[
Adam, M., Hofbauer, M., & Stehling, M. (2021). Effectiveness of a lean simulation training: challenges, measures and recommendations. Production Planning and Control, 32(6), 443-453. doi: 10.1080/09537287.2020.1742375
]Search in Google Scholar
[
AlShathry, O. (2016). Business process management: a maturity assessment of Saudi Arabian organizations. Business Process Management Journal, 22(3), 507-521. doi: 10.1108/BPMJ-072015-0101
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Anderson, H., Müllern, T., & Danilovic, M. (2023). Exploring barriers to collaborative innovation in supply chains – a study of a supplier and two of its industrial customers. Business Process Management Journal, 29(8), 25-47. doi: 10.1108/BPMJ-12-2021-0796
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Anna, Č. (2014). Process management in modern organization. In Vision 2020: Sustainable Growth, Economic Development, and Global Competitiveness - Proceedings of the 23rd International Business Information Management Association Conference, IBIMA 2014. Retrieved from https://www.proceedings.com/54684
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Avila, D. T., Santos, R. I. d., Mendling, J., & Thom, L. H. (2020). A systematic literature review of process modeling guidelines and their empirical support. Business Process Management Journal, 27(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-10-2019-0407
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Badakhshan, P., Conboy, K., Grisold, T., & vom Brocke, J. (2019). Agile business process management. Business Process Management Journal, 26(6), 1505-1523. doi: 10.1108/BPMJ-12-2018-0347
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Battisti, E., Shams, S. M. R., Sakka, G., & Miglietta, N. (2020). Big data and risk management in business processes: implications for corporate real estate. Business Process Management Journal, 26(5), 1141-1155. doi: 10.1108/BPMJ-03-2019-0125
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baumgartner, R. J. (2011). Critical perspectives of sustainable development research and practice. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(8), 783-786. doi: 10.1016/j. jclepro.2011.01.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. (2002). Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 676-707. doi: 10.2307/3094913
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Biesok, G., & Wyród-Wróbel, J. (2016). Modele satysfakcji klienta [Customer satisfaction models]. Warszawa, Poland: Difin.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bilas, L., & Adeeb, M. (2017). Innovation Management: The importance of Leadership and Teamwork in Business Organisation. Economica, 2(100), 51-61. Retrieved from https://ase.md/files/publicatii/economica/ec_2017_2.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bitkowska, A. (2017a). Business Processes Modelling in Knowledge Management Perspective. Research on Enterprise in Modern Economy, 21(2), 7-16. Retrieved from https://zie.pg.edu.pl/documents/30328766/58054239/REME_21_(2-2017)-Art1.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bitkowska, A. (2017b). Knowledge management in production enterprises. Production Engineering Archives, 15(15), 23-26. doi: 10.30657/pea.2017.15.06
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bitkowska, A. (2018). Business Process Management centre of excellence as a source of knowledge. Business, Management and Education, 16, 121-132. doi: 10.3846/bme.2018.2190
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bitkowska, A. (2020). The relationship between Business Process Management and Knowledge Management - selected aspects from a study of companies in Poland. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 16(1), 169-194. doi: 10.7341/20201616
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BPM. (2017). Extending Performance Management for Company-Wide Benefits Retrieved from https://www.bpmpartners.com/2017/10/01/extending-performance-management-forcompany-wide-benefits
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BPM. (2018). The Importance of AI in Corporate Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting. Retrieved from https://www.bpmpartners.com/2018/12/06/ai-in-corporate-budgeting
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BPM. (2020). Managing Performance in a Tough Economy. Retrieved from https://www.bpmpartners.com/2020/04/21/managing-performance-in-a-tough-economy
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BPM. (2021a). BPM Pulse 2021 Survey. Results: What’s Next. Retrieved from https://www.bpmpartners.com/2021/10/18/bpm-pulse-2021-whats-next
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BPM. (2021b). The Data Foundation Your CPM Initiative Needs to Succeed. Retrieved from https://www.bpm-partners.com/2021/08/24/data-foundation-for-cpm
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bracci, E., Gobbo, G., & Papi, L. (2022). The integration of risk and performance management: the role of boundary objects. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 34(1), 139-161. doi: 10.1108/JPBAFM-02-2020-0024
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brajer-Marczak, R. (2016). Elements of knowledge management in the improvement of business processes. Management, 20(2), 242-260. doi: 10.1515/manment-2015-0063
