1. bookVolumen 10 (2018): Heft 4 (December 2018)
24 Feb 2009
4 Hefte pro Jahr
access type Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Terra Incognita of the Russian Near North: Counter-Urbanization in Today’S Russia and the Formation of Dacha Communities

Online veröffentlicht: 11 Jan 2019
Volumen & Heft: Volumen 10 (2018) - Heft 4 (December 2018)
Seitenbereich: 673 - 692
Eingereicht: 11 Dec 2017
Akzeptiert: 24 Oct 2018
24 Feb 2009
4 Hefte pro Jahr

This article considers the salient features of counter-urbanization, which take place when urban residents, during the summer months, move to live in their second homes or their dachas [country homes or summer cottages]. Due to the social forces that are the result of incomplete urbanization, class polarization, and the rapid growth of major city centers, there are two powerful oppositional flows of migration taking place today in Russia. The first is centripetal migration or the movement of rural populations to large cities. The second form of migration is centrifugal migration or counterurbanization, which is the relocation of urban populations to rural areas. The article gives a theoretical overview of a new vision of migration as a part of modern flexible ‘liquid’ mobility, which enables urban residents to be constantly ‘on the move’, migrating between their urban apartments and suburban or distant dachas. A theoretical sociological background provides the field research, presented in the article, with an understanding of the realm of meanings of de-urbanization in a short and long historical run and in perspective. Russian men and women, who work in various professions due to advances in telecommunication technologies, are able to spend some extended periods at their dachas where they simultaneously work and enjoy the natural beauty and countryside. The different types of dachas in Russia that are either close to cities or in remote regions are examined. The case study of dacha counter-urbanization in the periphery region of Kostroma oblast' considers: 1) various features of the return counter-urbanization to remote dacha and 2) the social, economic and cultural effects that these dacha settlements have had on both the urban and rural residents.

[1] Averkieva, K., Artobolevskyi, S., Vedenin, J., Vendina, O., Machrova, A., Neretin, A., Razumovskyi, V., Tarchov, S., Nefedova, T. G. & Treivish, A. I. (2015). Путешествие из Петербурга в Москву: 222 года спустя. Кн. 1: Два столетия российской истории между Москвой и Санкт-Петербургом (Journey from St. Petersburg to Moscow: 222 Years After, Two Centuries of Russian History between Moscow and St. Petersburg) Moscow: Lenand.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity, Cambridge: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Berry, B. (1976). Urbanization and counter-urbanization: Beverly Hills: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Berry, B. (1980). Urbanization and counterurbanization in the United States. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 451(1), 13-20. DOI: 10.1177/000271628045100103.10.1177/000271628045100103DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[5] Burgess, E. W. (2008). The growth of the city: An introduction to a research project, In Marzluff, J. M., Shulenberger, E., Endlicher, W., Alberti, M., Bradley, G., Ryan, C., Simon, U. & zum Brunnen, C., eds., Urbanization and Human Domination of Earth (pp. 71-78). Boston, MA: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-73412-5_5.10.1007/978-0-387-73412-5_5DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[6] Castells, M. (1983). The City and Grassroots: A Cross-Cultural Theory of Urban Social Movement, London: Edward Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Dijst, M., Lanzendorf, M., Barendregt, A. & Smit, L. (2005). Second homes in Germany and the Netherlands: Ownership and travel impact explained, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 96(2), 139-152. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2005.00446.x.10.1111/j.1467-9663.2005.00446.xDOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[8] Elgin, D. (1981). Voluntary simplicity: Toward a Way of Life That Is Outwardly Simple, Inwardly Rich, Quill: New York.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Etzioni, A. (1998). Voluntary Simplicity: Characterization, select psychological implications, and societal consequences, Journal of Economic Psychology. 19(5), 619-643. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-03900-7_1.10.1007/978-3-662-03900-7_1DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[10] Fielding, A. (1989). Migration and counterurbanization in Western Europe since 1950, Geographical Journal, 155(1), 60-69. DOI: 10.2307/635381.10.2307/635381Search in Google Scholar

