[
ATTANASIO, L. B., KOZHIMANNIL, K. B. & KJERULFF, H. (2019): Women’s preference for vaginal birth after a first delivery by cesarean. In: Birth, 46(1), pp. 51–60.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BEAUCHAMP, T. L. & CHILDRESS, J. F. (2019): The Principles of biomedical ethics. Eighth Edition, New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BEAUCHAMP, T. L. (1991): Philosophical ethics. An introduction to moral philosophy. New York: McGraw-Hill.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DEMPSEY, A., DIAMOND, K. A., BONNEY, E. A. & MYERS, J. E. (2017): Caesarean section: techniques and complications. In: Obstetrics Gynaecology & Reproductive Medicine, 27(2), pp. 37–43.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DENCKER, A., NILSSON, C., BEGLEY, C., JANGSTEN, E., MOLLBERG, M., PATEL, H., WIGERT, H., HESSMAN, E., SJÖBLOM, H. & SPARUD-LUNDIN, C. (2019): Causes and outcomes in studies of fear of childbirth: A systematic rewiev. In: Women Birth, 32, pp. 99–111.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DOSEDLA, E., GAŠPAROVÁ, P., BALLOVÁ, Z. & ERDŐSOVÁ, A. (2024): Cesarean section on demand – A discussed request of mothers in the light of medical and legal justifications. In: Studia Iuridica Cassoviensia, 12(2), pp. 19–34.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FADEN, R. R. & BEAUCHAMP, T. L. (1986): A history And theory of informed consent. New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FIGO (2015): Ethical issues in obstetrics and gynecology by The FIGO Committee for the study of ethical aspects of human reproduction and women’s health. [online] [Retrieved March 21, 2024] Available at: https://www.figo.org/sites/default/files/2020-08/FIGO%20ETHICAL%20ISSUES%20-%20OCTOBER%202015%20%28003%29.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FREDRIKSSON, M., HOLMSTRÖM, I. K., HÖGLUND, A. T., FLERON, E. & MAGDALENA, M. (2024): Caesarean section on maternal request: a qualitative study of conflicts related to shared decision-making and person-centred care in Sweden. In: Reprod Health, 21(97), pp. 4–14.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF POPULATION STUDIES (2018): Turkey demographic and health survey. [online] [Retrieved March 13, 2024] Available at: https://fs.hacettepe.edu.tr/hips/dosyalar/Ara%C5%9Ft%C4%B1rmalar%20-%20raporlar/2018%20TNSA/TDHS2018_mainReport_compressed.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HARRİS, J. (2001): Bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HOPKINS MEDICINE. [online] [Retrieved March 27, 2024] Available at: https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/treatment-tests-and-therapies/cesarean-section#:~:text=Cesarean%20section%2C%20C%2Dsection%2C,and%2Ddown%20(vertical)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
JONSEN, A. R. (1998): The birth of bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KABA, R. & SOORIAKUMARAN, P. (2007): The evolution of the doctor-patient relationship. In: International Journal of Surgery, 5(1), pp. 57–65.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LEVY, K. S., SMITH, M. K., LACROIX, M. & YUDIN, M. H. (2022): Patient satisfaction with informed consent for cesarean and operative vaginal delivery. In: Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 44(7), pp. 785–790.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
OECD (2023): Caesarean sections (indicator). [online] [Retrieved February 8, 2023] Available at: https://data.oecd.org/healthcare/caesarean-sections.htm, doi: 10.1787/adc3c39f-en.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
O’CONNELL, M. A., LEAHY-WARREN, P., KHASHAN, A. S., KENNY, L. C. & O’NEILL, S. M. (2017): Worldwide prevalence of tocophobia in pregnant women: Systematic review and meta-analysis. In: Acta Obstetr Gynecol Scandinavica, 96(8), pp. 907–920.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PARRY, D. C. (2008): We wanted a birth experience, not a medical experience: Exploring Canadian women’s use of midwifery. In: Health Care for Women International, 29(8–9), pp. 784–806.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PROSEN, M. & KRAJNC, M. (2013): Sociological conceptualization of the medicalization of pregnancy and childbirth: The implications in Slovenia. In: Revijaza Sociologiju, 43, pp. 251–272.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
RESNIK, D. B. (2021): Informed consent, understanding, and trust. In: The American Journal of Bioethics, 21(5), pp. 61–63.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
RING, L., LANDAU, R. & DELGADO, C. (2021): The current role of general anesthesia for cesarean delivery. In: Curr Anesthesiol Rep, 11, pp. 18–27.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SILVA, M. C. (1990): Ethical decision making in nursing administration. Norwalk: Appleton-Lange.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
THULMAN, I., FAWCETT, J., GRABLEWSKI, L. & SILVERMAN, L. (1990): Changes in functional status after childbirth nursing. In: Research, 39(2), pp. 68–71.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
UNESCO (2005): Division of ethics of science and technology social and human science sector universal declaration on bioethics and human rights. [online] [Retrieved February 3, 2022] Available at: https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/universal-declaration-bioethics-and-human-rights.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
YU, L., SUN, X., GONG, J., LIU, M., YU, S. & LIU, L. (2024): Effectiveness of shared decision-making for mode of delivery after caesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. In: J Clin Nurs, 33(9), pp. 3721–3736.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
WHO (2015): Statement on caesarean section rates. [online] [Retrieved May 10, 2024] Available at: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/161442/WHO_RHR_15.02_eng.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
Orcid-Profil