[Barna, M., 2004: Adaptation of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) to different ecological conditions: leaf size variation. Polish Journal of Ecology, 52:35–45.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bloom, A. J., Chapin, F. S., Mooney, H. A., 1985: Resource limitation in plants – an economic analogy. Annual Re view of Ecology and Systematics, 16:363–392.10.1146/annurev.es.16.110185.002051]Search in Google Scholar
[Bošeľa, M., Konôpka, B., Šebeň, V., Vladovič, J., Tobin, B., 2014: Modelling height to diameter ratio - An opportunity to increase Norway spruce stand stability in the Western Carpathians. Lesnícky časopis – Forestry Journal, 60:71–80.10.2478/forj-2014-0007]Search in Google Scholar
[Bronisz, K., Strub, M., Cieszewski, Ch., Bijak, S., Bronisz, A., Tomusiak, R. et al., 2016: Empirical equations for estimating aboveground biomass of Betula pendula growing on former farmland in central Poland. Silva Fennica, 50:1–17.10.14214/sf.1559]Search in Google Scholar
[Bussotti, F., Borghini, F., Celesti, C., Leonzio, C., Bruschi, P., 2000: Leaf morphology and macronutrients in broadleaved trees in central Italy. Trees, 14:361–368.10.1007/s004680000056]Search in Google Scholar
[Cotrufo, M. F., Ineson, P., Roberts, D., 1995: Decomposition of birch leaf litters with varying C-to-N ratios. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 27:1219–1221.10.1016/0038-0717(95)00043-E]Search in Google Scholar
[Claesson, S., Sahlén, K., Lundmark, T., 2001: Functions for biomass estimation of young Pinus sylvestris, Picea abies and Betula spp. from stands in northern Sweden with high stand densities. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 16:138–146.10.1080/028275801300088206]Search in Google Scholar
[Closa, I., Irigoyen, J. J., Goicoechea, N., 2010: Microclimatic conditions determined by stem density influence leaf anatomy and leaf physiology of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) growing within stands that naturally regenerate from clear-cutting. Trees, 24:1029–1043.10.1007/s00468-010-0472-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Deng, J. M., Wang, G. X., Morris, E. C., Wei, X. P., Li, D. X., Chen, B. M. et al., 2006: Plant mass–density relationship along a moisture gradient in north-west China. Journal of Ecology, 94:953–958.10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01141.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Easlon, H. M., Bloom, A. J., 2014: Easy Leaf Area: Automated digital image analysis for rapid and accurate measurement of leaf area. Applications in Plant Sciences, 2:1400033.10.3732/apps.1400033410347625202639]Search in Google Scholar
[Eriksson, H., Johansson, U., Kiviste, A., 1997: A site-index model for pure and mixed stands of Betula pendula and Betula pubescens in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 12:149–156.10.1080/02827589709355396]Search in Google Scholar
[Finďo, S., Petráš, R., 2007: Ekologické základy ochrany lesa proti poškodeniu zverou. Zvolen, National Forest Centre, 186 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Friedlingstein, P., Joel, G., Field, C. B., Fung, I. Y. 1999: Toward an allocation scheme for global terrestrial carbon models. Global Change Biology, 5:755–770.]Search in Google Scholar
[Harrington, T. B., Harrington, C. A., DeBell, D., 2009: Effects of planting spacing and site quality on 25-year growth and mortality relationships of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii). Forest Ecology and Management, 258:18–25.10.1016/j.foreco.2009.03.039]Search in Google Scholar
[Hochbichler, E., Bellos, P., Lick, E., 2006: Biomass functions for estimating needle and branch biomass of spruce (Picea abies) and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) and branch biomass of beech (Fagus sylvatica) and oak (Quercus robur and petrea). Austrian Journal of Forest Sciences, 123:35–46.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hommel, R., Siegwolf, R., Zavadlav, S., Arend, M., Schaub, M., Galiano, L. et al., 2016: Impact of interspecific competition and drought on the allocation of new assimilates in trees. Plant Biology, 18:785–796.10.1111/plb.1246127061772]Search in Google Scholar
