1. bookVolumen 68 (2022): Heft 2 (June 2022)
Zeitschriftendaten
License
Format
Zeitschrift
eISSN
2454-0358
Erstveröffentlichung
14 Dec 2009
Erscheinungsweise
4 Hefte pro Jahr
Sprachen
Englisch
access type Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Bioeconomy perception by students of different study programs – study from Slovakia

Online veröffentlicht: 09 May 2022
Volumen & Heft: Volumen 68 (2022) - Heft 2 (June 2022)
Seitenbereich: 91 - 100
Zeitschriftendaten
License
Format
Zeitschrift
eISSN
2454-0358
Erstveröffentlichung
14 Dec 2009
Erscheinungsweise
4 Hefte pro Jahr
Sprachen
Englisch
Abstract

The paper builds on previous international research done by Masiero et al. (2020). It applies on Slovak national level and expands the previous study with different study programs. The societal transformation towards bioeconomy provides an opportunity for changing current economy and societies into more sustainable ones with mitigation of the environmental pressures at hearts. Such societal transition requires involvement of all stakeholders in bio-economy discussion and decision-making process and studying their perceptions of bioeconomy. Amongst all the stakeholders, future generation is particularly important, as it is important to understand bioeconomy perception by the generation of stakeholders that will manage this area in the near future. For that reason, we focus our attention on students of three bioeconomy related areas at the Technical University in Zvolen (forestry studies, wood processing studies and natural resources management studies). We were able to identify significant differences in bioeconomy perception between analyzed categories. The familiarity with the concept is quite high, as more then two thirds have heard about bioeconomy before the survey was conducted. As the main information sources were selected news, university courses and social media. The study program had a greater impact on perceived importance of forests within bioeconomy than the type of study. Overall, students perceive development of forest-based bioeconomy as favouring sustainable forest management.

Biber-Freudenberger, L., Basukala, A. K., Bruckner, M., Börner, J., 2018: Sustainability Performance of National Bio-Economies. Sustainability, 10:2705.10.3390/su10082705Search in Google Scholar

Bejinaru, R., Hapenciuc, C. V., Condratov, I., Stanciu, P., 2018: The University Role in Developing the Human Capital for a Sustainable Bioeconomy. Amfiteatru Economic [e-journal], 20:583–598.10.24818/EA/2018/49/583Search in Google Scholar

Bugge, M. M., Hansen, T., Klitkou, A., 2016: What is the bioeconomy? A review of the literature. Sustainability, 8:691.10.3390/su8070691Search in Google Scholar

Carleton-Hug, A., Hug, J. W., 2010: Challenges and opportunities for evaluating environmental education programs. Evaluation and Program Planning, 33:159–164.10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.07.00519712976Search in Google Scholar

D’Amato, D. N., Droste, M., Allen, K., Kettunen, J., Lähtinen, P., Korhonen, B. D. et al., 2017: Green, circular, bio economy: A comparative analysis of sustainability avenues. Journal of Cleaner Production 168:716–734.10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.053Search in Google Scholar

Drejerska, N., 2017: Employment in vs. education for the bioeconomy. In: A. Raupelien (ed.): Proceedings of the 8th International Scientific Conference Rural Development 2017, Available at http://doi.org/10.15544/RD.2017.24510.15544/RD.2017.245Search in Google Scholar

Enriquez, J., 1998: Genomics and the World’s Economy. Science, 281:925–926.10.1126/science.281.5379.9259722465Search in Google Scholar

Glenn, J. C., Florescu, E., 2015: 2015–2016 State of the Future. The Millenium Project, Washington, D. C., USA.10.4172/2167-0358.1000168Search in Google Scholar

Golowko, N., Marquardt, K., Budz, S., Foerster-Metz, U. S., 2019: German students’ perception of bioeconomy: An exploratory study. Amfiteatru Economic, 21: 138–151.10.24818/EA/2019/50/138Search in Google Scholar

Hardy, R. W. F., 2002: The bio-based economy. In: J. Janick, A. Whipkey (eds.): Trends in new crops and new uses, Alexandria, USA: ASHS Press, p. 11–16.Search in Google Scholar

Hodge, D., Brukas, V., Giurca, A., 2017: Forests in a bio-economy: Bridge, boundary or divide? Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 32:582–587.10.1080/02827581.2017.1315833Search in Google Scholar

Imbert, E., Ladu, L., Tani, A., Morone, P., 2019: The transition towards a bio-based economy: A comparative study based on social network analysis.10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.06830292014Search in Google Scholar

Kleinschmit, D., Lindstad, B. H., Thorsen, B. J., Toppinen, A., Roos, A., Baardsen, S., 2014: Shades of green: A social scientific view on bioeconomy in the forest sector. Scandinavian Journal of Forestry, 29: 402–410.10.1080/02827581.2014.921722Search in Google Scholar

Kylkilahti, E., Berghäll, S., Autio, M., Nurminen, J., Toivonen, R., Lähtinen, K. et al., 2020: A consumer-driven bioeconomy in housing? Combining consumption style with students’ perceptions of the use of wood in multi-storey buildings. Ambio, 49:1943–1957.10.1007/s13280-020-01397-7756874133034875Search in Google Scholar

