[
Alain, C., Arnott, S. R., Hevenor, S., Graham, S., & Grady, C. L. (2001). “What” and “where” in the human auditory system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(21), 12301. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.211209098
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual Symbol Systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577–660.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bériachvili, G. (2010). L’Espace Musical: Concept et Phénomène à travers l’Avant-Garde des Années 1950-60 (Stockhausen, Xenakis, Ligeti...). Université de Rouen.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bonnet, F. J. (2012). Les mots et les sons: Un archipel sonore. Éditions de l’éclat.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bourdieu, P. (1979). La distinction. Critique sociale du jugement. Les Éditions de Minuit.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brower, C. (1997). Pathway, Blockage, and Containment in Density 21.5. Theory and Practice, 22, 35–54.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brower, C. (2000). A Cognitive Theory Of Musical Meaning. Journal of Music Theory, 44, 323–379.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Caramiaux, B., Bevilacqua, F., Bianco, T., Schnell, N., Houix, O., & Susini, P. (2014). The Role of Sound Source Perception in Gestural Sound Description. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 11(1), 1–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2536811
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Churchland, P. M. (2013). Matter and Consciousness. MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cienki, A. (1999). Some Properties and Groupings of Image Schemas. In M. H. Verspoor, K. D. Lee & E. Sweetser (Eds.), Lexical and Syntactical constructions and the construction of meaning (pp. 3 –16). John Benjamins PublishingCompany.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Clarke, E. (2005). Ways of Listening: An Ecological Approach to the Perception of Musical Meaning. Oxford UniversityPress.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cox, A. (2016). Music and Embodied Cognition. Listening, Moving, Feeling, and Thiking. Indiana University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cox, C., & Warner, D. (2017). Audio Culture, Revised Edition: Readings in Modern Music (Vol. 1). Bloomsbury Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Damasio, A. (2010). Self Comes to Mind: Constructing the Conscious Brain. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Davies, S. (1994). Musical Meaning and Expression. Cornell University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Deil, J., Markert, N., Normand, P., Kammen, P., Küssner, M. B., & Taruffi, L. (2022). Mind-wandering during contemporary live music: An exploratory study. Musicae Scientiae, 10298649221103210. https://doi.org/10.1177/10298649221103210
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DeLanda, M. (2022). Materialist Phenomenology. A philosophy of Perception. Bloomsbury.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Deliège, I. (1989). Approche perceptive de formes musicales contemporaines. In S. McAdams & I. Deliège (Eds.), La musique et le science cognitives (pp. 305–326). P. Mardaga.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dennett, D. C. (2017). Consciousness Explained. Hachette UK.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Di Bona, E., & Santarcangelo, V. (2018). Il suono. L’esperienza uditiva e i suoi oggetti. Raffaello Cortina Editore.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Di Salle, F., Esposito, F., Scarabino, T., Formisano, E., Marciano, E., Saulino, C., Cirillo, S., Elefante, R., Scheffler, K., & Seifritz, E. (2003). FMRI of the auditory system: Understanding the neural basis of auditory gestalt. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 21(10), 1213–1224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2003.08.023
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dolscheid, S., Shayan, S., Majid, A., & Casasanto, D. (2013). The Thickness of Musical Pitch: Psychophysical Evidence for Linguistic Relativity. Psychological Science, 24(5), 613–621. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612457374
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dyson, F. (2009). Sounding New Media. Immersion and Embodyment in the Arts and Culture. University of California Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eitan, Z., & Granot, R. Y. (2006). How music moves: Musical parameters and listeners’ images of motion. Music Perception, 23(3), 221–247.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Emmerson, S., & Landy, L. (Eds.). (2016). Expanding the Horizon of Electroacoustic Music Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fingelkurts, A. A., Fingelkurts, A. A., & Neves, C. F. H. (2010). Natural world physical, brain operational, and mind phenomenal space-time. Physics of Life Reviews, 7(2), 195–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2010.04.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Frey, A., Daquet, A., Poitrenaud, S., Tijus, C., Fremiot, M., Formosa, M., Prod’homme, L., Mandelbrojt, J., Timsit-Berthier, M., Bootz, P., Hautbois, X., & Besson, M. (2009). Pertinence cognitive des unités sémiotiquestemporelles.Musicae Scientiae, 13(2), 415–440.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gallistel, C. R. (1990). The organization of learning. MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gärdenfors, P. (2000). Conceptual Spaces. The Geometry of Thought. MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gaver, W. W. (1993). What in the world do we hear? An ecological approach to auditory event perception. Ecological Psychology, 5(1), 1–29.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach To Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Giordano, B. L., & McAdams, S. (2010). Sound Source Mechanics and Musical Timbre Perception: Evidence From Previous Studies. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 28(2), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2010.28.2.155
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Glover, R., Gottschalk, J., & Harrison, B. (2018). Being Time. Case Studies in Musical Temporality. Bloomsbury.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Godøy, R. I. (1997). Knowledge in Music Theory by Shapes of Musical Objects and Sound-Producing Actions. In M. Leman (Ed.), Music, Gestalt, and Computing. Studies in Cognitive and Systematic Musicology ( Springer-Verlag, pp. 89–102).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Godøy, R. I. (2010). Gestural Affordances of Musical Sound. In R. I. Godøy & M. Leman (Eds.), Musical Gestures: Sound, Movement, and Meaning (pp. 103–125). Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Godøy, R. I. (2021). Perceiving Sound Objects in the Musique Concrète. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.672949