[Hynynen, J., Niemistö, P., Viherä-Aarnio, A., Brunner, A., Hein, S., Velling, P., 2010: Silviculture of birch (Betula pendula Roth and Betula pubescens Ehrh.) in northern Europe. Forestry, 83:103–119.10.1093/forestry/cpp035]Search in Google Scholar
[Jagodzinski, A. M., Zasada, M., Bronisz, K., Bronisz, A., Bijak, S., 2017: Biomass conversion and expansion factors for a chronosequence of young naturally regenerated silver birch (Betula pendula Roth) stands growing on post-agricultural sites. Forest Ecology and Management, 384:208–220.10.1016/j.foreco.2016.10.051]Search in Google Scholar
[Johansson, T., 1999: Biomass production of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) growing on abandoned farmland. Silva Fennica, 33:261–280.10.14214/sf.649]Search in Google Scholar
[Johansson, T., 2007: Biomass production and an allo-metric above- and below-ground relations for young birch stands planted at four spacings abandoned farmland. Forestry, 80:41–52.10.1093/forestry/cpl049]Search in Google Scholar
[Kacálek, D., Mauer, O., Podrázský, V., Slodičák, M. et al., 2017: Soil improving and stabilizing functions of forest trees. Lesnická práce, 300 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Konôpka, B., Konôpka, J., 2003: Static stability of forest stands in the seventh altitudinal vegetation zone in Slovakia. Journal of Forest Science, 49:474–481.10.17221/4719-JFS]Search in Google Scholar
[Konôpka, B., Pajtík, J., Marušák, R., Bošeľa, M., Lukac, M., 2016: Specific leaf area and leaf area index in developing stands of Fagus sylvatica L. and Picea abies Karst. Forest Ecology and Management, 364:52–59.10.1016/j.foreco.2015.12.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Konôpka, B., Pajtík, J., Máliš, F., Šebeň, V., Maľová, M., 2017: Carbon stock in aboveground biomass of vegetation at the High Tatra Mts. twelve years after disturbance. Central European Forestry Journal, 63:142–151.10.1515/forj-2017-0007]Search in Google Scholar
[Konôpka, B., Šebeň, V., Pajtík, J., 2019: Species composition and carbon stock of tree cover at a postdisturbance area in Tatra National Park, Western Carpathians. Mountain Research and Development, 39:71–80.10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-19-00008.1]Search in Google Scholar
[Kula, E., 2011: Bříza a její význam pro trvalý rozvoj lesa v imisných oblastech. Prague, Publishing House for Forestry, 276 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kunca, A., Zúbrik, M., Galko, J., Vakula, J., Leontovyč, R., Konôpka, B. et al., 2019: Salvage felling in the Slovak Republic′s forests during the last twenty years (1998–2017). Central European Forestry Journal, 1:3–11.10.2478/forj-2019-0007]Search in Google Scholar
[Kund, M., Vares, A., Sims, A., Tullus, H., Uri, V., 2010: Early growth and development of silver birch (Betula pendula Roth) plantations on abandoned agricultural land. European Journal of Forest Research, 129:679–688.10.1007/s10342-010-0369-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Kurvits, V., Ots, K., Kangur, A., Korjus, H., Muiste, P., 2020: Assessment of load and quality of logging residues from clear-felling areas in Järveselja: a case study from Southeast Estonia. Central European Forestry Journal, 66:3–11.10.2478/forj-2019-0022]Search in Google Scholar
[Lehtonen, A., Mäkipää, R., Heikkinen, J., Sievänen, J., Liski, J., 2004: Biomass expansion factors (BEFs) for Scots pine, Norway spruce and birch according to stand age for boreal forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 188:211–224.10.1016/j.foreco.2003.07.008]Search in Google Scholar
[Le Roux, X., Lacointe, A., Escobar-Gutierrez, A., Le Dizes, S., 2001: Carbon-based models of individual tree growth: A critical appraisal. Annals of Forest Science, 58:469–506.10.1051/forest:2001140]Search in Google Scholar
[Martiník, A., Knott, R., Krejza, J., Černý, J., 2018: Bio-mass production of Betula pendula stands regenerated in the region of allochthonous Pice abies dieback. Silva Fennica, 52:1–15.10.14214/sf.9985]Search in Google Scholar
