[
Benitez, Federico, Romero-Maltrana, Diego and Razeto-Barry, Pablo. 2022. “(Re)interpreting E = mc2”. Foundations of Physics 52(1): 1–19.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bigelow, John, Ellis, Brian and Lierse, Caroline. 1992. “The world as one of a kind: natural necessity and laws of nature”. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43(3): 371–88.10.1093/bjps/43.3.371
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bird, Alexander. 2005. “The dispositionalist conception of laws”. Foundations of Science 10(4): 353–70.10.1007/s10699-004-5259-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bird, Alexander. 2007. Nature’s Metaphysics: Laws and Properties. Oxford: Oxford University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bird, Alexander, Ellis, Brian and Sankey, Howard (eds.). 2013. Properties, Powers and Structures: Issues in the Metaphysics of Realism. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Demarest, Heather. 2017. “Powerful properties, powerless laws”. In Causal Powers. Jonathan D. Jacobs (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press: 38–53.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dorato, Mauro. 2017. “Dynamical versus structural explanations in scientific revolutions”. Synthese 194(7): 2307–27.10.1007/s11229-014-0546-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dorato, Mauro and Esfeld, Michael. 2010. “GRW as an ontology of dispositions”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41(1): 41–9.10.1016/j.shpsb.2009.09.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dorato, Mauro and Esfeld, Michael. 2015. “The metaphysics of laws: dispositionalism vs. primitivism”. In Metaphysics in Contemporary Physics. Tomasz Bigaj and Christian Wüthrich (eds.). Dordrecht: Kluwer: 403–24.10.1163/9789004310827_016
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dretske, Fred I. 1981. Knowledge and the Flow of Information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Einstein, Albert. 1919. “Time, space, and gravitation”. London Times: 13–4.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ellis, Brian. 2005. “Katzav on the limitations of dispositionalism”. Analysis 65(1): 90–2.10.1093/analys/65.1.90
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Esfeld, Michael. and Deckert Dirk-Andre. 2017. A Minimalist Ontology of the Natural World. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.10.4324/9781315142272
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Esfeld, Michael. and Sachse Christian. 2011. Conservative Reductionism. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.10.4324/9780203817346
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Felline, Laura. 2018. “Mechanisms meet structural explanation”. Synthese 195(1): 99–114.10.1007/s11229-015-0746-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Feynman, Richard, Leighton, Robert and Sands, Matthew. 2011. The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Vol. II: The New Millennium Edition: Mainly Electromagnetism and Matter. Feynman Lectures on Physics. New York: Basic Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Flores, Francisco. 1999. “Einstein’s theory of theories and types of theoretical explanation”. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 13(2): 123–34.10.1080/02698599908573613
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hicks, Michael T. 2019. “What everyone should say about symmetries (and how humeans get to say it)”. Philosophy of Science 86(5): 1284–94.10.1086/705475
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Katzav, Joel. 2004. “Dispositions and the principle of least action”. Analysis 64(3), 206–14.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Katzav, Joel. 2005. “Ellis on the limitations of dispositionalism”. Analysis 65(1): 92–4.10.1093/analys/65.1.92
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kosso, Peter. 2012. Observability and Observation in Physical Science. Synthese Library Volume 209. Springer Science & Business Media.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lange, Marc. 2007. “Laws and meta-laws of nature”. The Harvard Review of Philosophy 15(1): 21–36.10.5840/harvardreview20071512
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lange, Marc. 2016. Because without cause. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190269487.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lewis, David K. 1986. Philosophical Papers Vol. II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lewis, David K. 2009. “Ramseyan humility”. In Conceptual Analysis and Philosophical Naturalism. David Braddon-Mitchell and Robert Nola (eds.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: 203–22.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Livanios, Vasssilis. 2018. “Hamilton’s principle and dispositional essentialism: friends or foes?”. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 49(1): 59–71.10.1007/s10838-017-9380-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maudlin, Tim. 2007. The Metaphysics Within Physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199218219.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McKitrick, Jennifer. 2003. “The bare metaphysical possibility of bare dispositions”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66(2): 349–69.10.1111/j.1933-1592.2003.tb00265.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Psillos, Stathis. and Ioannidis Stravos. 2019. “Mechanistic causation”. Teorema: Revista Internacional de Filosofía 38(3): 53–76.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Romero-Maltrana, Diego, Benitez, Federico and Soto, Cristian. 2018. “A proposal for a coherent ontology of fundamental entities”. Foundations of Science 23: 1–13.10.1007/s10699-018-9548-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shapere, Dudley. 1982. “The concept of observation in science and philosophy”. Philosophy of science 49(4): 485–525.10.1086/289075
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shoemaker, Sydney. 1980. “Causality and properties”. In Time and Cause. Peter van Inwagen (ed.). Dordrecht: D. Reidel: 109–35.10.1007/978-94-017-3528-5_7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smart, Benjamin T. and Thébault, Karim P. 2015. “Dispositions and the principle of least action revisited”. Analysis 75(3), 386–95.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Terekhovich, Vladislav. (2018). “Metaphysics of the principle of least action”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 62: 189–201.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Williamson, Jon. 2011. “Mechanistic theories of causality”. Philosophy Compass: 421–47.10.1111/j.1747-9991.2011.00400.x
]Search in Google Scholar
