Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Are prohexadione calcium and Pseudomonas fluorescens a solution to limit the spread of annual bluegrass (Poa annua L.) on football pitches?


Zitieren

Figure 1

The average plant height on annual bluegrass treated with different PGRs. Within each evaluation date, comparison was done between different treatment (PGRs; Student-Neuman Keuls at p = 0.05). For comparisons within dates, df = 4.24 (11th February, F = 0.62, p = 0.6526; 14th February, F = 7.41, p < 0.05; 18th February, F = 27.76, p < 0.05; 21st February, F = 52.00, p < 0.05; 25th February, F = 110.50, p < 0.05; 28th February, F = 122.37, p < 0.05; 3rd March, F = 84.03, p < 0.05; 6th March, F = 39.57, p < 0.05; 10th March, F = 18.10, p < 0.05; 13th March, F = 16.61, p < 0.05; 17th March, F = 16.10, p < 0.05; 20th March, F = 23.81, p < 0.05; 24th March, F = 4.44, p < 0.05; 27th March, F = 45.97, p < 0.05; 31st March, F = 26.60, p < 0.05; 3rd April, F = 96.00; 7th April, F = 50.40, p < 0.05; 10th April, F = 86.40, p < 0.05; 17th April, F = 65.33, p < 0.05). df, degrees of freedom; Eth, ethephon; F, F-distribution; Mes, mesotrione; Pc, prohexadione calcium; PGRs, plant growth regulators; SE, standard error.
The average plant height on annual bluegrass treated with different PGRs. Within each evaluation date, comparison was done between different treatment (PGRs; Student-Neuman Keuls at p = 0.05). For comparisons within dates, df = 4.24 (11th February, F = 0.62, p = 0.6526; 14th February, F = 7.41, p < 0.05; 18th February, F = 27.76, p < 0.05; 21st February, F = 52.00, p < 0.05; 25th February, F = 110.50, p < 0.05; 28th February, F = 122.37, p < 0.05; 3rd March, F = 84.03, p < 0.05; 6th March, F = 39.57, p < 0.05; 10th March, F = 18.10, p < 0.05; 13th March, F = 16.61, p < 0.05; 17th March, F = 16.10, p < 0.05; 20th March, F = 23.81, p < 0.05; 24th March, F = 4.44, p < 0.05; 27th March, F = 45.97, p < 0.05; 31st March, F = 26.60, p < 0.05; 3rd April, F = 96.00; 7th April, F = 50.40, p < 0.05; 10th April, F = 86.40, p < 0.05; 17th April, F = 65.33, p < 0.05). df, degrees of freedom; Eth, ethephon; F, F-distribution; Mes, mesotrione; Pc, prohexadione calcium; PGRs, plant growth regulators; SE, standard error.

Figure 2

The average plant height on perennial ryegrass treated with different PGRs. Within each evaluation date, a comparison was done between different treatments (PGRs; Student-Neuman Keuls at p = 0.05). For comparisons within dates, df = 4.24 (11th February, F = 0.08, p = 0.9862; 14th February, F = 0.79, p = 0.5435; 18th February, F = 5.96, p < 0.05; 21st February, F = 18.08, p < 0.05; 25th February, F = 26.76, p < 0.05; 28th February, F = 49.53, p < 0.05; 3rd March, F = 35.67, p < 0.05; 6th March, F = 6.30, p < 0.05; 10th March, F = 18.10, p < 0.05; 13th March, F = 26.98, p < 0.05; 17th March, F = 26.37, p < 0.05; 20th March, F = 22.43, p < 0.05; 24th March, F = 18.80, p < 0.05; 27th March, F = 16.65, p < 0.05; 31st March, F = 111.00, p < 0.05; 3rd April, F = 140.00, p < 0.05; 7th April, F = 50.40, p < 0.05; 10th April, F = 116.67, p < 0.05; 17th April, F = 80.76, p < 0.05). df, degrees of freedom; Eth, ethephon; F, F-distribution; Mes, mesotrione; Pc, prohexadione calcium; PGRs, plant growth regulators; SE, standard error.
The average plant height on perennial ryegrass treated with different PGRs. Within each evaluation date, a comparison was done between different treatments (PGRs; Student-Neuman Keuls at p = 0.05). For comparisons within dates, df = 4.24 (11th February, F = 0.08, p = 0.9862; 14th February, F = 0.79, p = 0.5435; 18th February, F = 5.96, p < 0.05; 21st February, F = 18.08, p < 0.05; 25th February, F = 26.76, p < 0.05; 28th February, F = 49.53, p < 0.05; 3rd March, F = 35.67, p < 0.05; 6th March, F = 6.30, p < 0.05; 10th March, F = 18.10, p < 0.05; 13th March, F = 26.98, p < 0.05; 17th March, F = 26.37, p < 0.05; 20th March, F = 22.43, p < 0.05; 24th March, F = 18.80, p < 0.05; 27th March, F = 16.65, p < 0.05; 31st March, F = 111.00, p < 0.05; 3rd April, F = 140.00, p < 0.05; 7th April, F = 50.40, p < 0.05; 10th April, F = 116.67, p < 0.05; 17th April, F = 80.76, p < 0.05). df, degrees of freedom; Eth, ethephon; F, F-distribution; Mes, mesotrione; Pc, prohexadione calcium; PGRs, plant growth regulators; SE, standard error.

