[Albertazzi, L. (2015). A science of qualities. Biological Theory, 10, 188–199.10.1007/s13752-015-0213-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Anjum, R., & Mumford, S. (2017) Emergence and Demergence. In: M. Paoletti & F. Orilia (Eds.) Philosophical and Scientific Perspectives on Downward Causation (pp. 92–109). New York, London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315638577-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Arnheim, R. (1974). Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520351271]Search in Google Scholar
[Ash, M. G. (1985). Gestalt psychology: Origins in Germany and reception in the United States. In: C. E. Buxton (Ed.), Points of view in the modern history of psychology (pp. 295–344). Orlando e.a.: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-148510-8.50015-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Bischof, N. (1966). Erkenntnistheoretische Grundlagenprobleme der Wahrnehmungspsychologie. In: W. Metzger (Ed.) Handbuch der Psychologie. In 12 Bänden. Bd. 1 (pp. 27–78). Göttingen: Verlag für Psychologie.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brdar-Szabó, R., & Brdar, M. (2011) What do metonymic chains reveal about the nature of metonymy? In: F. de Mendoza, R. Benczes & A. Barcelona (Eds.) Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics: Towards a consensus view (pp. 217–248). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.28.12brd]Search in Google Scholar
[Gabriel, M. (2018). Der Sinn des Denkens. Berlin: Ullstein.]Search in Google Scholar
[Harrington, A. (1996). Reenchanted science: holism in German culture from Wilhelm 2 to Hitler. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691218083]Search in Google Scholar
[Hochstein, S., & Ahissar, M. (2002). View from the top: Hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system. Neuron, 36, 791–804.10.1016/S0896-6273(02)01091-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Hoffman, D., Richards, W. (1984). Parts of recognition. Cognition, 18, 65–96.10.1016/0010-0277(84)90022-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Husserl, E. (2001). Logical Investigations. London, New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203420034]Search in Google Scholar
[Husserl, E. (2003). Philosophy of arithmetic: Psychological and logical investigations with supplementary texts from 1887-1901. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-010-0060-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Koenderink, J. (2012). Visual awareness. Utrecht: De Clootcrans Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Koestler, A. (1970). Beyond atomism and holism - the concept of the holon. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 13(2), 131–154.10.1353/pbm.1970.0023]Search in Google Scholar
[Koffka, K. (1922). Perception: an introduction to the Gestalt-Theory. The Psychological Bulletin, 19(10), 531–585.10.1037/h0072422]Search in Google Scholar
[Köhler, W. (1939). The place of value in a world of facts. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lee, T. S., & Mumford, D. (2003). Hierarchical Bayesian inference in the visual cortex. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 20(7), 1434–1448.10.1364/JOSAA.20.001434]Search in Google Scholar
[Leisegang, H. (1951). Denkformen. Berlin: W. de Gruyter.]Search in Google Scholar
[McCulloch, W. (1945). A heterarchy of values determined by the topology of nervous nets. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 7, 89–93.10.1007/BF02478457]Search in Google Scholar
[Metzger, W. (2001). Psychologie. Die Entwicklung ihrer Grundannahmen seit der Einführung des Experiments. Vienna: Krammer.]Search in Google Scholar
[Næss, A., & Haukeland, P. I. (2002). Life’s philosophy: Reason & feeling in a deeper world. Athens, London: University of Georgia Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pind, Jörgen L. (2014). Edgar rubin and psychology in Denmark: Figure and ground. Dordrecht e.a.: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-01062-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Pinna, B. (2010). New Gestalt principles of perceptual organization: An extension from grouping to shape and meaning. Gestalt Theory, 32(1), 11–78.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pinna, B. (2011). What is the meaning of shape? Gestalt Theory, 33(3/4), 383–422.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pinna, B., & Albertazzi, L. (2010). From grouping to visual meanings: A new theory of perceptual organization. In: L. Albertazzi, G. J. van Tonder, & D. Vishwanath (Eds.) Perception beyond inference: The information content of visual processes (pp. 287–344). Cambridge, London: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/8594.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Pinna, B., & Reeves, A. (2009). From perception to art: How vision creates meanings. Spatial Vision, 22(3), 225–272.10.1163/15685680978831314719460274]Search in Google Scholar
