[
BARTOSZEWICZ, M. (2018): Definicje legalne w świetle określoności prawa [Legal definitions in the light of the specificity of the law]. In: R. Balicki & M. Jabłoński (eds.): Dookoła Wojtek… Księga pamiątkowa poświęcona Doktorowi Arturowi Wojciechowi Preisnerowi [Around Wojtek… Commemorative Book dedicated to Doctor Artur Wojciech Preisner]. Wrocław: E-Wydawnictwo. Prawnicza i Ekonomiczna Biblioteka Cyfrowa. Wydział Prawa, Administracji i Ekonomii Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, pp. 355–364.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BEYLEVELD, D., FINNEGAN, T. & PATTINSON, S. D. (2009): The regulation of hybrids and chimeras in the UK. In: J. Taupnitz & M. Weschka (eds): CHIMBIRDS: Chimeras and Hybrids in Comparative European and International Research. Berlin: Springer, pp. 645–666.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BIELSKA-BRODZIAK, A. (2008): Kłopoty z definicjami legalnymi [Problems with legal definitions]. In: O. Bogucki & S. Czepita (eds): System prawny a porządek prawny [Legal system and legal order]. Szczecin: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, pp. 159–174.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BIELSKA-BRODZIAK, A. (2017): Śladami prawodawcy faktycznego. Materiały legislacyjne jako narzędzie wykładni prawa [In the footsteps of factual legislator: Legislative materials as tool of law interpretation]. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwers.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BOKLAGE, C. E. (2006): Embryogenesis of chimeras, twins and anterior midline asymmetries. In: Human Reproduction, 21(3), pp. 579–591.10.1093/humrep/dei370
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BONNICKSEN, A. M. (2009): Chimeras, hybrids and interspecies research: Politics and policymaking. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BOURRET, R., MARTINEZ, E., VIALLA, F., GIQUEL, C., THONAT-MARIN, A. & DE VOS, J. (2016): Human–animal chimeras: ethical issues about farming chimeric animals bearing human organs. In: Stem Cell Research & Therapy, 7, pp. 1–7.10.1186/s13287-016-0345-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DE LOS ANGELES, A., PHO, N. & REDMOND Jr., D. E. et al. (2018): Generating human organs via interspecies chimera formation: Advances and barriers. In: Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 91, pp. 333–342.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GRAVES, R. (2017): The Greek myths. London: Penguin.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GREELY, H. T. (2003): Defining chimeras...and chimeric concerns. In: The American Journal of Bioethics, 3(3), pp. 17–20.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HAAS, B. J., GEVERS, D., EARL A. M., FELDGARDEN, M., WARD, D. V., GIANNOUKOS, G., CIULLA, D. M., TABBAA, D., HIGHLANDER, S., SODERGREN, E., METHE, B., DESANTIS T. Z., PETROSINO, J. F., KNIGHT, R. & BIRREN, B. (2011): Chimeric 16S rRNA sequence formation and detection in Sanger and 454-pyrosequenced PCR amplicons. In: Genome Research, 21, pp. 494–504.10.1101/gr.112730.110
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HANAHAN, D., WAGNER, E. F. & PALMITER, R. D. (2007): The origins of oncomice: a history of the first transgenic mice genetically engineered to develop cancer. In: Genes & Development, 21, pp. 2258–2270.10.1101/gad.1583307
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HUNTINGTON, C. (1936): A note on legal definitions. In: Columbia Law Review, 36(7), pp. 1099–1106.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HUTHER, C. (2009): Chimeras: The ethics of creating human-animal interspecifics. München: Electronic Theses of LMU Munich.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
