[Bartha, S. 2007: Composition, differentiation and dynamics in the forest steppe biome. In: Illyés, E., Bölöni, J. (eds.): Slope steppes, loess steppes and forest steppe meadows in Hungary. MTA ÖBKI, Budapest, pp. 194–210.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bartha, S., Meiners, S. J., Pickett, S. T. A. & Cadenasso, M. L. 2003: Plant colonization windows in a mesic old field succession. Applied Vegetation Science 6: 205–212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-109X.2003.tb00581.x10.1111/j.1654-109X.2003.tb00581.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Bartha, S., Campetella, G., Canullo, R., Bódis, J. & Mucina, L. 2004: On the importance of fine-scale spatial complexity in vegetation restoration. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences 30: 101–116.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bartha, S., Szentes, Sz., Horváth, A., Házi, J., Zimmermann, Z., Molnár, Cs., Dancza, I., Margóczi, K., Pál, R. W., Purger, D., Schmidt, D., Óvári, M., Komoly, C., Sutyinszki, Zs., Szabó, G., Csathó, A. I., Juhász, M., Penksza, K. & Molnár, Zs. 2014: Impact of mid-successional dominant species on the diversity and progress of succession in regenerating temperate grasslands. Applied Vegetation Science 17: 201–213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.1206610.1111/avsc.12066]Search in Google Scholar
[Batalha, M. A., Pipenbaher, N., Bakan, B., Kaligarič, M., & Škornik, S. 2015: Assessing community assembly along a successional gradient in the North Adriatic Karst with functional and phylogenetic distances. Oecologia 178(4): 1205–1214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-015-3295-510.1007/s00442-015-3295-525800875]Search in Google Scholar
[Breg Valjavec, M., Zorn, M. & Čarni, A. 2018: Human-induced land degradation and biodiversity of Classical Karst landscape: On the example of enclosed karst depressions (dolines). Land Degradation and Development 2018: 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.311610.1002/ldr.3116]Search in Google Scholar
[Čarni, A. & Kaligarič, M. 1991: Comparison of spontaneous reforestation in two formerly cultivated areas. Gortania 13: 77–85.]Search in Google Scholar
[Čarni, A., Košir, P., Karadžić, B., Matevski, V., Redžić, S. & Škvorc, Ž. 2009: Thermophilous deciduous forests in Southeastern Europe. Plant Biosystems 143: 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1126350080263388110.1080/11263500802633881]Search in Google Scholar
[Čarni, A., Košir, P., Marinšek, A., Šilc, U. & Zelnik, I. 2007: Changes in structure, floristic composition and chemical soil properties in a succession of birch forests. Periodicum Biologorum 109: 13–20.]Search in Google Scholar
[Čarni, A., Marinček, L., Seliškar, A. & Zupančič M. 2002: Vegetacijska karta gozdnih združb Slovenije 1 : 400.00. [The vegetation map of forest communities of Slovenia 1 : 400.000.]. ZRC Publishing, Ljubljana.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chytrý, M., Tichý, L., Holt, J. & Botta-Dukát, Z. 2002: Determination of diagnostic species with statistical fidelity measures. Journal of Vegation Science 13: 79–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2002.tb02025.x10.1111/j.1654-1103.2002.tb02025.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Cramer, V. A. & Hobbs, R. J. (eds.) 2007: Old fields: dynamics and restoration of abandoned farmland. Island Press, Washington, 335 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cramer, V. A., Hobbs, R. J. & Standish, R. J. 2008: What’s new about old fields? Land abandonment and ecosystem assembly. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 23: 104–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.00510.1016/j.tree.2007.10.00518191278]Search in Google Scholar
[Csecserits, A., Szabó, R., Halassy, M. & Rédei, T. 2007: Testing the validity of successional predictions on an old-field chronosequence in Hungary. Community Ecology 8: 195–207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.8.2007.2.610.1556/ComEc.8.2007.2.6]Search in Google Scholar
[Csecserits, A., Czúcz, B., Halassy, M., Kröel-Dulay, Gy., Rédei, T., Szabó, R., Szitár, K. & Török, K. 2011: Regeneration of sandy old-fields in the forest steppe region of Hungary. Plant Biosystems 145: 715–729. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2011.60134010.1080/11263504.2011.601340]Search in Google Scholar
[Donath, T. W., Hölzel, N. & Otte, A. 2003: The impact of site conditions and seed dispersal on restoration success in alluvial meadows. Applied Vegetation Science 6: 13–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-109X.2003.tb00560.x10.1111/j.1654-109X.2003.tb00560.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Gams, I. 1993: Origin of the term “karst,” and the transformation of the Classical Karst (Kras). Environmental Geology 21: 110–114.]Search in Google Scholar
[Godwin, H. 1929: The sub-climax and deflected succession. Journal of Ecology 17: 144–147.10.2307/2255919]Search in Google Scholar
[Halassy, M., Singh, A. N., Szabó, R., Szili-Kovács, T., Szitár, K.& Török, K. 2016: The application of a filter-based assembly model to develop best practices for Pannonian sand grassland restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 53: 765–773. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.1261810.1111/1365-2664.12618]Search in Google Scholar
