[AND - International, 2012. Value of production of agricultural products and foodstuffs, wines, aromatised wines and spirits protected by a geographical indication (GI). Final report by the European Commission and AND International, Oct. 2012.]Search in Google Scholar
[Barham E., 2003. Translating terroir: the global challenge of French AOC labelling. J. Rural Stud. 19: 127-138.10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00052-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Barjolle D., Sylvand er B., 2000. Some factors of success for origin labelled products in agrifood supply chains in Europe: market, internal resources and institutions. In: B. Sylvander, D. Barjolle and F. Arfini (Eds). The Socio-Economics Of Origin Labelled Products In Agri-Food Supply Chains: Spatial, Institutional And Co-Ordination Aspects. INRA Actes et Communications 17-1: 45-71.]Search in Google Scholar
[Belletti G., Burgassi T., Man co E., Marescotti A., Pacciani A., Scaramuzzi S., 2007. The roles of geographical indications (PDO and PGI) on the internationalisation process of agro-food products. Contributed Paper prepared for presentation at the 105th EAAE Seminar ‘International Marketing and International Trade of Quality Food Products’, Bologna, Italy, March 8-10, 2007. Available online at http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/7851/1/cp070035.pdf; cited on 09 July 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[Belletti G., Marescotti A., 2011. Evaluating the effects of protecting Geographical Indications: scientific context and case studies. In: Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property (Ed.). The Effects of Protecting Geographical Indications. Ways and Means of their Evaluation, Berne, Publication n.7 (07.11): 31-121.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bramley C., 2011. A review of the socio-economic impact of geographical indications: considerations for the developing World. Paper prepared for presentation at the WIPO Worldwide Symposium on Geographical Indications June 22 - 24 2011, Lima, Peru: 1-22. Available online at http://www.wipo.int/ edocs/mdocs/geoind/en/wipo_geo_lim_11/wipo_ geo_lim_11_9.pdf; cited on 15 July 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[Door database. Available online at: http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/quality/door/ list.html; cited on 15 July 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dziewirz F., 2013. „Wiśnia Nadwiślanka” w unijnym systemie jakości żywności. The Nadwiślanka Fruit and Vegetable Producers’ Cooperative, IX Wojewódzkie Święto Kwitnącej Wiśni, Plantpress, Nowe. European Commissi on, notice No 2009/C 104/09. Publication of an application pursuant to Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs, ‘Wiśnia Nadwiślanka’. Official Journal of the European Union, 2009.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission, 2011. Europe, the taste of quality, Europe values the diversity of its quality products. European Commission, Directorate - General for Agriculture and Rural Development, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission, 2013. Agriculture and Rural Development, Geographical indications and traditional specialties. Available online at http:// ec.europa.eu/agriculture/quality/schemes; cited on 09 July 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[Giovannucci D., Josling T., Kerr W., O’Conn or B., Yeung M.T., 2009. Guide to Geographical Indications: Linking products and their origins, International Trade Centre, Geneva.10.2139/ssrn.1736713]Search in Google Scholar
[Goodman D., 2003. The quality ‘turn’ and alternative food practices: reflections and agenda. J. Rural Stud. 19: 1-7.10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00043-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Green Paper on agricultural product quality: product standards, farming requirements and quality schemes, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, 15.10.2008.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hegnes A.W., 2012. Introducing and practising PDO and PGI in Norway, Anthropology of Food. Available online at http://aof.revues.org/7210; cited on 09 July 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hughes D., 2002. Consumer interests and the reform of the CAP: a review of relevant documentation and research, Imperial College, University of London: 1-31. Available online at http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/reports/rep02_en.pdf; cited on 09 July 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ilbery B., Kneafs y M., 2000. Producer constructions of quality in regional specialty food production: a case study from south West England. J. Rural Stud. 16: 217-230.10.1016/S0743-0167(99)00041-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Josling T., 2006. What’s in a Name? The Economics, Law, and Politics of Geographical Indications for Foods and Beverages. Institute for International Integration Studies Discussion, Paper No. 109: Trinity College, Dublin: 1-33. Available online at http://www.tcd.ie/iiis/documents/discussion/pdfs/iiisdp109.pdf; cited on 09 July 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[London Economics, 2008. Evaluation of the CAP policy on protected designations of origin (PDO) and protected geographical indications (PGI), London. Study financed by the European Commission.]Search in Google Scholar
[Marescotti A., 2003. Typical products and rural development: Who benefits from PDO/PGI recognition? Paper presented at: Food Quality Products in the Advent of the 21st Century: Production, Demand and Public Policy. 83rd EAAE Seminar, Chania, Greece, 4-7 September. Available online at http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/olq/documents/documents/cherry%20of%Lari%20marescotti.pdf; cited on 09 July 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[Marsden T., Banks J., Bris tow G., 2000. Food supply chain approaches: exploring their role in rural development. Sociologia Ruralis 40 424-438.10.1111/1467-9523.00158]Search in Google Scholar
[Marty F., 1997. Which are the ways of innovation in PDO and PGI products? In: F. Arfini and C. Mora (Eds). Typical and Traditional Products: Rural Effect and Agro-Industrial Problems. Proceedings of 52nd EAAE Seminar (19-21.6.1997), Parma. Available online at http://www.origin-food.org/pdf/eaae97/02_marty.pdf; cited on 09 July 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[Porter M., 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations, The Free Press, New York.10.1007/978-1-349-11336-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Regulation (EU ) No 1151/2012 of The European Parliament and of The Council, of 21 Nov. 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural product and foodstuffs, Article 1.]Search in Google Scholar
[Suszyna j., 2012. Wiśnia nadwiślanka w unijnym systemie jakości. The Nadwiślanka Fruit and Vegetable Producers’ Cooperative, VIII Wojewódzkie Święto Kwitnącej Wiśni. Plantpress, Nowe.]Search in Google Scholar
[Suszyna j., 2013. Szanse i zagrożenia uprawy ‘Wiśni nadwiślanki’. The Nadwiślanka Fruit and Vegetable Producers’ Cooperative, VIII Wojewódzkie Święto Kwitnącej Wiśni. Plantpress, Nowe.]Search in Google Scholar
[Warner K.D., 2007. The quality of sustainability: Agroecological partnerships and the geographic branding of California winegrapes. J. Rural Stud. 23: 142-155. 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.09.009]Search in Google Scholar