This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Agarwal, A., Shankar, R., & Tiwari, M. K. (2007). Modeling agility of supply chain. Industrial Marketing Management, 36, 443-457. doi:10.1016/j.indmar-man.2005.12.004AgarwalA.ShankarR.&TiwariM. K.2007Modeling agility of supply chainIndustrial Marketing Management36443–45710.1016/j.indmar-man.2005.12.004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Armistead, C., & Machin, S. (1997). Implications of business process management for operations management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 17(9), 886-98.ArmisteadC.&MachinS.1997Implications of business process management for operations managementInternational Journal of Operations & Production Management179886–9810.1108/01443579710171217Search in Google Scholar
Development Processes (2014). Performance Measurement Process. Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education.DevelopmentProcesses2014Performance Measurement ProcessOak Ridge Institute for Science and EducationSearch in Google Scholar
Dobrovič, J. et al. (2018). Balanced Scorecard concept as a tool of strategic management and its usage in the construction industry. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 18(2), 59-72. doi: 10.17512/pjms.2018.18.2.05DobrovičJ.et al2018Balanced Scorecard concept as a tool of strategic management and its usage in the construction industryPolish Journal of Management Studies18259–7210.17512/pjms.2018.18.2.05Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Evans, O. (2018). Improved financial performance without improved operational efficiency: the case of Nigerian firms. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 6(3), 25-39. doi: 10.23762/FSO_VOL6_NO3_2EvansO.2018Improved financial performance without improved operational efficiency: the case of Nigerian firmsForum Scientiae Oeconomia6325–3910.23762/FSO_VOL6_NO3_2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Franek, J., & Kashi, K. (2017). Application of hybrid madm methods for performance evaluation in manufacturing. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 5(2), 41-54. doi: 10.23762/fso_vol5no2_17_4FranekJ.&KashiK.2017Application of hybrid madm methods for performance evaluation in manufacturingForum Scientiae Oeconomia5241–5410.23762/fso_vol5no2_17_4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Gradišar et al. (2008). Model – based Production Control. Journal for Control, Measurement, Electronics, Computing and Communications, 49(3-4).Gradišaret al2008Model – based Production ControlJournal for Control, Measurement, Electronics, Computing and Communications493-4Search in Google Scholar
Harrington, H. (1995). Total Improvement Management – The Next Generation in Performance Improvement. New York, United States: McGraw-Hill.HarringtonH.1995Total Improvement Management – The Next Generation in Performance ImprovementNew York, United StatesMcGraw-HillSearch in Google Scholar
Hudson et al. (2001). Theory and Practice in SME Performance Measurement Systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(8), 1096-1115.Hudsonet al2001Theory and Practice in SME Performance Measurement SystemsInternational Journal of Operations & Production Management2181096–111510.1108/EUM0000000005587Search in Google Scholar
Jones, C. (1994). Improving your key business processes. The TQM Magazine, 6(2), 25-29.JonesC.1994Improving your key business processesThe TQM Magazine6225–2910.1108/09544789410053984Search in Google Scholar
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2000). The Balanced Scorecard. Praha, Czech Republic: Grada Publishing.KaplanR. S.&NortonD. P.2000The Balanced ScorecardPraha, Czech RepublicGrada PublishingSearch in Google Scholar
Kiseľáková, D. et al. (2018). Analysis of enterprise performance and competitiveness to streamline managerial decisions. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 17(2), 101-111. doi: 10.17512/pjms.2018.17.2.09KiseľákováD.et al2018Analysis of enterprise performance and competitiveness to streamline managerial decisionsPolish Journal of Management Studies172101–11110.17512/pjms.2018.17.2.09Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kueng, P. et al. (2001). A Holistic Process Performance Analysis through a Performance Data Warehouse. Proceedings of the American Conference on Information Systems, Boston, USA.KuengP.et al2001A Holistic Process Performance Analysis through a Performance Data WarehouseProceedings of the American Conference on Information SystemsBoston, USASearch in Google Scholar
Marcinekova, K., & Sujova, A., (2015). The influence of the process control level on the enterprises’ ROE. Procedia Economics and Finance, 34, 290-295. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01632-9MarcinekovaK.&SujovaA.2015The influence of the process control level on the enterprises’ ROEProcedia Economics and Finance34290–29510.1016/S2212-5671(15)01632-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Melan, E. (1989). Process management: a unifying framework for improvement. National Productivity Review, 8(4), 395-406.MelanE.1989Process management: a unifying framework for improvementNational Productivity Review84395–40610.1002/npr.4040080407Search in Google Scholar
Milanović Glavan, Lj. (2011). Understanding Process Performance Measurement System. Business System Research, 2(2), 1-56.Milanović GlavanLj.2011Understanding Process Performance Measurement SystemBusiness System Research221–5610.2478/v10305-012-0014-0Search in Google Scholar
Ortega, A., Resinas, M., & Ruiz-Cort´es, A. (2010). Defining Process Performance Indicators: An Ontological Approach. In Meersman, R. et al. (Eds.), OTM, Part I, LNCS 6426 (pp. 555-572). Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.OrtegaA.ResinasM.&Ruiz-Cort´esA.2010Defining Process Performance Indicators: An Ontological ApproachMeersmanR.et al. EdsOTM, Part I, LNCS 6426555–572Berlin, Heidelberg, GermanySpringer-Verlag10.1007/978-3-642-16934-2_41Search in Google Scholar
