Knowledge of the properties and quality of raw material is a key factor for any wood-based product and production. In the industrial timber procurement and processing chain this knowledge increases the efficiency of manufacturing as the raw material can be allocated to the right product segment as early as needed.
A significant impact of environmental and growth conditions on the horizontal and vertical variability of wood properties in tree stem is shown by a number of authors (Moore & Cown, 2015). In addition, geographical variations in wood properties of tree species and the dependence of the properties on soil type, soil reaction, genetic provenance, tree position in the storey, tree age and many other factors are generally known (Bektas
In Estonia, strong correlations have been observed between wood properties and site index in juvenile and maturing stands in
The objective of the current study was to analyse and describe the main differences in the physical and mechanical properties of Scots pine wood forming in peatland and heath forests when age, tree dimensions and site index of trees were similar.
The study material was collected from 10 natural regenerated stands aged 65–75 years growing on sites suitable for pine in Estonia (58–59° N; 22–28° E). Six sample trees (healthy trees with a width of an average diameter in the stand) were selected and felled for analysis from each of three heathland pine stands on Haplic Podzol (
In managed stands, a mean tree by its dimensions that can serve as a good indicator of the stand is usually on the borderline between the dominant and the co-dominant trees. For comparison we selected sample trees in
To prepare samples, sample blocks and test disks were cut from each stem at breast height (h1.3), at the half-tree height (h1/2) and from the crown (h3/4) at 75% of tree height. The disks were room-dried (8.4% relative humidity). After they were dried, annual radial increment was measured and annual ring latewood percentage as well as heartwood and sapwood proportions were determined. Relative humidity was measured using a Hydromette HT85T device (Gann GmbH) and a computer system with WinDENDRO TM software (Ver. 2002a, Regent Instruments Inc.) was used to measure annual ring widths. The annual radial increment was measured to the nearest 0.01 mm.
In mechanical sampling from sample blocks the heart boards were cut in the direction of two mutually perpendicular diameters. Samples for determining wood oven-dry density, along-the-grain hardness, tangential bending strength and along-the-grain compression strength were prepared separately from sapwood and heartwood (Table 1). All the mechanical properties in the present paper were adjusted to 12% wood moisture level.
Determination of wood properties.
Property | Used standard | Number of tests |
---|---|---|
Oven-dry density | ISO 13061-2:2014 (2014) | 1.478 |
Static bending strength across-the-grain | ISO 13061-3:2014 (2014) | 1.136 |
Compression strength along-the-grain | ISO 13061-17:2017 (2017) | 1.484 |
Hardness along-the-grain | ISO 13061-12:2017 (2017) | 952 |
Differences in the average wood characteristics between site types were estimated by the one-way ANOVA (Analysis of Variance). The critical
Under lack or insufficient availability of soil nutrients the annual tree ring widths in heartwood were relatively small in heath and peatland sites compared to the annual rings of the same age of the trees growing in
Pine wood physical properties (mean ± SE) at different heights.
Characteristic and unit | Sampling height | Site type | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heath | Drained raised bog | Raised bog | ||||
Diameter at breast height, mm | h1.3 | 164.4±3.5 | 156.5±2.0 | 124.2±2.0** | 226.3±3.2** | <0.0001 |
Heartwood annual ring width, mm | h1.3 | 1.37±0.08 | 0.92±0.08** | 0.88±0.05** | 2.19±0.11** | <0.0001 |
h1/2 | 1.74±0.15 | 2.72±0.16** | 2.12±0.25 | 2.72±0.24** | 0.0002 | |
h3/4 | 2.13±0.43 | 1.88±0.30 | 1.95±0.03 | 2.61±0.18 | 0.5127 | |
Sapwood annual ring width, mm | h1.3 | 0.95±0.06 | 1.20±0.07** | 0.99±0.04 | 1.23±0.09** | 0.0142 |
h1/2 | 1.29±0.10 | 1.86±0.07** | 1.77±0.06* | 1.20±0.09 | <0.0001 | |
h3/4 | 1.81±0.14 | 2.51±0.13** | 2.18±0.07 | 1.71±0.17 | 0.0003 | |
Latewood in heartwood, % | h1.3 | 36.6±1.4 | 26.9±1.3** | 25.7±1.4** | 33.1±1.1 | <0.0001 |
