD-B), golden jackal (GJ-B), and red fox (RF-B). Geographical origins of the referenced isolates: POR - Portugal, TUR - Turkey, IRA - Iran, CHN - China, IND - India, TAI - Taiwan, BRA - Brazil, CHI - Chile. Hosts and vectors of the referenced isolates (their labels are in brackets following the country codes next to the phylogram): D - dog, RP - red panda, M - mosquito.

The obtained data pointed out for the homogeneous genetic structure of D. immitis in Bulgaria despite the involvement of two wildlife and one domestic host species that extended to the European and Mediterranean scale (continental Portugal, Turkey) in the nuclear region examined. Previous studies of the ITS2 regions conducted on a variety of helminths revealed that while intraspecific variation may occur, it is much smaller than interspecific variation and is often restricted to single nucleotide polymorphism (e.g., Conole et al., 1999; Huby-Chilton et al., 2001; Jenkins et al., 2005). Such aspect was also confirmed in this study where this type of polymorphism was common in the Genbank-retrieved D. immitis sequences derived from three continents.

The first cases of heartworm in dogs from various regions of Bulgaria were reported by Kanev et al. in 1996. In 2001, Georgieva et al. (2001) confirmed a presence of D. immitis in hearts and lungs of necropsied red foxes, golden jackals and one wolf (Table 1). Since then, the parasite has been detected in carnivores from several regions of Bulgaria with the highest occurrence in southern and lowland parts of Bulgaria, especially in areas of the Upper Thracian Plain and Danubian Plain. These areas were often situated near wet or marshy grounds, enlarged by the restoration of landscapes for rice cultivation over the last decade in the southern parts of the country, and provided excellent conditions for the reproduction and proliferation of the mosquito vectors. Further, climate changes and the enhanced movement of dogs and people across Europe may also have contributed to the increased geographical dispersal of dirofilariosis in Bulgaria according to Panayotova-Pencheva et al. (2016). Review on the recorded prevalences of D. immitis in domestic and wild-living carnivores in the country is presented in Table 1 and its spatial distribution in Figure 3.

Fig. 3

Geographical distribution of Dirofilaria immitis in dogs (circles), red foxes (squares), golden jackals (rhombs) and wolf (triangle) recorded in the territory of Bulgaria. Orange marks represent D. immitis isolates analysed in the present study.

Review on the occurrence of Dirofilaria immitis in dogs and wild-living carnivores in Bulgaria.

Study year(s)Host species (n)LocalityDetection methodPrevalence % (ex/pos)Reference
1991 – 1996Dogs (341)various regionsKnott´s test5.3Kanev et al. (1996)
1998Dogs (20)Stara ZagoraNecropsy10.0Gerogieva et al. (1999)
Dogs (258)Knott´s test7.4
HW antigen test7.4
Dogs (40)Stara ZagoraNecropsy12.0
1997 – 1999Red foxes (78)Necropsy5.2Georgieva et al. (2001)
Golden jackals (45)Necropsy4.4
Wolves (18)Necropsy5.5
Dogs (487)Knott´s test8.6
2001 – 2006Red foxes (113)various regionsHW Necropsy antigen test9.2 3.0Kirkova et al. (2007)
Golden jackals (56)Necropsy8.9
SofiaKnott´s test8.7
2011Dogs (240)HW antigen test8.7Kostadinov (2012)
RuseKnott´s test15.7
HW antigen test15.7
2012 – 2013Red foxes (87)various regionsNecropsy27.6Mirchev et al. (2013)
2015Dogs (167)Stara ZagoraHW antigen test16.2Pantchev et al. (2015)
Dogs (27)Burgas(8/4)
Pazardzhik(5/3)
Silistra(1/1)
Sofia(2/1)
Red foxes (113)Burgas26.7
Pazardzhik44.4
Plovdiv40.9
Silistra(5/2)
Sliven(9/3)
2012 – 2013Stara Zagora HaskovoNecropsy(8/2) (1/1)Panayotova-Pencheva et al. (2016)
Golden jackals (56)Burgas29.1
Pazardzhik58.7
Pleven27.8
Plovdiv48.1
Silistra44.4
Sliven18.2
Stara Zagora(5/3)
Haskovo(4/4)
Yambol14.3
2013 – 2014Dogs (33)SofiaKnott´s test HW antigen test15.2 15.2Radev et al. (2016)
2012 – 2017Dogs (367)Stara ZagoraHW antigen test34.3Iliev et al. (2017)
2017 – 2018Dogs (80)SofiaHW antigen test31.3Stoyanova et al. (2019)

n=number of examined; HW = heartworm; un = unknown; (ex/pos) = D. immitis examined/positive if less than 10 samples were collected

Two herein examined wildlife isolates were recovered from golden jackal and red foxes, which are regarded as potential important reservoirs that could naturally widen the distribution area of filariae in Europe (Genchi & Kramer, 2020). The rapid spread of the golden jackals over the past decades throughout Europe addresses the issue of its involvement in the sylvatic cycle for a variety of pathogens in the newly colonized territories, including Dirofilaria spp. (Otranto et al., 2015). Since 1980´s, the jackal numbers have steadily increased in Europe and its current distribution range covers most of southeastern Europe and parts of eastern and central Europe, with animals occasionally being documented also in the north (Estonia, Lithuania) and in the west (Switzerland), far from the established Balkan populations (Arnold et al., 2012; Trouwborst et al., 2015). In light of recent positive findings of D. immitis in golden jackals and red foxes from Hungary (Tolnai et al., 2014), it might be possible that infected wild canids arrived from Romania (Ionică et al., 2017) or Serbia (Penezić et al., 2014) where Dirofilaria infections were recorded, which accentuates their role as reservoir hosts in the dissemination of these nematodes.

The present study provided the first evidence about the genetic structure of zoonotic D. immitis nematode in Bulgaria through the analysis of the partial 5.8-ITS2 nuclear region, with no polymorphism found among three animal isolates. Further studies will be aimed at screening of the additional gene segments in causative agents of canine dirofilariosis in Bulgaria and adjacent countries of southeastern Europe to better elucidate dissemination patterns linked to their recent expansion across the region.

eISSN:
1336-9083
ISSN:
0440-6605
Sprache:
Englisch
Zeitrahmen der Veröffentlichung:
4 Hefte pro Jahr
Fachgebiete der Zeitschrift:
Biologie, Zoologie, Ökologie, andere, Medizin, Klinische Medizin, Mikrobiologie, Virologie und Infektionsepidemiologie