Figure 3

The average plant height in Kentucky treated with different PGRs. Within each evaluation date, a comparison was done between different treatments (PGRs; Student-Neuman Keuls at p = 0.05). For comparisons within dates, df = 4.24 (11th February, F = 2.23, p = 0.1020; 14th February, F = 0.57, p = 0.6864; 18th February, F = 7.47, p < 0.05; 21st February, F = 18.83, p < 0.05; 25th February, F = 27.45, p < 0.05; 28th February, F = 67.49, p < 0.05; 3rd March, F = 109.41, p < 0.05; 6th March, F = 78.67, p < 0.05; 10th March, F = 75.42, p < 0.05; 13th March, F = 102.62, p < 0.05; 17th March, F = 107.32, p < 0.05; 20th March, F = 143.46, p < 0.05; 24th March, F = 73.35, p < 0.05; 27th March, F = 108.69, p < 0.05; 31st March, F = 15.47, p < 0.05; 3rd April, F = 102.67, p < 0.05; 7th April, F = 187.67, p < 0.05; 10th April, F = 187.67, p < 0.05; 17th April, F = 174.89, p < 0.05). df, degrees of freedom; Eth, ethephon; F, F-distribution; Mes, mesotrione; Pc, prohexadione calcium; PGRs, plant growth regulators; SE, standard error.
The average plant height in Kentucky treated with different PGRs. Within each evaluation date, a comparison was done between different treatments (PGRs; Student-Neuman Keuls at p = 0.05). For comparisons within dates, df = 4.24 (11th February, F = 2.23, p = 0.1020; 14th February, F = 0.57, p = 0.6864; 18th February, F = 7.47, p < 0.05; 21st February, F = 18.83, p < 0.05; 25th February, F = 27.45, p < 0.05; 28th February, F = 67.49, p < 0.05; 3rd March, F = 109.41, p < 0.05; 6th March, F = 78.67, p < 0.05; 10th March, F = 75.42, p < 0.05; 13th March, F = 102.62, p < 0.05; 17th March, F = 107.32, p < 0.05; 20th March, F = 143.46, p < 0.05; 24th March, F = 73.35, p < 0.05; 27th March, F = 108.69, p < 0.05; 31st March, F = 15.47, p < 0.05; 3rd April, F = 102.67, p < 0.05; 7th April, F = 187.67, p < 0.05; 10th April, F = 187.67, p < 0.05; 17th April, F = 174.89, p < 0.05). df, degrees of freedom; Eth, ethephon; F, F-distribution; Mes, mesotrione; Pc, prohexadione calcium; PGRs, plant growth regulators; SE, standard error.

Figure 4

The average plant height on annual bluegrass treated with different PGRs. Within each evaluation date, a comparison was done between different treatments (PGRs; Student-Neuman Keuls at p < 0.05). For comparisons within dates, df = 4.24 (11th February, F = 0.62, p = 0.6526; 28th February, F = 10.38, p < 0.05; 3rd March, F = 12.97, p < 0.05; 6th March, F = 19.11, p < 0.05; 10th March, F = 23.30, p < 0.05; 13th March, F = 24.30, p < 0.05; 17th March, F = 22.24, p < 0.05; 20th March, F = 32.62, p < 0.05; 24th March, F = 13.20, p = 0.0624; 27th March, F = 20.20, p = 0.0523; 31st March, F = 30.30, p < 0.05; 3rd April, F = 26.11, p < 0.05; 7th April, F = 25.13, p < 0.05; 10th April, F = 40.11, p < 0.05; 14th April, F = 52.00, p < 0.05; 17th April, F = 142.37, p < 0.05). df, degrees of freedom; Eth, ethephon; F, F-distribution; Mes, mesotrione; Pc, prohexadione calcium; PGRs, plant growth regulators; SE, standard error.
The average plant height on annual bluegrass treated with different PGRs. Within each evaluation date, a comparison was done between different treatments (PGRs; Student-Neuman Keuls at p < 0.05). For comparisons within dates, df = 4.24 (11th February, F = 0.62, p = 0.6526; 28th February, F = 10.38, p < 0.05; 3rd March, F = 12.97, p < 0.05; 6th March, F = 19.11, p < 0.05; 10th March, F = 23.30, p < 0.05; 13th March, F = 24.30, p < 0.05; 17th March, F = 22.24, p < 0.05; 20th March, F = 32.62, p < 0.05; 24th March, F = 13.20, p = 0.0624; 27th March, F = 20.20, p = 0.0523; 31st March, F = 30.30, p < 0.05; 3rd April, F = 26.11, p < 0.05; 7th April, F = 25.13, p < 0.05; 10th April, F = 40.11, p < 0.05; 14th April, F = 52.00, p < 0.05; 17th April, F = 142.37, p < 0.05). df, degrees of freedom; Eth, ethephon; F, F-distribution; Mes, mesotrione; Pc, prohexadione calcium; PGRs, plant growth regulators; SE, standard error.

