[Anderson K. 2004. Nature, culture and big trees. University of Texas Press, Austin.10.7560/702127]Search in Google Scholar
[Blicharska M. Mikusinski G. 2013. Old trees: cultural value. Science, 339: 904.10.1126/science.339.6122.904-b]Search in Google Scholar
[Blicharska M., Mikusinski G., Godbole A., Sarnaik J. 2013. Safeguarding biodiversity and ecosystem services of Sacred Groves – experiences from northern western Ghats. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services and Management, 9, 4: 339–346.10.1080/21513732.2013.835350]Search in Google Scholar
[Blicharska M., Mikusinski G. 2014. Incorporating social and cultural significance of large trees in conservation policy. Conservation Biology, 28, 6: 1558–1567.10.1111/cobi.12341]Search in Google Scholar
[Buhyoff G.J., Gauthier L.J., Wellman J.D. 1984. Predicting scenic quality for urban forests using vegetation measurements. Forest Science, 30, 1: 71–82.]Search in Google Scholar
[Carinanos P., Casares-Porcel M., Quesada-Rubio J.M. 2014. Estimating the allergenic potential of urban green spaces: A case-study in Granada, Spain. Landscape and Urban Planning, 123: 134–144.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.12.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Churkina G., Grote R., Butler T.M., Lawrence M. 2015. Natural selection? Picking the right trees for urban greening. Environmental Science Policy, 47: 12–17.10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.014]Search in Google Scholar
[Dafni A. 2006. On the typology and the worship status of sacred trees with a special reference to the Middle East. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 2: 26.10.1186/1746-4269-2-26]Search in Google Scholar
[De la Sota C., Ruffato-Ferreira V.J., Ruiz-García L., Alvarez S. 2019. Urban green infrastructure as a strategy of climate change mitigation. A case study in northern Spain. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 40: 145–151.10.1016/j.ufug.2018.09.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Dahlhausen J., Rotzer T., Biber P., Uhl E., Pretzsch H. 2018. Urban climate modifies tree growth in Berlin. International Journal of Biometeorology, 62, 5: 795–808.10.1007/s00484-017-1481-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Endreny T., Santagata R., Perma A., De Stefano C., Rallo R.F., Ulgiati S. 2017. Implementing and managing urban forests: A much needed conservation strategy to increase ecosystem services and urban wellbeing. Ecological Modelling, 360: 328–335.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.07.016]Search in Google Scholar
[Grote R., Samson R., Alonso R., Amorim J.H., Carinanos P., Churkina G., Fares S., Thiec D.L., Niinemets U., Mikkelsen T.N., Paoletti E., Tiwary A., Calfapietra C. 2016. Functional traits of urban trees: Air pollution mitigation potential. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment, 14, 10: 543–550.10.1002/fee.1426]Search in Google Scholar
[Haase D., Schwartz N., Strohbach M., Kroll F., Seppelt R. 2012. Synergies, Trade-offs, and Loses of Ecosystem Services in Urban Regions: an Integrated Multiscale Framework Applied to the Leipzig-Halle region, Germany. Ecology and Society, 17, 3: 22.10.5751/ES-04853-170322]Search in Google Scholar
[Haider W., Hunt L. 2002. Visual aesthetic quality of Northern Ontario’s forested shorelines. Environmental Management, 29: 324–334.10.1007/s00267-001-0009-Z]Search in Google Scholar
[Jim C.Y. 2005. Monitoring the performance and decline of heritage trees in urban Hong Kong. Journal of Environmental Management, 74, 2: 161–172.10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.08.014]Search in Google Scholar
[Jochner-Oette S., Stitz T., Jetschni J., Carinanos P. 2018. The Influence of Individual-Specific Plant Parameters and Species Composition on the Allergenic Potential of Urban Green Spaces. Forests, 9, 6: 284.10.3390/f9060284]Search in Google Scholar
[Kilianova H., Pechanec V., Svobodova J., Machar, I. 2012. Analysis of the evolution of the floodplain forests in the aluvium of the Morava river. 12th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geoconference, SGEM 2012, Vol. IV; Albena, Bulgaria: 1–8; Accession Number: WOS: 000348535300001.10.5593/sgem2012/s15.v4001]Search in Google Scholar