Ortega, A., Resinas, M., Cabanillas, C., & Ruiz-Cort´es, A. (2013). On the definition and design-time analysis of process performance indicators. Information Systems, 38, 470-490. doi: 10.1016/j.is.2012.11.004OrtegaA.ResinasM.CabanillasC.&Ruiz-Cort´esA.2013On the definition and design-time analysis of process performance indicatorsInformation Systems38470–49010.1016/j.is.2012.11.004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Palmberg, K. (2009). Exploring process management: are there any widespread models and definitions? The TQM Journal, 21(2), 203-215. doi: 10.1108/17542730910938182PalmbergK.2009Exploring process management: are there any widespread models and definitions?The TQM Journal212203–21510.1108/17542730910938182Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Parmenter, D. (2007). Key performance indicators. 1st. ed. New Jersey, United States: John Wiley & Sons.ParmenterD.2007Key performance indicators1st. edNew Jersey, United StatesJohn Wiley & SonsSearch in Google Scholar
Pritchard, J., & Armistead, C. (1999). Business process management: lessons from European business. Business Process Management Journal, 5(1), 10-32.PritchardJ.&ArmisteadC.1999Business process management: lessons from European businessBusiness Process Management Journal5110–3210.1108/14637159910249144Search in Google Scholar
Remeň, O., & Sujová, A. (2018). Management of changes in business processes: an empirical study in Slovak enterprises, Engineering Management in Production and Services, 10(3), 37-50. doi: 10.2478/emj-2018-0015RemeňO.&SujováA.2018Management of changes in business processes: an empirical study in Slovak enterprisesEngineering Management in Production and Services10337–5010.2478/emj-2018-0015Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rongier et al. (2010). Towards performance measurement system to Control Disastre Response. Collaborative Networks for Sustainable World. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.Rongieret al2010Towards performance measurement system to Control Disastre Response. Collaborative Networks for Sustainable WorldBerlin, Heidelberg, GermanySpringer10.1007/978-3-642-15961-9_22Search in Google Scholar
Rubin, A. (2010). Statistic for Evidence-Based Practice and Evaluation. 2nd Edition. Belmont, United States: Brooks/Cole.RubinA.2010Statistic for Evidence-Based Practice and Evaluation. 2nd EditionBelmont, United StatesBrooks/ColeSearch in Google Scholar
Senvar et al. (2014). Prioritization of balanced scorecard measurement indicators as a process management approach via fuzzy AHP: case study in automotive industry. Technical Gazette, 21(1), 155-162.Senvaret al2014Prioritization of balanced scorecard measurement indicators as a process management approach via fuzzy AHP: case study in automotive industryTechnical Gazette211155–162Search in Google Scholar
Shuttleworth, M. (2008). Student’s T-Test. Retrieved from https://explorable.com/students-t-testShuttleworthM.2008Student’s T-TestRetrieved fromhttps://explorable.com/students-t-testSearch in Google Scholar
Sinclair, D., & Zairi, M. (1995). Effective process management through performance measurement, Part III: an integrated model of total quality-based performance measurement. Business Process Re-engineering and Management Journal, 1(3), 50-65.SinclairD.&ZairiM.1995Effective process management through performance measurement, Part III: an integrated model of total quality-based performance measurementBusiness Process Re-engineering and Management Journal1350–6510.1108/14637159510103220Search in Google Scholar
Šmída, F. (2007). Zavádění a rozvoj procesního řízení ve firmě. Praha, Czech Republic: Grada Publishing.ŠmídaF.2007Zavádění a rozvoj procesního řízení ve firměPraha, Czech RepublicGrada PublishingSearch in Google Scholar
Soleimannejad, F. (2004). Six Sigma, Basic Steps & Implementation. Bloomington, United States: Author-House.SoleimannejadF.2004Six Sigma, Basic Steps & ImplementationBloomington, United StatesAuthor-HouseSearch in Google Scholar
Sujova, A. (2013). Business Process Performance Management – a Modern Approach to Corporate Performance Management. Liberec Economic Forum. Liberec, Czech Republic: TU Liberec.SujovaA.2013Business Process Performance Management – a Modern Approach to Corporate Performance Management. Liberec Economic ForumLiberec, Czech RepublicTU LiberecSearch in Google Scholar
Sujova, A., & Marcinekova, K. (2015). Modern Methods of Process Management Used in Slovak Enterprises. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, 889-893. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00381-0SujovaA.&MarcinekovaK.2015Modern Methods of Process Management Used in Slovak EnterprisesProcedia Economics and Finance23889–89310.1016/S2212-5671(15)00381-0Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sujova, A., Marcinekova, K., & Hittmar, S. (2017). Sustainable Optimization of Manufacturing Process Effectiveness in Furniture Production. Sustainability, 9(6), 923. doi:10.3390/su9060923SujovaA.MarcinekovaK.&HittmarS.2017Sustainable Optimization of Manufacturing Process Effectiveness in Furniture ProductionSustainability9692310.3390/su9060923Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sujová, A., Simanová, Ľ., & Marcineková, K. (2016). Sustainable Process Performance by Application of Six Sigma Concepts: The Research Study of Two Industrial Cases. Sustainability, 8(3), 260. doi: 10.3390/su8030260SujováA.SimanováĽ.&MarcinekováK.2016Sustainable Process Performance by Application of Six Sigma Concepts: The Research Study of Two Industrial CasesSustainability8326010.3390/su8030260Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Vukomanovič et al. (2010). Leading, lagging and perceptive performance measures in the construction industry. Construction: An International Journal, 2(1), 103-111.Vukomanovičet al2010Leading, lagging and perceptive performance measures in the construction industryConstruction: An International Journal21103–111Search in Google Scholar
