[
BEHRENS P. The extraterritorial reach of EU competition law revisited – The “effects doctrine” before the ECJ. Discussion Paper. 2016, no. 3, pp. 1–15. [online] Available at: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/148068/1/87238506x.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BERKES A. The extraterritorial human rights obligations of the EU in its external trade and investment policies. Europe and the World: A law review. 2018, vol. 2, issue 1, рр. 1–21. [online] Available at: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/bitstream/2438/19661/1/FullText.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela v Council of the European Union. Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber), 13 September 2023. Case T65/18 RENV. [online] Available at: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=extraterritorial&docid=277442&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=3733838#ctx1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde v Nordzucker AG, Südzucker AG, Agrana Zucker Gmbh. Opinion of Advocate General Bobek, 2 September 2021. Case C151/20. [online] Available at: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=extraterritorial&docid=245556&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=3733838#ctx1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case 214/94 Ingrid Boukhalfa v. Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Judgment of the ECJ of 30 April 1996), [1996] ECR I-02253. [online] Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEx:61994J0214:EN:hTML
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case 237/83 SARL Prodest v. Caisse Primaire d’Assurance Maladie de Paris (ECJ 12 July 1984), [1984] ECR 03153. Para. 6. [online] Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TxT/?uri=CELEx%3A61983CJ0237
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case 48/69 Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd. v. Commission of the European Communities (Judgment of the ECJ of 14 July 1972), [1972] ECR 619. [online] Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELExnumdoc&numdoc=61969J0048&lg=en
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case 6/72 Europemballage Corporation and Continental Can Company Inc. v. Commission of the European Communities (Judgment of the ECJ of 21 February 1973), [1973] ECR 215. [online] Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TxT/?uri=CELEx%3A61972CJ0006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case 9/88 Mário Lopes da Veiga v. Staatssecretaris van Justitie (ECJ 27 September 1989), [1989] ECR 02989. [online] Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TxT/?qid=1484604389892&uri=CELEx:61988CJ0009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case C-149/96 Portugal v. Council (ECJ 23 November 1999), [1999] ECR I-08395. [online] Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TxT/hTML/?uri=ecli:ECLI:EU:C:1999:574
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case C-366/10 Air Transport Association of America and Others v. Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change (Judgment of the Court of 21 December 2011), [2011] ECR 2011-00000. [online] Available at: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=117193&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=106658
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case C-377/98 Kingdom of the Netherlands v. European Parliament and Council of the European Union (ECJ 9 October 2001), [2001] ECR I-07079. [online] Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TxT/?uri=CELEx%3A61998CJ0377
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case C-413/14 P Intel Corporation Inc. v. European Commission (Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 September 2017 [Text rectified by orders of 19 September and 24 October 2017]). ECLI:EU:C:2017:632. [online] Available at: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf;jsessionid=C1072FDD4C1F6DEEF6ED0356BE445505?text=&docid=194082&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=353468
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case C-61/94 Commission of the European Communities v. Federal Republic of Germany (ECJ 10 September 1996), [1994] ECR I-03989. [online] Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TxT/?uri=CELEx%3A61994CJ0061&print=true
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case T-102/96 Gencor Ltd v. Commission of the European Communities (ECJ 25 March 1999), [1999] ECR II-00753. [online] Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TxT/?qid=1484653360889&uri=CELEx:61996TJ0102
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case T-286/09 Intel Corporation Inc. v. European Commission (Judgement of the General Court of the European Union of 12 June 2014). [online] Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TxT/?qid=1484603038618&uri=CELEx:62009TJ0286
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Commission Decision 85/202/EEC of 19 December 1984 relating to a procedure under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty (IV/29.725 – Wood pulp). Official Journal of the European Communities. L 85. Vol. 28. 26 March 1985. pp. 1–52. [online] Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TxT/?uri=OJ:L:1985:085:TOC
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union. C 202/01. Vol. 59. 7 June 2016. [online] Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TxT/hTML/?uri=OJ:C:2016:202:FULL&from=EN
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (the EC Merger Regulation). Official Journal of the European Union. L 24. Vol. 47. 29 January 2004. pp. 1–22. [online] Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TxT/?uri=OJ:L:2004:024:TOC&toc=OJ:C:2017:026:FULL
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FALALIEIEVA, L. Ekstraterytorialna diia norm prava YeS: osoblyvosti teorii ta praktyky zastosuvannia. Pam’iati profesora Pavla Petrovycha Zavorotka. Aktualni problemy pravovoi nauky: zb. nauk. statei / za zah. red. N. P. Shyshkovoi; Kyivskyi nats. un-t imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Kyiv: Pretsedent, 2014. S. 154–161 (in Ukrainian).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FALALIEIEVA, L. Modern Approaches to the Extraterritorial Application of the EU Law. European Studies – The Review of European Law, Economics and Politics. 2014, vol. 1, pp. 103–110.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FALALIEIEVA, L. Prava liudyny ta ekstraterytorialna diia prava YeS: evoliutsiia praktyky zastosuvannia yurysdyktsiinykh modelei. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Mizhnar. vidnosyny. 2017. Vyp. 1 (46). S. 91–97 (in Ukrainian).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FALALIEIEVA, L. Vplyv sudovoi praktyky na ekstraterytorialnu diiu norm prava Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu. Aktualni doslidzhennia v yurysprudentsii: materialy mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. internet-konferentsii (Ternopil, 14 hrud. 2013 r.). Ternopil, 2013. S. 22–23. [online]. Available at: http://www.lex-line.com.ua (in Ukrainian).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
JENNINGS R. Y. Extraterritorial Jurisdiction and the United States Antitrust Law. British Year Book of International Law. 1957, vol. 33, p. 157.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Joined cases 89, 104, 114, 116, 117 and 125 to 129/85 A. Ahlström Osakeyhtiö and others v. Commission of the European Communities (ECJ 28 September 1988), [1988] ECR 5193. [online] Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TxT/?qid=1484647592793&uri=CELEx:61985CJ0089(01)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KHRYSTOVA, H. Pozytyvni zobov’iazannia derzhavy u sferi prav liudyny: suchasni vyklyky: monohr. Kharkiv: Pravo, 2018, 680 s. (in Ukrainian)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LANGE DIETER, G. F., SANDAGE, J. B. The Wood Pulp Decision and its Implications for the Scope of EC Competition Law. Common Market Law Review. 1989, issue 26, pp. 137–165.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MEDVEDIEVA, M. O. Teoretychni ta praktychni aspekty realizatsii mizhnarodno-pravovykh norm u haluzi okhorony navkolyshnoho seredovyshcha / za nauk. red. prof. O. V. Zadorozhnoho. Kyiv: Feniks, 2012, 484 s. (in Ukrainian)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MURAVIOV, V. I. Pravovi zasady rehuliuvannia ekonomichnykh vidnosyn Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu z tretimy krainamy (teoriia i praktyka): monohr. Kyiv: Akadem-Pres, 2002, 426 s. (in Ukrainian).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
NAUWELAERTS, W. The Extra-Territorial Reach of EU Data Protection Law. July 2019, pp. 1–2. [online] Available at: https://www.sidley.com/-/media/publications/the-extraterritorial-reach-of-eu-data-protection-law.pdf?la=en
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PEREMOT, S. Ekstraterytorialne zastosuvannia konkurentnoho prava YeS: vynyknennia ta rozvytok yurysdyktsiinoi modeli. Ukrainskyi shchorichnyk mizhnarodnoho prava. 2009. Kyiv: Vyd-vo «Feniks», 2014, S. 361–402 (in Ukrainian).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PEREMOT, S. V. Ekstraterytorialna yurysdyktsiia. Entsyklopediia mizhnarodnoho prava: u 3 t. / redkol.: Yu. S. Shemshuchenko, V. N. Denysov (spivholovy) ta in.; In-t derzhavy i prava im. V. M. Koretskoho NAN Ukrainy. Kyiv: Akademperiodyka, 2017. T. 2: E–L. S. 49 (in Ukrainian).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pilatus Bank plc v European Central Bank (ECB). Opinion of Advocate General Kokott, 25 May 2023. Cases C750/21 P and C256/22 P. [online] Available at: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=extraterritorial&docid=274111&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=3733838#ctx1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). Official Journal of the European Union. L 119, vol. 59, 4 May 2016, pp. 1–88. [online] Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj
]Search in Google Scholar
[
RYNGAERT, C. EU Trade Agreements and human Rights: From Extraterritorial to Territorial Obligations. International Community Law Review. 2018, vol. 20, issue 3–4, рр. 374–393. [online] Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326335056_EU_Trade_Agreements_and_human_Rights_From_Extraterritorial_to_Territorial_Obligations/fulltext/5bb7a22e92851c7fde2f1d7d/EU-Trade-Agreements-and-human-Rights-From-Extraterritorial-to-Territorial-Obligations.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SATO, C. Extraterritorial Application of EU Competition Law. Is It Possible for Japanese Companies to Steer Clear of EU Competition Law? Journal of Political Science and Sociology. 2010, no. 11, pp. 23–47.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SMYRNOVA, K. V. Pravovyi poriadok konkurentsii v Yevropeiskomu Soiuzi (novitni tendentsii rozvytku): avtoref. dys. … d-ra yuryd. nauk: 12.00.11 / Kyivskyi nats. un-t imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Kyiv, 2015, 40 s. (in Ukrainian).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
United States v. Aluminum Co. of America (Alcoa), 148 F.2d 416 (2d Cir. 1945). 12 March 1945. [online] Available at: https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/148/416/1503668/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
VAN BAEL, I. Due Process in EU Competition Proceedings. Alphen van den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2011, 546 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
