[
Butler, J. (2005). Giving an Account of Oneself. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Etherington, K. (2004). Becoming a Reflexive Researcher: Using Our Selves in Research. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fairhurst, G. T., & Grant, D. (2010). The Social Construction of Leadership: A Sailing Guide. Management Communication Quarterly, 24(2), 171–210. DOI: 10.1177/08933189093596.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Helin, J. (2019). Dialogical writing: Co-inquiring between the written and the spoken word. Culture and Organization, 25(1), 1–15. DOI: 10.1080/14759551.2016.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hyland, K., & Lehman, I. M. (2020). Preface. Discourses on Culture, 1(13), 7–20 DOI: 10.36145/DoC2020.01.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Latour, B. (1988). The Politics of Explanation: An Alternative. In S. Woolgar (Ed.), Knowledge and Reflexivity: New Frontiers in the Sociology of Knowledge (pp. 155–176). London: Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lehman, I. M., & Krzeszowski, T. (2022). Writing differently about scholarly issues: Defending our voices and inviting the reader. Discourses on Culture, 18(2), 13–20.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lehman, I. M., Tiennari, J., Hyland, K., & Alejandro. A. Forum essay: A case for reflexive practices in academic writing on management and organizational communication. Management Communication Quarterly (forthcoming).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Linstead, S. A. (2017). Foreword: Being Human. In van de Klundert, M. & van Boeschoten, R (Eds.), Organisations and Humanisation: Perspectives on Organising Humanisation and Humanising Organisations (pp xi–xix). London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Linstead, S. A. (1993). From Postmodern Anthropology to Deconstructive Ethnography. Human Relations, 46(1), 97–120.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Linstead, S. A. (1994). Objectivity, Reflexivity and Fiction: Humanity, Inhumanity and the Science of the Social. Human Relations, 47(11), 1321–1346.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Linstead, S. A. (2002). Organizational Kitsch. Organization, 9(4), 657–684.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lyotard, J-F. (1983/88). The Differend: Phrases in Dispute. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lyotard, J-F. (1979/84). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Meier N., & Wegener C. (2017). Writing with resonance. Journal of Management Inquiry, 26(2), 193–201. DOI: 10.1177/1056492616673911.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tienari, J. Respect. In Forum essay: A case for reflexive practices in academic writing on management and organizational communication. Management Communication Quarterly (forthcoming).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Winter, R., Buck, A., & Sobiechowska, P. (1996). Professional Experience and the Investigative Imagination: The Art of Reflexive Writing. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Woolgar, S. (1988). Reflexivity is the Ethnographer of the Text. In S. Woolgar (Ed.), Knowledge and Reflexivity: New Frontiers in the Sociology of Knowledge (pp 13–34). London: Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
und 