Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on travel behavior: A case study of domestic inbound travelers in Turkey
31. Jan. 2024
Über diesen Artikel
Artikel-Kategorie: Research Article
Online veröffentlicht: 31. Jan. 2024
Seitenbereich: 211 - 224
Eingereicht: 04. Juli 2022
Akzeptiert: 23. Okt. 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ejthr-2023-0017
Schlüsselwörter
© 2023 Mehmet Sariişik et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1:

Figure 2:

Demographics of Respondents
Variable | n | % |
---|---|---|
Female | 342 | 56.0 |
Male | 269 | 44.0 |
30 and younger | 256 | 41.9 |
31–40 | 166 | 27.2 |
41 and older | 189 | 30.9 |
High school | 104 | 17.0 |
Bachelor’s | 301 | 49.3 |
Postgraduate | 206 | 33.7 |
None | 327 | 53.5 |
1 | 120 | 19.6 |
2 | 164 | 26.8 |
Married | 305 | 49.9 |
Single | 306 | 50.1 |
400 dollars or less | 352 | 57.6 |
401–600 dollars | 80 | 13.1 |
601 dollars or more | 179 | 29.3 |
Alone | 41 | 6.7 |
With immediate family | 376 | 61.2 |
With a friend | 93 | 15.5 |
With multiple friends | 83 | 13.6 |
With relatives | 18 | 2.9 |
Analysis of the Convergent Validity of the Theory of Planned Behaviour
During the travel ban. the city I intended on visiting remained welcoming to visitors from parts of the country hardest hit by the pandemic | 0.953 | 0.845 | 0.948 | 0.901 | |
The city I intended on visiting showed a great deal of resilience in ensuring the health and safety of visitors | 0.945 | ||||
My impression of the city will be affected by the number of coronavirus cases reported | 0.869 | 0.843 | 0.860 | 0.754 | |
My impression of the city will be affected by its reported coronavirus recovery rate | 0.868 | ||||
Once this epidemic is over, I believe it is still a good idea to go on holiday to the city I intended on visiting | 0.875 | 0.776 | 0.813 | 0.705 | |
Once this epidemic is over, I would be excited about going on holiday to the city I intended on visiting | 0.778 | ||||
Once this epidemic is over, we intend on going on holiday to the destination we had chosen to visit originally | 0.875 | 0.772 | 0.808 | 0.709 | |
Once this epidemic is over, my friends and colleagues intend on going on holiday to the destination they had chosen to visit originally | 0.769 | ||||
Once this epidemic is over, I will remain financially able to go on holiday in the city I intended on visiting | 0.862 | 0.779 | 0.814 | 0.695 | |
Once this epidemic is over, I will continue to have availability in my schedule to go on holiday in the city I intended on visiting originally | 0.794 | ||||
After this epidemic, I will go on holiday to the city I intended on visiting originally | 1 |
Analysis of Goodness of Fit of the Model
χ2 (chi-square) | Smaller the Better | 49.481 | 4.123 | pass |
χ2 and degrees of freedom | < 3 | 3.54 | 2.72 | pass |
GFI | > 0.80 | .930 | .977 | pass |
AGFI | > 0.80 | .930 | .945 | pass |
RMSEA | < 0.08 | .079 | .064 | pass |
CFI | > 0.90 | .974 | .966 | pass |
PCFI | > 0.50 | .326 | .371 | pass |
Path Analysis and Effect Size
IPP-ATT | .145 | 3.825 | 0.213 |
IPP-PPT | .105 | 2.662 | 0.138 |
ATT-PPT | .346 | 6.258 | 0.375 |
PBC-PPT | .686 | 15.510 | 0.480 |
SUN-PPT | .262 | 5.387 | 0.303 |
R2 | Q2 | ||
ATT | 0.226 | 0.184 | |
PPT | 0.620 | 0.590 |
PLS path analysis results
H1 | IPP → ATT | .305 | 3.118 | Accepted |
H2 | ATT → PTT | .458 | 12.291 | Accepted |
H3 | IPP → PPT | .280 | 2.348 | Accepted |
H4 | PBC → PPT | .872 | 47.964 | Accepted |
H5 | SUN → PPT | .624 | 35.542 | Accepted |