Synergy of Contexts in the Creative Shaping of the Spatial Structure of the Housing Environment on the Example of the Experience of a Design Studio

[1] Abraham, A., 2022. Creativity or creativities? Why context matters. Design Studies, 78, January 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2021.101060. Search in Google Scholar

[2] Akyol, D., 2017. Examination of effect of globalisation on urban landscape through trabzon çömlekçi urban transformation field in the context of urban structure. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies, 2(2):84-92. Search in Google Scholar

[3] Amabile, T.M., 1996. Creativity in Context. Westview Press, Boulder, CO. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Aranda-Mena, G., 2018. Tacit knowledge transfer for city design. In P. Rajagopalan & M. M. Andamon (Eds.), Engaging Architectural Science: Meeting the Challenges of Higher Density: 52nd International Conference of the Architectural Science Association 2018, Melbourne, Australia, pp.761-769. Search in Google Scholar

[5] Bashier, F., 2014. Reflections on architectural design education: The return of rationalism in the studio. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 3(4),424-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2014.08.004. Search in Google Scholar

[6] Biddulph, M., 2012. The problem with thinking about or for urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2011.646251. Search in Google Scholar

[7] Budge, K., 2015. Teaching art and design: Communicating creative practice through embodied and tacit knowledge. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022215592247. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Carmona, M., 2014. Investigating Urban Design. In M. Carmona (Ed.), Explorations in Urban Design: An Urban Design Research Primer (pp.1-11). Farnham, UK: Ashgate. Search in Google Scholar

[9] Cordts, M., M. Omran, S. Ramos, i in., 2016. The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understanding. In: 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (pp.3213-3223). Las Vegas, NV, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.350. Search in Google Scholar

[10] Chmielewski, J.M., 2010. Teoria urbanistyki w projektowaniu i planowaniu miast. [The theory of urban planning in designing and planning cities]. Warsaw: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej. Search in Google Scholar

[11] Cross, N., 1982. Designerly ways of knowing. Design studies, 3(4):221-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(82)90040-0. Search in Google Scholar

[12] Cross, N., 2007. Forty years of design research. Design studies, 28(1):1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2006.11.004. Search in Google Scholar

[13] Cross, N., 2019. Editing Design Studies - and how to improve the likelihood of your paper being published. Design Studies, 63, A1-A9. Search in Google Scholar

[14] Cuthbert, A.R., 2003. Introduction. In Designing Cities: Critical Readings in Urban Design (pp.2-20). Malden, MA: Blackwell. Search in Google Scholar

[15] Daly, S.R., Adams R., Bodner, G.M., 2012. What does it mean to design? A qualitative investigation of design professionals’ experiences. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(2):187-219. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00048.x. Search in Google Scholar

[16] Domaradzki, K., 2013. Przestrzeń Warszawy. Tożsamość miasta a urbanistyka. [The Space of Warsaw: Identity of the City and Urban Planning]. Warsaw: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej. Search in Google Scholar

[17] Dorst, K., 2008. Design research: a revolution-waiting-to-happen. Design studies, 29(1):4-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2007.12.001. Search in Google Scholar

[18] Ellin, N., 2012. Integral Urbanism: A Context for Urban Design. In S. Pickett, M. Cadenasso, & B. McGrath (Eds.), Resilience in Ecology and Urban Design (Vol.3). Dordrecht: Springer. Search in Google Scholar

[19] Faste, R.A., 1972. The Role of Visualisation in Creative Behavior. Journal of Engineering Education, 63(2):124-127. Search in Google Scholar

[20] Faste, R.A., 1994. Ambidextrous Thinking. In Innovations in Mechanical Engineering Curricula for the 1990s. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Search in Google Scholar

[21] Faste, R.A., 1995. The role of aesthetics in engineering. Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers Journal, 28, 385. Search in Google Scholar

[22] Faste, R.A., 2001. The human challenge in engineering design. International Journal of Engineering Education, 17(4/5):327-331. Search in Google Scholar

[23] Fann, K.T., 2012. Peirce’s theory of abduction. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media. Search in Google Scholar

[24] Frayling, C., 1993. Research in Art and Design. Royal College of Art Research Papers, 1(1):1-5. Search in Google Scholar

[25] Glaveanu, V.P., 2013. Rewriting the language of creativity: The Five A’s framework. Review of General Psychology, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029528. Search in Google Scholar

[26] Hack, G., Canto, M., 1984. Collaboration and context in urban design. Design Studies, 5(3):178-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(84)90011-5. Search in Google Scholar

[27] Hassi, L., Laakso, M., 2011. Making Sense of Design Thinking. In IDBM Papers 1, edited by T. M. Karjalainen, M. Koria, and M. Salimäki (pp.50-63). International Design Business Management Program, Aalto University. Search in Google Scholar

[28] Höök, K., Löwgren, J., 2012. Strong concepts: Intermediate- level knowledge in interaction design research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI). https://doi.org/10.1145/2362364.2362371. Search in Google Scholar

[29] Imrie, R., 2003. Architects’ conceptions of the human body. Environment and planning D. Society and Space. https://doi.org/10.1068/d271t. Search in Google Scholar

[30] Jones, J.C., 1970. Design methods: Seeds of human futures. London: Wiley-Interscience. Search in Google Scholar

[31] Kropf, K., 2009. Aspects of urban form. Urban Morphology, 13(2):105-20. Search in Google Scholar

[32] Lawson, B., 2006. How designers think: The design process demystified. London: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

[33] Lehmann, S., 2019. Urban Regeneration. A Manifesto for transforming UK Cities in the Age of Climat Change. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04711-5. Search in Google Scholar

