This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Hoffmann VH, Busch T. Corporate carbon performance indicators: Carbon intensity, dependency, exposure, and risk. J Industrial Ecol. 2008;12(4):505-20. DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00066.x.Search in Google Scholar
Subramaniam N, Wahyuni D, Cooper BJ, Leung P, Wines G. Integration of carbon risks and opportunities in enterprise risk management systems: evidence from Australian firms. J Cleaner Prod. 2015;96(1):407-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.02.013.Search in Google Scholar
Gao B, Zhang J, Liu X. Does carbon risk amplify environmental uncertainty? Int Rev Economics Finance. 2023;88. DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2023.06.037.Search in Google Scholar
Jung J, Herbohn K, Clarkson P. Carbon risk, carbon risk awareness and the cost of debt financing. J Business Ethics. 2018;150:1151-71. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-016-3207-6.Search in Google Scholar
Clarkon PM, Li Y, Richapdson GD, Vasvari FP. Does it really pay to be green? Determinants and consequences of proactive environmental strategies. J Accounting Public Policy. 2011;30(2):122-44. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.955890.Search in Google Scholar
Li DY, Zheng M, Cao CC, Chen X, Ren S, Huang M. The impact of legitimacy pressure and corporate profitability on green innovation: evidence from China top 100. J Cleaner Prod. 2017;141(1):41-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.123.Search in Google Scholar
Dumrose M, Höck A. Corporate carbon-risk and credit-risk: the impact of carbon-risk exposure and management on credit spreads in different regulatory environments. Finance Research Lett. 2023;51:103414. DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2022.103414.Search in Google Scholar
Liu W, Tsai SB, Wu CH, Shao X, Wacławek M. Corporate environmental management and sustainable operation: theory and application. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2022;29(3):283-5. DOI: 10.2478/eces-2022-0020.Search in Google Scholar
Filak M, Hoffman S. Benzo(a)pyrene in PM10 - Air monitoring results in Poland. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2023;30(4):557-65. DOI: 10.2478/eces-2023-0048.Search in Google Scholar
Li J, Zhan G, Dai X, Qi M, Liu B. Innovation and optimization logic of grassroots digital governance in china under digital empowerment and digital sustainability. Sustainability. 2022;14(24):16470. DOI: 10.3390/su142416470.Search in Google Scholar
Ghasemaghaei M, Calic G. Assessing the impact of big data on firm innovation performance: Big data is not always better data. J Business Res. 2020;108:147-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.062.Search in Google Scholar
Tao F, Sui F, Liu A, Qi Q, Zhang M, Song B, et al. Digital twin-driven product design framework. Int J Prod Res. 2019;57(12):3935-53. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2018.1443229.Search in Google Scholar
Adeniji D, Schoop J. In-situ calibrated digital process twin models for resource efficient manufacturing. J Manufacturing Sci Eng. 2022;144(4):041008. DOI: 10.1115/1.4052131.Search in Google Scholar
Nambisan S. Digital Entrepreneurship: Toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice. 2017;41(6):1029-55. DOI: 10.1111/etap.12254.Search in Google Scholar
Autio E, Nambisan S, Thomas LDW, Wright M. Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 2018;12(1):72-95. DOI: 10.1002/sej.1266.Search in Google Scholar
Bertl M, Metsallik J, Ross P. A systematic literature review of AI-based digital decision support systems for post-traumatic stress disorder. Front Psychiatry. 2022;13:923613. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.923613.Search in Google Scholar
Wu CH, Tsai SB, Liu W, Xue FS, Yang KX, Wacławek M. Green environment and sustainable development: methods and applications. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2021;28(4):467-70. DOI: 10.2478/eces-2021-0030.Search in Google Scholar
Jiang LH. Research on low carbon financial support strategies from the perspective of eco-environmental protection. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2021;28(4):525-39. DOI: 10.2478/eces-2021-0035.Search in Google Scholar
Mubeen R, Han D, Abbas J, Raza S, Bodian W. Examining the relationship between product market competition and Chinese firms performance: the mediating impact of capital structure and moderating influence of firm size. Front Psychol. 2022;12:709678. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.709678.Search in Google Scholar
Haar J, O’Kane C, Daellenbach U. High performance work systems and innovation in New Zealand SMEs: testing firm size and competitive environment effects. Int J Human Resource Manage. 2022;33(16):3324-52. DOI: 0.1080/09585192.2021.1894213.Search in Google Scholar