[Pomerantz, J. R., Cragin, A. I. (2015). Emergent features and feature combination. In: J. Wagemans (Ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Perceptual Organization (pp. 88–107). Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199686858.013.021]Search in Google Scholar
[Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z. (1999). Towards a theory of metonymy. In: K.-U. Panther, & G. Radden (Eds.) Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 17–60). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.4.03rad]Search in Google Scholar
[Rausch, E. (1967). Über Summativität und Nichtsummativität. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rubin, E. (1921). Visuell wahrgenommene Figuren. Studien in psychologischer Analyse. Kopenhagen e.a.: Gyldendalske Boghandel.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ruiz de Mendoza, F. (2000). The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. In: A. Barcelona (Ed.) Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp. 109–132). Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110894677.109]Search in Google Scholar
[Simons, P. M. (1982). The formalisation of Husserl’s theory of wholes and parts. In: B. Smith (Ed.) Parts and moments: Studies in logic and formal ontology (pp. 113–159). Munich, Vienna: Philosophia.10.2307/j.ctv2x8v896.6]Search in Google Scholar
[Smith, B. (1988). Gestalt theory: An essay in philosophy. Munich, Vienna: Philosophia.10.2307/j.ctv2x8v91j.4]Search in Google Scholar
[Smith, B. (1994). Austrian philosophy: The Legacy of Franz Brentano. Chicago, LaSalle: Open Court.]Search in Google Scholar
[Smith, B., & Mulligan, K. (1982). Pieces of a theory. In: B. Smith (Ed.), Parts and moments: Studies in logic and formal ontology (pp. 15–109). Munich, Vienna: Philosophia.10.2307/j.ctv2x8v896.4]Search in Google Scholar
[Smith, B., & Smith, D. W. (1995). Introduction. In: B. Smith, & D. W. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Husserl (pp. 1–44). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CCOL0521430232.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Sokolowski, R. (2000). Introduction to phenomenology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ströker, E. (2009). Husserls Logische Untersuchungen. Ein Werk des Durchbruchs zur Phänomenologie. In: E. Husserl, Logische Untersuchungen (pp. xxvii–lxxiii). Hamburg: Felix Meiner.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stumpf, C. (1873). Über den psychologischen Ursprung der Raumvorstellung. Leipzig: S. Hirzel.]Search in Google Scholar
[van der Helm, P. (2012). Cognitive architecture of perceptual organization: From neurons to gnosons. Cognitive Processing, 13, 13–40.10.1007/s10339-011-0425-9326486222086351]Search in Google Scholar
[van der Helm, P. (2017). Human visual perceptual organization beats thinking on speed. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79, 1227–1238.10.3758/s13414-017-1281-128233279]Search in Google Scholar
[Varzi, A. C. (2016). Mereology. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mereology/(last visited 1 October 2018).]Search in Google Scholar
[Von Ehrenfels, C. (1988). On ‘gestalt qualities.’ In: B. Smith (Ed.), Foundations of Gestalt theory (pp. 82-117). Munich, Vienna: Philosophia.10.2307/j.ctv2x8v91j.5]Search in Google Scholar
[Wagemans, J., Feldman, J., Gepshtein, S., Kimchi, R., Pomerantz, J., van der Helm, P., van Leeuwen, C. (2012). A century of gestalt psychology in visual perception II. Conceptual and theoretical foundations. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1218–1252.10.1037/a0029334]Search in Google Scholar
[Wertheimer, M. (1938). The general theoretical situation (Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt I). In: W. D. Ellis (Ed.) A source book of gestalt psychology (pp. 12–16). Abingdon: Routledge.10.1037/11496-002]Search in Google Scholar