Towards automated recommendations for drunk driving penalties in Poland - a case study analysis in selected court

[1] Agthe M., Spörrle M., Maner J., Does Being Attractive Always Help? Positive and Negative Effects of Attractiveness on Social Decision Making, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2011, p. 1042Search in Google Scholar

[2] Ashworth A. and Roberts J.V. (eds) Sentencing guidelines: Exploring the English model, Oxford University Press: Oxford, England 2013Search in Google Scholar

[3] Bacik I., The Courts: Consistent Sentencing?, Irish Quarterly Review 88, 164, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Bates D., Mächler M., Bolker B., Walker S., Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1, 2015, pp. 1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Bennett H., Broe T., Judicial Neurobiology, Markarian Synthesis and Emotion: How Can the Human Brain Make Sen-tencing Decisions?, Criminal Law Journal, no. 75, 2007, p. 84.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Chisholm R., Values and Assumptions in Judicial Cases, National Judicial College Conference: Judicial Reasoning - Art or Science?, Canberra, 7-8 February 2009Search in Google Scholar

[7] Danziger S., Levav J., Avnaim-Pesso L., Extraneous Factors in Judicial Decisions, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 17, 2011, pp. 6889 - 6892.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Dasgupta A., Alcohol a double-edged sword: Health benefits with moderate consumption but a health hazard with excess alcohol intake in: Alcohol, Drugs, Genes and the Clinical Laboratory, eds: Amitava Dasgupta, Academic Press, 2017, pp. 1-21.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Dhami M. K., Sentencing Guidelines in England and Wales: Missed Opportunities?, Law and Contemporary Problems, 76, 289, 2013, 302Search in Google Scholar

[10] Dhami M. K., Quasirational Models of Sentencing, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4, 2015, 239-247Search in Google Scholar

[11] Douglas R., Does the Magistrate Matter? Sentencers and Sentence in the Victorian Magistrates’ Courts, 22, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 40, 50, 1989.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Duff R. A., Guidance and Guidelines, Columbia Law Review, 105, pp. 1162 - 1164, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Edwards G. et al, The Effects of Voluntary and Presumptive Sentencing Guidelines, Texas Law Review, 98, 1 (2019)Search in Google Scholar

[14] Franko Aas K., Sentencing in the Age of Information: From Faust to Macintosh, 2005, pp. 24-26.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Hao K., Stray J., Can you make AI fairer than a judge? Play our courtroom algorithm game, https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/10/17/75285/ai-fairer-than-judge-criminal-risk-assessment-algorithm/ (accessed: 4 March 2023).Search in Google Scholar

[16] Harris C. R., Millman K. J., van der Walt S. J., Gommers R., Virtanen P., Cournapeau D., Oliphant, T. E., Array programming with NumPy. Nature, 585, 2020, 357–362.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Hassemer W., Juristische Methodenlehre und Richterliche Pragmatik, 39 Rechtstheorie 1, 17, 20, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Herz C., Striving for Consistency: Why German Sentencing Needs Reform, German Law Journal, 21, 2020, p. 1631.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Hörnle T., Strafzumessungslehre im Lichte des Grundgesetzes, in: Das strafende Gesetz im sozialen Rechtsstaat, ed. Eva Schumann, De Gruyter, 2010, p. 121.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Hunter J. D., “Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment”, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 3, 2007, pp. 90-95.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Kaczmarek T., Problemy indywidualizacji wymiaru kary sprawiedliwej i celowej, in: Dyrektywy sądowego wymiaru kary, ed. Majewski J., Warsaw 2014, p. 21.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Kantner R., Kukkonen C., An introduction to risk of Al for general counsel, 2018 https://www.law.com/corpcounsel/2018/10/1 1/an-introduction-to-the-risks-of-ai-for-general-counse/ (accessed: 1 May 2021);Search in Google Scholar

[23] Kaspar J., Deutschen Juristentag: sentencing guidelines versus freies tatrichter-liches ermessen–brauchen wir ein neues strafzumessungsrecht?, 2018, p. 50 and p. 107Search in Google Scholar

