Electrodermal Response Ratios: Scoring Against the Stronger of Two Comparison Questions in Search of an Optimal Minimum Threshold

Ansley, N., and Krapohl, D.J. (2000), The frequency of appearance of evaluative criteria in field polygraph charts. Polygraph, 29 (2), 169–176.Search in Google Scholar

Bell, B.G., Raskin, D.C., Honts, C.R., and Kircher, J.C. (1999), The Utah numerical scoring system. Polygraph, 28 (1), 1–9.Search in Google Scholar

Bernhardt, P.C. (2005), Effects of prior demonstrations of polygraph accuracy on outcomes of probable-lie and directed-lie polygraph tests. The University of Utah, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Cacioppo, J.T., Tassinary, L.G., and Berntson, G.G. (2000), Handbook of Psychophysiology, 2^nd edition. New York, NY: Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511546396Search in Google Scholar

Dollins, A.B., Senter, S.M., and Pollina, D.A. (2001), A Test of the Counterintelligence Screening Polygraph Process. Report No. DoDPI01-R-0002. Department of Defense Polygraph Institute, Ft. Jackson, SC. Unpublished.Search in Google Scholar

Handler, M.D. (2006), Utah Probable Lie Comparison Test. Polygraph, 35 (3), 139– 148.Search in Google Scholar

Kircher, J.C. (1983), Computerized decision-making and patterns of activation in the detection of deception. Dissertation Abstracts International, 44 (1-B).Search in Google Scholar

Krapohl, D.J. (2020), Electrodermal responses: When is bigger really better? (in press).Search in Google Scholar

Podlesny, J.A., and Raskin, D.C. (1978), Effectiveness of techniques and physiological measures in the detection of deception. Psychophysiology, 15 (4), 344–359.10.1111/j.1469-8986.1978.tb01391.x693743Search in Google Scholar

Pollina, D.A. Dollins, A.B., Senter, S.M., Krapohl, D.J., & Ryan, A.H. (2004), Comparison of polygraph data obtained from individuals involved in mock crimes and actual criminal investigations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1099–1105.10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.109915584845Search in Google Scholar