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Christiansson, M. T., & Van Looy, A. (2017), Elements for tailoring a BPM maturity model to simplify its use. In J. Carmona, G. Engels, & A. Kumar (Eds.), Business Process Management Forum, Business Process Management Conference Business Process Management Forum, Vol. 297. Cham: Springer International Publishing (Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-65015-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chromjakova, F., Trentesaux, D., & Kwarteng, M. A. (2021). Human and cobot cooperation ethics: The process management concept of the production work-place. Journal of Competitiveness, 13(3), 21-38. doi: 10.7441/joc.2021.03.02
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Criado-García, F., Calvo-Mora, A., & Martelo-Landroguez, S. (2020). Knowledge management issues in the EFQM excellence model framework. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 37(5), 781-800. doi: 10.1108/IJQRM-11-2018-0317
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Detyna, B. (2016). Integrated management system of local administration against modern challenges of the economy. Economic and Regional Studies/Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne, 9(1), 18-32. Retrieved from http://www.ers.edu.pl/Issue-1-2016,4134
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Detyna, B. (2018). Implementation of lean management concept at the university. Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Humanitas [Scientific Journals of the Humanitas University], 19(2), 65-81. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0012.2039
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Detyna, B., & Detyna, J. (2017). Possibility of using control cards in the improvement of medical services quality. International Journal of Current Advanced Research, 6(3), 2564-2570. doi: 10.24327/ijcar.2017.2570.0050
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Detyna, B., Detyna, J., & Dudek-Kajewska, A. (2016). Evaluation of training programs by medical employees in a chosen hospital in Poland. Managerial Economics, 17(2), 203-216. doi: 10.7494/manage.2016.17.2.203
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., Mendling, J., & Reijers, H. A. (2013). Fundamentals of Business Process Management. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-33143-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., Mendling, J., & Reijers, H. A. (2018). Introduction to Business Process Management. Fundamentals of Business Process Management. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1-33. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-56509-4_1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
El Ghalbzouri, H., & El Bouhdidi, J. (2022). Integrating Business Intelligence with Cloud Computing: State of the Art and Fundamental Concepts. In M. Ben Ahmed, H-N.L. Teodorescu, T. Mazri, P. Subashini, A.A. Boudhir (Eds.), Networking, Intelligent Systems and Security. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 237. Singapore: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-3637-0_14
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Espírito Santo, P. M., Cardoso, P. M. A., & Marques, A. M. A. (2022). Effects of E-Business Adoption on Organizational Agility in the COVID-19 Context. International Journal of Marketing, Communication and New Media, 11, 45-61. doi: 10.54663/2182-9306.2022. sn11.45-61
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gabryelczyk, R., Kulesza, P., & Rakowska, E. (2018). Improving public sector performance by using business process modelling and measurement: a case study analysis. Sinergie Italian Journal of Management, 35(102), 115-132. doi: 10.7433/s102.2017.09
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gómez, J., Salazar, I., & Vargas, P. (2022). Production outsourcing, technological cooperation and E-business adoption by Spanish manufacturing firms. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 63(Complete). doi: 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2022.101677
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Govender, S., & Parumasur, S. B. (2010). The relationship between employee motivation and job involvement. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 13(3), 237-253. doi: 10.4102/sajems.v13i3.102.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grisold, T., Groß, S., Stelzl, K., Brocke, J., Mendling, J., Röglinger, M., & Rosemann, M. (2022). The Five Diamond Method for Explorative Business Process Management. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 64(2), 149-166. doi: 10.1007/s12599-02100703-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Groß, S., Stelzl, K., Grisold, T., Mendling, J., & Röglinger, M. (2021). The business process design space for exploring process redesign alternatives. Business Process Management Journal, 27(8), 25-56. doi: 10.1108/ bpmj-03-2020-0116
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gupta, B., Iyer, L. S., & Aronson, J. E. (2000). Knowledge management: practices and challenges. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 100(1), 17-21. doi: 10.1108/02635570010273018.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gzik, T. (2020). Business Process as a Service – A systematic literature review. In M. Hernes, A. Rot, D. Jelonek (Eds.), Towards Industry 4.0 — Current Challenges in Information Systems/Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 887 (pp. 163-181). Cham Switzerland: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-40417-8_10