[24] Kirby M., Judging: Reflections on the Moment of Decision, Australian Bar Review, 4, 1999, p. 19Search in Google Scholar

[25] Krasnostein S., Freiberg A., Pursuing Consistency In An Individualistic Sentencing Framework: If You Know Where You’re Going, How Do You Know When You’ve Got There?, Law and Contemporary Problems, 76, 2013, pp. 265-288.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Larson J., Mattu S., Kirchner L., Angwi J., How We Analyzed the COMPAS Recidivism Algorithm, https://www.propublica.org/article/how-we-analyzed-the-compas-recidivism-algorithm (accessed: 4 March 2023).Search in Google Scholar

[27] Lawrence J. A., Homel J.R., Sentencer and Offender Factors as Sources of Discrimination in Magistrates’ Penalties for Drinking Drivers, Social Justice Research 5, 385, 1992.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Markiewicz Ł., Markiewicz-Żuchowska A., Skłonności poznawcze sȩdziego wpływające na wysokość wymierzonej kary, Decyzje, 12, 2012, p. 62Search in Google Scholar

[29] Mason K., Unconscious Judicial Prejudice, Australian Law Journal 2001, pp. 676 - 680Search in Google Scholar

[30] Meier B.-D., Regionale Justizkulturen in der Strafrechtspraxis: ein Problem für den Rechtsstaat? in: Justizvollzug und Strafrechtsreform im Bundesstaat, eds. Axel Dessecker & Rudolf Egg, Kriminologische Zentralstelle, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

[31] Niller E., Can AI Be a Fair Judge in Court? Estonia Thinks So, https://www.wired.com/story/can-ai-be-fair-judge-court-estonia-thinks-so/ (accessed: 4 March 2023).Search in Google Scholar

[32] O’Connell F., Comparative Research Into Sentencing Guidelines Mechanisms, Northern Ireland Assembly, 610, 10, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

[33] O’Malley T., Living Without Guidelines, in: Sentencing Guidelines: Exploring the English Model, eds. Ashworth A. and Roberts J.V., 2005, Oxford University Press, p. 219, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

[34] Pina-Sanchez J., Linacre R., Enhancing Consistency in Sentencing: Exploring the Effects of Guidelines in England and Wales, Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 30, 4, 2014, pp. 731.Search in Google Scholar

[35] Quintanilla V., Different Voices: A Gender Difference when Reasoning about the Letter Versus Spirit of the Law, Law and Society Conference, Honolulu, June, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[36] Reiling A. D., Courts and Artificial Intelligence, International Journal for Court Administration, 11, 2, 2020, p. 3.Search in Google Scholar

[37] Roberts J.V. et al, Individualisation at Sentencing: the Effects of Guidelines and ‘Preferred’ Numbers, Criminal Law Review, 2, 123, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

[38] Roberts J. V., The Evolution of Sentencing Guidelines in Minnesota and England and Wales, Crime and Justice, 48, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

[39] Streng F., Perspektiven für die Strafzumessung, Strafverteidiger, 38, 593, 2018, p. 594Search in Google Scholar

[40] Tang Y., Horikoshi M., Li W., “ggfortify: Unified Interface to Visualize Statistical Result of Popular R Packages.”, The R Journal, 8, 2, 2016, pp. 474–485.Search in Google Scholar

[41] Tierney Cf. J., Do You Suffer from Decision Fatigue? New York Times (online), http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/2 1/magazine/do-you-suffer-from-decision-fatigue.html?_r-2&pagewanted=1 (accessed: 4 March 2023).Search in Google Scholar

[42] Tonry M., Sentencing Fragments: Penal Reform in America, 1975-2025, Oxford University Press, 2016, p. 33.Search in Google Scholar

[43] Van Meter M., One Judge Makes the Case for Judgment, The Atlantic magazine, 2016, https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/02/one-judge-makes-the-case-for-judgment/463380/ (accessed: 16 August 2023)Search in Google Scholar