Figure 5

The average plant height on perennial ryegrass treated with different PGRs. Within each evaluation date, a comparison was done between different treatments (PGRs; Student-Neuman Keuls at p < 0.05). For comparisons within dates, df = 4.24 (11th February, F = 5.42, p = 0.0726; 28th February, F = 13.13, p = 0.0595; 3rd March, F = 44.97, p < 0.05; 6th March, F = 39.81, p < 0.05; 10th March, F = 11.30, p < 0.05; 13th March, F = 16.30, p < 0.05; 17th March, F = 33.24, p < 0.05; 20th March, F = 32.62, p < 0.05; 24th March, F = 23.11, p = 0.0724; 27th March, F = 23.26, p = 0.06; 31st March, F = 11.30, p < 0.05; 3rd April, F = 30.11, p < 0.05; 7th April, F = 44.23, p < 0.05; 10th April, F = 30.60, p < 0.05; 14th April, F = 16.00, p < 0.05; 17th April, F = 88.37, p < 0.05). df, degrees of freedom; Eth, ethephon; F, F-distribution; Mes, mesotrione; Pc, prohexadione calcium; PGRs, plant growth regulators; SE, standard error.
The average plant height on perennial ryegrass treated with different PGRs. Within each evaluation date, a comparison was done between different treatments (PGRs; Student-Neuman Keuls at p < 0.05). For comparisons within dates, df = 4.24 (11th February, F = 5.42, p = 0.0726; 28th February, F = 13.13, p = 0.0595; 3rd March, F = 44.97, p < 0.05; 6th March, F = 39.81, p < 0.05; 10th March, F = 11.30, p < 0.05; 13th March, F = 16.30, p < 0.05; 17th March, F = 33.24, p < 0.05; 20th March, F = 32.62, p < 0.05; 24th March, F = 23.11, p = 0.0724; 27th March, F = 23.26, p = 0.06; 31st March, F = 11.30, p < 0.05; 3rd April, F = 30.11, p < 0.05; 7th April, F = 44.23, p < 0.05; 10th April, F = 30.60, p < 0.05; 14th April, F = 16.00, p < 0.05; 17th April, F = 88.37, p < 0.05). df, degrees of freedom; Eth, ethephon; F, F-distribution; Mes, mesotrione; Pc, prohexadione calcium; PGRs, plant growth regulators; SE, standard error.

Figure 6

The average plant height on Kentucky bluegrass treated with different PGRs. Within each evaluation date, a comparison was done between different treatments (PGRs; Student-Neuman Keuls at p < 0.05). For comparisons within dates, df = 4.24 (11th February, F = 3.02, p = 0.0626; 28th February, F = 11.26, p = 0.0485; 3rd March, F = 11.97, p < 0.05; 6th March, F = 103.81, p < 0.05; 10th March, F = 151.20, p < 0.05; 13th March, F = 23.30, p < 0.05; 17th March, F = 55.24, p < 0.05; 20th March, F = 32.62, p = 0.0532; 24th March, F = 7.11, p = 0.0814; 27th March, F = 23.26, p = 0.08; 31st March, F = 30.30, p < 0.05; 3rd April, F = 25.11, p < 0.05; 7th April, F = 38.23, p < 0.05; 10th April, F = 30.60, p < 0.05; 14th April, F = 32.00, p < 0.05; 17th April, F = 30.37, p < 0.05). df, degrees of freedom; Eth, ethephon; F, F-distribution; Mes, mesotrione; Pc, prohexadione calcium; PGRs, plant growth regulators; SE, standard error.
The average plant height on Kentucky bluegrass treated with different PGRs. Within each evaluation date, a comparison was done between different treatments (PGRs; Student-Neuman Keuls at p < 0.05). For comparisons within dates, df = 4.24 (11th February, F = 3.02, p = 0.0626; 28th February, F = 11.26, p = 0.0485; 3rd March, F = 11.97, p < 0.05; 6th March, F = 103.81, p < 0.05; 10th March, F = 151.20, p < 0.05; 13th March, F = 23.30, p < 0.05; 17th March, F = 55.24, p < 0.05; 20th March, F = 32.62, p = 0.0532; 24th March, F = 7.11, p = 0.0814; 27th March, F = 23.26, p = 0.08; 31st March, F = 30.30, p < 0.05; 3rd April, F = 25.11, p < 0.05; 7th April, F = 38.23, p < 0.05; 10th April, F = 30.60, p < 0.05; 14th April, F = 32.00, p < 0.05; 17th April, F = 30.37, p < 0.05). df, degrees of freedom; Eth, ethephon; F, F-distribution; Mes, mesotrione; Pc, prohexadione calcium; PGRs, plant growth regulators; SE, standard error.