h1/2 | 26.7±1.6 | 16.7±1.1** | 16.0±1.9** | 23.3±0.9 | <0.0001 | |
h3/4 | 24.1±3.0 | 19.6±3.8 | 16.6±6.2 | 22.7±0.9 | 0.6653 | |
Latewood in sapwood, % | h1.3 | 44.6±0.9 | 36.3±1.3** | 31.4±2.1** | 42.1±0.9* | <0.0001 |
h1/2 | 34.2±1.1 | 30.9±0.8* | 24.2±0.9** | 31.9±0.9 | <0.0001 | |
h3/4 | 29.0±1.1 | 23.8±0.9** | 23.0±2.2* | 25.6±1.0 | 0.0034 | |
Proportion of heartwood, % | h1.3 | 22.3±2.3 | 17.7±2.2 | 12.4±1.3* | 36.2±4.1** | <0.0001 |
h1/2 | 17.3±2.2 | 9.1±1.1** | 4.0±0.9** | 32.2±4.6** | <0.0001 | |
h3/4 | 2.9±0.7 | 0.6±0.1** | 0.1±0.1* | 10.9±2.2** | <0.0001 | |
Number of annual rings in sapwood, pcs | h1.3 | 49.8±2.5 | 35.7±1.4** | 42.5±3.4 | 40.9±1.4* | <0.0001 |
h1/2 | 33.9±1.9 | 21.2±0.4** | 24.5±1.0* | 30.2±1.2 | <0.0001 | |
h3/4 | 24.3±1.9 | 14.90.5** | 15.3±0.8** | 23.8±1.5 | <0.0001 | |
Oven-dry density of heartwood, kg/m3 | h1.3 | 553±11 | 457±0** | 425±21** | 489±8** | <0.0001 |
h1/2 | 442±10 | 378±10** | 371±15** | 410±11* | <0.0001 | |
h3/4 | 444±13 | 391±10** | 0.0043 | |||
Oven-dry density of sapwood, kg/m3 | h1.3 | 583±7 | 497±12** | 441±26** | 563±10 | <0.0001 |
h1/2 | 469±8 | 420±8** | 408±13** | 464±10 | <0.0001 | |
h3/4 | 445±9 | 381±6** | 370±10** | 424±9 | <0.0001 |
Unlike heartwood, the mean annual ring widths in sapwood in the three cross-sections of the tree stem were broadly similar in heath and
At h1/2, heartwood percentages had decreased by 5% in the heath pine stands, 8% in the raised bog pine stand, 4% in the drained raised bog pine stands and 4% in the pine stands on
At h3/4 heartwood contained relatively more wood weaker in strength properties around the pith. There were many trees where the heartwood had not yet formed at that height, which accounts for the high variability of heartwood proportions at that height. In general, the variability in the heartwood percentage was higher between trees in individual stands than between stands.
It is common knowledge that there is a strong correlation between latewood percentage and oven-dry density. In our results, the determination coefficient in a stand (
Because of higher latewood levels in heath pine forests the heartwood and sapwood density there exceeds wood density in the corresponding parts of the stem in other stands. Although it is clear that there is normally less latewood in heartwood than in sapwood, heartwood density was higher than sapwood density at equal latewood percentages (Figure 1). The results show that the difference is variable in different site types. It was smallest in
Significant differences were observed between the stands under study in wood bending strength, compression strength and hardness. If we take the heartwood bending strength of the heath site type pine stands as 100%, then the bending strength of samples taken from the
Pine wood mechanical properties (mean ± SE) at different heights.
Characteristic | Sampling height | Site type | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heath | Drained raised bog | Raised bog | ||||
Bending strength of heartwood, MPa | h1.3 | 103±3 | 73±2** | 72±6** | 88±3** | <0.0001 |
h1/2 | 82±3 | 54±3** | 54±3** | 71±2** | <0.0001 | |
h3/4 | 74±2 | 53±0** | 67±2 | 0.0004 | ||
Bending strength of sapwood, MPa | h1.3 | 123±2 | 92±3** | 82±7** | 111±4** | <0.0001 |
h1/2 | 92±2 | 73±2** | 70±4** | 91±2 | <0.0001 | |
h3/4 | 80±2 | 57±2** | 53±5 | 79±2 | <0.0001 | |
Compression strength of heartwood, MPa | h1.3 | 60.5±1.5 | 52.5±1.5** | 46.5±4.5** | 53.0±1.5** | <0.0001 |
h1/2 | 48.5±4.0 | 39.5±1.0** | 39.5±2.0** | 45.5±1.5 | <0.0001 | |
h3/4 | 44.5±2.0 | 40.5±2.0 | 0.1092 | |||
Compression strength of sapwood, MPa | h1.3 | 69.0±1.0 | 59.0±1.5** | 52.0±5.5** | 63.0±2.0** | <0.0001 |
h1/2 | 54.5±1.0 | 48.5±1.0** | 47.5±2.5** | 54.0±1.5 | 0.0003 | |
h3/4 | 46.5±1.0 | 41.5±1.0* | 40.5±1.5 | 48.0±1.5 | 0.0008 | |
Hardness of heartwood, MPa | h1.3 | 38±2 | 34±1 | 33±2 | 33±1* | 0.0269 |
h1/2 | 31±1 | 28±1* | 30±1 | 26±1** | 0.0072 | |
h3/4 | 31±1 | 28±1* | 31±1 | 26±1 | 0.0034 | |
Hardness of sapwood, MPa | h1.3 | 41±1 | 36±1* | 34±3** | 35±1** | 0.0022 |
h1/2 | 34±1 | 34±1 | 32±2 | 28±1** | 0.0003 | |
h3/4 | 32±1 | 33±1 | 32±1 | 27±1 | 0.0021 |
Increased wood density does not have similar effects on mechanical properties. The effect of density was the strongest on bending strength and compression strength (Figures 3–4) and relatively weak on along-the-grain hardness (Figure 5).