[Mäkinen, H., Nöjd, P., Isomäki, A., 2002: Radial, height and volume increment variation in Picea abies (L.) Karst. stands with varying thinning intensities. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 2:227–228.10.1080/02827580260138062]Search in Google Scholar
[Mensah, S., Kakai, R.G., Seifert, T., 2016: Patterns of biomass allocation between foliage and woody structure: the effects of tree size and specific functional traits. Annals of Forest Research, 59:49–60.10.15287/afr.2016.458]Search in Google Scholar
[Merganičová, K., Merganič, J., Lehtonen, A., Vacchiano, A., Ostrogović-Sever, M.Z., Augustynczik, A.L.D. et al., 2019: Forest carbon allocation modelling under climate change. Tree Physiology, 39:1937–1960.10.1093/treephys/tpz105699585331748793]Search in Google Scholar
[Milla, R., Reich, P.B., Niinemets, U., Castro-Diez, P., 2008: Environmental and developmental controls on specific leaf area are little modified by leaf allometry. Functional Ecology, 22:565–576.10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01406.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Nilsson, U., 1993: Competition in young stands of Norway spruce and Scots pine. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, PhD. Thesis, 173 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Niinemets, Ü., Ellsworth, D.S., Lukjanova, A., Tobias, M., 2001: Site fertility and the morphological and photosynthetic acclimation of Pinus sylvestris needles to light. Tree Physiology, 21:1231–1244.10.1093/treephys/21.17.1231]Search in Google Scholar
[Niinemets, U., Portsmuth, A., Tobias, M., 2007: Leaf Shape and Venation Pattern Alter the Support Investments within Leaf Lamina in Temperate Species: A Neglected Source of Leaf Physiological Differentiation, Functional Ecology, 21:28–40.10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01221.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Oker-Blom, P., Kellomäki, S., Valtonen, E., Väisänene, H., 1988: Structural development of Pinus sylvestris stands with varying initial density: a simulation model. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 3:185–200.10.1080/02827588809382508]Search in Google Scholar
[Opio, C., Jacob, N., Coopersmith, D., 2000: Height to diameter ratio as a competition index for young conifer plantations in northern British Columbia, Canada. Forest Ecology and Management, 137:245–252.10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00312-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Pajtík, J., Konôpka, B., Lukac, M., 2008: Biomass functions and expansion factors in young Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst) trees. Forest Ecology and Management, 256:1096–1103.10.1016/j.foreco.2008.06.013]Search in Google Scholar
[Poorter, H., Niklas, K. J., Reich, P. B., Oleksyn, J., Poot, P., Mommer, L., 2012: Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control. New Phytologist, 193:30–50.10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03952.x22085245]Search in Google Scholar
[R Development Core Team, 2012: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R foundation for Statistical Computing. Webpage: http://www.R-project.org/]Search in Google Scholar
[Repola, J., 2008: Biomass equations for birch in Finland. Silva Fennica, 42:605–624.10.14214/sf.236]Search in Google Scholar
[Richardson, A. D., Carbone, M. S., Huggett, B. A., Furze, M. E., Czimczik, C. I., Walker, J. C. et al., 2015: Distribution and mixing of old and new nonstructural carbon in two temperate trees. New Phytologist, 206:590–597.10.1111/nph.13273440504825558814]Search in Google Scholar
[San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., de Rigo, D., Caudullo, G., Dur-rant, T.H. et al., 2016: European Atlas of Forest Tree Species. Luxembourg, Publication Office of European Union, 200 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schua, K., Wende, S., Wagner, S., Feger, K.-H., 2015: Soil chemical and microbial properties in a mixed stand of spruce and birch in the Ore Mountains (Germany) – A case study. Forests, 6:1949–1965.10.3390/f6061949]Search in Google Scholar