Figure 7

The average number of tillers on annual bluegrass treated with different PGRs. Within each evaluation date, a comparison was done between different treatments (PGRs; Student-Neuman Keuls at p < 0.05). For comparisons within dates, df = 4.24 (14th February, F = 3.02, p = 0.0626; 18th February, F = 0.57, p = 0.0485; 21st February, F = 0.50, p = 0.7360; 25th February, F = 3.30, p = 0.0623; 28th February, F = 30.40, p < 0.05; 3rd March, F = 0.88, p < 0.05; 6th March, F = 4.56, p < 0.05; 10th March, F = 4.23, p < 0.05; 13th March, F = 6.87, p < 0.05; 17th March, F = 5.63, p < 0.05; 20th March, F = 5.63, p < 0.05; 24th March, F = 6.19, p < 0.05; 27th March, F = 23.62 p < 0.05; 31st March, F = 2.71, p < 0.0591; 3rd April, F = 20.11, p < 0.05; 7th April, F = 7.25, p < 0.05; 10th April, F = 81.15, p < 0.05; 17th April, F = 30.11, p < 0.05). df, degrees of freedom; Eth, ethephon; F, F-distribution; Mes, mesotrione; Pc, prohexadione calcium; PGRs, plant growth regulators; SE, standard error.
The average number of tillers on annual bluegrass treated with different PGRs. Within each evaluation date, a comparison was done between different treatments (PGRs; Student-Neuman Keuls at p < 0.05). For comparisons within dates, df = 4.24 (14th February, F = 3.02, p = 0.0626; 18th February, F = 0.57, p = 0.0485; 21st February, F = 0.50, p = 0.7360; 25th February, F = 3.30, p = 0.0623; 28th February, F = 30.40, p < 0.05; 3rd March, F = 0.88, p < 0.05; 6th March, F = 4.56, p < 0.05; 10th March, F = 4.23, p < 0.05; 13th March, F = 6.87, p < 0.05; 17th March, F = 5.63, p < 0.05; 20th March, F = 5.63, p < 0.05; 24th March, F = 6.19, p < 0.05; 27th March, F = 23.62 p < 0.05; 31st March, F = 2.71, p < 0.0591; 3rd April, F = 20.11, p < 0.05; 7th April, F = 7.25, p < 0.05; 10th April, F = 81.15, p < 0.05; 17th April, F = 30.11, p < 0.05). df, degrees of freedom; Eth, ethephon; F, F-distribution; Mes, mesotrione; Pc, prohexadione calcium; PGRs, plant growth regulators; SE, standard error.

