[1. Anastasiades, P. and Iliadou, C. (2010). Communication between tutors- students in DL. A case study of the Hellenic Open University. In European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 13(2). Retrieved on April 10, 2012 from: http://www.eurodl.org/index.php?p=archives&year=2010&halfyear=2&article=407]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Anderson, T. (2003). Getting the Mix Right Again: An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. In International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(2). http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/14910.19173/irrodl.v4i2.149]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Anderson, T. and Dron, J. (2011). Three Generations of Distance Education Pedagogy. In International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), (pp. 80-97).10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.890]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Angelaki, C. and Mavroidis, I. (2013). Communication and Social Presence: The impact on adult Learners’ emotions in distance learning. In European Journal of Open, Distance and e- Learning, 16(1), (pp. 78-93). http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2013/Angelaki_Mavroidis.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Barker, S. (2003). Introducing group work and communication skills for external students: an analysis of the use of asynchronous online tools. In G. Crisp, D. Thiele, I. Scholten, S. Barker & J. Baron (eds.), Interact, Integrate, Impact: Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. Adelaide, 7-10 December 2003.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Benson, R. and Samarawickrema, G. (2009). Addressing the context of e-learning: using transactional distance theory to inform design. In Distance Education, 30(1), (pp. 5-21).10.1080/01587910902845972]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Bird, M.; Hammersley, M.; Gomm, R. and Woods, P. (1999). Educational Research in Practice.Study Manual. Patras, HOU Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Bischoff, W.R. (1993). Transactional distance, interactive television, and electronic mail communication in graduate public health and nursing courses: Implications for professional education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hawaii.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Bischoff, W.R.; Bisconer, S.W.; Kooker, B.M. and Woods, L.C. (1996). Transactional distance and interactive television in the distance education of health professionals. In American Journal of Distance Education, 10(3), (pp. 4-19).10.1080/08923649609526937]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Bradley, J. (1993). Methodological issues and practices in qualitative research. In The Library Quarterly, 63(1), (pp. 431-449).]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Chen, Y.J. (2001a). Transactional distance in World Wide Web learning environments. In Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(4), (pp. 327-338).10.1080/14703290110074533]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Chen, Y.J. (2001b). Dimensions of transactional distance in World Wide Web learning environment: A factor analysis. In British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), (pp. 459-470).10.1111/1467-8535.00213]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Chen, Y.J. and Willits, F.K. (1998). A path analysis of the concepts in Moore’s theory of transactional distance in a videoconferencing learning environment. In The American Journal of Distance Education, 13(2), (pp. 51-65).]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Clair, R.S. and Fite, S. (2005). Far off Voices: Social Capital and Distance Education. In A.Lionarakis (ed), 1st Panhellenic Conference for Open and Distance Education. Pedagogical and Technological Applications. Conference Proceedings. Vol. A, (pp.13-19). Athens : Propompos.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Cohen, L.; Manion, L. and Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. 6th edition.Routledge.10.4324/9780203029053]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Conrad, D. (2005). Building and Maintaining Community in Cohort -Based Online Learning.In Journal of Distance Education, 20(1), (pp. 1-20).]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Dabbagh, N. (2004). Distance learning: emerging pedagogical issues and learning designs. In Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 5(1), (pp. 37-49).]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Deschenes, A.J. (1996). Un programme d’initiation a la formation a distance de type constructiviste: Un réseau de communication pour l’apprentissage. In Distances, 1(2), (pp. 15-34). Retrieved on June 8, 2012 from http://cqfd.teluq.uquebec.ca/distances/D1_2_c.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Dewey, J. and Bentley, A. (1949). Knowing and the Known. Beacon Press, Boston.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Dron, J.; Seidel, C. and Litten, G. (2004). Transactional distance in a blended learning environment. In ALT-F: Research in Learning Technology, 12(2), (pp. 163-174).]