Uneingeschränkter Zugang

European Union agri-food quality schemes for the protection and promotion of geographical indications and traditional specialities: an economic perspective


Zitieren

AND - International, 2012. Value of production of agricultural products and foodstuffs, wines, aromatised wines and spirits protected by a geographical indication (GI). Final report by the European Commission and AND International, Oct. 2012.Search in Google Scholar

Barham E., 2003. Translating terroir: the global challenge of French AOC labelling. J. Rural Stud. 19: 127-138.10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00052-9Search in Google Scholar

Barjolle D., Sylvand er B., 2000. Some factors of success for origin labelled products in agrifood supply chains in Europe: market, internal resources and institutions. In: B. Sylvander, D. Barjolle and F. Arfini (Eds). The Socio-Economics Of Origin Labelled Products In Agri-Food Supply Chains: Spatial, Institutional And Co-Ordination Aspects. INRA Actes et Communications 17-1: 45-71.Search in Google Scholar

Belletti G., Burgassi T., Man co E., Marescotti A., Pacciani A., Scaramuzzi S., 2007. The roles of geographical indications (PDO and PGI) on the internationalisation process of agro-food products. Contributed Paper prepared for presentation at the 105th EAAE Seminar ‘International Marketing and International Trade of Quality Food Products’, Bologna, Italy, March 8-10, 2007. Available online at http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/7851/1/cp070035.pdf; cited on 09 July 2013.Search in Google Scholar

Belletti G., Marescotti A., 2011. Evaluating the effects of protecting Geographical Indications: scientific context and case studies. In: Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property (Ed.). The Effects of Protecting Geographical Indications. Ways and Means of their Evaluation, Berne, Publication n.7 (07.11): 31-121.Search in Google Scholar

Bramley C., 2011. A review of the socio-economic impact of geographical indications: considerations for the developing World. Paper prepared for presentation at the WIPO Worldwide Symposium on Geographical Indications June 22 - 24 2011, Lima, Peru: 1-22. Available online at http://www.wipo.int/ edocs/mdocs/geoind/en/wipo_geo_lim_11/wipo_ geo_lim_11_9.pdf; cited on 15 July 2013.Search in Google Scholar

Door database. Available online at: http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/quality/door/ list.html; cited on 15 July 2013.Search in Google Scholar

Dziewirz F., 2013. „Wiśnia Nadwiślanka” w unijnym systemie jakości żywności. The Nadwiślanka Fruit and Vegetable Producers’ Cooperative, IX Wojewódzkie Święto Kwitnącej Wiśni, Plantpress, Nowe. European Commissi on, notice No 2009/C 104/09. Publication of an application pursuant to Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs, ‘Wiśnia Nadwiślanka’. Official Journal of the European Union, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

European Commission, 2011. Europe, the taste of quality, Europe values the diversity of its quality products. European Commission, Directorate - General for Agriculture and Rural Development, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

European Commission, 2013. Agriculture and Rural Development, Geographical indications and traditional specialties. Available online at http:// ec.europa.eu/agriculture/quality/schemes; cited on 09 July 2013.Search in Google Scholar

Giovannucci D., Josling T., Kerr W., O’Conn or B., Yeung M.T., 2009. Guide to Geographical Indications: Linking products and their origins, International Trade Centre, Geneva.10.2139/ssrn.1736713Search in Google Scholar

Goodman D., 2003. The quality ‘turn’ and alternative food practices: reflections and agenda. J. Rural Stud. 19: 1-7.10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00043-8Search in Google Scholar

Green Paper on agricultural product quality: product standards, farming requirements and quality schemes, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, 15.10.2008.Search in Google Scholar

Hegnes A.W., 2012. Introducing and practising PDO and PGI in Norway, Anthropology of Food. Available online at http://aof.revues.org/7210; cited on 09 July 2013.Search in Google Scholar

Hughes D., 2002. Consumer interests and the reform of the CAP: a review of relevant documentation and research, Imperial College, University of London: 1-31. Available online at http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/reports/rep02_en.pdf; cited on 09 July 2013.Search in Google Scholar

Ilbery B., Kneafs y M., 2000. Producer constructions of quality in regional specialty food production: a case study from south West England. J. Rural Stud. 16: 217-230.10.1016/S0743-0167(99)00041-8Search in Google Scholar

Josling T., 2006. What’s in a Name? The Economics, Law, and Politics of Geographical Indications for Foods and Beverages. Institute for International Integration Studies Discussion, Paper No. 109: Trinity College, Dublin: 1-33. Available online at http://www.tcd.ie/iiis/documents/discussion/pdfs/iiisdp109.pdf; cited on 09 July 2013.Search in Google Scholar

London Economics, 2008. Evaluation of the CAP policy on protected designations of origin (PDO) and protected geographical indications (PGI), London. Study financed by the European Commission.Search in Google Scholar

Marescotti A., 2003. Typical products and rural development: Who benefits from PDO/PGI recognition? Paper presented at: Food Quality Products in the Advent of the 21st Century: Production, Demand and Public Policy. 83rd EAAE Seminar, Chania, Greece, 4-7 September. Available online at http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/olq/documents/documents/cherry%20of%Lari%20marescotti.pdf; cited on 09 July 2013.Search in Google Scholar

Marsden T., Banks J., Bris tow G., 2000. Food supply chain approaches: exploring their role in rural development. Sociologia Ruralis 40 424-438.10.1111/1467-9523.00158Search in Google Scholar

Marty F., 1997. Which are the ways of innovation in PDO and PGI products? In: F. Arfini and C. Mora (Eds). Typical and Traditional Products: Rural Effect and Agro-Industrial Problems. Proceedings of 52nd EAAE Seminar (19-21.6.1997), Parma. Available online at http://www.origin-food.org/pdf/eaae97/02_marty.pdf; cited on 09 July 2013.Search in Google Scholar

Porter M., 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations, The Free Press, New York.10.1007/978-1-349-11336-1Search in Google Scholar

Regulation (EU ) No 1151/2012 of The European Parliament and of The Council, of 21 Nov. 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural product and foodstuffs, Article 1.Search in Google Scholar

Suszyna j., 2012. Wiśnia nadwiślanka w unijnym systemie jakości. The Nadwiślanka Fruit and Vegetable Producers’ Cooperative, VIII Wojewódzkie Święto Kwitnącej Wiśni. Plantpress, Nowe.Search in Google Scholar

Suszyna j., 2013. Szanse i zagrożenia uprawy ‘Wiśni nadwiślanki’. The Nadwiślanka Fruit and Vegetable Producers’ Cooperative, VIII Wojewódzkie Święto Kwitnącej Wiśni. Plantpress, Nowe.Search in Google Scholar

Warner K.D., 2007. The quality of sustainability: Agroecological partnerships and the geographic branding of California winegrapes. J. Rural Stud. 23: 142-155. 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.09.009Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2083-5965
Sprache:
Englisch
Zeitrahmen der Veröffentlichung:
2 Hefte pro Jahr
Fachgebiete der Zeitschrift:
Biologie, Botanik, Zoologie, Ökologie, andere