Figure 8

The average number of tillers on perennial ryegrass treated with different PGRs. Within each evaluation date, a comparison was done between different treatments (PGRs; Student-Neuman Keuls at p < 0.05). For comparions within date, df = 4.24 (14th February, F = 0.0723, p < 0.05; 18th February, F = 2.09, p = 0.1200; 21st February, F = 1.55, p = 0.2274; 25th February, F = 12.12, p = 0.2236; 28th February, F = 13.07, P < 0.05; 3rd March, F = 1.10, p < 0.05; 6th March, F = 7.50, p < 0.05; 10th March, F = 10.10, p = 0.0564; 13th March, F = 19.29, p < 0.05; 17th March, F = 3.21, p = 0.0345; 20th March, F = 6.31, p < 0.05; 24th March, F = 4.75, p < 0.05; 27th March, F = 30.30, p < 0.05; 31st March, F = 21.70, p < 0.05; 3rd April, F = 15.08, p < 0.05; 7th April, F = 25.40, p < 0.05; 10th April, F = 61.13, p < 0.05; 14th April, F = 61.13, p < 0.05; 17th April, F = 33.15; p < 0.05). df, degrees of freedom; Eth, ethephon; F, F-distribution; Mes, mesotrione; Pc, prohexadione calcium; PGRs, plant growth regulators; SE, standard error.
The average number of tillers on perennial ryegrass treated with different PGRs. Within each evaluation date, a comparison was done between different treatments (PGRs; Student-Neuman Keuls at p < 0.05). For comparions within date, df = 4.24 (14th February, F = 0.0723, p < 0.05; 18th February, F = 2.09, p = 0.1200; 21st February, F = 1.55, p = 0.2274; 25th February, F = 12.12, p = 0.2236; 28th February, F = 13.07, P < 0.05; 3rd March, F = 1.10, p < 0.05; 6th March, F = 7.50, p < 0.05; 10th March, F = 10.10, p = 0.0564; 13th March, F = 19.29, p < 0.05; 17th March, F = 3.21, p = 0.0345; 20th March, F = 6.31, p < 0.05; 24th March, F = 4.75, p < 0.05; 27th March, F = 30.30, p < 0.05; 31st March, F = 21.70, p < 0.05; 3rd April, F = 15.08, p < 0.05; 7th April, F = 25.40, p < 0.05; 10th April, F = 61.13, p < 0.05; 14th April, F = 61.13, p < 0.05; 17th April, F = 33.15; p < 0.05). df, degrees of freedom; Eth, ethephon; F, F-distribution; Mes, mesotrione; Pc, prohexadione calcium; PGRs, plant growth regulators; SE, standard error.

Figure 9

The average number of tillers on Kentucky bluegrass treated with different PGRs. Within each evaluation date, a comparison was done between different treatments (PGRs; Student-Neuman Keuls at p < 0.05). For comparisons within date, df = 4.24 (14th February, F = 3.09, p < 0.05; 18th February, F = 2.09, p = 0.7200; 21st February, F = 1.55, p = 0.2274; 25th February, F = 30.12, p = 0.7236; 28th February, F = 20.07, p < 0.05; 3rd March, F = 1.10, p < 0.05; 6th March, F = 7.50, p < 0.05; 10th March, F = 10.10, p = 0.0564; 13th March, F = 19.29, p < 0.05; 17th March, F = 3.21, p = 0.0345; 20th March, F = 6.31, p < 0.05; 24th March, F = 4.75, p < 0.05; 27th March, F = 30.30, p < 0.05; 31st March, F = 21.70, p < 0.05; 3rd April, F = 15.08, p < 0.05; 7th April, F = 75.40, p = 0.0935; 10th April, F = 61.13, p < 0.05; 14th April, F = 77.13, p < 0.05; 17th April, F = 37.15; p < 0.05). df, degrees of freedom; Eth, ethephon; F, F-distribution; Mes, mesotrione; Pc, prohexadione calcium; PGRs, plant growth regulators; SE, standard error.
The average number of tillers on Kentucky bluegrass treated with different PGRs. Within each evaluation date, a comparison was done between different treatments (PGRs; Student-Neuman Keuls at p < 0.05). For comparisons within date, df = 4.24 (14th February, F = 3.09, p < 0.05; 18th February, F = 2.09, p = 0.7200; 21st February, F = 1.55, p = 0.2274; 25th February, F = 30.12, p = 0.7236; 28th February, F = 20.07, p < 0.05; 3rd March, F = 1.10, p < 0.05; 6th March, F = 7.50, p < 0.05; 10th March, F = 10.10, p = 0.0564; 13th March, F = 19.29, p < 0.05; 17th March, F = 3.21, p = 0.0345; 20th March, F = 6.31, p < 0.05; 24th March, F = 4.75, p < 0.05; 27th March, F = 30.30, p < 0.05; 31st March, F = 21.70, p < 0.05; 3rd April, F = 15.08, p < 0.05; 7th April, F = 75.40, p = 0.0935; 10th April, F = 61.13, p < 0.05; 14th April, F = 77.13, p < 0.05; 17th April, F = 37.15; p < 0.05). df, degrees of freedom; Eth, ethephon; F, F-distribution; Mes, mesotrione; Pc, prohexadione calcium; PGRs, plant growth regulators; SE, standard error.