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Godøy, R. I., & Jørgensen, H. (Eds.). (2001). Musical Imagery. Taylor & Francis.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grebosz-Haring, K., & Weichbold, M. (2020). Contemporary art music and its audiences: Age, gender, and social class profile. Musicae Scientiae, 24(1), 60–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864918774082
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grey, J. M. (1977). Multidimensional perceptual scaling of musical timbres. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61(5), 1270–1277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.381428
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Griffiths, P. (2010). Modern Music And After (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Griffiths, T. D., & Warren, J. D. (2004). What is an auditory object? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(11), 887–892. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1538
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grisey, G. (1987). Tempus ex machina: A composer’s reflections on musical time. Contemporary Music Review, 2(1), 239–275.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hampe, B. (2008). From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. Walter de Gruyter.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hjortkjær, J. (2015). Sound objects – Auditory objects – Musical objects. Dansk Musikforskning Online, SPECIAL EDITION, 47–56.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Huron, D. B. (2006). Sweet Anticipation: Music and the Psychology of Expectation. MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Imberty, M. (2005). La musique creuse le temps. De Wagner à Boulez: Musique, psychologie, psychanalyse. L’Harmattan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Johnson, M. (2008). The Meaning of the Body: Aesthetics of Human Understanding. University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Johnson, M., & Larson, S. (2003). “Something in the way she moves”—Metaphors of musical motion. Metaphor and Symbol, 18, 63–84.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Joseph, S., Kumar, S., Husain, M., & Griffiths, T. D. (2015). Auditory working memory for objects vs. Features. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 9, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Juslin, P. N., & Sloboda, J. A. (2013). Music and Emotion. In D. Deutsch (Ed.), The Psychology of Music (Third Edition) (3rd ed., pp. 583–645). Academic Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kivy, P. (1991). Music Alone: Philosophical Reflections on the Purely Musical Experience. Cornell University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Koelsch, S., & Siebel, W. A. (2005). Towards a neural basis of music perception. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 9(12), 578–584.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kosslyn, S. M., Shephard, J. M., & Thompson, W. L. (2007). Spatial Processing during Mental Imagery: A Neurofunctional Theory. In F. Mast & L. Jäncke (Eds.), Spatial Processing in Navigation, Imagery and Perception (pp. 1–15). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71978-8_1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kozak, M. (2020). Enacting Musical Time. The Bodily Experience of New Music. Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kramer, J. D. (1988). The time of music: New meanings, new temporalities, new listening strategies. Schirmer/Mosel Verlag GmbH.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krueger, J. (2014). Affordances and the musically extended mind (Vol. 1).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kubovy, M., & Van Valkenburg, D. (2001). Auditory and visual objects. Cognition, 80, 97–126.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Laeng, B. (2013). Representation of Spatial Relations. In K. N. Ochsner & S. Kosslyn (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Neuroscience, Volume 1: Core Topics (p. 0). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199988693.013.0003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2008). Philosophy In The Flesh (Vol. 1).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Landy, L. (2007). Understanding the Art of Sound Organization. MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Larson, S. (2012). Musical Forces. Motion, Metaphor, and Meaning in Music. Indiana University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Larson, S., & VanHandel, L. (2005). Measuring Musical Forces. Music Perception, 23(2), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2005.23.2.119
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leech-Wilkinson, D., & Prior, H. M. (Eds.). (2017). Music and Shape. Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leman, M. (2008). Embodied Music Cognition and Mediation Technology. MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lerdahl, F. (1992). Cognitive Constraints on Compositional Systems. Contemporary Music Review, 6(2), 97–121.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lerdahl, F. (2001). Tonal Pitch Space. Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lerdahl, F., & Jackendoff, R. (1983). A Generative Theory of Tonal Music. MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lundy, T., James, C., & Reybrouck, M. (2022). Editorial: Neuroscience and new music: Assessing behavioral and cerebral aspects of its perception, cognition, induction, and entrainment. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.979570
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marr, D. (1982). Vision. MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mencke, I., Omigie, D., Wald-Fuhrmann, M., & Brattico, E. (2019). Atonal Music: Can Uncertainty Lead to Pleasure? Frontiers in Neuroscience, 12, 979. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00979
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Menger, P.-M. (2014). The Economics of Creativity. Art and Achievement under Uncertainty. Harvard University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Menin, D., & Schiavio, A. (2012). Rethinking Musical Affordances. AVANT, III(2), 202–215.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moore, A. (2016). Sonic Art: An Introduction to Electroacoustic Music Composition. Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Noë, A. (2004). Action in Perception. MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ockelford, A., & Sergeant, D. (2012). Musical expectancy in atonal contexts: Musicians’ perception of “ antistructure”.Psychology of Music, 41(2), 139–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735612442582
