Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Degradation of mycorrhizal fungal communities associated with cork oak and understory vegetation by the anthropogenic factors

Hana Ksentini

Hana Ksentini

Badji Mokhtar University, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Biology, Laboratory of Plant Biology and EnvironmentAnnaba, Algeria
Suche nach diesem Autor auf
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Ksentini, Hana
, 
Meddad-Hamza Amel

Meddad-Hamza Amel

Badji Mokhtar University, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Biology, Laboratory of Environmental BiomonitoringAnnaba, Algeria
Suche nach diesem Autor auf
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Amel, Meddad-Hamza
 und 
Beddiar Arifa

Beddiar Arifa

Badji Mokhtar University, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Biology, Laboratory of Plant Biology and EnvironmentAnnaba, Algeria
Suche nach diesem Autor auf
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Arifa, Beddiar
  
22. Sept. 2022
Degradation of mycorrhizal fungal communities associated with cork oak and understory vegetation by the anthropogenic factors's Cover Image
Über diesen Artikel
Vorheriger Artikel
Nächster Artikel
Zitieren
COVER HERUNTERLADEN
Artikel-Kategorie: Short Communication
Online veröffentlicht: 22. Sept. 2022
Seitenbereich: 184 - 194
Eingereicht: 28. Sept. 2021
Akzeptiert: 04. Mai 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ffp-2022-0018
Schlüsselwörter
© 2022 Hana Ksentini et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Figure 1

Location of the cork oak forest ‘Brabtia’ and the study stations (Diaf et al. 2019). ND – non-degraded station, D – degraded station
Location of the cork oak forest ‘Brabtia’ and the study stations (Diaf et al. 2019). ND – non-degraded station, D – degraded station

Figure 2

Rate of EcM colonization of cork oak (Quercus suber L.) and Cistus (Cistus monspeliensis L.). Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments according to Tukey's HSD test (P < 0.05). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. COND: cork oak in non-degraded station, COD: cork oak in degraded station, CIND: Cistus in non-degraded station, CID: Cistus in degraded station, EcM: ectomycorrhizal, HSD: honestly significant difference
Rate of EcM colonization of cork oak (Quercus suber L.) and Cistus (Cistus monspeliensis L.). Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments according to Tukey's HSD test (P < 0.05). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. COND: cork oak in non-degraded station, COD: cork oak in degraded station, CIND: Cistus in non-degraded station, CID: Cistus in degraded station, EcM: ectomycorrhizal, HSD: honestly significant difference

Figure 3

Mycorrhizal intensity (M%) of the root system of Quercus suber, Cistus monspeliensis, Lavendula stoechas and Thymus vulgaris in the two stations. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments according to Tukey's HSD test (P < 0.05). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001COND: cork oak in the non-degraded station; COD: cork oak in the degraded station; CIND: Cistus in the non-degraded station, CID: Cistus in the degraded station, LD: lavender in the degraded station; TND: thyme in the non-degraded station, TD: thyme in the degraded station, HSD: honestly significant difference
Mycorrhizal intensity (M%) of the root system of Quercus suber, Cistus monspeliensis, Lavendula stoechas and Thymus vulgaris in the two stations. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments according to Tukey's HSD test (P < 0.05). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001COND: cork oak in the non-degraded station; COD: cork oak in the degraded station; CIND: Cistus in the non-degraded station, CID: Cistus in the degraded station, LD: lavender in the degraded station; TND: thyme in the non-degraded station, TD: thyme in the degraded station, HSD: honestly significant difference

Figure 4

The number of AM propagules per kilogram of soil in the degraded and the non-degraded stations
The number of AM propagules per kilogram of soil in the degraded and the non-degraded stations

Figure 5

The total number of the fungal diversity of spores of the four rhizospheres in the degraded and the non-degraded stations
The total number of the fungal diversity of spores of the four rhizospheres in the degraded and the non-degraded stations

Soil physicochemical properties of Quercus suber rhizosphere soil in the two stations

Station pH OM (%) N % P (mg/kg) K total
ND 5.95a 3.50a 0.31a 6.80b 21.17b
D 5.88a 2.00b 0.27a 4.60a 11.27a

Frequency of morphotypes of spores in the four rhizospheres

Fractions Spores collected from
Quercus suber rhizosphere
250 μm50 μm Glomus sp. 1+++ Glomus constrictum+++ Glomus sp. 2+++
Lavandula stoechas rhizosphere
250 μm50 μm Gigaspora sp.1+++ Glomus sp. 2++ Glomus sp. 3+
Thymus vulgaris rhizosphere
250 μm50 μm Glomus sp. 4++ Glomus sp. 3+ Gigaspora sp. 1++
Cistus monspeliensis rhizosphere
250 μm50 μm Glomus mosseae+++ Glomus sp. 3++ Glomus sp. 4++
Sprache:
Englisch
Zeitrahmen der Veröffentlichung:
4 Hefte pro Jahr
Fachgebiete der Zeitschrift:
Biologie, Botanik, Medizin, Veterinärmedizin
Zeitschrift RSS Feed