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harmon P. (2020). BPTrends State of Business Process Management – 2020 Report. Retrieved from https://www.bptrends.com/bptrends-state-of-business-process-management-2020-report
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harmon, P. (2010). The Scope and Evolution of Business Process Management. Handbook on Business Process Management 1. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-45100-3_3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harymawan, I., Nasih, M., Agustia, D., Putra, F. K. G., & Djajadikerta, H. G. (2022). Investment efficiency and environmental, social, and governance reporting: Perspective from corporate integration management. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(5), 1186-1202. doi: 10.1002/ csr.2263
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Helbin, T., & Van Looy, A. (2021). Is business process management (BPM) ready for ambidexterity? Conceptualization, implementation guidelines and research agenda. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(4), 1906. doi: 10.3390/su13041906
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hill, C. W. L., & Rothaermel, F. T. (2003). The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 257-274. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2003.9416161
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hove, M., von Rosing, G., & Storms, B. (2015). Business Process Management Governance. In M.V. Rosing, A-W. Scheer, H. von Scheel (Eds.), The Complete Business Process Handbook – Body of Knowledge from Process Model to BPM. vol. 1 (pp. 603-616). Waltham: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-799959-3.00029-X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ispas, L., & Mironeasa, C. (2022). The Identification of Common Models Applied for the Integration of Management Systems: A Review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(6), 3559. doi: 10.3390/su14063559
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). The strategy-focused organization. Strategy & Leadership, 29(3). doi: 10.1108/sl.2001.26129cab.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Keser Aschenberger, F. K., Radinger, G., Brachtl, S., Ipser, Ch., & Oppl, S. (2023). Physical home learning environments for digitally supported learning in academic continuing education during COVID-19 pandemic. Learning Environments Research, 26, 97-128. doi: 10.1007/s10984-022-09406-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kir, H., & Erdogan, N. (2021). A knowledge-intensive adaptive business process management framework. Information Systems, 95. doi: 10.1016/j.is.2020.101639
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Langley, A. (2007). Process thinking in strategic organization. Strategic Organization, 5(3), 271–282. doi: 10.1177/1476127007079965
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lombarts, M. J. M. H., Rupp, I., Vallejo, P., Suñol, R., & Klazinga, N. S. (2009). Application of quality improvement strategies in 389 European hospitals: results of the MARQuIS project. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 18(Suppl 1), i28–i37. doi: 10.1136/ qshc.2008.029363
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lopes, A., Polónia, D., Gradim, A., & Cunha, J. (2022). Challenges in the Integration of Quality and Innovation Management Systems. Standards, 2(1), 52-65. doi: 10.3390/standards2010005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mahdi, O. R., & Nassar, I. A. (2021). The business model of sustainable competitive advantage through strategic leadership capabilities and knowledge management processes to overcome COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(17), 9891. doi: 10.3390/ su13179891
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marín-González, F., & Pérez-González, J. (2021). Process management in intersectoral cooperation networks. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 27(1), 162-179. Retrieved from https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7817689
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mbah, R. E., & Wasum, D. (2022). Russian-Ukraine 2022 War: A Review of the Economic Impact of Russian-Ukraine Crisis on the USA, UK, Canada, and Europe. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 9(3), 144-153. doi: 10.14738/assrj.93.12005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mendling, J., Pentland, B. T., & Recker, J. (2020). Building a complementary agenda for business process management and digital innovation. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(3), 208-219. doi: 10.1080/0960085X.2020.1755207
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mohamad, A. K., Jayakrishnan, M., & Yusof, M. M. (2022). Thriving information system through business intelligence knowledge management excellence framework. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 12(1), 506-514. doi: 10.11591/ ijece.v12i1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moreno, V., Cavazotte, F., & Lapa, E. (2015). Integrating Knowledge Management Practices and Business Processes: A Case Study. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2015(1). doi: 10.5465/ ambpp.2015.18915abstract
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Muntean, M. (2018). Business intelligence issues for sustainability projects. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(2), 335. doi: 10.3390/su10020335
