1. bookVolumen 44 (2019): Heft 1 (March 2019)
Zeitschriftendaten
License
Format
Zeitschrift
eISSN
2300-3405
Erstveröffentlichung
24 Oct 2012
Erscheinungsweise
4 Hefte pro Jahr
Sprachen
Englisch
access type Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Mappism: formalizing classical and artificial life views on mind and consciousness

Online veröffentlicht: 28 Mar 2019
Volumen & Heft: Volumen 44 (2019) - Heft 1 (March 2019)
Seitenbereich: 55 - 99
Eingereicht: 08 Oct 2018
Akzeptiert: 21 Nov 2018
Zeitschriftendaten
License
Format
Zeitschrift
eISSN
2300-3405
Erstveröffentlichung
24 Oct 2012
Erscheinungsweise
4 Hefte pro Jahr
Sprachen
Englisch
Abstract

Throughout centuries philosophers have attempted to understand the disparity between the conscious experience and the material world – i.e., the problem of consciousness and the apparent mind–body dualism. Achievements in the fields of biology, neurology, and information science in the last century granted us more insight into processes that govern our minds. While there are still many mysteries to be solved when it comes to fully understanding the inner workings of our brains, new discoveries suggest stepping away from the metaphysical philosophy of mind, and closer to the computational viewpoint. In light of the advent of strong artificial intelligence and the development of increasingly complex artificial life models and simulations, we need a well-defined, formal theory of consciousness. In order to facilitate this, in this work we introduce mappism. Mappism is a framework in which alternative views on consciousness can be formally expressed in a uniform way, thus allowing one to analyze and compare existing theories, and enforcing the use of the language of mathematics, i.e, explicit functions and variables. Using this framework, we describe classical and artificial life approaches to consciousness.

[1] Adams D. The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy. Pan Books, 1979.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Bedau M. A. Artificial life: organization, adaptation and complexity from the bottom up. Trends in cognitive sciences, 7(11):505–512, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Buckingham G., Michelakakis E. E., and Rajendran G. The influence of prior knowledge on perception and action: Relationships to autistic traits. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(5):1716–1724, May 2016. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2701-0, doi:10.1007/s10803-016-2701-0.10.1007/s10803-016-2701-0,doi:10.1007/s10803-016-2701-0DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[4] Chalmers D. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford University Press, Inc., New York, NY, USA, 1996.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Chalmers D. J. Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2(3):200–219, 1995.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Chalmers D. J. Panpsychism and panprotopsychism. In The Amherst Lecture in Philosophy 8, pages 1–35, 2013. URL: http://www.amherstlecture.org/chalmers2013/.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Churchland P. M. Matter and Consciousness: A Contemporary Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1st edition, 1988.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Coren S. and Girgus J. S. Seeing is deceiving: The psychology of visual illusions. Lawrence Erlbaum, 1978.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Dennett D. C. Consciousness Explained. Penguin Books, 1991.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Dennett D. C. Sweet Dreams: Philosophical Obstacles to a Science of Consciousness. MIT Press, 2005.10.7551/mitpress/6576.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[11] Descartes R. A Discourse on Method. 1637.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Eysenck M. W. and Keane M. T. Cognitive Psychology: a student’s handbook. Psychology Press, 6th ed. edition, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Fitelson B. and Zalta E. N. Steps toward a computational metaphysics. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 36(2):227–247, 2007.10.1007/s10992-006-9038-7Search in Google Scholar

[14] Gallagher S. Phenomenological Approaches to Consciousness, chapter 50, pages 711–725. Wiley-Blackwell, 2017. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781119132363.ch50, arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/9781119132363.ch50, doi:10.1002/9781119132363.ch50.10.1002/9781119132363.ch50Search in Google Scholar