Comparison of the bending strength in heartwood and sapwood at the same density showed that it was greater in sapwood in all the site types. At the same oven-dry density the bending strength was almost identical in heath and
Study of along-the-grain compression strength at the same density yielded an identical result in three site types for both sapwood and heartwood (Figure 4). In contrast, along-the-grain hardness of heartwood and sapwood at the same wood density proved to be the greatest in wood from the drained raised bog pine stands (Figure 5).
Growth conditions in different stands can be best characterised by annual height growth or ring width (Mäkinen, 1998; Metslaid
The transition from sapwood to heartwood is a steady occurrence, and heartwood boundary does not necessarily go past an annual ring (Yang & Hazenberg, 1991). The difference between heartwood and sapwood is primarily chemical and on the border of heartwood replacing of some elements occurs, which may influence bonds and the growth stress division between heartwood cells and thus affect wood properties (Bowyer
Climate is a significant factor in heartwood development. Wider heartwood occurs in drier climate types (Climent
In addition to latewood percentage, density is another key characteristic of tree properties (Wilhelmsson
It is well known that silvicultural methods influence wood formation. Drainage of peat bogs leads to a number of changes in wood properties. Wood formed before drainage has greater density than wood formed after drainage (Varhimo
One of the factors influencing density is cell wall thickness. Cell wall thickness is directly correlated with the length of the growth period (Antonova & Stasova, 1993) and with factors of influence during the time of wood cell and tissue formation (Wodzicki, 2001).
The difference in density during the period of heartwood formation cannot be caused by wood macroscopic structure, since cell wall thickness remains the same in the process of heartwood formation (Crivellaro & Ruffinatto, 2021). However, the process sees the accumulation in heartwood of various substances, the quantities of which are influenced by growth conditions. Among these, consideration is given primarily to resins, dyes, tannins and other substances (Bowyer
Our results harmonise with those of Aleinikovas and Grigaliūnas (2006), according to which wood bending and compression strengths were the highest on poor sites with normal moisture, and significantly different from corresponding values for fertile sites with normal moisture.
Improvement in growth conditions after drainage may reduce basic density and latewood percentage. However, as the period of intensive growth in a raised bog is relatively short compared to tree age, then, according to our previous studies, reduced density ultimately has relatively little effect on wood mechanical properties (Pikk
The findings obtained cast doubt on the hypothesis that the wood of stunted swamp pines has the greatest strength. Do the findings coincide with those showing that wood obtained from fresh forests and from fresh mixed forests containing deciduous trees is the best (Spława-Neyman, 1994)?
Our test results had large variation and showed statistically weaker relations of density with wood hardness than bending strength and compression. We found that although the most important factor affecting mechanical properties was wood density, there were other important factors (annual ring width, proportion of heartwood, proportion of latewood) influencing strength properties.
From the perspective of practical wood utilisation, a reduction in along-the-grain mechanical properties is of importance. Percentage wise, the reduction in strength properties from breast height (h1.3) up to ¾ of tree height (h¾) per one metre was the highest for sapwood bending strength in natural raised bog pines (5.0%), followed by drained raised bog pines (4.0%), heath pines (3.2%) and
This study provided some new information on the quality of wood from different site conditions and coincides with earlier studies and findings concerning differences in pine wood properties between neighbouring regions.
Wood density and strength properties are greater in wood growing in heath pine stands, exceeding the corresponding values for wood from sites optimal for pine (
The proportion of latewood increases with tree age; however, at the same latewood percentage heartwood density is greater than sapwood density by an average of 1.0–11.2% depending on the site type. At equal oven-dry densities wood obtained from different site types manifests significant differences in bending strength and hardness. The results of the study can be applied in selecting pine stands with good quality roundwood.