[Sebastia, M.-T., 2007: Plant guilds drive biomass response to global warming and water availability in subalpine grassland. Journal of Applied Ecology, 44:158–167.10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01232.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Seidl, R., Schelhaas, M.-J., Rammer, W., Verkerk, P.J., 2014: Increasing forest disturbances in Europe and their impact on carbon storage. Nature Climate Change, 4:806–810.10.1038/nclimate2318]Search in Google Scholar
[Sharma, R.P., Vacek, Z., Vacek, S., 2016: Modeling individual tree height to diameter ratio for Norway spruce and European beech in Czech Republic. Trees, 30:1969–1982.10.1007/s00468-016-1425-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Shipley, B., 2006: Net assimilation rate, specific leaf area and leaf mass ratio: which is most closely correlated with relative growth rate? A meta-analysis. Functional Ecology, 20:565–574.10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01135.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Snowdon, P., Waring, H. D., Woollons, R. C., 1981: Effect of fertilizer and weed control on stem form and average taper in plantation-grown pines. Australian Forestry Journal, 11:209–221.]Search in Google Scholar
[Song, M., Hu, Q., Tian, Y., Ouyang, H., 2012: Seasonal patterns of root and shoot interactions in an alpine meadow on the Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Plant Ecology 5:182–190.10.1093/jpe/rtq032]Search in Google Scholar
[Stark, H., Nothdurft, A., Bauhus, J., 2013: Allometries for widely spaced Populus ssp. and Betula ssp. in nurse crop systems. Forests, 4:1003–1031.10.3390/f4041003]Search in Google Scholar
[Šebeň, V., 2017: Národná inventarizácia a monitoring lesov Slovenskej republiky 2015–2016. Lesnícke štúdie 65, Zvolen, National Forest Centre, 255 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Uri, V., Lohmus, K., Ostonen, I., Tullus, H., Lastik, R., Vildo, M., 2007: Biomass production, foliar and root characteristics and nutrient accumulation in young silver birch (Betula pendula Roth.) stand growing on abandoned agricultural land. European Journal of Forest Research, 126:495–506.10.1007/s10342-007-0171-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Valkonen, S., Valsta, L., 2001: Productivity and economics of mixed two-storied spruce and birch stands in Southern Finland simulated with empirical models. Forest Ecology and Management, 140:133–149.10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00321-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Vološčuk, I. et al., 1994: Tatra National Park. Martin, Slovakia: Gradus, Ltd., 557 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, Y., Titus, S. J., LeMay, V. M., 1998: Relationship between tree slenderness coefficient and tree or stand characteristics for major species in boreal mixed wood forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 28:1171–1183.10.1139/x98-092]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, J., Zhang, C., Xia, F., Zhao, X., Wu, L., von Gadow, K., 2011: Biomass Structure and Allometry of Abies nephrolepis (Maxim) in Northeast China. Silva Fennica, 45:211–226.10.14214/sf.113]Search in Google Scholar
[Wiklund, K., Konôpka, B., Nilsson, L.-O., 1995: Stem form and growth in Picea abies (L.) Karst. In response to water and mineral nutrient availability. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 10:326–332.10.1080/02827589509382899]Search in Google Scholar
[Yang, X.-Z., Zhang, W. H., He, Q. Y., 2019: Effects of intraspecific competition on growth, architecture and biomass allocation of Quercus liaotungensis. Journal of Plant Interactions, 14:284–294.10.1080/17429145.2019.1629656]Search in Google Scholar
[Zasada, M., Bijak, S., Bronisz, K., Bronisz, A., Gaweda, T., 2014: Biomass dynamics in young silver birch stands on post-agricultural lands in central Poland. Drewno, 57:29–39.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhou, W., Cheng, X., Wu, R., Han, H., Kang, F., Zhu, J. et al., 2018: Effect of intraspecific competition on biomass partitioning of Larix principis-rupprechtii. Journal of Plant Interactions, 13:1–8.10.1080/17429145.2017.1406999]Search in Google Scholar