[Kilianova H., Pechanec V., Brus J., Kirchner K., Machar I. 2017. Analysis of the development of land use in the Morava River floodplain, with special emphasis on the landscape matrix. Moravian Geographical Records, 25, 1: 46–59.10.1515/mgr-2017-0005]Search in Google Scholar
[Lindenmayer D.B., Laurance W., Franklin J.F. 2012. Global decline in large old trees. Science, 338: 1305–1306.10.1126/science.1231070]Search in Google Scholar
[Lindenmayer D.B. 2013. New policies for old trees: averting a global crisis in a keystone ecological structure. Conservation Letters, 7, 1: 61–69.10.1111/conl.12013]Search in Google Scholar
[Lindenmayer D.B. 2016. The importance of managing and conserving large old trees: a case study from Victorian mountain ash forests. The Royal Society of Victoria, 128: 64–70.10.1071/RS16006]Search in Google Scholar
[Lindenmann-Matthies P., Marty T. 2013. Does ecological gardening increase species richness and aesthetic quality of a garden? Biological Conservation, 159: 37–44.10.1016/j.biocon.2012.12.011]Search in Google Scholar
[Lutz J.A. et al. 2018. Global importance of large-diameter trees. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 27, 7: 849–864.]Search in Google Scholar
[Machar I. 2009. Conservation and Management of Floodplain Forests in the Protected Landscape Area Litovelske Pomoravi (Czech Republic) Introduction. [in:] I. Machar (ed.) Conservation and Management of Floodplain Forests in the Protected Landscape Area Litovelske Pomoravi (Czech Republic), Palacky University, Olomouc: 7–108.]Search in Google Scholar
[Machar I. 2010. Attempt to summarize the problems: Is a sustainable management of floodplain forest geobiocenoses possible? [in:] I. Machar (ed.) Biodiversity and target management of floodplain forests in the Morava River basin (Czech Republic), Palacky University, Olomouc: 189–226.]Search in Google Scholar
[Machar I., Simon J., Rejsek K., Pechanec V., Brus J., Kilianova H. 2016. Assessment of Forest Management in Protected Areas Based on Multidisciplinary Research. Forests, 7, 11: 285.10.3390/f7110285]Search in Google Scholar
[Maldonado A.D., Aguilera P.A., Salmeron A., Nicholson A.E. 2018. Probabilistic modelling of the relationship between socioeconomy and ecosystem Services in cultural landscapes. Ecosystem Services, 33, B: 146–164.10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.04.007]Search in Google Scholar
[Meerow S., Newell J.P. 2017. Spatial planning for multifunctional green infrastructure: Growing resilience in Detroit. Landscape and Urban Planning, 159: 62–75.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Millard A. 2010. Cultural Aspects of Urban Biodiversity. [in:] Müller N., Werner P., Kelcey J.G. (eds.) Urban Biodiversity and Design, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford: 56–80.10.1002/9781444318654.ch3]Search in Google Scholar
[Moser A., Rotzer T., Pauleit S., Pretzsch H. 2017. City trees: Growth, functions and services - risks and research prospects. Allgemeine Forst und Jagdzeitung, 188, 5/6: 94–111.]Search in Google Scholar
[Moser-Reischl A., Uhl E., Rotzer T., Biber P., Con T.V., Tan N.T., Pretzsch H. 2018. Effects of the urban heat island and climate change on the growth of Khaya senegalensis in Hanoi, Vietnam. Forest Ecosystems, 5: 37.10.1186/s40663-018-0155-x]Search in Google Scholar
[Oprsal Z., Harmacek J., Pavlik P., Machar I. 2018. What Factors can Influence the Expansion of Protected Areas around the World in the Context of International Environmental and Development Goals? Problemy Ekorozwoju, 13, 1: 145–157.]Search in Google Scholar
[Östlund L., Zackrisson O., Hörnberg G. 2002. Trees on the border between nature and culture, culturally modified trees in boreal Sweden. Environmental History, 7, 1: 48–68.10.2307/3985452]Search in Google Scholar
[Pace R., Biber P., Pretzsch H., Grote R. 2018. Modeling Ecosystem Services for Park Trees: Sensitivity of i-tree Eco Simulations to Light Exposure and tree Species Classification. Forests, 9, 2: 89.10.3390/f9020089]Search in Google Scholar