JACKSON, K. T. (1985): Definition in legal reasoning. In: Jurimetrics, 25(4) pp. 377–386.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KOPLIN, J. J. & SAVULESCU, J. (2019): Time to rethink the law on part-human chimeras. In: Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 6(1), pp. 37–50.10.1093/jlb/lsz005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KUŘE, J. (2009): Etymological background and further clarifying remarks concerning chimeras and hybrids. In: J. Taupnitz & M. Weschka (eds.): CHIMBIRDS: Chimeras and hybrids in comparative European and international research. Berlin: Springer, pp. 7–21.10.1007/978-3-540-93869-9_3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KWISDA, K., WHITE, L. & HÜBNER, D. (2020): Ethical arguments concerning human-animal chimera research: A systematic review. In: BMC Medical Ethics, 21, pp. 1–8.10.1186/s12910-020-00465-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LEVINE, S. & GRABEL, L. (2017): The contribution of human/non-human animal chimeras to stem cell research. In: Stem Cell Research 24, pp.128–134.10.1016/j.scr.2017.09.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MACAGNO, F. (2010): Definitions in law. In: Bulletin suisse de linguistique appliquée, 2, pp. 199–217.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MALINOWSKI, A. (2005): Definicje legalne w prawie polskim [Legal definitions in Polish law]. In: Studia Iuridica, 44, pp. 214–240.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
OPAŁEK, K. & WRÓBLEWSKI, J. (1969): Zagadnienia teorii prawa [Issues of legal theory]. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PIETRZYKOWSKI, T. (2018): Personhood beyond humanism: Animals, chimeras, autonomous agents and the law. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-78881-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PORSDAM, S., SUN, R. & HERMERÉN, G. (2019): A framework for the ethical assessment of chimeric animal research involving human neural tissue. In: BMC Medical Ethics, 20, pp. 1–9.10.1186/s12910-019-0345-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ROBERTS, N. (1960): A chimera is a chimera: A medieval tautology. In: Journal of the History of Ideas, 21(2), pp. 273–284.10.2307/2708200
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SAŁUGA, P. (2008): Sposoby wyodrębniania definicji legalnych [Methods of isolating legal definitions]. In: Państwo i prawo, 5, pp. 76–86.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SHI, L., LUO, X., JIANG, J., CHEN, Y., LIU, C., HU, T., LI, M., LIN, Q., LI, Y., HUANG, J., WANG, H., NIU, Y., SHI, Y., STYNER, M., WANG, J., LU, Y., SUN, X., YU, H., JI, W. & SU, B. (2019): Transgenic rhesus monkeys carrying the human MCPH1 gene copies show human-like neoteny of brain development. In: National Science Review, 6(3), pp. 480–493.10.1093/nsr/nwz043
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SOBOLEV, A. (2015): Legal terminology from the rhetorical perspective: Legal genres approach. In: Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly economiki, 3, pp. 168–180.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SOLAN, L. M. (2001): Why laws work pretty well, but not great: Words and rules. In: Law & Social Inquiry, 26(1), pp. 243–270.10.1111/j.1747-4469.2001.tb00177.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SYKES, M. (2001): Mixed chimerism and transplant tolerance. In: Immunity, 417, pp. 417–424.10.1016/S1074-7613(01)00122-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
TAUPNITZ, J. (2009): Summary, conclusions and recommendations: Legal aspects. In: J. Taupnitz, M & Weschka (eds.): CHIMBIRDS: Chimeras and hybrids in comparative European and international research. Berlin: Springer, pp. 433–458.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
WALSH, N. C, KENNEY, L. L., JANGWALE, S., ARYEE, K. E., GREINER, D. L., BREHM, M. A. & SCHULZ, L. D. (2017): Humanized mouse models of clinical disease. In: Annual Review of Pathology: Mechanisms of Disease, 12, pp. 187–215.10.1146/annurev-pathol-052016-100332
]Search in Google Scholar
[
WESCHKA, M. (2009): Examples of inter-species mixtures aa. Xenotransplantation. In: J. Taupnitz & M. Weschka (eds.): CHIMBIRDS: Chimeras and hybrids in comparative European and international research. Berlin: Springer, pp. 35–39.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ZIELIŃSKI, M. (2012): Wykładnia prawa: zasady, reguły, wskazówki [Interpretation of law: Principles, rules, advices]. Warszawa: Wolter Kluwers.
]Search in Google Scholar