[34] Linden, J.C., Lacerda, A.P., Aguiar, J.P., 2011. The Evolution Of Design Methods. Tidak Diterbitkan. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273704768. Accessed 13 May 2022. Search in Google Scholar

[35] Lloyd-Jones, T., 2014. The context for urban design in practice. In M. Roberts, C. Greed, B. Erickson, T. Lloyd-Jones, A. Madanipour, C. Marsh, D. Seex, M. Theis, T. Townshend (Eds.), Approaching Urban Design (pp.128-131). London: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

[36] Lubart, T., 2017. The 7 C’s of Creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 51(4): 293-296. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.190. Search in Google Scholar

[37] Luck, R., 2019. Design research, architectural research, architectural design research: An argument on disciplinarity and identity. Design Studies, 65: 152-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.11.001. Search in Google Scholar

[38] Lynch, K., 1964. The image of the city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Search in Google Scholar

[39] McCullough, M., Hoinkes, R., 1995. Dynamic data sets as collaboration in urban design. In M. Tan & R. Teh (Eds.), Proceedings of Computer Aided Architectural Design Futures 1995, Centre for Advanced Studies in Architecture, Department of Architecture, National University of Singapore, 24–26 September, Singapore. http://papers.cumincad.org/cgi-bin/works/Show_id=caadria2010_044/paper/7c88. Accessed 13 May 2022. Search in Google Scholar

[40] McKim, R., 1973. Experiences in Visual Thinking. Brooks/Cole Publishing Co., Pacific Grove, CA. Search in Google Scholar

[41] Owen, C.L., 1992. Context for creativity. Design Studies, 13(3):216–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(92)90200-T. Search in Google Scholar

[42] Oxford Languages. 2022. Context, Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

[43] Pankina, M., 2020. Axiology and Praxeology of Design Thinking. KnE Social Sciences /Questions of Expertise in Culture, Arts and Design, pp.284-293. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v4i11.7559. Search in Google Scholar

[44] Peinado, A.D., Klose, S., 2011. Design Innovation: Research-Practice- Strategy. In E. Bohemia, B. Borja de Mozota, & L. Collina (Eds.), Researching Design Education, Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium for Design Education Researchers (pp.18-21). CUMULUS Association//DRS SIG on Design Pedagogy, Paris. Search in Google Scholar

[45] Peng, C., Jones, B.P., 2004. Reconstructing urban contexts online for interactive urban designs. Design Studies, 25(2):175-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2003.10.005. Search in Google Scholar

[46] Polanyi, M., 1958. Personal Knowledge. Towards a post-critical philosophy (pp.266-67). New York: Harper Torchbooks. Search in Google Scholar

[47] Polanyi, M., 2012. Personal knowledge. Routledge, London. Search in Google Scholar

[48] Protzen, J.P., 2010. Design Thinking: What is that. Department of Architecture, Cal Design Lab Lecture, Sept. 14, 2010, Berkeley, University of California. http://www.ced.berkeley.edu/downloads/pubs/faculty/protzen_2010_design-thinking-what-is-that.pdf. Accessed 13 May 2022. Search in Google Scholar

[49] Rhodes, M., 1961. An Analysis of Creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7):305–310. Search in Google Scholar

[50] Rittel, H. W. J., Webber, M.M., 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy sciences, 4(2): 155-169. Search in Google Scholar

[51] Rowe, P.G., 1991. Design thinking. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Search in Google Scholar

[52] Sanders, E.B.N., 2005. Information, Inspiration and Co-creation. In The 6th International Conference of the European Academy of Design, March 29-31, 2005, University of the Arts, Bremen, Germany. Search in Google Scholar

[53] Schön, D., 1983. The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books. Search in Google Scholar

[54] Schön, D., 1987. Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Search in Google Scholar

[55] Seex, D., 2014. Design at the local scale. In M. Roberts, C. Greed, B. Erickson, T. Lloyd-Jones, A. Madanipour, C. Marsh, D. Seex, M. Theis, T. Townshend (Eds.), Approaching Urban Design (pp.74-80). London: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

[56] Simon, H., 1969. The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Search in Google Scholar

[57] Szmetler, A., 2019. Początki urbanistyki współczesnej. Doświadczenia zagraniczne a środowisko warszawskich urbanistów przełomu XIX i XX w. [The beginnings of modern urbanism. Foreign experience and the milieu of Warsaw town planners at the turn of the 20th century.]. Warsaw: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej. Search in Google Scholar

[58] Trębacz, P. Duda, M., 2021. Designing of the public space structure of urban units as the condition for effective transformations of the post-industrial zone on the example of Pelcowizna area in Warsaw. Housing Environment, 34:96-111. Search in Google Scholar

[59] Tschaepe, M., 2014. Guessing and abduction. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy, 50(1):115-138. https://doi.org/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.50.1.115. Search in Google Scholar

[60] Tubbs, N., 2000. From reflective practitioner to comprehensive teacher. Educational Action Research, 8(1):167-178. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790000200113. Search in Google Scholar

[61] Wang, T., 2010. A new paradigm for design studio education. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 29(1):18-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2010.01647.x. Search in Google Scholar

[62] Vartanian, O., 2017. The creation and aesthetic appreciation of architecture. In J. C. Kaufman, J. Baer, & V. P. Glăveanu (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity Across Domains (pp.110-122). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

[63] Verhulst, L.C., Elsen, C., Heylighen, A., 2016. Whom do architects have in mind during design when users are absent? Observations from a design competition. Journal of Design Research, 14(4):368-387. Search in Google Scholar