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Dron,J. (2006). Social software and the emergence of control. In Proceedings of the sixth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2006), (pp. 41-45). Kerkra, The Netherlands IEEE.10.1109/ICALT.2006.1652589]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Dron, J. (2007a). Control and Constraint in e-learning: Choosing when to choose. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.10.4018/978-1-59904-390-6]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Dron, J. (2007b). Designing the undesignable. Social software and control. In Educational Technology & Society, 10(3), (pp. 60-71).]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Farquhar, L. (2013). The intersection of dialogue and low transactional distance: considerations for Higher Education. In European Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 16(2), 28-39. http://www.eurodl.org/?p=archives&year=2013&halfyear=2&article=581]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Force, D. (2004). Relationships among transactional distance variables in asynchronous computer conferences: A correlational study. Unpublished Master Thesis Athabasca University.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Garrison, R. (2000). Theoretical challenges for Distance Education in the 21st century: A swift from structural to transactional issues. In The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 1(1), Retrieved on October 10, 2011 from: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/viewFile/2/2210.19173/irrodl.v1i1.2]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Garrison, D.R. (2009). Implications of online learning for the conceptual development and practice of distance education. In Journal of Distance Education, 23(2), (pp. 93-104).]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Giossos, I. (2009). Validity and reliability of transactional distance in the framework of Hellenic Open University. Dissertation. Course: Studies in Education, School of Humanities, Patras, Hellenic Open University. (in Greek with English abstract)]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Giossos, I.; Mavroidis, I. and Koutsouba, M. (2008). Research in distance education: review and perspectives. In Open Education, 4(1), (pp. 49-60). In Greek with English abstract.]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Giossos, I.; Koutsouba, M.; Lionarakis, A. and Skavantzos, K. (2009). Reconsidering Moore’s transactional distance Theory. In European Journal of Open Distance and ELearning, 2009(2), (pp. 1-6).]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Gokool-Ramdoo, S. (2008). Beyond the Theoretical Impasse: Extending the applications of Transactional Distance Theory. In International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, (9)3.10.19173/irrodl.v9i3.541]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Gunawardena, C.N. and McIsaac, M.S. (2004). Distance Education. In D.H. Jonassen (ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications & technology, (pp. 355-395), (2nd Edition).London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Herbert, M. (2006). Staying the Course: A study in online student satisfaction and retention.In Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 9(4).]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Hillman, D.C.; Willis, D.J. and Gunawardena, C.N. (1994). Learner interface Interaction in distance education: An extension of contemporary models and Strategies for practitioners. In The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), (pp. 30-42).10.1080/08923649409526853]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Jung, I. (2001). Building a theoretical framework of Web-based instruction in the context of distance education. In British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(5), (pp. 525-534).10.1111/1467-8535.00222]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Kanuka, H.; Collet, D. and Caswell, C. (2002). University instructor perceptions of use of asynchronous text-based discussion in distance courses. In The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), (pp. 151-167).10.1207/S15389286AJDE1603_3]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Lemone, K. (2005). Analysing Cultural Influences on E-Learning Transactional Issues. In G.Richards (ed.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2005, (pp. 2637-2644). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Liu, G.; Liu, Y.; Liang, G.; Song, J.; Liao, J.; Li, G. and Lin, M. (2004). Comparison of ELearning in Distance Education in Different Cultural Settings. In G. Richards (ed.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2004, (pp. 370-374). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Loizidou-Hatzitheodoulou, P.; Vasala, P.; Kakouris, Α.; Mavroidis, I.; Tassios, T. (2001).Types of communication in distance learning and their contribution to the educational process. The case of the students of the postgraduate module “Open and Distance Education” of HOU. In the Proceedings - 1st Panhellenic Conference for Open and Distance Education (in Greek with English abstract).]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Mavroidis, I.; Karatrantou, A.; Koutsouba, M.; Giossos, Y.; Papadakis, S. (2013). Technology Acceptance and Social Presence in Distance Education. A case Study on the Use of Teleconference at a Postgraduate Course of the Hellenic Open University. In European Journal of Open Distance and e-Learning, 16(2). Retrieved on November 27, 2013 from: http://www.eurodl.org/?p=archives&year=2013&halfyear=2&article=590]Search in Google Scholar
