<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>In this essay, I explain why I agree with Angela Knobel’s judgement that, despite recent claims to the contrary, Aquinas did not jettison from his mature theology the distinction of ‘human mode’ and ‘superhuman mode’ of action in articulating his understanding of the Gifts of the Holy Spirit and their relationship to the virtues. However, I disagree with Knobel’s claim that, in his mature thought, Aquinas saw the infused virtues as inherently part of the superhuman mode. Rather, I argue that, in Aquinas’s mature thought, the infused virtues have an inherently human mode of operation, even if they can be elevated to the higher superhuman mode, when they operate in unison with the Gifts. I also diverge from Knobel in as much as I argue that the infused virtues have a default operation that is distinct from the Gifts, whereas a gift never operates without the co-operation of an infused virtue.</p>
</abstract>

In this essay, I explain why I agree with Angela Knobel’s judgement that, despite recent claims to the contrary, Aquinas did not jettison from his mature theology the distinction of ‘human mode’ and ‘superhuman mode’ of action in articulating his understanding of the Gifts of the Holy Spirit and their relationship to the virtues. However, I disagree with Knobel’s claim that, in his mature thought, Aquinas saw the infused virtues as inherently part of the superhuman mode. Rather, I argue that, in Aquinas’s mature thought, the infused virtues have an inherently human mode of operation, even if they can be elevated to the higher superhuman mode, when they operate in unison with the Gifts. I also diverge from Knobel in as much as I argue that the infused virtues have a default operation that is distinct from the Gifts, whereas a gift never operates without the co-operation of an infused virtue.

The Co-Activity of Gifts and Virtues: A Response to Angela Knobel

European Journal for the Study of Thomas Aquinas

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

{"article-title":"The Co-Activity of Gifts and Virtues: A Response to Angela Knobel"}

In this essay, I explain why I agree with Angela Knobel’s judgement that, despite recent claims to the contrary, Aquinas did not jettison from his mature...

The Co-Activity of Gifts and Virtues: A Response to Angela Knobel

Online veröffentlicht: 20. Okt. 2022

Seitenbereich: 1 - 19

Eingereicht: 13. Sept. 2021

Akzeptiert: 05. Apr. 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ejsta-2022-0001

Schlüsselwörter
Infused virtues, Gifts of the Holy Spirit,

© 2022 William Newton, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

The Co-Activity of Gifts and Virtues: A Response to Angela Knobel

Online veröffentlicht: 20. Okt. 2022

Seitenbereich: 1 - 19

Eingereicht: 13. Sept. 2021

Akzeptiert: 05. Apr. 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ejsta-2022-0001

SchlüsselwörterInfused virtues, Gifts of the Holy Spirit,

© 2022 William Newton, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Schlüsselwörter
Infused virtues, Gifts of the Holy Spirit,