[Házi, J., Bartha, S., Szentes, Sz. & Penksza, K. 2011: Seminatural grassland management by mowing of Calamagrostis epigeios in Hungary. Plant Biosystems 145: 699–707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2011.60133910.1080/11263504.2011.601339]Search in Google Scholar
[Janišová, M., Michalková, D., Bacaro, G. & Ghisla, A. 2014: Landscape effects on diversity of semi-natural grasslands. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 182: 47–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.05.02210.1016/j.agee.2013.05.022]Search in Google Scholar
[Jongepierová, I., Jongepier, J. W., Klimes, L. 2004: Restoring grassland on arable land: an example of a fast spontaneous succession without weed-dominated stages. Preslia 76: 361–369.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaligarič, M. 1997: Rastlinstvo Primorskega krasa in Slovenske Istre: travniki in pašniki. Zgodovinsko društvo za južno Primorsko: Znanstveno-raziskovalno središče Republike Slovenije, Koper. 111 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaligarič, M., Culiberg, M. & Kramberger, B. 2006: Recent vegetation history of the North Adriatic grasslands: expansion and decay of an anthropogenic habitat. Folia Geobotanica 41: 241–258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0290494010.1007/BF02904940]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaligarič, M. & Ivanjšič, D. 2014: Vanishing landscape of the “classic” Karst: changed landscape identity and projections for the future. Landscape and Urban Planning 132: 148–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.09.00410.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.09.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Lepš, J. 1989: Horizontal structure. In: Osbornová J, Kovářová M, Lepš J, Prach K (eds.) Succession in abandoned fields. Studies in Central Bohemia, Czechoslovakia. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 38–42.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mangiafico, S. 2020: rcompanion: Functions to Support Extension Education Program Evaluation. R package version 2.3.25., https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rcompanion]Search in Google Scholar
[Martinčič, A. (ed.) 2007: Mala flora Slovenije. Ključ za določanje praprotnic in semenk. Tehniška založba, Ljubljana, 967 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Matus, G., Tóthmérész, B. & Papp, M. 2003: Restoration prospects of abandoned species-rich sandy grassland in Hungary. Applied Vegetation Science 6: 169–178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-109X.2003.tb00577.x10.1111/j.1654-109X.2003.tb00577.x]Search in Google Scholar
[McCallum, K. P., Lowe, A. J., Breed, M. F. & Paton, D. C. 2018: Spatially designed revegetation—why the spatial arrangement of plants should be as important to revegetation as they are to natural systems. Restoration Ecology 26: 446–455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.1269010.1111/rec.12690]Search in Google Scholar
[McCune, B. & Mefford, M. J. 1999: PC-ORD. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data. Version 5.0.]Search in Google Scholar
[Molnár, Zs. & Botta-Dukát, Z. 1998: Improved space-for-time substitution for hypothesis generation: secondary grasslands with documented site history in SE-Hungary. Phytocoenologia 28: 1–29.10.1127/phyto/28/1998/1]Search in Google Scholar
[Mucina, L., Bültmann, H., Dierßen, K., Theurillat, J. P., Raus, T. & Čarni, A., (...) & Tichý, L. 2016: Vegetation of Europe: hierarchical floristic classification system of vascular plant, bryophyte, lichen, and algal communities. Applied Vegetation Science 19 (Suppl. 1): 3–264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.1225710.1111/avsc.12257]Search in Google Scholar
[Ogle, D. H. 2018: FSA: Fisheries Stock Analysis. R package version 0.8.20.]Search in Google Scholar
[Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F. G., Friendly, M., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., McGlinn, D., Minchin, P. R., O’Hara, R. B., Simpson, G.L., Solymos, P., Henry, M., Stevens, H., Szoecs, E. & Wagner, H. 2017: Package ‘vegan’. Community ecology package. R package version, pp 117–118.]Search in Google Scholar
[Osbornová, J., Kovářová, M., Lepš, J. & Prach, K. (eds.) 1989: Succession in abandoned fields. Studies in Central Bohemia, Czechoslovakia. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 168 pp.10.1007/978-94-009-2444-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Öster, M., Ask, K., Cousins, S. A. O. & Eriksson, O. 2009: Dispersal and establishment limitation reduces the potential for successful restoration of semi-natural grassland communities on former arable fields. Journal of Applied Ecology 46: 1266–1274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01721.x10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01721.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Palang, H., Printsmann, A., Gyuro, E. K., Urbanc, M., Skowronek, E., & Woloszyn, W. 2006: The forgotten rural landscapes of Central and Eastern Europe. Landscape Ecology 21(3): 347–357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-004-4313-x10.1007/s10980-004-4313-x]Search in Google Scholar