[Peschardt K., Schipperijn J., Stigsdotter J. 2012. Use of small public urban green spaces (SPUGS). Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 11, 3: 235–244.10.1016/j.ufug.2012.04.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Petritan I.C., Commarmot B., Hobi M.L., Petritan A.M., Bigler C., Abrudan I.V., Rigling A. 2015. Structural patterns of beech and silver fir suggest stability and resilience of the virgin forest Sinca in the Southern Carpathians, Romania. Forest Ecology and Management, 356: 184–195.10.1016/j.foreco.2015.07.015]Search in Google Scholar
[Pretzsch H., Biber P., Uhl E., Dahlhausen J., Schutze G., Perkins D., Rotzer T., Caldentey J., Koike T., van Con T., Chavanne A., du Toit B., Foster K., Lefer B. 2017. Climate change accelerates growth of urban trees in metropolises worldwide. Scientific Reports, 7: 15403.10.1038/s41598-017-14831-w]Search in Google Scholar
[Przybyl K. 2007. Fungi and minerals occurring in heartwood discolorations in Quercus robur trees. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae, 76, 1: 55–60.10.5586/asbp.2007.007]Search in Google Scholar
[Read H. 1999. Veteran trees: a guide to good management. English Nature, Peterborough.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ribe R.G. 1989. The aesthetics of forestry: what has empirical preference research taught us? Environmental Management, 13, 1: 55–74.10.1007/BF01867587]Search in Google Scholar
[Rudl A. 2016. Significant Trees. Agency Koniklec, Prague.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schroeder H.J., Flannigan J., Coles R. 2006. Residents’ attitudes toward street trees in the U.K. and U.S. communities. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry, 32, 5: 236–246.10.48044/jauf.2006.030]Search in Google Scholar
[Simon J., Machar I., Bucek A. 2014. Linking the historical research with the growth simulation model of hardwood floodplain forests. Polish Journal of Ecology, 62, 2: 273–288.10.3161/104.062.0208]Search in Google Scholar
[Simon J., Machar I., Brus J., Pechanec V. 2015. Combining a growth-simulation model with acoustic-wood tomography as a decision-support tool for adaptive management and conservation of forest ecosystems. Ecological Informatics, 30: 309–312.10.1016/j.ecoinf.2015.08.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Smith M., Bunce R.G.H. 2004. Veteran trees in landscape: a methodology for assessing landscape features with special reference to two ancient landscapes. [in:] R. Smithers (ed.) Landscape ecology of trees and forests, Proceeding of the twelfth annual IALE (UK) conference in Cirencester, UK, London: 168–175.]Search in Google Scholar
[Teoh S.H.S., Symes W.S., Sun H., Pienkowski T., Carraso L.R. 2018. A global meta-analysis of the economic values of provisioning and cultural ecosystem services. Science of the Total Environment, 649: 1293–1298.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.422]Search in Google Scholar
[Tribot A.S., Deter J., Mouquet N. 2018. Integrating the aesthetic value of landscapes and biological diversity. Proceedings of Royal Society B, 285: 20180971.10.1098/rspb.2018.0971]Search in Google Scholar
[Uradnicek L., Sramek M., Dreslerova J. 2017. Checklist of champion trees in the Czech Republic. Journal of Landscape Ecology, 10, 2: 109–120.10.1515/jlecol-2017-0020]Search in Google Scholar
[Vandekerkhove K., Vanhellemont M., Vrska T., Meyer P., Tabaku V., Thomaes A., Leyman A., De Keersmaeker L., Verheyen K. 2018. Very large trees in a lowland old-growth beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) forest: Density, size, growth and spatial patterns in comparison to reference sites in Europe. Forest Ecology and Management, 417: 1–17.10.1016/j.foreco.2018.02.033]Search in Google Scholar
[Zackrisson O., Ostlund L., Korhonen O., Bergman I. 2000. The ancient use of Pinus sylvestris L. (Scots pine) inner bark by Sami people in northern Sweden, related to cultural and ecological factors. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 9, 2: 99–109.10.1007/BF01300060]Search in Google Scholar