Teleconference in Support of Autonomous Learning

1. Achtemeier, S. D., Morris, L. V., & Finnegan, C. L. (2003). Considerations for developing evaluations of online courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 1-13.Search in Google Scholar

2. Alimisis, D., & Plessas, A. (2011). Teacher Distance Training in Educational Robotics through Synchronous Audiographic Conferencing: towards a Learner-centered Approach. Proceedings of the EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology, 901-906. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).Search in Google Scholar

3. Anastasiades, P. (2008a). The Interactive Teleconference at the Modern School: A Framework for Teaching Design. Proceedings of the 6th Pan-Hellenic Conference with International Participation: Communication and Information Technologies in Education. Limassol 25-28 September 2008.Search in Google Scholar

4. Anastasiades, P.S. (2008b). Teleconference in the service of life-long learning and distance education. Pedagogical applications of collaborative distance learning from the Hellenic post-secondary education. Athens: Gutenberg (in Greek).Search in Google Scholar

5. Armakolas, S., Alimisis, D., & Panagiotakopoulos, Ch. (2013). The Flashmeeting Digital Platform: A I am not scared Project for school violence study. Proceedings of ICODL, 192-200.Search in Google Scholar

6. Armakolas, S., Mikroyannidis, A., Panagiotakopoulos, Ch., & Panousopoulou, S. (2016). A case study on the Perceptions of Educators on the Penetration of Personal Learning Environments in Typical Education. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments (IJVPLE), 6(1), 18-28. doi: 10.4018/IJVPLE.2016010102.10.4018/IJVPLE.2016010102DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

7. Armakolas, S., Panagiotakopoulos, Ch., & Fragoulis, I. (2014). The distance learning of courses between branches of ASPETE. Using the Flashmeeting digital platform. Proceedings of the 9th Pan-Hellenic Conference with International Participation “Information and Communication Technologies in Education”, University of Crete, 451-458.Search in Google Scholar

8. Armakolas, S., Panagiotakopoulos, Ch., & Vasilopoulou, G. (2014). The Learning Environment in a Virtual Videoconference Classroom and Transforming Learning. Proceedings of the 9th Panhellenic Conference “Greek Pedagogical and Educational Research”, University of Western Macedonia, vol. A, 339-353Search in Google Scholar

9. Athanasiou, L. (2000). Methods and Techniques of Research in Educational Sciences. Ioannina.Search in Google Scholar

10. Atkins, D. E., Brown, J. S., & Hammond, A. L. (2007). A review of the open educational resources (OER) movement: achievements, challenges, and new opportunities. Menlo Park: The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.hewlett.org/uploads/files/Hewlett_OER_report.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

11. Bannert, M. (2006). Effects of reflection prompts when learning with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(4), 359–375.10.2190/94V6-R58H-3367-G388Search in Google Scholar

12. Baynton, M. (1992). Dimensions of “control” in distance education: A factor analysis. American Journal of Distance Education, 6(2), 17-31.10.1080/08923649209526783Search in Google Scholar

13. Bell, J. (2014). Doing Your Research Project: A guide for first-time researchers. UK: McGraw-Hill Education.Search in Google Scholar

14. Castañeda, L., Cosgrave, M., Marin, V., & Cronin, C. (2016). Personal Learning Environments: PLE Conference 2015 Special Issue Guest Editorial. Digital Education Review, 29.Search in Google Scholar

15. Castañeda, L., Dabbagh, N., & Torres-Kompen, R. (2017). Personal Learning Environments: Research-Based Practices, Frameworks and Challenges. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 6(1), 1.10.7821/naer.2017.1.229Search in Google Scholar

16. Chaney, B. H., Eddy, J. M., Dorman, S. M., Glessner, L. L., Green, B. L., & Lara-Alecio, R. (2009). A primer on quality indicators of distance education. Health Promotion Practice, 10(2), 222-231.10.1177/1524839906298498Search in Google Scholar

17. Chatti, M. A., Jarke, M., & Frosch-Wilke, D. (2007). The future of e-learning: a shift to knowledge networking and social software. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 3(4-5), 404-420.10.1504/IJKL.2007.016702Search in Google Scholar

18. Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1997). Methodology of Educational Research. Athens: Expression.Search in Google Scholar

19. Coureau, S. (2000). The basic “tools” of the adult educator. Athens: Metaixmio.Search in Google Scholar

20. Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and higher education, 15(1), 3-8.10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002Search in Google Scholar

21. Dille, B., & Mezack, M. (1991). Identifying predictors of high risk among community college telecourse students. American Journal of Distance Education, 5(1), 24-35.10.1080/08923649109526729Search in Google Scholar