Figure 10

The average number of tillers on annual bluegrass treated with different PGRs. Within each evaluation date, comparison was done between different treatment (PGRs; Student-Neuman Keuls at p < 0.05). For comparisons within dates, df = 4.24 (28th February, F = 9.06, p = 0.0936; 3rd March, F = 7.38, p < 0.05; 6th March, F = 4.56, p < 0.05; 10th March, F = 4.23, p < 0.05; 13th March, F = 13.87, p < 0.05; 17th March, F = 77.33, p < 0.05; 20th March, F = 130.63, p < 0.05; 24th March, F = 31.19, p < 0.05; 27th March, F = 66.62 p < 0.05; 31st March, F = 77.71, p < 0.05; 3rd April, F = 220.11, p < 0.05; 7th April, F = 34.25, p < 0.05; 10th April, F = 111.15, p < 0.05; 17th April, F = 230.11, p < 0.05). df, degrees of freedom; Eth, ethephon; F, F-distribution; Mes, mesotrione; Pc, prohexadione calcium; PGRs, plant growth regulators; SE, standard error.
The average number of tillers on annual bluegrass treated with different PGRs. Within each evaluation date, comparison was done between different treatment (PGRs; Student-Neuman Keuls at p < 0.05). For comparisons within dates, df = 4.24 (28th February, F = 9.06, p = 0.0936; 3rd March, F = 7.38, p < 0.05; 6th March, F = 4.56, p < 0.05; 10th March, F = 4.23, p < 0.05; 13th March, F = 13.87, p < 0.05; 17th March, F = 77.33, p < 0.05; 20th March, F = 130.63, p < 0.05; 24th March, F = 31.19, p < 0.05; 27th March, F = 66.62 p < 0.05; 31st March, F = 77.71, p < 0.05; 3rd April, F = 220.11, p < 0.05; 7th April, F = 34.25, p < 0.05; 10th April, F = 111.15, p < 0.05; 17th April, F = 230.11, p < 0.05). df, degrees of freedom; Eth, ethephon; F, F-distribution; Mes, mesotrione; Pc, prohexadione calcium; PGRs, plant growth regulators; SE, standard error.

Figure 11

The average number of tiller on perennial ryegrass treated with different PGRs. Within each evaluation date, comparison was done between different treatments (PGRs; Student-Neuman Keuls at p < 0.05). For comparions within date, df = 4.24 (28th February, F = 17.06, p = 0.0936; 3rd March, F = 7.38, p = 0.2005; 6th March, F = 4.56, p < 0.05; 10th March, F = 4.23, p < 0.05; 13th March, F = 22.87, p < 0.05; 17th March, F = 77.33, p < 0.05; 20th March, F = 130.63, p < 0.05; 24th March, F = 70.16, p < 0.05; 27th March, F = 30.11, p < 0.05; 31st March, F = 13.71, p < 0.05; 3rd April, F = 70.11, p < 0.05; 7th April, F = 130.35, p < 0.05; 10th April, F = 17.15, p < 0.05; 17th April, F = 90.11, p < 0.05). df, degrees of freedom; Eth, ethephon; F, F-distribution; Mes, mesotrione; Pc, prohexadione calcium; PGRs, plant growth regulators; SE, standard error.
The average number of tiller on perennial ryegrass treated with different PGRs. Within each evaluation date, comparison was done between different treatments (PGRs; Student-Neuman Keuls at p < 0.05). For comparions within date, df = 4.24 (28th February, F = 17.06, p = 0.0936; 3rd March, F = 7.38, p = 0.2005; 6th March, F = 4.56, p < 0.05; 10th March, F = 4.23, p < 0.05; 13th March, F = 22.87, p < 0.05; 17th March, F = 77.33, p < 0.05; 20th March, F = 130.63, p < 0.05; 24th March, F = 70.16, p < 0.05; 27th March, F = 30.11, p < 0.05; 31st March, F = 13.71, p < 0.05; 3rd April, F = 70.11, p < 0.05; 7th April, F = 130.35, p < 0.05; 10th April, F = 17.15, p < 0.05; 17th April, F = 90.11, p < 0.05). df, degrees of freedom; Eth, ethephon; F, F-distribution; Mes, mesotrione; Pc, prohexadione calcium; PGRs, plant growth regulators; SE, standard error.

