[
Alexios Anagnostakis v European Commission. Judgment of the Court (grand Chamber), 12 September 2017. C-589/15 P. [online] Available at: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?language=en&num=C-589/15
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BOUTE, A. The Principle of Solidarity and the geopolitics of Energy: Poland v. Commission (OPAL pipeline). Common Market Law Review. 2020, vol. 57, pp. 898–914
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BUSCHLE, D. Energy Solidarity: approaching a new constitutional principle. European Energy Environment. 2021, vol. 10, no. 3, p. 66–70.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BUSCHLE, D., TALUS, K. One for all and all for one?: the general court ruling in the OPAL case. Oil, gas & energy law intelligence. 2019, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 1–5.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Communication from the Commission Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, REPowerEU Plan, 2022. [online] Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2022%3A230%3AFIN
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Decision: Commission Decision of 20. 12. 2022 on the exemption of Deutsche Regas gmbh & Co. KgaA LNg Terminal in Lubmin (germany) from certain provisions of Directive 2009/73/EC pursuant to Article 36 of that Directive. [online], Available at: <https://energy.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2023-06/2023_german_lng_decision_en.pdf>
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Directive 2009/73/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas and repealing Directive 2003/55/EC. [online] Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02009L0073-20220623
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HOSSEINI, S. E. Transition away from fossil fuels toward renewables: lessons from Russia-Ukraine crisis. Future Energy. 2022, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 2–5.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HUHTA, K.; REINS, L. Foster Collaboration in European Union Legal Principles and Implement Them within the Energy Industry. International & Comparative Law Quarterly. 2023, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 771–791.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
IAKOVENKO, M. A need for clarification of the energy solidarity principle: what can be learned from the general Court’s judgment in the OPAL case?, The Journal of World Energy Law & Business. 2021, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 38–48.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
IAKOVENKO, M. Case C-848/19 P: germany v Poland and its outcomes for EU energy sector: an extended case note on the European Court of Justice judgment in the OPAL case: Judgment of the Court (grand Chamber) of 15 July 2021, C-848/19 P, germany v Poland, ECLI: EU: C: 2021: 598. J. World Energy Law Bus. 2021, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 436–446.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KARDAŚ, S. Keeping the lights on: The EU’s energy relationships since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. [online] Available at: <https://ecfr.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Keeping-the-lights-on-The-EUs-energy-relationships-since-Russias-invasion-of-Ukraine-01.pdf>.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KOVAČOVSKÁ, L. European Union’s Energy (In) security–Dependence on Russia. Obrana a strategie. 2007, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 5–21
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MENGOZZI, P. Common rules for the internal market in natural gas and the principle of energy solidarity. Número actual. 2022, vol. 14, pp. 405–421.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
NOUICER, A., KEHOE, A. M., NYSTEN, J., FOUQUET, D., HANCHER, L., MEEUS, L. [online]. Available at: < https://hdl.handle.net/1814/68899>
]Search in Google Scholar
[
OSIČKA, J., ČERNOCH, F. European energy politics after Ukraine: The road ahead. Energy Research & Social Science. 2022, vol. 91, pp. 102–757.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PALLE, A. Regional dimension to Europe’s energy integration. [online] Available at: https://www.oxfordenergy.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/SP-29.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
RAPAIĆ, S., NOVAKOVIĆ, M. Dependence of EU energy market on Russian oil and gas. Institute of International Politics and Economics. 2013, pp. 83–95
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Regulation: Council Regulation (EU) 2022/2577 of 22 December 2022 laying down a framework to accelerate the deployment of renewable energy, para 1. [online] Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2577/oj
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Republic of Austria v European Commission. Judgment of the Court (grand Chamber), 22 September 2020. Case C-594/18 P. [online]. Available at: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?num=C-594/18P
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Republic of Poland v European Commission. Judgment of the general Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition), 10 September 2019. Case T-883/16. [online] Available at: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?language=en&num=T-883/16
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Republic of Poland v European Commission. Judgment of the general Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition), 10 September 2019. Case T-883/16. [online] Available at: <https://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?language=en&num=T-883/16>
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Republic of Poland v germany. Judgment of the Court (grand Chamber), 15 July 2021. C-848/19 P. [online] Available at: <https://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?num=C-848/19>
]Search in Google Scholar
[
RYŚ. M. D. The principle of energy solidarity clarified: a certain way to uncertainty. Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo. 2022, vol. 26, no. 71, pp. 149–167.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SIDDI, M. german foreign policy towards Russia in the aftermath of the Ukraine crisis: A new Ostpolitik? Europe-Asia Studies. 2016, vol. 68, pp. 665–677
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SPIKE, J. hungary forces new energy deals with Russia amid Ukraine war. [online] Avail able at: <https://apnews.com/article/hungary-makes-new-energy-agreement-russia-c069d83bc748cb820c3958bbecf13f17>
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SZŐKE, E. Hungary strikes deal with Gazprom to ramp up gas deliveries. [online] Available at: <https://ceenergynews.com/oil-gas/hungary-strikes-deal-with-gazprom-to-ramp-up-gas-deliveries/>
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SZYDLO, M. Disputes Over the Pipelines Importing Russian gas to the EU: how to Ensure Consistency in EU Energy Law and Policy?, Baltic Journal of Law & Politics. vol. 11, no. 2, 2018, pp. 95–126.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
TALUS, K., AALTO, P. Competences in EU energy policy. In: R. Leal-Arcas & J. Wouters (eds.). Research Handbook on EU Energy Law and Policy. Cheltenham, UK. Northampton, MA. USA: Edward Elgar, 2017, pp. 15–29.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
TALUS, K. Interpretation of the principle of energy solidarity: A critical comment on the opinion of the Advocate general in OPAL. [online] Available at: < https://www.oxfordenergy.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Insight-89-The-interpretation-of-the-principle-of-energy-solidarity-.pdf>
]Search in Google Scholar
[
TALUS, K. Vertical Natural Gas Transportation Capacity, Upstream Commodity Contracts, and EU Competition Law. Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2011, p 18.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
TURKSEN, U. EU energy relations with Russia: Solidarity and the rule of law. 1st Edition, London: Routledge, pp 17–19.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
YAFIMAVA, K. The Council Legal Service’s assessment of the European Commission’s negotiating mandate and what it means for Nord Stream 2. [online] Available at: <https://www.oxfordenergy.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/The-Council-Legal-Services-assessment-of-the-European-Commissions-negotiating-mandate-and-what-it-means-for-Nord-Stream-2.pdf>
]Search in Google Scholar
