[
Abbe A. & Brandon S.E. (2013), The role of rapport in investigative interviewing: A review. Journal of investigative psychology and offender profiling, 10(3), 237–249.10.1002/jip.1386
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Adolphs R. (2015), The unsolved problems of neuroscience. Trends in cognitive sciences, 19(4), 173–175.10.1016/j.tics.2015.01.007457463025703689
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beattie G.W. (1981), A further investigation of the cognitive interference hypothesis of gaze patterns during conversation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 243, 248.10.1111/j.2044-8309.1981.tb00493.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Clarke C. & Milne B. (2001), National evaluation of the PEACE investigative interviewing course. Police Research Award Scheme. London: Home Office.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dittmann, 877 F.3d 297 (7th Cir. 2017).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DePaulo B.M., Finkelstein S., Rosenthal R. & Eisenstat R.A. (1980), Thinking about deceit. Unpuhlished data, University of Virginia.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Driskell T. & Driskell J.E. (2019), Got Theory? Multitasking, Cognitive Load, and Deception. In: The Palgrave Handbook of Deceptive Communication (pp. 145–165). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.10.1007/978-3-319-96334-1_8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fisher R.P. & Geiselman R.E. (1992), Memory-enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Charles C Thomas, Publisher.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fisher R.P. (2010), Interviewing cooperative witnesses. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15(1), 25–38.10.1348/135532509X441891
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fisher R.P. & Geiselman R.E. (2019), Expanding the cognitive interview to non-criminal investigations. In: Evidence-based Investigative Interviewing: Applying Cognitive Principles, (pp. 1–28). Routledge.10.4324/9781315160276-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Geiselman R.E., Fisher R.P., Firstenberg I., Hutton L.A., Sullivan S.J., Avetissian I.V & Prosk A.L. (1984), Enhancement of eyewitness memory: An empirical evaluation of the cognitive interview. Journal of Police Science & Administration, 12(1), 74–80.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goodman-Delahunty J., Martschuk N. & Dhami M.K. (2014), Interviewing high value detainees: Securing cooperation and disclosures. Applied cognitive psychology, 28(6), 883–897.10.1002/acp.3087
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Geiselman R.E. & Fisher R.P. (2014), Interviewing witnesses and victims. In: M. St-Yves (ed.), Investigative interviewing: Handbook of best practices. Toronto: Toronto, ON: Thomson Reuters.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Green E., Nesson C. & Murray P. (1999), Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 113 S. Ct. 2786 (1993). United States, Harvard Law. http://www.law.harvard.edu/publications/evidenceiii/cases/daubert.htm.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gremler D.D. & Gwinner K.P. (2008), Rapport-building behaviors used by retail employees. Journal of Retailing, 84(3), 308–324.10.1016/j.jretai.2008.07.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Griffiths A., Milne B. & Cherryman J. (2011), A question of control? The formulation of suspect and witness interview question strategies by advanced interviewers. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 13 (3), 255–267.10.1350/ijps.2011.13.3.219
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hartwig M., Granhag P.A. & Luke T. (2014), Strategic use of evidence during investigative interviews: The state of the science. In: Credibility assessment (pp. 1–36). Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-394433-7.00001-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hoekendijk J. & van Beek M. (2015), Investigative Interviewing: Research and Practice.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jayne B.C. & Buckley J.P. (1999), The investigator anthology: A compilation of articles and essays about the Reid technique of interviewing and interrogation. Chicago, IL: John E. Reid and Associates.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Johnson M.K. & Raye C.L. (1981), Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.1.6710.1037/0033-295X.88.1.67
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Keedy E.R. (1936), Third Degree and Legal Interrogation of Suspects. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 85, 761.10.2307/3308644
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Knoke M.E. & De Lise E.P. (2010), Professional investigator’s manual. ASIS International. Alexandria, VA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Langley C. (2017), Getting to the Truth: A Practical, Scientific Approach to Behaviour Analysis for Professionals. Emotional Intelligence Academy.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McCarron A.L., Ridgway S. & Williams A. (2004), The truth and lie story: Developing a tool for assessing child witnesses’ ability to differentiate between truth and lies. Child Abuse Review: Journal of the British Association for the Study and Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect, 13(1), 42–50.10.1002/car.832
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MacPherson S.E. & Della Sala S. (eds.) (2019), Cases of Amnesia: Contributions to Understanding Memory and the Brain. Routledge.10.4324/9780429023880
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Memon A., Meissner C.A. & Fraser J. (2010), The Cognitive Interview: A meta-analytic review and study space analysis of the past 25 years. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16(4), 340.10.1037/a0020518
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moulton L. (2017), The naked consultation: A practical guide to primary care consultation skills. CRC Press.10.1201/9781315379463
