Accreditation of Moocs

1. Bolkan, J. (2013). MOOCs Top Open Access for Disruptive Potential. In Campus Technology, Blog, 2013, October 23. Retrieved from: http://campustechnology.com/articles/2013/10/23/report-moocs-top-open-access-fordisruptive- potential.aspxSearch in Google Scholar

2. Cheng, C.Y. (2014). An Exploratory Study of Emotional Affordance of a Massive Open Online Courses. In European Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 17(1), (pp. 43-55). Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2014/Cheng.pdf10.2478/eurodl-2014-0003Search in Google Scholar

3. Daniel, J. (2012). Making Sense of MOOCs: Musings in a Maze of Myth, Paradox and Possibility. In Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2012. Retrieved from http://wwwjime. open.ac.uk/jime/article/view/2012-1810.5334/2012-18Search in Google Scholar

4. DeBoer, J.; Ho, A.D.; Stump, G.S.; Breslow, L. (2014). Changing “Course”: Reconceptualizing Educational Variables for Massive Open Online Courses. In Educational Researcher, 43(2), (pp. 74-84).10.3102/0013189X14523038Search in Google Scholar

5. Hatiba, N. (2014). The tsunami of MOOC courses: Will they induce an overall revolution in teaching, learning and higher education institutions? In Teaching in the Academy, 4, (pp. 40-64). Retrieved from http://www.academicteaching.net [Hebrew]Search in Google Scholar

6. Kirp, D.L. (2013). Tech mania goes to college: Are MOOCs - massive open online courses - the utopia of affordable higher education, or just the latest fad? In The Nation, Blog, 2013, September 23. Retrieved from: http://www.thenation.com/article/176037/tech-mania-goescollege# axzz2g2HzfG5tSearch in Google Scholar

7. Lewin, T. (2013). Colleges adapt online courses to ease burden. In The New York Times, 29 April 2013. Retrieved from: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/30/education/collegesadapt- online-courses-to-ease-burden.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

8. Norton, A.; Sonnemann, J.; McGannon, C. (2013). The online evolution: when technology meets tradition in higher education. Grattan Institute Report No. 2013-3, April 2013. Retrieved from: http://grattan.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/186_online_higher_education.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

9. Olsson, U. (2014). A preliminary Exploration of Operating Models of Second Cycle/Research Led Open Education Involving Industry Collaboration. In European Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 17(1), (pp. 76-92). Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2014/Olsson.pdf10.2478/eurodl-2014-0005Search in Google Scholar

10. Perrin, D. (2013). Robo-Grading and Writing Instruction: Will the Truth Set Us Free? In English Journal, 102(6), (pp.104-106). Retrieved from: http://www.ncte.org/library/NCTEFiles/Resources/Journals/EJ/1026- jul2013/EJ1026Robo.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

12. Shah, D. (2013). MOOCs in 2013: Breaking Down the Numbers. In edSurge, Blog. Retrieved from: https://www.edsurge.com/n/2013-12-22-moocs-in-2013-breaking-down-the-numbersSearch in Google Scholar

13. Smith, J.A.; Flowers, P.; Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. Sage.Search in Google Scholar

14. Thompson, G. (2013a). A MOOC Platform Based on Engagement. In Campus Technology, Blog, 2013, November 06. Retrieved from: http://campustechnology.com/articles/2013/11/06/a-mooc-platform-based-onengagement. aspxSearch in Google Scholar

15. Thompson, G. (2013b). Can MOOCs Replace Traditional Textbooks? In Campus Technology, Blog, 2013, December 04. Retrieved from: http://campustechnology.com/articles/2013/12/04/can-moocs-replace-traditionaltextbooks. aspxSearch in Google Scholar

16. Yuan, L.; Powell, S. (2013). MOOCs and Open Education: Implications for Higher Education. JISC CETIS. Cetis publications - publications from the Centre for Educational Technology, Interoperability and Standards. Retrieved from: http://publications.cetis.ac.uk/2013/667 Search in Google Scholar