[
Armstrong, David M. 1978. A Theory of Universals: Universals and Scientific Realism, Volume II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Armstrong, David M. 1993. “The inference and the identification problem”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53(2): 421–2.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Backmann. Marius. 2019. “Varieties of justification—How (not) to solve the problem of induction”. Acta Analytica 34(2): 235–55.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beebee, Helen. 2011. “Necessary connections and the problem of induction”. Noûs 45(3): 504–27.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bird, Alexander. 1998. “Dispositions and antidotes”. The Philosophical Quarterly 48(191): 227–34.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bird, Alexander. 2007. Nature’s Metaphysics. Laws and Properties. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BonJour, Laurence. 1998. In Defense of Pure Reason. A Rationalist Account of A Priori Justification. Cambridge Studies in Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Castro, Eduardo. 2014. “On induction: time-limited necessity vs. timeless necessity”. Teorema 33(3): 67–82.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ellis, Brian. 1998. “An essentialist perspective on the problem of induction.” Principia 2(1): 103–24.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goodman, Nelson. 1983 [1955]. Fact, Fiction, and Forecast, 4th edition. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hesse, Mary. 1974. The Structure of Scientific Inference. Berkeley/Los Angeles: The University of California Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hildebrand, Tyler. 2018. “Natural properties, necessary connections, and the problem of induction”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 96(3): 668–89.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hume, David. 1739–40. A Treatise of Human Nature. Edited by David F. Norton and Mary J. Norton. Oxford Philosophical Texts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hüttemann. Andreas. 2014. “Scientific practice and necessary connections”. Theoria: An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science 79: 29–39.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lewis, David. 1983. “New work for a theory of universals”. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61(4): 343–77.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martin, Charles B. 1994. “Dispositions and conditionals”. The Philosophical Quarterly 44: 1–8.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mumford, Stephen and Rani Lil Anjum. 2011. Getting Causes from Powers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Psillos, Stathis. 2015. “Induction and natural necessity in the Middle Ages”. Philosophical Inquiry 39(1): 92–134.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reichenbach, Hans. 1935. Wahrscheinlichkeitslehre – Eine Untersuchungüber die logischen und mathematischen Grundlagen der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung. Leiden: A.W. Sijthoff’s Uitgevermaatschapij N.V.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Salmon. Wesley. 1974. “The concept of inductive inference”. In Richard Swinburne (ed.), The Justification of Induction. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 49–57.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shepherd. Mary. 1824. “Essay upon the relation of cause and effect”. In Jennifer McRobert (ed.), Philosophical Writings of Mary Shepherd. Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 2000.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smart, Benjamin T. H. 2013. “Is the humean defeated by induction?”. Philosophical Studies 162: 319–32.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Strawson, Peter F. 1952. An Introduction to Logical Theory. London: Methuen.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tooley, Michael. 1977. “The nature of laws”. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7: 667–98.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
van Fraassen, Bas. 1989. Laws and Symmetry. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Williams. Donald. 1947. The Ground of Induction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