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Oliveros, P. (2005). Deep Listening: A Composer’s Sound Practice. Iuniverse.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Petitot, J. (2011). Cognitive Morphodynamics. Dynamical Morphological Models of Constituency in Perception and Syntax. Peter Lang AG.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reybrouck, M. (2012). Musical Sense-Making and the Concept of Affordance: An Ecosemiotic and Experiential Approach. Biosemiotics, 5(3), 391–409.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reybrouck, M. (2013). Musical universals and the axiom of psychobiological equivalence. In J.-L. Leroy (Ed.), Topicality of Musical Universals / Actualité des Universaux musicaux (pp. 31–44). Editions des Archives Contemporaines.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reybrouck, M. (2020). Musical Sense-Making: Enaction, Experience, and Computation. Taylor & Francis.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ridley, A. (2004). The Philosophy of Music: Theme and Variations. Edinburgh University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rocchesso, D., & Fontana, F. (Eds.). (2003). The Sounding Object. GNU Free Documentation License.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roy, S. (2003). L’Analyse des Musiques Électroacoustiques: Modèles et Propositions. L’Harmattan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Santarcangelo, V., & Wanke, R. (2020). The Early Stage of Perception of Contemporary Art Music: A matter of time. Organised Sound, 25(2), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355771820000047
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schaeffer, P. (1966). Traité des Objets Musicaux. Seuil.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scruton, R. (1997). The Aesthetics of Music. Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schulze, K., & Koelsch, S. (2012). Working memory for speech and music. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1252, 229–236.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shamma, S. (2001). On the role of space and time in auditory processing. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 5(8), 340–348.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sheets-Johnstone, M. (1999). The Primacy of Movement. John Benjamins.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smolensky, P. (1988). On the proper treatment of connectionism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 1–74. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00052432
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Snyder, B. (2001). Music and Memory. MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Solomos, M. (2019). From Music to Sound: The Emergence of Sound in 20th- and 21st-Century Music. Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Solomos, M. (2023). Exploring the Ecologies of Music and Sound: Environmental, Mental and Social Ecologies in Music, Sound Art and Artivisms. Routledge, Taylor & Francis. https://www.routledge.com/Exploring-the-Ecologies-of-Music-and-Sound-Environmental-Mental-and-Social/Solomos/p/book/9781032184234
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Spence, C. (2011). Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review (Vol. 1).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tenney, J. (2015). From Scratch: Writings in Music Theory (Vol. 1).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van de Cruys, S., & Wagemans, J. (2011). Gestalts as predictions—Some reflections and an application to art. Gestalt Theory, 33(3–4), 325–344.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van der Schyff, D., Schiavio, A., & Elliott, D. J. (2022). Musical Bodies, Musical Minds. MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The Embodied Mind. MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Viel, M. (2019). Listening Patterns. From Music to Perception and Cognition.Lap Lambert Academic Publishing. Voegelin, S. (2014). Sonic Possible Worlds. Hearing the Continuum of Sound. Bloomsbury.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wagner, K., & Dobkins, K. R. (2011). Synaesthetic Associations Decrease During Infancy. Psychological Science, 22(8), 1067–1072. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611416250
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wanke, R. (2019). A unified approach to perceiving sound in current experimental music genres. Filigrane. Musique, Esthétique, Sciences, Société., 23. https://revues.mshparisnord.fr/filigrane/index.php?id=879
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wanke, R. (2021). Sound in the Ecstatic-Materialist Perspective on Experimental Music. Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wanke, R. (2022). Listening Survey – figshare. DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21590658.v3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wanke, R., Camci, A., Noble, J. D. K., & Lembke, S.-A. (2018). Symposium: What do we hear in contemporary and experimental music? New answers to an old question. ICMPC15/ESCO10. International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition, Graz (AU), Montreal (CA).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wanke, R., & Santarcangelo, V. (2021). Memory as the Aspatial Domain for the Perception of Certain Genres of Contemporary Art Music. Music & Science, 4, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059204321997658
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Windsor, L. W. (2000). Through and around the acousmatic: The interpretation of electroacoustic sounds. In S. Emmerson (Ed.), Music, Electronic Media and Culture (pp. 7–35). Ashgate.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Windsor, L. W., & de Bézenac, C. (2012). Music and affordances. Musicae Scientiae, 16(1), 102–120.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zbikowski, L. M. (2002). Conceptualizing Music: Cognitive Structure, Theory, and Analysis (Vol. 1). Oxford UniversityPress.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zbikowski, L. M. (2008). Metaphor and music. In The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought (pp. 502–524). Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zbikowski, L. M. (2010). Foundations of Musical Grammar (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zbikowski, L. M. (2017). Music, Analogy and Metaphor. In The Routledge COmpanion to Music Cognition (pp. 501–512). Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zuckerkandl, V. (1969). Sound and Symbol: Music and the External World. Princeton University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar