[Bałut S., Sabor J. 2001. Inventory provenance test of Norway Spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst.] IPTNSIUFRO 1964/68 in Krynica. Part I. Description of the experimental area. Wydawnictwo Akademii Rolniczej, Kraków.]Search in Google Scholar
[Barszcz J., Małek S. 2006. The quality and viability of Picea abies (L.) Karst. seedlings in young crops laid out after a decay of stands at high mountain elevations in the Śląski Beskid Mountains and the western part of the Beskid Żywiecki Mountains. In: Current problems of forest protection in spruce stands under conversion (eds.: W. Grodzki, T. Oszako). IBL (FRI), Warsaw, 21-35.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bergmann F., Gregorious H.R. 1979. Comparison of the genetic diversities of various populations of Norway spruce (Picea abies). Proceedings of the Conference on Biochemical Genetics of Forest Trees (ed.: F. Rudin). Umeå, 99-107.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bruchwald A., Dmyterko E. 2010. Lasy Beskidu Śląskiego i Żywieckiego - zagrożenia, nadzieja. Instytut Badawczy Leśnictwa, Sękocin Stary, pp. 80.]Search in Google Scholar
[Burczyk J. 1998. Systemy kojarzenia drzew leśnych. Wyd. Uczelniane WSP, Bydgoszcz, pp. 105.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chałupka W., Mejnartowicz L., Lewandowski A. 2008. Reconstitution of a lost forest tree population: A case study of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.). Forest Ecology and Management, 255, 2103-2108.]Search in Google Scholar
[Conkle M.T., Paul D.H., Nunnaly L.B., Hunter S.C. 1982. Starch Gel Electrophoresis of Conifer Seeds: a Laboratory Manual. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSWGTR-64. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.10.2737/PSW-GTR-64]Search in Google Scholar
[Forest Condition in Europe. 2004. Technical Report of ICP Forests. Federal Research Centre for Forestry and Forest Products (BFH), Hamburg.]Search in Google Scholar
[Giannini R., Morgante M., Vendramin G.G. 1991. Allozyme variation in Italian populations of Picea abies (L.) Karst. Silvae Genetica, 40 (3/4), 160-166.]Search in Google Scholar
[Giertych M. 1984. Świerk istebniański w świetle międzynarodowych doświadczeń proweniencyjnych. Sylwan, 128 (12), 27-42.]Search in Google Scholar
[Giertych M. 1997. Świerk pospolity Picea abies (L.) Karst. Nasze Drzewa Leśne. Warszawa-Poznań, PWN.]Search in Google Scholar
[Giertych M. 2002. Troska o bioróżnorodność. Sesja naukowa: Zagospodarowanie oraz wartość genetyczna populacji drzew gatunków domieszkowych i introdukowanych w aspekcie stabilizacji ekosystemów leśnych Karpat. Zeszyty Naukowe AkademiiRolniczej im. H. Kołłątaja w Krakowie, 394, 289-301.]Search in Google Scholar
[Konnert M., Maurer W. 1995. Isozymic Investigations on Norway Spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst.] and European Silver Fir (Abies alba M ill.). A Practical Guide to Separation Methods and Zymogram Evaluation. Bayerische Landesanstalt für forstliche Saat- und Pflanzenzucht, Teisendorf, pp. 79.]Search in Google Scholar
[Konnert M. 2009. Genetic variation of Picea abies in southern Germany as determined using isozyme and STS markers. Dendrobiology, 61 (Supplement), 131-136.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kraj W. 2002. The estimation of genetic variation within and between polish provenances of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) on the basis of RAPD polymorphism, EJPAU 5 (2). Available online: http://www.ejpau.media.pl/volume5/issue2/forestry/abs-02.html]Search in Google Scholar
[Krutovskii K.V., Bergmann F. 1995. Introgressive hybridization and phylogenetic relationship between Norway, Picea abies (L.) Karst., and Siberian, P. obovata L edeb., spruce species studied by isozyme loci. Heredity, 74 (5), 464-480.]Search in Google Scholar
[Krutzsch P. 1968. Die Pflanzschulenergebnisse eines inventierenden Fichtenherkunftsversuches (Piceaabies Karst. und Picea obovata Ledeb.). Königliche Forstliche Hochschule, Stockholm.]Search in Google Scholar
[Langercrantz U., Ryman N. 1990. Genetic structure of Norway spruce (Picea abies): concordance of morphological and allozymic variation. Evolution, 44, 38-53.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ledig F.T. 1986. Heterozygosity, heterosis, and fitness in outbreeding plants. In: Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity (ed.: M.E. Soule). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass. (USA), 77- 104.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lewandowki A., Burczyk J., Chałupka W. 1997. Preliminary results on allozyme diversity and differentiation on Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst.] in Poland based on plus tree investigations. Acta SocietatisBotanicorum Poloniae, 66 (2), 197-200.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lewandowski A., Burczyk J. 2002. Allozyme variation of Picea abies in Poland. Scandinavian Journal ofForest Research, 17, 478-494.]Search in Google Scholar
[Longauer R., Gömöry D., Paule L., Blada I., Popescu F., Maňkovská B. 2004. Genetic effects of air pollution on forest tree species of the Carpathian Mountains. Environmental Pollution, 130, 85-92.]Search in Google Scholar
[Masternak K., Sabor J., Majerczyk K. 2009. Effect of provenance on the survival of Norway spruce (Piceasabies (L.) Karst.) trees on the IPTNS-IUFRO 1964/68 site in Krynica (Poland). Dendrobiology, 61, 53-61.]Search in Google Scholar
[Masternak K., Zielińska M., Sabor J. 2011. Polimorfizm izoenzymów i wzrost wybranych pochodzeń świerka pospolitego [Picea abies (L.) Karst.] doświadczenia IPTNS-IUFRO 1964/68 w Krynicy. LeśnePrace Badawcze, 72 (1), 65-75.]Search in Google Scholar
[Modrzyński J., Prus-Głowacki W. 1998. Isoenzymatic variability in some of the polish populations of Norway spruce (Picea abies) in the IUFRO 1972 provenance trial. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae, 67 (1), 75-85.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nei M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. American Naturalist, 106, 283-292.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nei M., Roychoudhury A.K. 1974. Sampling variances of heterozygosity and genetic distance. Genetics, 76, 379-390.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nowakowska J.A. 2009. Mitochondrial and nuclear DNA differentiation of Picea abies populations in Poland. Dendrobiology, 61 (Supplement), 119-129.]Search in Google Scholar
[Paule L., Szmidt A.E., Yazdani R. 1990. Isozyme polymorphism of Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.) in Slovakia. I. Genetic structure of adjacent populations. Acta Facultatis Zvolen, 32, 57-70.]Search in Google Scholar
[Polak-Berecka M., Perchlicka I. 2007. Polimorfizm izoenzymowy i zmienność genetyczna wybranych pochodzeń cząstkowych świerka rasy istebniańskiej. Sylwan, 151 (10), 47-53.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sabor J. 1996. Możliwości zachowania i metody selekcji drzewostanów świerkowych rasy istebniańskiej. Sylwan, 140 (3), 61-81.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sabor J. 2010. Genetic basis of conversion and conservation of forest gene resources of spruce stands in Silesian and Zywiec Beskid Mountains. Beskydy, 3 (2), 175-186. Skroppa T. 1994. Impact of tree improvement on genetic structure and diversity of planted forests. SilvaFennica, 28 (4), 265-274.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sneath P.H.A., Sokal R.R. 1973. Numerical Taxonomy: the Principles and Practice of Numerical Classification. W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wright S. 1978. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations. Vol. 4. Variability within and among natural populations. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yeh F.C., Yang R., Boyle T. 1999. Popgene Version 1,31. Microsoft Window - Based Freeware for Population Genetic Analysis. University of Alberta and Centre for International Forestry Research, Edmonton, Canada.]Search in Google Scholar