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Muntu, D., Setyawati, R., Riantini, L. S., & Ichsan, M. (2021). Effect of human resources management and advances to improve construction project performance. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 122, 103000. doi: 10.1016/j.pce.2021.103000
]Search in Google Scholar
[
OMG. (2008). Business Process Maturity Model (BPMM), version 1.0. OMG Document Number: formal/2008-06-01, Object Management Group, Nedham, MA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pereira, F. C. M., Barbosa, R. R., & Duarte, L. da C. (2020). Integration between knowledge management and business process management: Perspectives of bpm professionals. Perspectivas em Ciencia da Informacao, 25(4), 170-191. doi: 10.1590/19815344/4088
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Polančič, G., & Orban, B. (2023). An experimental investigation of BPMN-based corporate communications modelling. Business Process Management Journal, 29(8), 1-24. doi: 10.1108/BPMJ-08-2022-0362
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Riyanto, S., Endri, E., & Herlisha, N. (2021). Effect of work motivation and job satisfaction on employee performance: Mediating role of employee engagement. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19(3), 162-174. doi: 10.21511/ppm.19(3).2021.14
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rubin, D., & Levin, R. (2013). Statistics for Management. 7th edn. London: Pearson Education.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sanchez, L., Delgado, A., Ruiz, F., Garcia, F., & Piattini, M. (2009). Measurement and Maturity of Business Processes. In J. Cardoso & W. van der Aalst (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Business Process Modeling (pp. 532-556). IGI Global. doi: 10.4018/978-1-60566-288-6.ch024
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Silvestre, W. J., Fonseca, A., & Morioka, S. N. (2022). Strategic sustainability integration: Merging management tools to support business model decisions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(5), 2052-2067. doi: 10.1002/bse.3007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sitnikov, P., Dodonova, E., Dokov, E., Ivaschenko, A., & Efanov, I. (2022). Digital Transformation of Public Service Delivery Processes in a Smart City. In K. Arai (Ed.), Intelligent Systems and Applications. IntelliSys 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 296. Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-82199-9_21
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sjöström, M., Wold, S., & Söderström, B. (1986). PLS discriminant plots. In E. S. Gelsema, & L. N. Kanal (Eds.), Pattern Recognition in Practice (pp. 461-470). Amsterdam: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-444-87877-9.50042-x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sobczyk, M. (2022). Statystyka [Statistics]. Warszawa, Poland: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sobolewska, O., & Bitkowska, A. (2020). Selected aspects of evaluating knowledge management quality in contemporary enterprises. Information (Switzerland), 11(5), 244. doi: 10.3390/INFO11050244
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ståhle, L., & Wold, S. (1987). Partial least squares analysis with cross-validation for the two-class problem: A Monte Carlo study. Journal of Chemometrics, 1(3), 185-196. doi: 10.1002/cem.1180010306
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Steinke, G., & Nickolette, C. (2003). Business rules as the basis of an organization’s information systems. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 103(1), 52-63. doi: 10.1108/02635570310456904
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Szelagowski, M., & Lupeikiene, A. (2020). Business Process Management Systems: Evolution and Development Trends. Informatica (Netherlands), 31(3), 579-595. doi: 10.15388/20-INFOR429
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Team, CMMI Product. (2018). CMMI for Services, Version 1.3. Improving processes for providing better services. Carnegie Mellon University. Report. doi: 10.1184/ R1/6572375.v1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tubis, A. A., & Werbińska-Wojciechowska, S. (2021). Risk management maturity model for logistic processes. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(2), 659. doi: 10.3390/ su13020659
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zakrzewska-Bielawska, A., & Staniec, I. (2020). Contemporary challenges in cooperation and coopetition in the age of industry 4.0. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland AG. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-30549-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zapalska, A., Wroblewski, B., Imbriale, P., Kaleiwahea, P., & Schwartz, J. (2020). Strategy for development and assessment of critical thinking in undergraduate management and leadership education. Obrazovanje za poduzetništvo - E4E, 10(1) 54-75. doi: 10.38190/ ope.10.1.8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zuhaira, B., & Ahmad, N. (2021). Business process modeling, implementation, analysis, and management: the case of business process management tools. Business Process Management Journal, 27(1), 145-183. doi: 10.1108/BPMJ-06-2018-0168
]Search in Google Scholar
, 