[11] Gallent, N., Mace, A. & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2005). Second Homes: European Perspectives and UK Policies, Aldershot: Ashgate.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Gallent, N. & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2018). Rural second homes in Europe. Abingdon-on- Thames: Routledge.10.4324/9781315201979Search in Google Scholar

[13] Geyer, Y. S. & Kontuly, T. (1993). The theoretical foundation of the concept of differential urbanization, International Regional Science Review 15(2), 157-177. DOI: 10.1177/016001769301500202.10.1177/016001769301500202DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[14] Harvey, D. (1989). The Urban Experience. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Ioffe, G., Nefedova, T. & Zaslavski, I. (2004). From spatial continuity to fragmentation: The case of Russian farming, Annals of the. Association of American Geographers, 94(4), 913-943. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.00441.x.10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.00441.xDOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[16] Khauke, М. О. (1960). The Suburban Zone of a Big City (Пригородная зона большого города), Moscow: Государственное издательство литературы по строительству, архитектуре и строительным материалам.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Kontuly, T., Wiard, S. & Vogelsang, R. (1986). Counterurbanization in the Federal Republic of Germany. The Professional Geographer, 38(2), 170-181. DOI: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1986.00170.x.10.1111/j.0033-0124.1986.00170.xDOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[18] Lovell, S. (2003). Summerfolk: A History of the Dacha, 1710-2000, Ithaca NJ: Cornell University Press.10.7591/9781501704574Search in Google Scholar

[19] Makhrova, A. G., Nefedova, T. G. & Pallot, J. (2016). The specifics and spatial structure of circular migration in Russia. Eurasian Geography and Economics. 57(6), 802-818. DOI: 10.1080/15387216.2016.1274663.10.1080/15387216.2016.1274663DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[20] Marjanvaara, R. & Ludholm, E. (2014). Does second-home ownership trigger migration in later life? Population, Space and Place 22(3), 228-240. DOI: 10.1002/psp.1880.10.1002/psp.1880DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[21] McIntyre, N., Williams, D. & McHugh, K., eds. (2006). Multiple Dwelling and Tourism. Wallingford: CABI.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Mitchell, C. (2004). Making sense of counterurbanization, Journal of Rural Studies. 20(1), 15-34. DOI: 10.1016/S0743-0167(03)00031-7.10.1016/S0743-0167(03)00031-7DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[23] Moss, L. A. G. & Glorioso, R. S., eds. (2014). Global Amenity Migration: Transforming Rural Culture Economy and Landscape Kaslo: The New Ecology Press.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Nefedova, T. G., Averkieva, K. V. & Makhrova, F. G, eds. (2016). Между домом и… домом. Возвратная пространственная мобильность населения России (Between home and… home. The return spatial mobility of population in Russia. Moscow; Novyi Khronograf.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Nefedova, T. G. and Treivish, A. I., Differential Urbanisation in Russia, Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie. Journal of Economic and Social Geography, 2003, vol. 94, no. 1, pp.75-88.10.1111/1467-9663.00238Search in Google Scholar

[26] Nefedova, T. G. (2012). Major trends for changes in the socioeconomic space of rural Russia, Regional Research of Russia 2(1), 41-54. DOI: 10.1134/S2079970512010078.10.1134/S2079970512010078DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[27] Nefedova, T. G. (2015). Российские дачи в разном масштабе пространства и времени (Russian dachas in different space of scale and time). Demoskop Weekly 657-658, 1-20.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Nefedova, T.G. (2008). Российская глубинка глазами ее обитателей/. Угорский проект: экология и люди ближнего Севера (The Russian backwater through the eyes of its inhabitants In Pokrovsky, N. E., ed., The Ecology and People of the Near North. The Ugorskii Project. Pokrovsky, N. E., ed., Социология. Естествознание. Общество. Moscow: Union of Professional Sociologists.Search in Google Scholar

[29] Nefedova, T. G., Pokrovsky, N. E. & Treivish, A. I. (2015). Урбанизация, дезурбанизация и сельско-городские сообщества в условиях роста горизонтальной мобильности (Urbanization, Desurbanization and Rural-Urban Communities under Condition of Rising Spatial Mobility of Population). Социологические исследования (Sociological Studies). 12, 60-69.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Nefedova, T. G., Nikolaeva, U. G. & Pokrovsky, N. E. (2016). Интеллигенция в пространственном измерении внегородской России (Intellectuals in the spatial dimension extra-urban Russia). Социологические исследования (Sociological Studies) 12, 52-61.Search in Google Scholar

