[
Cambridge Dictionary (Online) [2017]. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/physical.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Campbell, Keith [1997]. “Review of physicalism: the philosophical foundations (Poland 1994)”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57: 223–6.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carruth, Alex [2018]. “Physical properties”. In Consciousness and Ontology, edited by Mihretu Guta. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chalmers, David [1997]. “Facing up to the problem of consciousness”. In Explaining Consciousness—the Hard Problem, edited by Jonathan Shear. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chalmers, David [2010]. “Consciousness and its place in nature”. In The Character of Consciousness. New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chalmers, David [2011]. “Verbal disputes”. Philosophical Review 120: 515–66.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crane, Tim and Mellor, D. Hugh [1990]. “There is no question of physicalism”. Mind 99: 185–206.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crook, Seth and Gillett, Carl [2001]. “Why physics alone cannot define the ‘physical’: Materialism, metaphysics, and the formulation of physicalism”. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 31: 333–59.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dennett, Daniel [1991]. Consciousness Explained. Boston: Little, Brown.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dorsey, Jonathan [2011]. “On the supposed limits of physicalist theories of mind”. Philosophical Studies 155: 207–25.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dowell, Janice [2006]. “The physical: empirical not metaphysical”. Philosophical Studies 131: 25–60.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Elpidorou, Andreas [2018]. “Introduction: The character of physicalism”. Topoi 37: 435–55.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fiorese, Raphael [2015]. “Stoljar’s Dilemma and three conceptions of the physical: A defence of the via negativa”. Erkenntnis: 1–29.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Galileo [1957]. “The assayer”. In Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo, edited by Stillman Drake. New York: Anchor Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gentner, Dedre et al [1997]. “Analogy and creativity in the works of Johannes Kepler”. In Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes, edited by T. Ward et al. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gillett, Carl and Witmer, Gene [2001]. “A “physical” need: Physicalism and the via negativa”. Analysis 61: 302–9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Göcke, Benedikt [2009]. “What is physicalism?”. Ratio XXII: 291–307.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goff, Philip [2017]. Consciousness and Fundamental Reality. New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goff, Philip [2019]. Galileo’s Error: Foundations for a New Science of Consciousness. New York: Pantheon Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gomes, Anil [2016]. “Unity, objectivity, and the passivity of experience”. European Journal of Philosophy 24: 946–69.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heil, John [ms]. Metaphysics Speaks for Itself.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hempel, Carl [1980]. “Comments on Goodman’s ways of worldmaking”, Synthese 45: 193–9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judisch, Neal [2008]. “Why non-mental won’t work: on Hempel’s Dilemma and the characterization of the ‘physical”’. Philosophical Studies 140: 299–318.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kim, Jaegwon [1993]. Supervenience and Mind: Selected Philosophical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MacDonald, Paul [2003]. “Why you can’t read my mind”. Philosophy Now 42. https://philosophynow.org/issues/42
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice [1962]. The Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Montero, Barbara [2001]. “Post-physicalism”. Journal of Consciousness Studies 8: 61–80.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Montero, Barbara and Papineau, David [2005]. “A defence of the via negativa argument for physicalism”. Analysis 65: 233–7.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nagel, Thomas [1974]. “What is it like to be a bat?”. Philosophical Review 83: 435–50.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nagel, Thomas [2012]. Mind and Cosmos. New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ney, Alyssa [2008]. “Defining physicalism”. Philosophy Compass 3: 1033–48.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
O’Conaill, Donnchadh [2018]. “Grounding, physicalism and necessity”. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 61: 713–30. Oxford Dictionary (Online) [2017]. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/physical.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Papineau, David. [2001]. “The rise of physicalism”. In Physicalism and its Discontents, edited by Carl Gillett and Barry Loewer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Papineau, David. [2002]. Thinking about Consciousness. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Poland, Jeffrey. [1994]. Physicalism: The Philosophical Foundations. New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pylkkänen, Paavo. [2020]. “A quantum cure for panphobia”. In The Routledge Handbook of Panpsychism, edited by William Seager. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Seager, William. [2013]. “Classical levels, Russellian monism and the implicate order”. Foundations of Physics 43: 548–67.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sellars, Wilfred. [1962]. “Philosophy and the scientific image of man”. In Frontiers of Science and Philosophy, edited by Robert Colodny. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stoljar, Daniel. [2010]. Physicalism. London & New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stoljar, Daniel. [2024]. “Physicalism”. In The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (Spring 2024 Edition) (Online), edited by Edward Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2024/entries/physicalism/ (30 May 2024).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Strawson, Galen. [2003]. “Real materialism”. In Chomsky and His Critics, edited by Louise Antony and Norbert Hornstein. Oxford: Blackwell.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stroud, Barry. [2000]. Understanding Human Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thompson, Evan. [2007]. Mind in Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tiehen, Justin. [2016]. “Physicalism requires functionalism: A new formulation and defense of the via negativa”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 93: 3–24.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tiehen, Justin. [2018]. “Physicalism”. Analysis 78: 537–51.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
van Fraassen, Bas. [2002]. The Empirical Stance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van Inwagen, Peter. [1990]. Material Beings. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Varela, Francisco. [1997]. “Neurophenomenology”. In Explaining Consciousness—The Hard Problem, edited by Jonathan Shear. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vicente, Agustin [2011]. “Current physics and ‘the physical”’. British Journal of Philosophy of Science 62: 393–416.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wellman, Henry [2014]. Making Minds: how theory of mind develops. New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wilson, Catherine [1995]. The Invisible World: Early Modern Philosophy and the Invention of the Microscope. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wilson, Jessica [2006]. “On characterizing the physical”. Philosophical Studies 131: 61–99.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wittgenstein, Ludwig [1953]. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Witmer, Gene. [2018]. “Physicality for physicalists”. Topoi 37: 457-472.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Worley, Sara. [2006]. “Physicalism and the via negativa”. Philosophical Studies 131: 101–26.
]Search in Google Scholar