Figure 12

The average number of tillers per plant on Kentucky bluegrass treated with different PGRs. Within each evaluation date, comparison was done between different treatments (PGRs; Student-Neuman Keuls at p < 0.05). For comparions within date, df = 4.24 (28th February, F = 7.03, p = 0.0636; 3rd March, F = 9.33, p = 0.4005; 6th March, F = 9.53, p = 0.5246; 10th March, F = 9.23, p < 0.05; 13th March, F = 22.87, p = 0.0563; 17 th March, F = 7.23, p = 0.0625; 20th March, F = 30.11, p < 0.05; 24th March, F = 70.16, p < 0.05; 27th March, F = 11.11, p < 0.05; 31st March, F = 143.61, p < 0.05; 3rd April, F = 270.11, p < 0.05; 7th April, F = 136.31, p < 0.05; 10th April, F = 141.15, p < 0.05; 17th April, F = 90.11, p < 0.05). df, degrees of freedom; Eth, ethephon; F, F-distribution; Mes, mesotrione; Pc, prohexadione calcium; PGRs, plant growth regulators; SE, standard error.
The average number of tillers per plant on Kentucky bluegrass treated with different PGRs. Within each evaluation date, comparison was done between different treatments (PGRs; Student-Neuman Keuls at p < 0.05). For comparions within date, df = 4.24 (28th February, F = 7.03, p = 0.0636; 3rd March, F = 9.33, p = 0.4005; 6th March, F = 9.53, p = 0.5246; 10th March, F = 9.23, p < 0.05; 13th March, F = 22.87, p = 0.0563; 17 th March, F = 7.23, p = 0.0625; 20th March, F = 30.11, p < 0.05; 24th March, F = 70.16, p < 0.05; 27th March, F = 11.11, p < 0.05; 31st March, F = 143.61, p < 0.05; 3rd April, F = 270.11, p < 0.05; 7th April, F = 136.31, p < 0.05; 10th April, F = 141.15, p < 0.05; 17th April, F = 90.11, p < 0.05). df, degrees of freedom; Eth, ethephon; F, F-distribution; Mes, mesotrione; Pc, prohexadione calcium; PGRs, plant growth regulators; SE, standard error.

Spraying dates within Experiments 1 and 2.

Experiment type Treatment Dates

11th Feb 18th Feb 25th Feb 3rd Mar 10th Mar 17th Mar 24th Mar 31st Mar 7th Apr
1 Contr Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Pf × Ab Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Pc Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Eth Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Mes Yes No Yes No No No

2 Contr Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Pf × Ab Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Pc Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Eth Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Mes Yes No Yes No No No

Repeated measures ANOVA parameters for the main effects and associated interactions for plant height within turfgrass species in Experiments 1 and 2 (error df = 470).

Experiment type Source df F p
1 Sources within annual bluegrass
Date of evaluation 18 11.7 <0.05
Treatment 4 43.3 <0.05
Date of evaluation × treatment 72 2.9 <0.05
Source within perennial ryegrass
Date of evaluation 18 19.9 <0.05
Treatment 4 50.6 <0.05
Date of evaluation × treatment 72 2.7 <0.05
Source within Kentucky bluegrass
Date of evaluation 18 33.4 <0.05
Treatment 4 17.1 <0.05
Date of evaluation × treatment 72 8.3 <0.05

2 Source within annual bluegrass
Date of evaluation 15 245.436 <0.05
Treatment 4 105.3 <0.05
Date of evaluation × treatment 60 93.9 <0.05
Source within Lolium perenne
Date of evaluation 15 198.8 <0.05
Treatment 4 122.1 <0.05
Date of evaluation × treatment 60 66.3 <0.05
Source within Poa pratensis
Date of evaluation 15 148.5 <0.05
Treatment 4 163.8 <0.05
Date of evaluation × treatment 60 8.3 <0.05

Plant height ratio of three turfgrass species across five treatments and three growth periods – Experiment 1.

Turfgrass species Treatment Period

3rd Mar/11th Feb 27th Mar/6th Mar 17th Apr/31st Mar
Annual bluegrass Contr 2.03 1.45 1.10
Pf × Ab 1.86 1.58 1.00
Pc 1.28 1.00 1.00
Eth 1.58 1.52 1.00
Mes 1.81 1.52 1.00

Perennial ryegrass Contr 1.25 1.58 1.07
Pf × Ab 1.17 1.71 1.04
Pc 0.94 1.20 1.00
Eth 1.05 1.17 1.14
Mes 1.00 1.00

Kentucky bluegrass Contr 2.06 1.80 1.35
Pf × Ab 2.41 1.57 1.37
Pc 1.09 1.21 1.00
Eth 1.75 1.03 1.00
Mes 1.35

Tillers ratio of three turfgrass species across five treatments and two growth periods – Experiment 2.

Turfgrass species Treatment Period

20th Mar/28th Feb 17th Apr/23rd Mar
Annual bluegrass Contr 1.13 1.00
Pc × Ab 0.93 1.06
Pc 1.19 1.23
Eth 0.94 1.63
Mes 0.89 1.06
Perennial ryegrass Contr 1.26 1.04
Pc × Ab 1.35 0.89
Pc 1.42 1.21
Eth 1.75 1.37
Mes 1.00
Kentucky bluegrass Contr 1.19 0.80
Pc × Ab 1.12 1.06
Pc 1.43 1.00
Eth 1.37 1.04
Mes 0.94

Repeated measures ANOVA parameters for the main effects and associated interaction for average plant height.