[41. Moore, M.G. (1997). Theory of Transactional distance. In D. Keegan (ed.), Theoretical Principles of Distance Education, (pp. 22-38). New York: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[42. Moore, M. and Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance Education: A systems review. Belmont CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Moss, D. (2004). Creating space for learning: Conceptualising women & higher education through space & time. In Gender & Education, 16(3), (pp. 283-362).10.1080/09540250042000251452]Search in Google Scholar
[44. Μüller, T. (2008). Persistence of Women in on line Degree Completion Programs. In International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 9(2), (pp. 1-18).]Search in Google Scholar
[45. Parrott, S. (1995). Future Learning: Distance Education in Community Colleges. ERIC Digest No.ED385311.]Search in Google Scholar
[46. Pavlakis, A. and Kaitelidou, D. (2012) Burnout Syndrome in Students of a Distance Learning Program: The Open University of Cyprus Experience. In European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 15(1). Retrieved on March 8, 2013 from: http://www.eurodl.org/?p=archives&year=2012&halfyear=1&article=485]Search in Google Scholar
[47. Richardson, C.J. and Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning & satisfaction. In Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), (pp. 68-88). ]Search in Google Scholar
[48. Rovai, A.P. and Baker, J.D. (2005). Gender Differences in Online Learning: Sense of community, perceived learning, and interpersonal interactions. In Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6(1), (pp. 31-44).]Search in Google Scholar
[49. Saba, F. and Shearer, R. (1994). Verifying key theoretical concepts in a dynamic model of distance education. In The American Journal of Distance Education, 9(1), (pp. 36-59).10.1080/08923649409526844]Search in Google Scholar
[50. Saenz, B.L. (2002). Students’ perceptions of Social Presence and its value in Asynchronous Web-based Master’s Instructional Program. PhD Thesis Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.]Search in Google Scholar
[51. Sarakatsanou, E. (2007). Tutor-Student Communication at the Hellenic Open University. Students perceptions of two postgraduate course: Studies in Education and Adult Education. M.Ed Dissertation.Patras, Hellenic Open University (in Greek with English abstract).]Search in Google Scholar
[52. Simpson, O. (2003). Student retention in online, open and distance learning. London: Kogan Page.10.4324/9780203416563]Search in Google Scholar
[53. Stein, S.D.; Wanstreet, E.C.; Calvin, J.; Overtoom, C. and Wheaton, E.J. (2005). Bridging the Transactional Distance Gap in Online Learning Environments. In The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(2), (pp. 105-118).10.1207/s15389286ajde1902_4]Search in Google Scholar
[54. Schellens, T. and Valcke, M. (2006). Fostering knowledge construction in university students through asynchronous discussion groups. In Computers & Education, 46(4), (pp. 349-370).10.1016/j.compedu.2004.07.010]Search in Google Scholar
[55. Terre Blanche, M.; Durrheim, K. and Painter, D. (eds.) (2006). Research in practice: Applied methods for the social sciences. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[56. Tait, A. (2003). Reflection on Student Support in Open & Distance Learning. In The International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 4(1). Retrieved on February 2, 2011 from: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/viewArticle/134/214]Search in Google Scholar
[57. Tzoutza, S. (2010). Face-to-face tutorials: The views of postgraduate students and their tutors at the Hellenic Open University. The case of postgraduate course on “Open and Distance Education” at Hellenic Open University. In Open Education, 6(1-2), (pp. 46-65). In Greek with English abstract.]Search in Google Scholar
[58. Terhemba, N. (2006). Interactivity in distance education: The National Open University of Nigeria (NOUN) experience. In Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education - TOJDE, (7)4, Article 9. Retrieved on May 25, 2012 from: http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/tojde24/articles/article_9.htm]Search in Google Scholar
[59. Wilson, Τ. and Whitelock, D. (1998). What are the perceived benefits of participating in a computer-mediated communication (CMC) environment for distance learning computer science students? In Computers & Education, 36(3/4), (pp. 259-269).]Search in Google Scholar
[60. Zhang, A. (2003). Transactional distance in web-based college learning environments: Toward measurement and theory construction. PhD Thesis. Virginia Commonwealth University. ]Search in Google Scholar