22. Dobbs, R. R., Waid, C. A., & del Carmen, A. (2009). Students’ perceptions of online courses. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10(1), 9-26.Search in Google Scholar

23. Dunn, K. (2000). Interviewing. In I. Hay (Ed.), Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

24. Ehlers, U. D., & Pawlowski, J. M. (Eds.) (2006). Handbook on Quality and Standardisation in E-learning. Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/3-540-32788-6Search in Google Scholar

25. Fiedler, S. H., & Väljataga, T. (2011). Personal learning environments: concept or technology? International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments (IJVPLE), 2(4), 1-11.10.4018/jvple.2011100101Search in Google Scholar

26. Fotiadou, A., Angelaki, C., & Mavroidis, I. (2017). Learner Autonomy as a Factor of the Learning Process in Distance Education. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 20(1), 95-110.10.1515/eurodl-2017-0006Search in Google Scholar

27. Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133-148.10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_2Search in Google Scholar

28. Giannakoudakis, Z., & Giossos, G. (2017). Differences between Regular and Distance Education in a Teacher’s Training Program. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 20(2), 17-29.10.1515/eurodl-2017-0014Search in Google Scholar

29. Gunawardena, C. N., & McIsaac, M. S. (2004). Distance Education. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (2^nd ed.) (pp. 355-395). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

30. Hrtoňová, N., Kohout, J., Rohlíková, L., & Zounek, J. (2015). Factors influencing acceptance of e-learning by teachers in the Czech Republic. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 873-879.10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.018Search in Google Scholar

31. Issing, L. J. (2002). Instruktions-Design für Multimedia. In L.J. Issing & P. Klimsa (Eds.), Informationen und Lernen mit Multimedia and Internet. Lehrbuch für Studium und Praxis (3^rd ed.) (pp.151–178). Weinheim: Beltz, Psychologische Verlags Union.Search in Google Scholar

32. Jarvis, P. (1999). Adult & Continuing Education (2^nd ed.) London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

33. Johnson, L., Smith, R., Willis, H., Levine, A., & Haywood, K. (2011). The Horizon Report: 2011 Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.Search in Google Scholar

34. Khan, B. H. (Ed.) (2005). Managing e-learning: Design, delivery, implementation, and evaluation. IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-59140-634-1Search in Google Scholar

35. Κnowles, M., Holton, E., & Swanson, R. (1998). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (5^th ed.). Houston: Gulf Publishing Co.Search in Google Scholar

36. Kocdar, S., Karadeniz, A., Bozkurt, A., & Buyuk, K. (2018). Measuring Self-Regulation in Self-Paced Open and Distance Learning Environments. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1).10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.3255Search in Google Scholar

37. Kop, R., & Fournier, H. (2014). Developing a framework for research on Personal Learning Environments. E-learning in Europe Journal, 35. Retrieved on 02/02/2018 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262103299_Developing_a_framework_for_research_on_personal_learning_environmentsSearch in Google Scholar

38. Koutsoukos, M., Fragoulis, I., & Valkanos, E. (2015). Connection of environmental education with application of experiential teaching methods: A case study from Greece. International Education Studies, 8(4), 23.10.5539/ies.v8n4p23Search in Google Scholar

39. Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews, An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks: Sage PublicationsSearch in Google Scholar

40. Kyriazopoulos, P., & Samanta, E. (2011). Methodology for researching diploma theses. Athens: Sychroni Ekdotiki.Search in Google Scholar

41. Laube, M. R. (1992). Academic and Social Integration Variables and Secondary Student Persistence in Distance Education. Research in Distance Education, 4(1), 2-9.Search in Google Scholar

42. Laurillard D. (2012), Teaching as a Design Science. Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology. N.Y.: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

43. Lionarakis, A., & Lykourgiotis, A. (1999). Open and Traditional Education. In D. Vergides, A. Lionarakis, A. Lykourgiotis, V. Makrakis, & C. Matralis (Eds.), Open and distance education: Institutions and functions (vol. A, pp.31-32). Patras: Hellenic Open University Publications.Search in Google Scholar

44. Maloof, J. (2006). Experience This! The Experiential Approach to Teaching Environmental Issues. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 5, 193-197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1533015060091474310.1080/15330150600914743DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

45. Mavroidis, H. (2009). Possibility and conditions for the use of modern communication and e-learning methods in programs of the Hellenic Open University School of Humanities. Case study in parts of the EWC65. Postgraduate thesis. Hellenic Open University.Search in Google Scholar

46. Mavroidis, I., Karatrantou, A., Koutsouba, M., Giossos, Y., & Papadakis, S. (2013). Technology acceptance and social presence in distance education–A case study on the use of teleconference at a postgraduate course of the Hellenic Open University. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 16(2).Search in Google Scholar

47. McGloughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. W. (2010). Personalised and self regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: International exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 28–43.Search in Google Scholar

48. Mertens, D. M. (2014). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Sage publications.Search in Google Scholar

49. Mikroyannidis, A., Connolly T., & Law, E. (2012). A survey into the teacher’s perception of self-regulated learning. Proceedings of 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 696–697.10.1109/ICALT.2012.69Search in Google Scholar

50. Mikroyannidis, A., Connolly, T., Law, E. L. C., Schmitz, H. C. Vieritz, H., Nussbaumer, A. Berthold, M., Ullrich, C., & Dhir, A. (2014). Self-regulated learning in formal education: perceptions, challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 6(2), 145-163.10.1504/IJTEL.2014.066860Search in Google Scholar

51. Nikolaki, E., & Koutsoumpa, M. (2013). Self-regulated learning in distance education. Open Education – The Journal for Open and Distance Education and Educational Technology, 9(1), 19-31.Search in Google Scholar

52. Panagiotakopoulos, C., (2014). Information and Communication Technologies: An overall view. Athens.Search in Google Scholar

53. Panagiotakopoulos, C., Tsiatsos, T., Lionarakis A., & Tzanakos N. (2013). Teleconference in support of distance learning: Views of educators. Open Education – The Journal for Open and Distance Education and Educational Technology, 9(1), 5-18.10.12681/jode.9806Search in Google Scholar

54. von Prummer, C. (1990). Study Motivation of Distance Students: A Report on Some Results from a Survey Done at the FernUniversitat in 1987/88. Research in Distance Education, 2(2), 2-6.Search in Google Scholar

55. Smith, M. M. (2011). The quality factors which influence online learning and impact on the student experience (Doctoral dissertation). Open University.Search in Google Scholar

56. Tsiotakis, P., & Jimoyiannis, A. (2017). Investigating the Role of Structure in Online Teachers’ Communities of Learning. In P. Anastasiades & N. Zaranis (Eds.), Research on e-Learning and ICT in Education (pp. 161-174). Springer, Cham.10.1007/978-3-319-34127-9_12Search in Google Scholar

57. Türker, M. A., & Zingel, S. (2008). Formative interfaces for scaffolding self-regulated learning in PLEs. Elearning papers, 14(9, July).Search in Google Scholar

58. Tzanakos, N. (2012). The positive and negative aspects in the use of teleconference as an educational tool, from the perspective of educators. Master Thesis. Patra: Hellenic Open University.Search in Google Scholar

59. Valkanos, E., & Fragoulis, I. (2007). Experiential learning–its place in in-house education and training. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, 21(5), 21-23.Search in Google Scholar

60. Vlachopoulos, P., & Hatzigianni, M. (2017). Online Learning and Self-Regulation: Balancing Between Personal and Social Dimensions. In P. Anastasiades & N. Zaranis (Eds.), Research on e-Learning and ICT in Education (pp. 177-188). Switzerland: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

61. Weiss, R. E., Knowlton, D. S., & Speck, B. W. (2000). Principles of Effective Teaching in the Online Classroom. New Directions for Teaching and Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Search in Google Scholar

62. Welsh, J. B. (2007). Identifying factors that predict student success in a community college online distance learning course. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of North Texas Digital Library. (OCLC: 230804538). Retrieved on 02/05/2018 from https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc5111/?q=Identifying%20factors%20that%20predict%20student%20success%20in%20a%20community%20college%20online%20%20 distance%20learning%20courseSearch in Google Scholar

63. Wiesenberg, F., & Stacey, E. (2005). Reflections on Teaching and Learning Online: Quality program design, delivery and support issues from a cross-global perspective. Distance Education, 26(3), 385-404.10.1080/01587910500291496Search in Google Scholar

64. Wilson, S. (2008). Patterns of personal learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 16(1), 17-34.10.1080/10494820701772660Search in Google Scholar

65. Xenos, M., Tsiatsios, Th., & Vassiliadis, B. (2008). Large-scale deployment of distance education in computer science at the Hellenic Open University. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 4(2/3), 285-297.10.1504/IJKL.2008.020669Search in Google Scholar

66. Yen, C. J., Tu, C. H., Sujo-Montes, L., & Sealander, K. (2016). A Predictor for PLE Management: Impacts of Self-Regulated Online Learning on Student’s Learning Skills. Journal of Educational Technology Development & Exchange, 9(1), 29-48.10.18785/jetde.0901.03Search in Google Scholar

67. Zimmermann, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement. Theoretical Perspective. N.Y.: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.Search in Google Scholar