[31] Paris, Ch. (2018). Australian holiday homes. In Hall, C. M. & Müller, D., eds., The Routledge handbook of second homes tourism and mobilities. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

[32] Park, R. (1967). The City as a Social Laboratory. In Park, R. E., ed., On Social Control and Collective Behavior: Selected Papers (pp. 3-18), University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Park, R. E. (2011). Избранные очерки: Сборник переводов. ИНИОН РАН (Selected Essays. Collection of translations. Institute of Information for Social Scienses of the Russian Academy of Sciences). Moscow. ISBN 978-5-248-00602-1.Search in Google Scholar

[34] Patsiorkovskii, V. V. (2013). Sociology of resettlement as a special sociological theory. In Toshchenko, Zh. T., ed., New Ideas in Sociology: A Monograph (pp. 162-166). Moscow: YuNITI-DANA.Search in Google Scholar

[35] Pokrovsky, N. & Guseva, Y. (2014). Alternative to Urbanization: Life after the city, Livebetter Magazine 34, not paged.Search in Google Scholar

[36] Pokrovsky, N. E. & Nefedova, T. G. (2013). Клеточная глобализация» и тенденции в сельских сообществах ближнего севера России ("Cellular globalization" and trends in rural communities of Russia's Near North). Социологические исследования (Sociological Studies), 4, 13-35.Search in Google Scholar

[37] Pokrovsky, N. E. (2014). Ближний Северв контексте мировых тендов проблемы теории) // Потенциал Ближнего Севера: экономика, экология, сельские поселения (The Near North in the context of global trends problems of theory). In Pokrovsky, N. E. & Nefedova, T. G., eds., The Potential of the Near North: Economics, Ecology, Rural Settlements (pp. 451- 486). Moscow: Logos.Search in Google Scholar

[38] Redfield, R. (1930). Tepoztlan, a Mexican Village: A Study of a Folk Life. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

[39] Richardson, H. W. (1980). Polarization reversal in developing countries, Papers of the Regional Science Association, 45(1), 67-85. DOI: 10.1111/j.1435-5597.1980.tb01101.x.10.1111/j.1435-5597.1980.tb01101.xDOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[40] Roca, Z., ed. (2013). Second Home Tourism in Europe: Lifestyle Issues and Policy Responses. Farnham: Ashgate.Search in Google Scholar

[41] Sorokin, P. A. (1930). A systematic source book in rural sociology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar

[42] Sorokin, P. A. (1957). Social and Cultural Dynamics. Oxford: Porter Sargent.Search in Google Scholar

[43] Coppock, J. T., ed. (1977). Second Homes: Curse or Blessing? Oxford: Pergamon Press.Search in Google Scholar

[44] Simmel, G. (2002). The Metropolis and Mental Life. In Bridge, G. & Watson, S., eds., The Blackwell City Reader (pp. 11-19). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

[45] Toennies, F. (1955). Community and Society, New York: Harper and Row.Search in Google Scholar

[46] Treivish, A. I. (2014). “Dacha studies” as the science on second homes in the West and in Russia. Regional Research in Russia 4(3). 179-188.10.1134/S2079970514030095Search in Google Scholar

[47] Treivish, А. (2015). Дачная мобильность, дачный менталитет и дачеведение (Dacha mobility, dacha mentality, and dacha studies). Demoskop Weekly 655-656 not paged.Search in Google Scholar

[48] Urry, J. (2000). Sociology beyond Societies: Mobilities for the Twenty-First Century. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

[49] Weber, M. (2001). The History of Economics: The City. Moscow: Kanon-Press.Search in Google Scholar

[50] Zelinsky, W. (1971). The hypothesis of mobility transition, Geographical Review 61(2), 219-249. DOI: 10.2307/213996.10.2307/213996DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

Empfohlene Artikel von Trend MD

Planen Sie Ihre Fernkonferenz mit Scienceendo