[Pickett, S. T. 1989: Space-for-time substitution as an alternative to long-term studies. In: Likens, F. G. (ed.) Long-term studies in ecology. Springer, New York, pp 110–135.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pickett, S. T. A., Cadenasso, M. L. & Bartha, S. 2001: Implication from the Buell-Small Successional Study for vegetation restoration. Applied Vegetation Science 4: 41–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-109X.2001.tb00233.x10.1111/j.1654-109X.2001.tb00233.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Pickett, S. T. A., Collins, S. L. & Armesto, J. J. 1987: Models, mechanisms and pathways of succession. The Botanical Review 53: 335–371.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pignatti, S., Menegoni, P., Pietrosanti, S. 2005: Valori di bioindicazione delle piante vascolari. Valori di indicatione secondo Ellenberg per la piante delle flora d’Italia. Braun-Blanquetia 39: 3–97]Search in Google Scholar
[Pipenbaher, N., Kaligarič, M., Škornik, S. 2011: Floristic and functional comparision of karst pastures and karst meadows from the north Adriatic Karst. Acta Carsologica 40: 515–525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3986/ac.v40i3.6110.3986/ac.v40i3.61]Search in Google Scholar
[Podani, J. 1987: Computerized sampling in vegetation studies. Coenoses 2: 9–18.]Search in Google Scholar
[Prach, K. & Pyšek, P. 1999: How do species dominating in succession differ from the others? Journal of Vegetation Science 10: 383–392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/323706710.2307/3237067]Search in Google Scholar
[Prach, K. & Walker, L. R. 2019: Differences between primary and secondary plant succession among biomes of the world. Journal of Ecology 107: 510–516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.1307810.1111/1365-2745.13078]Search in Google Scholar
[Prach, K., Pyšek, P. & Šmilauer, P. 1999: Prediction of vegetation succession in human-disturbed habitats using an expert system. Restoration Ecology 7: 15–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100X.1999.07102.x10.1046/j.1526-100X.1999.07102.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Prach, K., Bartha, S., Joyce, C. H. B., Pyšek, P., van Diggelen, R. & Wiegleb, G. 2001: The role of spontaneous vegetation succession in ecosystem restoration: A perspective. Applied Vegetation Science 4: 111–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-109X.2001.tb00241.x10.1111/j.1654-109X.2001.tb00241.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Prach, K., Lepš, J. & Rejmánek, M. 2007: Old field succession in Central Europe: local and regional patterns. In: Cramer, V. A. & Hobbs, R. J. (eds.) Old fields: Dynamics and restoration of abandoned farmland. Island Press, pp 180–202.]Search in Google Scholar
[Prach, K., Řehounková, K., Lencová, K., Jírová, A., Konvalinková, P., Mudrák, O., Študent, V., Vaněček, Z., Tich, L., Petřík, P., Šmilauer, P. & Pyšek, P. 2014: Vegetation succession in restoration of disturbed sites in Central Europe: the direction of succession and species richness across 19 seres. Applied Vegetation Science 17: 193–200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.1206410.1111/avsc.12064]Search in Google Scholar
[Pywell, R. F., Bullock, J. M., Hopkins, A., Walker, K. J., Sparks, T. H., Burke, M. J. & Peel, S. 2002: Restoration of species-rich grassland on arable land: assessing the limiting processes using a multi-site experiment. Journal of Applied Ecology 39: 294–309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00718.x10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00718.x]Search in Google Scholar
[R Core Team 2018: R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, URL https://www.R-project.org/]Search in Google Scholar
[Rejmánek, M. & van Katwyk, P. 2005: Old-field succession: a bibliographic review (1901–1991), http://botanika.bf.jcu.cz/suspa/pdf/BiblioOF.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Robertson, G. P., Huston, M. A., Evans, F. C. & Tiedje, J. M. 1988: Spatial variability in successional plant community: patterns of nitrogen availability. Ecology 69: 1517–1524. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/194164910.2307/1941649]Search in Google Scholar
[Ruprecht, E. 2006: Successfully recovered grassland: a promising example from Romanian old-fields. Restoration Ecology 14: 473–480.10.1111/j.1526-100X.2006.00155.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Ruprecht, E., Bartha, S., Botta-Dukát, Z. & Szabó, A. 2007: Assembly rules during old-field succession in two contrasting environments. Community Ecology 8: 31–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.8.2007.1.510.1556/ComEc.8.2007.1.5]Search in Google Scholar
