[
Arnheim, R. (2004). Visual thinking. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Elias, N. (2000). The civilizing process. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fitzek, H. (2000). Figurations in everyday life – A research program of cultural psychology. Forum Qualitative Social Research, 1(2). doi: 10.17169/fqs-1.2.1077
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fitzek, H. (2013). Artcoaching. Gestalt theory in arts and culture. Gestalt Theory, 35(1), 33–46.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Freud, S. (1955). The Moses of Michelangelo. In S. Freud (Ed.), Standard edition (Vol. XIII, pp. 210–238). London, UK: Hogarth.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Freud, S. & Jung, C. G. (1974). Briefwechsel. Frankfurt, Germany: Fischer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grubrich-Simitis, I. (2004). Michelangelos Moses und Freuds “Wagstück”. Eine Collage. Frankfurt, Germany: Fischer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kris, E. (1952). Psychoanalytic explorations in art. New York, NY: International Universities Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Machiavelli, N. (2013). The prince. Scotts Valley, CA: Create Space Independent Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Salber, W. (1957). Bildgefüge und Erlebnisgefüge. Jahrbuch für Psychologie, Psychotherapie und medizinische Anthropologie, 5(1/2), 72–81.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schiff, G. (1959). Das “non finito” bei Michelangelo und im Manierismus. Du: kulturelle Monatsschrift, 19, 29–30.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shannon, C. & Weaver, W. (1949). A Mathematical Model of Communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Weizsäcker, V. V. (1940). Der Gestaltkreis. Theorie der Einheit von Wahrnehmen und Bewegen. Leipzig, Germany: Thieme.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zybowski, P. (2009). Rezensions- und Rezeptionsgeschichte zu “Der Gestaltkreis. Theorie der Einheit von Wahrnehmen und Bewegen” von Viktor von Weizsäcker (dissertation), Berlin.
]Search in Google Scholar