Masiero, M. et al., 2020: Bioeconomy perception by future stakeholders: Hearing from European forestry students. Ambio, 49:1925–1942.10.1007/s13280-020-01376-y756874833048322Search in Google Scholar

McCormick, K., Kautto, N., 2013: The Bioeconomy in Europe: An overview. Sustainability, 5:2589–2608.10.3390/su5062589Search in Google Scholar

Mustalahti, I., 2017: The responsive bioeconomy: The need for inclusion of citizens and environmental capability in the forest based bioeconomy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 30: 1–10.Search in Google Scholar

Navrátilová, L., Výbošťok, J., Dobšinská, Z., Šálka, J., Pichlerová, M., Pichler, V., 2020: Assessing the potential of bioeconomy in Slovakia based on public perception of renewable materials in contrast to non-renewable materials. Ambio, 49:1912–1924.10.1007/s13280-020-01368-y756872732915444Search in Google Scholar

Pätäri, S., Arminen, H., Puumalainen, K., Toppinen, A., Albareda, L., 2017: Student values and perceptions of corporate social responsibility in the forest industry on the road to a bioeconomy. Forest Policy and Economics, 85: 201–215.10.1016/j.forpol.2017.10.009Search in Google Scholar

Philp, J. C., Krishna, P., 2013: Bio-based production in a Bioeconomy. Asian Biotechnology and Development Review, 15: 81–88.Search in Google Scholar

Philp, J. C., 2015: Balancing the bioeconomy: supporting biofuels and bio-based materials in public policy. Energy and Environmental Science, 11:3063–3068.10.1039/C5EE01864ASearch in Google Scholar

Priefer, C., Jörissen, J., Frör, O., 2017: Pathways to Shape the Bioeconomy. Resources, 10: 1–23.10.3390/resources6010010Search in Google Scholar

Pubule, J., Kalnbalkite, A., Teirumnieka, E., Blumberga, D., 2019: Evaluation of the Environmental Engineering Study Programme at University. Environmental and Climate Technologies, 23:310–324.10.2478/rtuect-2019-0070Search in Google Scholar

Rakowska, J., 2011: Support for Innovations in Higher Education in Poland under Selected Operational Programmes since 2004. In: Savolainen, M. et al., 2011: Technology Innovation and Industrial Management 2011, 28-30 June, Oulu, Finland, p. 1279–1293.Search in Google Scholar

Ramcilovic-Suominen, S., Pülzl, H., 2018: Sustainable development: A ‘selling point’ of the emerging EU bioeconomy policy framework? Journal of Cleaner Production, 172:4170–4780.10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.157Search in Google Scholar

Richardson, B., 2012: From a fossil-fuel to a biobased economy: The politics of industrial biotechnology. Environment and Planning C, 30:282–296.10.1068/c10209Search in Google Scholar

Schmid, O., Padel, S., Levidow, L., 2012: The bio-economy concept and knowledge base in a public goods and farmer perspective. Bio-Based and Applied Economics, 1:47–63.Search in Google Scholar

Staffas, L., Gustavsson, M., McCormick, K., 2013: Strategies and policies for the bioeconomy and bio-based economy: An analysis of official national approaches. Sustainability, 5:2751–2769.10.3390/su5062751Search in Google Scholar

Stafford, W., De Lange, W., Nahman, A., Chunilall, V., Lekha, P., Andrew, J.et al., 2020: Forestry biorefineries. Renewable Energy, 154:461–475.10.1016/j.renene.2020.02.002Search in Google Scholar

Stern, T., Ranacher, L., Mair, C., Berghäll, S., Lähtinen, K., Forsblom, M. et al., 2018: Perceptions on the Importance of Forest Sector Innovations: Biofuels, Biomaterials, or Niche Products? Forests, 9:255.10.3390/f9050255Search in Google Scholar

Stern, T., Ploll, U., Spies, R., Schwarzbauer, P., Hesser, F., Ranacher, L., 2018: Understanding Perceptions of the Bioeconomy in Austria – An Explorative Case Study. Sustainability, 10:4142.10.3390/su10114142Search in Google Scholar

Tiron-Tudor, A., Nistor, C. S., Ştefănescu, C. A., 2018: The role of universities in consolidating intellectual capital and generating new knowledge for a sustainable bio-economy. Amfiteatru Economic Journal, 20:599–615.10.24818/EA/2018/49/599Search in Google Scholar

European Commision, 2012: Innovating for sustainable growth. A bioeconomy for Europe. Available at <https://ec.europa.eu/research/bioeconomy/pdf/officialstrategy_en.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

European Commission, 2018: A sustainable Bioeconomy for Europe: strengthening the connection between economy, society and the environment. Brussels. https://doi.org/10.2777/478385.Available at <https://ec.europa.eu/research/bioeconomy/pdf/ec_bioeconomy_strategy_2018.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

UNECE (UNECE/FAO Forestry and Timber Section). 2018. Green jobs in the forest sector : Geneva timber and forest discussion paper 71. New York: United Nations, Available at https://unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/timber/publications/DP71_WEB.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Empfohlene Artikel von Trend MD

Planen Sie Ihre Fernkonferenz mit Scienceendo