[Schmid, B. C., Poschlod, P. & Prentice, H. C. 2017: The contribution of successional grasslands to the conservation of semi-natural grassland species – A landscape perspective. Biological Conservation 206: 112–119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.12.00210.1016/j.biocon.2016.12.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Škornik, S., Vidrih, M. & Kaligarič, M. 2010: The effect of grazing pressure on species richness, composition and productivity in North Adriatic Karst pastures. Plant Biosystems 144: 355–364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1126350100375025010.1080/11263501003750250]Search in Google Scholar
[Sojneková, M. & Chytrý, M. 2015: From arable land to species-rich semi-natural grasslands: Succession in abandoned fields in a dry region of central Europe. Ecological Engineering 77: 373–381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.01.04210.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.01.042]Search in Google Scholar
[Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. 1995: Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. 3rd ed. Freeman, New York, 887 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Symonides, E. 1985: Changes in phytocoenose structure in early phases of old-field succession in Poland. Tuexenia 5: 259–271.]Search in Google Scholar
[Szentes, Sz., Sutyinszki, Zs., Szabó, G., Zimmermann, Z., Házi, J., Wichmann, B., Hufnágel, L., Penksza, K. & Bartha, S. 2012: Grazed Pannonian grassland beta-diversity changes due to C4 yellow bluestem. Central European Journal of Biology 7: 1055–1065. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11535-012-0101-910.2478/s11535-012-0101-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Tichý, L. & Chytrý, M. 2006: Statistical determination of diagnostic species for site groups of unequal size. Journal of Vegetation Science 17: 809–818. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2006.tb02504.x10.1111/j.1654-1103.2006.tb02504.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Tichý, L., Chytrý, M., Hájek, M., Talbot, S. S. & Botta-Dukát, Z. 2010: OptimClass: Using species-to-cluster fidelity to determine the optimal partition in classification of ecological communities. Journal of Vegetation Science 21: 287–299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.01143.x10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.01143.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Tölgyesi, Cs., Török, P., Kun, R., Csathó, A. I., Bátori, Z., Erdős, L. & Vadász, Cs. 2019: Recovery of species richness lags behind functional recovery in restored grasslands. Land Degradation and Development 30: 1083–1094. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.329510.1002/ldr.3295]Search in Google Scholar
[Török, P & Helm, A. 2017: Ecological theory provides strong support for habitat restoration. Biological Conservation 206: 85–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.12.02410.1016/j.biocon.2016.12.024]Search in Google Scholar
[Török, P., Vida, E., Deák, B., Lengyel, Sz. & Tóthmérész, B. 2011a: Grassland restoration on former croplands in Europe: an assessment of applicability of techniques and costs. Biodiversity and Conservation 20: 2311–2332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-011-9992-410.1007/s10531-011-9992-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Török, P., Kelemen, A., Valkó, O., Deák, B., Lukács, B. & Tóthmérész, B. 2011b: Lucerne-dominated fields recover native grass diversity without intensive management actions. Journal of Applied Ecology 48: 257–264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01903.x10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01903.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Török, P., Kelemen, A.,Valkó, O., Miglécz, T., Tóth, K., Tóth, E., Sonkoly, J., Kiss, R., Csecserits, A., Rédei, T., Deák, B., Szűcs, P., Varga, N. & Tóthmérész, B. 2018: Succession in soil seed banks and implications for restoration of calcareous sand grasslands. Restoration Ecology 26(S2): S134–S140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.1261110.1111/rec.12611]Search in Google Scholar
[Vitasović Kosić, I., Tardella, F. M. & Catorci, A. 2012: Effect of management modification on the coenological composition of the North Adriatic pastoral landscape (Ćićarija, Croatia). Hacquetia 11: 17–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10028-012-0002-510.2478/v10028-012-0002-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Vrščaj, B., Repe, B. & Simončič, P. 2017: The soils of Slovenia. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht. 216 pp.10.1007/978-94-017-8585-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Walker, K. J., Stevens, P. A., Stevens, D. P., Mountford, J. O., Manchester, S. J., & Pywell, R. F. 2004: The restoration and re-creation of species-rich lowland grassland on land formerly managed for intensive agriculture in the UK. Biological Conservation 119: 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2003.10.02010.1016/j.biocon.2003.10.020]Search in Google Scholar
[Wickham, H. 2016: ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York.10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Zelený, D. 2018: Which results of the standard test for community - weighted mean approach are too optimistic? Journal of Vegetation Science 29: 953–966. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.1268810.1111/jvs.12688]Search in Google Scholar