[
Artiga, Marc. 2016. “Liberal representationalism : a deflationist defense”. Dialectica 70(3): 407–30.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bates, Elizabeth, Camaioni, Luigia and Volterra, Virginia. 1975. “The acquisition of performatives prior to speech”. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development 21(3): 205–26.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Burge, Tyler. 2010. Origins of Objectivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Call, Joseph and Tomasello, Michael. 2007. The Gestural Communication of Apes and Monkeys. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cheney, Dorothy and Seyfarth, Robert. 1990. How Monkeys See the World: Inside the Mind of Another Species. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cohen, Jonathan. 2015. “Perceptual constancy”. In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Perception. Mohan Matthen (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dretske, Fred. 1981. Knowledge and the Flow of Information. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fodor, Jerry. 1986. “Why paramecia don’t have mental representations”. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 10(1): 3–23.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fodor, Jerry. 1987. Psychosemantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goldstein, E. Bruce. 2010. “Constancy”. In Encyclopedia of Perception. E. Bruce Goldstein (ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Godfrey-Smith, Peter. 2009. Darwinian Populations and Natural Selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hilbert, David. 2005. “Color constancy and the complexity of color”. Philosophical Topics 33(1): 141–58.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ingle, David and Cook, Jefferey. 1977. “The effect of viewing distance upon size preference of frogs for prey”. Vision Research 17(9): 1009–13.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jackson, Frank and Pettit, Philip. 1992. “In defense of explanatory ecumenism”. Economics & Philosophy 8(1): 1–21.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Millikan, Ruth Garrett. 1984. Language, Thought and Other Biological Categories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Millikan, Ruth Garrett. 1989. “In defense of proper functions”. Philosophy of Science 56(2): 288–302.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Millikan, Ruth Garrett. 2004. Varieties of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
O’Keefe, John and Nadel, Lynn. 1978. The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Palmer, Stephen. 1978. “Fundamental aspects of cognitive representation”. In Cognition and Categorization. Eleanor Rosch & Barbara Lloyd (eds.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Papineau, David. 1993. Philosophical Naturalism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Papineau, David. 2016. “Teleosemantics”. In How Biology Shapes Philosophy: New Foundations for Naturalism. David Livingstone Smith (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ramsey, William. 2007. Representation Reconsidered. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rescorla, Michael. 2013. “Millikan on honeybee navigation and communication”. In Millikan and Her Critics. Dan Ryder & Justine Kingsbury & Kenneth Williford (eds.). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ristau, Carolyn. 1991. “Aspects of cognitive ethology of an injury-feigning bird, the piping plover”. In Cognitive Ethology: the Minds of Other Animals. Carolyn Ristau (ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schulte, Peter. 2015. “Perceptual representations: a teleosemantic answer to the breadth-of-application problem”. Biology & Philosophy 30(1): 119–36.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schulte, Peter. 2021. “The nature of perceptual constancies”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 103(1): 3–20.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shea, Nicholas. 2007. “Consumers need information: supplementing geleosemantics with an input condition”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75(2): 404–35.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Souza Filho, Sérgio. 2017. “The constancy mechanism proposal for the limits of intentionality”. In The Philosophy of Perception and Observation: Contributions of the 40th International Wittgenstein Symposium. Christoph Limbeck-Lilienau & Friedrich Stadler (eds.). Kirchberg am Wechsel: Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Souza Filho, Sérgio. 2018. Naturalising intentionality: A Teleological Approach. PhD thesis, King’s College London. Retrieved September 10, 2022. https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/files/103712183/2018 Farias de Souza Filho S rgio 1465852 ethesis.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Souza Filho, Sérgio. 2022. “A dual proposal of minimal conditions for intentionality”. Synthese 200(115): 1–22.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sterelny, Kim. 1995. “Basic minds”. Philosophical Perspectives 9: 251–70.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
von Frisch, Karl. 1967. The Dance Language and Orientation of the Bees. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