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Meissner C.A., Redlich A.D., Bhatt S. & Brandon S. (2012). Interview and interrogation methods and their effects on true and false confessions. Campbell systematic reviews, 8(1), 1–53.10.4073/csr.2012.13
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Milne R. (2004), The enhanced cognitive interview: A step-by-step guide. Portsmouth University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nahari G., Vrij A. & Fisher R.P. (2014), Exploiting liars’ verbal strategies by examining the verifiability of details. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 19, 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8333.2012.02069.x.10.1111/j.2044-8333.2012.02069.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Meissner C.A., Redlich A.D., Michael S.W., Evans J.R., Camilletti C.R., Bhatt S. & Brandon S. (2014), Accusatorial and information-gathering interrogation methods and their effects on true and false confessions: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10(4), 459–486.10.1007/s11292-014-9207-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nortje A. & Tredoux C. (2019), How good are we at detecting deception? A review of current techniques and theories. South African Journal of Psychology, https://doi.org/10.1177/0081246318822953.10.1177/0081246318822953
]Search in Google Scholar
[
O’Mara S. (2015), Why Torture Doesn’t Work. Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674915510
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pérez-Campos Mayoral E. & Langer A.A. (2019), Devil’s Advocate Tactic to Generate Rapport. Polygraph, 52 (5).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ray D. (2015), United States Air Force Report to Congressional Committees: Report on the Use of the Forensic Experiential Trauma Interview (FETI) Technique with the Department of the Air Force. Washington DC.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saks M.J. & Koehler J.J. (2005), The coming paradigm shift in forensic identification science. Science, 309(5736), 892–895.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Satin G.E. & Fisher R.P. (2019), Investigative utility of the cognitive interview: Describing and finding perpetrators. Law and human behavior. 43(5), 491–50610.1037/lhb000032630920236
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sigurdsson J.F. & Gudjonsson G.H. (2001), False confessions: The relative importance of psychological, criminological and substance abuse variables. Psychology, Crime & Law, 7(3), 275–289.10.1080/10683160108401798
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Starr D. (2019), The confession. Science 364 (6445), 1022–1026.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
United Kingdom Home Office (1984) Police and Criminal Evidence act (PACE).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
United States v. Jacques, 744 F.3d 804 (1st Cir. 2014).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vrij A. (2008a), Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities, 2nd ed., Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vrij A. (2008b), Nonverbal dominance versus verbal accuracy in lie detection: A plea to change police practice. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 1323–1336.10.1177/0093854808321530
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vrij A. (2019), Deception and truth detection when analyzing nonverbal and verbal cues. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(2), 160–167.10.1002/acp.3457
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vrij A., Fisher R.P. & Blank H. (2017), A cognitive approach to lie detection: A meta-analysis. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 22(1), 1–21.10.1111/lcrp.12088
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vrij A., Fisher R., Mann S. & Leal S. (2006), Detecting deception by manipulating cognitive load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 141–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.02.00310.1016/j.tics.2006.02.00316516533
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vrij A., Granhag P.A., Mann S. & Leal S. (2011), Outsmarting the liars: Toward a cognitive lie detection approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(1), 28–32.10.1177/0963721410391245
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vrij A., Jundi S., Hope L., Hillman J., Gahr E., Leal S., Warmelink L., Mann S., Vernham Z. & Granhag P.A. (2012), Collective interviewing of suspects. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1(1), 41–44.10.1016/j.jarmac.2011.12.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vrij A., Leal S., Granhag P.A., Mann S., Fisher R.P., Hillman J. & Sperry K. (2009), Outsmarting the liars: The benefit of asking unanticipated questions. Law and Human Behavior, 33(2), 159–166.10.1007/s10979-008-9143-y18523881
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vrij A., Leal S., Mann S. & Fisher R. (2012), Imposing cognitive load to elicit cues to deceit: Inducing the reverse order technique naturally. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18(6), 579–594.10.1080/1068316X.2010.515987
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vrij A., Mann S.A., Fisher R.P., Leal S., Milne R. & Bull R. (2008). Increasing cognitive load to facilitate lie detection: The benefit of recalling an event in reverse order. Law and Human Behavior, 32(3), 253–265.10.1007/s10979-007-9103-y
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vrij A., Mann S., Leal S. & Fisher R.P. (2010), ‘Look Into My Eyes’: Can an instruction to maintain eye contact facilitate lie detection? Psychology, Crime, & Law, 16, 327–348.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vrij A. & Nahari G. (2019), Evidence-based Investigative Interviewing. Applying Cognitive Principles. The Verifiability Approach (pp. 116–133). Routledge.10.4324/9781315160276-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zuckerman M., DePaulo B.M. & Rosenthal R. (1981), Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 1–59). Academic Press.10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60369-X
]Search in Google Scholar
