[
Adams, Valerie (2001). Complex Words in English. Harlow, Essex: Longman.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Anić, Vladimir (2004). Veliki rječnik hrvatskoga jezika. Zagreb: Novi Liber.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Aronoff, Mark (1976). Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Massachusetts / London, England: The MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baayen, Harald, Rochelle Lieber (1991). Productivity and English derivation: a corpus-based study. Linguistics 29: 801–844. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1991.29.5.801
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Babić, Stjepan (2002). Tvorba riječi u hrvatskome književnome jeziku, 3rd improved edition. Zagreb: HAZU Nakladni zavod Globus.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barlow, Michael, Suzanne Kemmer (eds.). (2000). Usage-Based Models of Language. Stanford: CSLI.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bley-Vroman, Robert (2002). Frequency in production, comprehension and acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24: 209–213. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310200205X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brysbaert, Marc, Boris New (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods 41: 977–990. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bybee, Joan, Carol Lynn Moder (1983). Morphological classes as natural categories 59(2): 251–270.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bybee, Joan (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10:5: 425–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969508407111
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bybee, Joan (2007). Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301571.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bybee, Joan (2008). Usage-based grammar and second language acquisition. Robinson, Peter, Nick Ellis, eds. Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition. New York: Routledge, 216–236.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bybee, Joan (2010). Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01338.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Clark, Eve V. (2014). Acquisition of Derivational Morphology. Lieber, Rochelle, Pavol Štekauer, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 424–439. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199641642.013.0024
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Clark, Eve V., Sophia R. Cohen (1984). Productivity and memory for newly formed words. Journal of Child Language 11: 611–625. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900005985
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cohen, Jacob (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cruse, Alan, William Croft (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Davies, Mark (2008–). The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990-present. Available online at http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Divjak Dagmar, Catherine L. Caldwell-Harris (2015). Frequency and entrenchment. Dabrowska, Eva, Dagmar Divjak, eds. Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: de Gruyter, 53–75.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dörnyei, Zoltán, Stephen Ryan (2015). The Psychology of the Language Learner Revisited. New York/London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315779553
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ellis, Nick C. (2002a). Reflections on frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24: 297–339. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002140
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ellis, Nick C. (2002b). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24: 143–188. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002024
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ellis, Nick C. (2008). Usage-based and form-focused language acquisition. Robinson Peter, Nick C. Ellis, eds. Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition. NewYork: Routledge, 372–405.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ellis, Nick C. (2012). Frequency-based accounts of SLA. Gass, Susan M., Alison Mackey, eds. Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. London/New York: Routledge, 193–210.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ellis, Nick C., Richard Schmidt (1997). Morphology and longer distance dependencies: laboratory research illuminating the A in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19: 145–171.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ellis, Rod (1994). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fillmore, Charles (1968). The case for case. Bach, Emmon, Robert Harms, eds. Universals in Linguistic Theory. New York: Holt, Rinehard and Winston, 1–88.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gentner, Dedre, Arthur B. Markman. (1997). Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist 52(1): 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.1.45
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gentner, Dedre, José Medina (1998). Similarity and the development of rules. Cognition 65(2-3): 263–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00002-X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Glynn, Dylan (2014). Polysemy and synonymy: Cognitive theory and corpus method. Glynn, Dylan, Justina A. Robinson, eds. Corpus Methods for Semantics: Quantitative studies in polysemy and synonymy. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 7–38.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gries, Stefan Th. (2008). Corpus-based methods in analyses of Second Language Acquisition data. Robinson, Peter, Nick C. Ellis, eds. Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition. New York: Routledge, 406–431.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hay, Jennifer (2001). Lexical frequency in morphology: is everything relative? Linguistics 39: 1041–1070.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kirsner, Kim (1994). Implicit processes in second language learning. Ellis, Nick, ed., Implicit and Explicit Learning of Languages. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 283–312.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kline, Rex (2010). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. (3rd ed.). New York, London: The Guilford Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Langacker, Ronald W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. I. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Langacker, Ronald W. (2000). A dynamic usage-based model. Barlow, Michael, Suzanne Kemmer, eds. Usage-Based Models of Language. Stanford: CLSI Publications, 1–64.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lieber, Rochelle (2004). Morphology and Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lieber, Rochelle (2014). Methodological issues in studying derivation. Lieber, Rochelle, Pavol Štekauer, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199641642.013.0006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lowie, Wander (2000). Cross-linguistic influence on morphology in the bilingual mental lexicon. Studia Linguistica 54: 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9582.00058
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lowie, Wander (2005). Exploring a second language. The discovery of morphological productivity. EUROSLA Yearbook 5: 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.5.12low
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lowie, Wander, Marjolijn Verspoor (2004). Input versus transfer? The role of frequency and similarity in the acquisition of L2 prepositions. Achard, Michel, Susanne Niemeier, eds. Cognitive Linguistics, Second Language Acquisition, and Foreign Language Teaching. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199857.77
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Luschützky, Hans Christian, Franz Rainer (2013). Instrument and place nouns: A typological and diachronic perspective. Linguistics 51(6): 1301–1359. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2013-0051
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MacWhinney, Brian (2008). A unified model. Robinson, Peter, Nick C. Ellis, eds. Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition. New York: Routledge, 341–371.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marchand, Hans (1969). The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-formation. München: C. H. Beck‘sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Morris, Scott, Richard P. DeShon (2002). Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs. Psychological Methods 7: 105–125. https://doi.org/10.1037//1082-989X.7.1.105
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nagy, William, Irene-Anna Diakidoy, Richard Anderson (1993). The acquisition of morphology: Learning the contribution of suffixes to the meanings of derivatives. Journal of Reading Behavior 25: 155–170.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Panther, Klaus U., Linda U. Thornburg (2002). The roles of metaphor and metonymy in English -er nominals. Dirven, René, Ralf Pörings, eds. Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 279–319.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Plag, Ingo (1999). Morphological Productivity. Structural Constraints on English Derivation. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rainer, Franz (2005). Constraints on productivity. Štekauer, Pavol, Rochelle Lieber, eds. Handbook of word-formation. Spinger Verlag, 335–352.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Robinson, Peter, Nick Ellis, eds. (2008). Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition. New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ryder, Mary Ellen (1991). Mixers, mufflers and mousers: The extending of the -er suffix as a case of prototype reanalysis. Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley, California: Berkeley Linguistics Society, 299–311. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v17i0.1616
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sawilowsky, Shlomo S. (2009). New effect size rules of thumb. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods 8(2): 597–599.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Silić, Josip, Ivo Pranjković (2007). Gramatika hrvatskoga jezika za gimnazije i visoka učilišta. (2nd edition). Zagreb: Školska knjiga.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tagarelli, Kaitlyn M., Simon Ruiz, José Luis Moreno Vega, Patrick Rebuschat (2016). Variability in second language learning: The roles of individual differences, learning conditions, and linguistic complexity. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 38: 293–316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000036
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Taylor, John R. (2002). Cognitive Grammar. New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Talmy, Leonard (2000a). Toward Cognitive Semantics, Volume 1: Concept Structuring Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Talmy, Leonard (2000b). Toward Cognitive Semantics, Volume 2: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tomasello, Michael (2000). First steps in a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cognitive Linguistics 11: 61–82. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2001.012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tomasello, Michael (2003). Constructing a Language. A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA/London, UK: Harvard University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tyler, Andrea (2010). Usage-based approaches to language and their applications to second language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 30: 270–291. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0267190510000140
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van Valin, Robert, David Wilkins (1996). The case for ‘effector’: Case roles, agents and agency revisited. Shibatani, Masayoshi, Sandra A. Thompson, eds. Grammatical Constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 289-322.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yoonsang Song, Do Younngah, Arthur L. Thomspon, Eileen R. Waegemaekers, Jong-bong Lee (2019). Second language users exhibit shallow morphological processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 2020: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263120000170
]Search in Google Scholar
[
COCA word frequency list. Retrieved from http://www.wordfrequency.info/ free.asp?s=y
]Search in Google Scholar