[44] Venables W.N., Ripley B.D., Modern Applied Statistics with S, Fourth edition, Springer, New York, 2002.Search in Google Scholar

[45] Verrel T., Brauchen wir ein neues Strafzumessungsrecht?, JuristenZeitung, 73, 811, 2018, p. 813.Search in Google Scholar

[46] Virtanen R., Gommers R., Oliphant T.E., Haberland M., Reddy T., Cournapeau D., Burovski E., Peterson P., Weckesser W., Bright J., van der Walt S.J., Brett M., Wilson J., Millman K.J., Mayorov N., Nelson A. R. J., Jones E., Kern R., Larson E., Carey C.J., Polat I., Feng Y., Moore E. W., VanderPlas J., Laxalde D., Perktold J., Cimrman R., Henriksen I., Quintero E.A., Harris Ch. R., Archibald A.M., Ribeiro A.H., Pedregosa F., van Mulbregt P., and SciPy 1.0 Contributors, SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python. Nature Methods, 17, 3, 2020, pp. 261-272.Search in Google Scholar

[47] Waskom, M. L., seaborn: statistical data visualization. Journal of Open Source Software, 6, 60, 2021.Search in Google Scholar

[48] Whitman J. Q., Equality in Criminal Law: The Two Divergent Western Roads, Journal Legal Analysis, 1, 119, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

[49] Wickham H., ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

[50] Wrócbel W., Granice racjonalizacji sądowego wymiaru kary, in: Dyrektywy sądowego wymiaru kary, ed. Majewski J., Warsaw, 2014, p. 45-46.Search in Google Scholar

[51] case of Kudła v. Poland, app. 30210/96, HUDOC (accessed: 23 August 2023).Search in Google Scholar

[52] case of Rutkowski and others v. Poland, app. 72287/10, 13927/11 and 46187/11, HUDOC (accessed: 23 August 2023).Search in Google Scholar

[53] Cf. COM (2021) 206: Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (artificial intelligence act) and amending certain union legislative acts, European Commission, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

[54] Data quality and artificial intelligence – mitigating bias and error to protect fundamental rights, FRA, 2019, https://fra.europa.eu/en/publication/2019/data-quality-and-artificial-intelligence-mitigating-bias-and-error-protect (accessed: 4 March 2023).Search in Google Scholar

[55] Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA, OJ L 119, 4 May 2016, p. 89–131Search in Google Scholar

[56] European Ethical Charter on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Systems and their environment, Council of Europe, Strasburg, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

[57] Ministry of Justice, Podstawowa informacja o działalności sądów powszechnych - 2016 rok na tle poprzednich okresców statystycznych, 2017, https://isws.ms.gov.pl/pl/baza-statystyczna/publikacje/download,2779,0.html, (accessed: 23 August 2023)Search in Google Scholar

[58] Postçpowania wszczȩte, nietrzeźwi kierujący w ruchu drogowym wg jednostek organizacyjnych Policji, 2023, https://data.europa.eu/data/datasets/https-dane-gov-pl-pl-dataset-3290-dane-o-przestepczosci-w-latach-1999-2022?locale=en (accessed: 23 August 2023).Search in Google Scholar

[59] Prowadzenie pojazdu w stanie nietrzeźwozści, https://statystyka.policja.pl/st/przestepstwa-ogolem/przestepstwa-drogowe/prowadzenie-pojazdu-w-s/122332,Prowadzenie-pojazdu-w-stanie-nietrzezwosci.html (accessed: 23 August 2023).Search in Google Scholar

[60] Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (Text with EEA relevance), OJ L 119, 4 May 2016, p. 1–88Search in Google Scholar

[61] Sentencing guidelines mechanisms in other jurisdictions, Northern Ireland Assembly, Research and Information Service, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

[62] U.K. Sentencing Council, Analytical Note: The Resource Effects of Increased Consistency in Sentencing 3.1 (2011).Search in Google Scholar