Source between variables df F p
All between 30 41.13 <0.05
Intercept 1 33.12 <0.05
Treatment 4 61.34 <0.05
Turfgrass species 2 42.72 <0.05
Experiment type 1 14.23 <0.05
Treatment × turfgrass species 8 8.10 <0.05
Treatment × experiment type 4 0.66 0.053
Turfgrass species × experiment type 2 8.26 <0.05
Treatment × turfgrass species × experiment type 8 2.03 <0.05

Source within Experiment 1

Within interactions 140 87.12 <0.05
Date of evaluation 18 1,749.17 <0.05
Treatment 4 154.24 <0.05
Turfgrass species 2 197.68 <0.05
Date of evaluation × treatment 72 29.46 <0.05
Date of evaluation × turfgrass species 36 122.71 <0.05
Treatment × turfgrass species 8 132.78 <0.05

Source within Experiment 2

Within interactions 139 77.08 <0.05
Date of evaluation 19 154.62 <0.05
Treatment 4 142.48 <0.05
Turfgrass species 2 109.22 <0.05
Date of evaluation × treatment 76 68.22 <0.05
Date of evaluation × turfgrass species 38 45.45 <0.05

Repeated measures ANOVA parameters for the main effects and associated interactions for average tiller number per plant within turfgrass species in Experiments 1 and 2 (error df = 474).

Experiment type Source df F p
1 Sources within annual bluegrass
Date of evaluation 18 11.7 <0.05
Treatment 4 43.3 <0.05
Date of evaluation × treatment 72 2.9 <0.05
Source within perennial ryegrass
Date of evaluation 18 19.9 <0.05
Treatment 4 50.7 <0.05
Date of evaluation × treatment 72 2.7 <0.05
Source within Kentucky bluegrass
Date of evaluation 18 13.3 <0.05
Treatment 4 44.4 <0.05
Date of evaluation × treatment 72 13.3 <0.05

2 Sources within annual bluegrass
Date of evaluation 14 4.4 <0.05
Treatment 4 24.8 <0.05
Date of evaluation × treatment 56 3.8 <0.05
Source within perennial ryegrass
Date of evaluation 14 4.7 <0.05
Treatment 4 25.6 <0.05
Date of evaluation × treatment 56 2.7 <0.05
Source within Kentucky bluegrass
Date of evaluation 18 3.0 <0.05
Treatment 4 22 <0.05
Date of evaluation × treatment 72 13.33 <0.05

Repeated measures ANOVA parameters for the main effects and associated interaction for average tiller number.

Source between variables df F p
All between 28 88.1 <0.05
Intercept 1 77.1 <0.05
Treatment 4 109.8 <0.05
Turfgrass species 2 145.2 <0.05
Experiment type 1 11.6 <0.05
Treatment × turfgrass species 8 14.7 <0.05
Turfgrass species × experiment type 4 4.7 <0.05
Treatment × turfgrass species × experiment type 8 12.3 <0.05

Source within Experiment 1

Within interactions 126 87.3 <0.05
Date of evaluation 18 40.9 <0.05
Date of evaluation × treatment 72 4.9 <0.05
Date of evaluation × turfgrass species 36 3.4 <0.05

Source within Experiment 2

Within interactions 98 65.1 <0.05
Date of evaluation 14 55.3 <0.05
Date of evaluation × treatment 56 44.4 <0.05
Date of evaluation × turfgrass species 28 25.1 <0.05

Plant height ratio of three turfgrass species across five treatments and two growth periods – Experiment 2.

Turfgrass species Treatment Period

20th Mar/28th Feb 17th Apr/23rd Mar
Annual bluegrass Contr 1.62 1.40
Pc × Ab 1.48 1.32
Pc 1.24 1.00
Eth 1.52 1.15
Mes 1.30 1.18
Perennial ryegrass Contr 1.52 1.28
Pc × Ab 1.73 1.63
Pc 1.42 0.95
Eth 1.54 1.68
Mes 1.28
Kentucky bluegrass Contr 1.84 1.75
Pc × Ab 1.74 1.84
Pc 1.35 1.02
Eth 1.38 1.00
Mes 1.11
eISSN:
2083-5965
Sprache:
Englisch
Zeitrahmen der Veröffentlichung:
2 Hefte pro Jahr
Fachgebiete der Zeitschrift:
Biologie, Botanik, Zoologie, Ökologie, andere