[15] Jackendoff R. Consciousness and the computational mind. The MIT Press, 1987.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Kang M.-S., Hong S. W., Blake R., and Woodman G. F. Visual working memory contaminates perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(5):860–869, Oct 2011. URL: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0126-5, doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0126-5.10.3758/s13423-011-0126-5,doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0126-5DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[17] Key B. Fish do not feel pain and its implications for understanding phenomenal consciousness. Biology & Philosophy, 30(2):149–165, Mar 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-014-9469-4, doi:10.1007/s10539-014-9469-4.10.1007/s10539-014-9469-4,doi:10.1007/s10539-014-9469-4DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[18] Kim J. Philosophy of Mind. Westview Press, 1996.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Koch C., Massimini M., Boly M., and Tononi G. Neural correlates of consciousness: progress and problems. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17:307–321, 2016. doi:10.1038/nrn.2016.61.10.1038/nrn.2016.61DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[20] Komosinski M. Universes and simulations: civilizational development in nested embedding. Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences, 43(3):181–205, 2018. doi:10.1515/fcds-2018-0010.10.1515/fcds-2018-0010DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[21] Komosinski M. and Ulatowski S. Framsticks: Creating and understanding complexity of life. In Komosinski M. and Adamatzky A., editors, Artificial Life Models in Software, chapter 5, pages 107–148. Springer, London, 2nd edition, 2009. URL: http://www.springer.com/978-1-84882-284-9.10.1007/978-1-84882-285-6_5Search in Google Scholar

[22] Komosinski M. and Ulatowski S. Framsticks web site, 2018. URL: http://www.framsticks.com.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Laureys S., Gosseries O., and Tononi G. The neurology of consciousness: cognitive neuroscience and neuropathology. Academic Press, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Leibniz G. W. Monadology. In Philosophical Essays. Indianapolis, Hackett, 1989.10.1007/978-94-010-1426-7_68Search in Google Scholar

[25] Lindgren K. and Nordahl M. G. Universal computation in simple one-dimensional cellular automata. Complex Systems, 4(3):299–318, 1990.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Mainzer K. and Chua L. The Universe as Automaton: From Simplicity and Symmetry to Complexity. SpringerBriefs in Complexity. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2012. URL: https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783642234767, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23477-4.10.1007/978-3-642-23477-4Search in Google Scholar

[27] Mayner W. G. P., Marshall W., Albantakis L., Findlay G., Marchman R., and Tononi G. PyPhi: A toolbox for integrated information theory. PLOS Computational Biology, 14(7):1–21, 07 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006343, doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006343.10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006343,doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006343DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[28] Nagel T. What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review, 83(October):435–50, 1974.10.2307/2183914Search in Google Scholar

[29] Peters F. Consciousness as recursive, spatiotemporal self-location. Psychological Research PRPF, 74(4):407–421, 2010.10.1007/s00426-009-0258-719763611Search in Google Scholar

[30] Putnam H. Minds and machines. In Hook S., editor, Journal of Symbolic Logic, pages 57–80. New York University Press, 1960.Search in Google Scholar

[31] Rapaport W. J. and Kibby M. W. Contextual vocabulary acquisition as computational philosophy and as philosophical computation. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 19(1):1–17, 2007.10.1080/09528130601116162Search in Google Scholar

[32] Rendell P. Turing universality of the game of life. In Collision-based computing, pages 513–539. Springer, 2002.10.1007/978-1-4471-0129-1_18Search in Google Scholar

[33] Schilling M. and Cruse H. The evolution of cognition – from first order to second order embodiment. In Wachsmuth I. and Knoblich G., editors, Modeling Communication with Robots and Virtual Humans, pages 77–108, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.10.1007/978-3-540-79037-2_5Search in Google Scholar

[34] Schrödinger E. What is Life?: The Physical Aspect of the Living Cell; with Mind and Matter & Autobiographical Sketches. Cambridge University Press, 1967.Search in Google Scholar

[35] Tegmark M. Consciousness as a state of matter. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 76:238 – 270, 2015. URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077915000958, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2015.03.014.10.1016/j.chaos.2015.03.014DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[36] Tononi G. An information integration theory of consciousness. BMC Neuroscience, 5(1):42, Nov 2004. doi:10.1186/1471-2202-5-42.10.1186/1471-2202-5-4254347015522121DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[37] Tononi G. and Koch C. Consciousness: here, there and everywhere? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 370(1668), 2015. URL: http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/370/1668/20140167, arXiv:http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/370/1668/20140167.full.pdf, doi:10.1098/rstb.2014.0167.10.1098/rstb.2014.0167438750925823865Search in Google Scholar

[38] Velmans P. M. How to define consciousness – and how not to define consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 16(5):139–156, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

[39] Wittgenstein L. Tractatus logico-philosophicus. 1922.Search in Google Scholar

[40] Wittgenstein L. Philosophical Investigations. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1953.Search in Google Scholar

[41] Zahavi D. Killing the straw man: Dennett and phenomenology. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(1-2):21–43, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

Empfohlene Artikel von Trend MD

Planen Sie Ihre Fernkonferenz mit Scienceendo